Guest guest Posted April 5, 2004 Report Share Posted April 5, 2004 In a message dated 4/4/2004 5:39:18 PM Eastern Standard Time, nurse_tracy@... writes: > Hi All, I'm a nurse (married to a paramedic) and a few years ago > when we went to confrence we sat through a seminar about the use of > oxygen in COPD patients. I'll admit I didn't pay great attention at > the time and now find myself in a situation were I need the > information I missed. Does anyone remember that lecture.. or what it > said about high flow O2 in COPD? Any help would be > appriciated. Howdy, : This is an age-old question in emergency care. I would say there are a couple of things, to simplify it, to remember when giving oxygen to a COPD-er: 1. Most COPD deaths are from hypoxia. They need O2. In one really cool study done in the VA hospital system, they found that about 70% of the COPD deaths were from hypoxia. The REALLY cool thing about that study was that they also concluded that a significant portion of those where " iatrogenic " .....caused by the intentional withholding of O2 by the health care personnel. (oops!) For most COPD-ers, the nasal cannula will be fine. They are VERY comfortable with the nasal cannula (n.c.)...to the point that they have pet names for them ( " This is Bubba...my nasal cannula and my friend " ). There is an advantage to that comfort level that we can all benefit from. If you can't get their SpO2 up to 90-ish with a n.c., then go to an NRB. If that doesn't work, use the BVM. 2. COPD patients also suffer from hypercarbia....and can die of that independent of their oxygenation status. O2 and CO2 are both interrelated and separate. For example, giving a COPD-er lots of O2 will NOT improve the hypercarbia. You have to recognize and fix hypercarbia independent of hypoxia. The only way to fix high CO2 is through ventilation.....either getting the patient to breath better (coaching - " take big breaths " ....very intensive and difficult....but most effective), or by using the BVM (careful about those pressures, tho). 3. Lots of oxygen CAN be harmful to a COPD-er. But NOT by " knocking out their respiratory drive " . There are NO verifiable reports of that EVER actually happening in the out-of-hospital environment. COPD-ers will occasionally quit breathing after you start giving them O2, but that ain't " hypoxic drive " .....it's exhaustion ( & a little bit of trust in you....now that you're at their side helping them). How is O2 bad for them? Well, COPD-ers have a really hard time getting rid of CO2. Too much CO2 will make them sick and even kill them, all by itself. And when they are metabolizing O2, guess what they are producing as the byproduct? Yup...that bad ol' CO2. And if they're using MORE o2, they're producing more CO2...that they can't get rid of. So the trick is to get their O2 levels up, while watching for hypercarbia and treating it ( " take big breaths " and/or using BVM). Hope that helps. , BS, LP Director Pre-Hospital Services and White Memorial Hospital Temple, Texas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2004 Report Share Posted April 5, 2004 In a message dated 4/4/2004 5:39:18 PM Eastern Standard Time, nurse_tracy@... writes: > Hi All, I'm a nurse (married to a paramedic) and a few years ago > when we went to confrence we sat through a seminar about the use of > oxygen in COPD patients. I'll admit I didn't pay great attention at > the time and now find myself in a situation were I need the > information I missed. Does anyone remember that lecture.. or what it > said about high flow O2 in COPD? Any help would be > appriciated. Howdy, : This is an age-old question in emergency care. I would say there are a couple of things, to simplify it, to remember when giving oxygen to a COPD-er: 1. Most COPD deaths are from hypoxia. They need O2. In one really cool study done in the VA hospital system, they found that about 70% of the COPD deaths were from hypoxia. The REALLY cool thing about that study was that they also concluded that a significant portion of those where " iatrogenic " .....caused by the intentional withholding of O2 by the health care personnel. (oops!) For most COPD-ers, the nasal cannula will be fine. If you can't get their SpO2 up to 90-ish with an n.c., then go to an NRB. If that doesn't work, use the BVM. 2. COPD patients also suffer from hypercarbia....and can die of that independant of their oxygenation status. O2 and CO2 are both inter-related and separate. For example, giving a COPD-er lots of O2 will NOT improve the hypercarbia. You have to recognize and fix hypercarbia independant of hypoxia. The only way to fix high CO2 is through ventilation.....either getting the patient to breath better (coaching - " take big breaths " ....very intensive and difficult....but very effective), or by using the BVM (careful about those pressures, tho). 