Re: Re: Carrying of Firearms

[Guest guest]

jwservices wrote:

> I, personally know of situations where two " officers " escort a prisoner

> on a transfer---where one of the them is armed and sits in the cab--NOT

> with the patient. I don't like it--but it's part of the job---I really

> wish I could say no !!!

Say no to what? The officer not being in the rear, or him being armed?

Either way, sounds like you need to worry more about your own job than

his.

Rob

[Guest guest]

No to the transfer! These " officers " are TDCJ. The prisoner is handcuffed and

shackled. He's not going anywhere, and usually, not in that bad a shape that the

local hospital can treat, but you know logistics and the government. Take the

patient to Galveston.

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------

Reply-To:

Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 21:20:07 -0600

>jwservices wrote:

>> I, personally know of situations where two " officers " escort a prisoner

>> on a transfer---where one of the them is armed and sits in the cab--NOT

>> with the patient. I don't like it--but it's part of the job---I really

>> wish I could say no !!!

>

>Say no to what? The officer not being in the rear, or him being armed?

> Either way, sounds like you need to worry more about your own job than

>his.

>

>Rob

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

phil reynolds wrote:

>

> I'm referring to patients, of course.

and...

jwservices wrote:

>

> No to the transfer!

Ah! Okay. I completely misunderstood both of your posts. My apologies.

Rob

[Guest guest]

No problem----------take care

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------

Reply-To:

Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 02:40:29 -0600

>phil reynolds wrote:

> >

> > I'm referring to patients, of course.

>

>and...

>

>jwservices wrote:

> >

>> No to the transfer!

>

>Ah! Okay. I completely misunderstood both of your posts. My apologies.

>

>Rob

>

>

>

>

>

>

>