3. Lots of oxygen CAN be harmful to a COPD-er. But NOT by " knocking out their respiratory drive. There are NO verifiable reports of that EVER actually happening in the out-of-hospital environment. COPD-ers will occassionally quit breathing after you start giving them O2, but that ain't " hypoxic drive " .....it's exhaustion( & a little bit of trust in you). How is O2 bad for them? Well, COPD-ers have a really hard time getting rid of CO2. Too much CO2 will make them sick and even kill them, all by itself. And when they are using O2, guess what they are producing as the byproduct? And if they're using MORE o2, they're producing more CO2...that they can't get rid of. So the trick is to get their O2 levels up, while watching for hypercarbia and treating it ( " take big breaths " and/or using BVM) Hope that helps. , BS, LP Director Pre-Hospital Services and White Memorial Hospital Temple, Texas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2004 Report Share Posted April 5, 2004 NEVER withhold EMERGENCY O2 from any patient that needs it. EMERGENCY O2 and THERAPUTIC O2 are different things. In the emergent clinical setting, O2 is a necessity. Any issues with COPD patients are factors in the long term theraputic clinical setting, but don't factor into the short-term EMS outlook. In fact, the FDA clearly differentiates between CLINICAL and THERAPUTIC Oxygen administration. For example, EMERGENCY O2 administration is a class we teach to laypersons. It doesn't even require a prescription. =Steve , EMT-LP= Regional Instructor Trainer American Safety & Health Institute Brown wrote: >Hi All, I'm a nurse (married to a paramedic) and a few years ago >when we went to confrence we sat through a seminar about the use of >oxygen in COPD patients. I'll admit I didn't pay great attention at >the time and now find myself in a situation were I need the >information I missed. Does anyone remember that lecture.. or what it >said about high flow O2 in COPD? Any help would be appriciated. >Thanks. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 The short term effects of high flow O2 to COPD'ers has long been an issue for us in the pre hospital arena, while physicians and nurses alike (certain present company excluded) deal almost strictly with long term issues, we in the field tend to deal with 'what do they need right now?'. Patients who are at risk of repiratory failure secondary to the loss of the hypoxic drive, are at risk after what could amount to a few hours of high flow O2, and quite honestly, if it's an emergency, and it takes you longer than a couple of hours to get to the ER, you should consider flying, or driving faster.... An O2 sat of 84% for a long term COPD'er, may very well be normal for them. The benchmarks that you learned in school, no matter the level of certification, are guidelines to follow, but they are not written in stone. Not all patients who sat at less than 90% are definitively losing brain cells. In the case of the patient you present, I am curious as to if the O2 helped the altered LOC any? Could you have increased the oxygen progessively? Assessing the patient each time? What other history did they have, yada yada yada. I certainly won't armchair quarterback your call, but what was the outcome of it all? Just remember that not all patients are 'textbook'. what's normal for one, may be abnormal for the next, and neither will be what you expected... Reagards, 'Tater Salad' Hatfield " I had the right to remain silent, but I did not have the ability. " Don't miss EMStock 2004!!! May 21-23 in booming Midlothian, Texas!!!! www.EMStock.com > Yesterday I responded to a call with a COPD patient presenting with > and altered LOC. When we put the o2 sat on the pt it read 84%. So we > placed the pt on high flow o2. Which then increased the pts o2 sat > to 100%. When we got to the ER the nurse immediatly yanked the NRB > off the pt. When my partner asked the Dr. about this, she replied > that a NC on 5 or 6 whould be better for the patient. I have been > taught that If a pts o2 sat is below 95% they are slightly hypoxic, > and below 90% they are hypoxic. So as I have been taught an o2 sat of > 84% brain cells are dying. So I think that high flow o2 is a nessity > to the patient. Why would the Nurse and Dr. feel this way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 Because that's the way they were trained. You will continue to have this fight as long as you are in EMS, along with some other ones. Very few ER nurse or doctors realize that you practice medicine from a different point of view than they do, just as the brand of medicine they practice is different from Med Surg or ICU. Sometimes, you just have to put your head down and keep truckin' in spite of the nasty looks and snide comments. I brought a patient in from an MVA once, in really bad shape. It was raining cats and dogs, and the car was sideays in a ditch. It took us 20 minutes to get the car cut open enough to get the pt. out, and during that time I stuck a 16 g in the one arm I could get to. We drag-assed into the ER covered in mud and soaked to the bone, and the nurse says " Christ, can't you people hit anything except an AC? " Different kinds of medicine. ER nurse do theirs in a different setting, with different priorities, and the 2 worlds do not always mesh. Thus shall it ever be. Your protocol says high flow O2, you give high flow O2. magnetass sends Oxygen and COPD > Yesterday I responded to a call with a COPD patient presenting with > and altered LOC. When we put the o2 sat on the pt it read 84%. So we > placed the pt on high flow o2. Which then increased the pts o2 sat > to 100%. When we got to the ER the nurse immediatly yanked the NRB > off the pt. When my partner asked the Dr. about this, she replied > that a NC on 5 or 6 whould be better for the patient. I have been > taught that If a pts o2 sat is below 95% they are slightly hypoxic, > and below 90% they are hypoxic. So as I have been taught an o2 sat of > 84% brain cells are dying. So I think that high flow o2 is a nessity > to the patient. Why would the Nurse and Dr. feel this way. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.