Guest guest Posted January 17, 2004 Report Share Posted January 17, 2004 Truly a comprehensive statement and what ails Texas (and national) EMS. Outstanding! Texas EMS: Past Medical Hx and Hx of the Present Illness With the improvement in education and availability of information through the Internet and otherwise, the distance between licensed professionals and paraprofessionals has lessened. Beginning after the second world war nurse education made great strides forward, the hospital based nursing programs became almost extinct, and the requirement of college degrees arrived. The recognition that paraprofessionals can perform some aspects of medical diagnosis and treatment should come as no surprise. Nurses have progressed from being doctor's helpers to semi-independent practice, and physicians' assistants have come into being. Paramedics are perhaps where the nurses were in 1945 in terms of formal education requirements. Some paramedics have educated themselves well, have used every opportunity to broaden their knowledge and scope of practice, while others have been content to learn the minimum curriculum required to pass the certification exams and no more. It is truly remarkable that some paramedics have progressed to the levels of advanced practice that they have achieved in the face of almost no industry wide support for improved educational and certification requirements. In fact, the ambulance industry as a whole has doggedly fought against raising standards for fear that it would cost them money. When paramedicine first came into being, protocols were written to be followed strictly and rigidly. This was because the physicians running the systems generally had little experience in teaching other than other physicians their skills and knowledge and had no idea how the experiment in paramedicine would work out. They were acutely aware of the very limited education paramedics were to be given (400 hours above Basic EMT) and were certainly warranted in being cautious. However, in time, the best and the brightest paramedics and EMTs found a thirst for knowledge and pursued self improvement with a vengeance. Through the efforts and involvement of these people in governmental regulation, progressive EMS regulatory agencies soon began to realize that more education and training could lead to a much higher level of care than was then being provided. Hence, the evolution of the present National Standard Curriculum EMS educators were ahead of the national trends in that they developed and implemented better curriculum and included more basic knowledge than were in the original curriculum as expounded in Caroline's text. They found a ready audience for people who wanted to improve their knowledge and skills and progress to better positions and pay. Forward looking EMS physicians and administrators realized that protocols had ceased to be rigid recipes to be followed blindly and had evolved into practice guidelines. The very best services have changed their cultures to reflect the increased knowledge and abilities of their medics, but not all. Unfortunately, the ambulance industry under the leadership of large fire department EMS services and the conglomeration of large private firms which have now evolved into basically two companies, AMR and Rural/Metro, saw early on that improved education for paramedics would soon require them to begin paying wages comparable to those paid to other allied medical professionals such as radiology techs, respiratory therapists, and nurses. They also recognized that improved educational standards would soon produce empoyees who would rebel at the " System Status Management " system and demand decent working conditions. They quickly mobilized to " dumb down " the curriculum and provide for continued certification of medics at what was basically the 1988 curriculum. Under these pressures mandatory teaching of the full national standard curriculum was scuttled. The college programs that invested in the new curriculum under the BEM's assurance that it would be mandated have either dumbed down their programs or their programs are struggling for life. College administrators quickly made the bean counter's decision to chop the legs out from under struggling programs and return to shorter, simpler courses. {The only reason that the colleges haven't done that to nursing is that nursing has a strong national organization and a strong state organization that controls their curriculum. We have none.} At the same time, the models used in providing EMS which allows service contracts to be awarded to the lowest bidder have driven governmental agencies to avoid responsibility for providing service. Couple that with the inability of the EMS profession to decide whether it is a rescue service, public safety service, or a medical service, and you have a profession that is dead in the water as ours is now. Another aspect that cannot be overlooked is the current fascination with " evidence based medicine. " There may not be much evidence that what we do works, but there is also little evidence that much of what physicians do in their offices and in the ER works other than what they have observed over time. If we stopped doing every intervention except those that have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt through valid studies, we could do little more than defibrillate and drive our patients to the hospital. Once there, they wouldn't receive any cardiac medications in the ER because the same rules apply there for acute cardiac care that we adhere to in the field. The only difference is that doctors rather than paramedic are doing the interventions. The continued subterranean buzz about paramedics not really doing anything to change the mortality outcomes doesn't help. There are always segments of the medical industry waiting to shoot us down, argue that we should not be doing advanced procedures and revert to scooping and hauling. We certainly do need research that will clear up some of these conceptions, but in a profession that cannot pay its employees a living wage across the board, the prospect of doing basic research to confirm that we do some good is slim to none. There's no money for it. And it's hard to do randomized studies with people who are trying their best to die within the next 5 minutes and we're trying to keep them from it. In my judgment Texas EMS is in crisis. We face many difficult and threatening situations. The currently ongoing reorganization of Texas Health and Human Services and Texas Department of Health will probably result in the breakup of the Bureau of Emergency Management and its functions being divided among several other sub-agencies. If that happens, there will be no one agency focused on EMS in Texas. Who will look out for our interests? Who will explain our needs and functions to the bureaucrats? What will happen to GETAC? What we do in the next two years and in the next legislative session will mark our course for the next 10 to 15 years. Are we ready for the challenge? Gene Gandy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 In a message dated 1/17/2004 11:41:53 PM Central Standard Time, wegandy1938@... writes: but in a profession that cannot pay its employees a living wage across the board, the prospect of doing basic research to confirm that we do some good is slim to none. There's no money for it. And it's hard to do randomized studies with people who are trying their best to die within the next 5 minutes and we're trying to keep them from it. In my judgment Texas EMS is in crisis. We face many difficult and threatening situations. The currently ongoing reorganization of Texas Health and Human Services and Texas Department of Health will probably result in the breakup of the Bureau of Emergency Management and its functions being divided among several other sub-agencies. If that happens, there will be no one agency focused on EMS in Texas. Who will look out for our interests? Who will explain our needs and functions to the bureaucrats? What will happen to GETAC? What we do in the next two years and in the next legislative session will mark our course for the next 10 to 15 years. Are we ready for the challenge? This oh so true. You cannot compete against systems that continuously bid $0 for transport contracts and continue to pay the slave labor prices. FD EMS systems are basically out for your budget money and more IAFF membership dues and continue to fumble through the act of paramedicine til they (paramedics) can get on an engine and get out of the system. My City is very stringent on qualifications for our department (3rd service Public Health) and have just about depleted the local area for paramedics that we can find to continue our high standards or at least teach the medicine it takes to make people well. This would be different from making sure they stay alive til we get them to the hospital. In a few short weeks we will start hiring Intermediates that can keep the level of stress down on our paramedics and still manage to get trucks on the streets and maintain our high level of medicine. It does not make money and thankfully our City Manager doesn't care right now. He wants us to maintain that level of care and he will do whatever it takes to keep the trucks on the streets. I feel that intermediates can take that ball and help us. I am proud that our ROSC rate was 37.5% for 2003. I am proud that the CHF'er get to the hospital with virtually all of their symptoms gone by our giving the meds we do pre-hospital. I am not proud that I have to pay them what I do and we will continue to try and improve that. I am not proud that certain services feel that this type of treatment is unnecessary and too expensive to try and implement in on their trucks. You can bet that the ER doctors at our hospitals know and respect the paramedics on my trucks. A lot of this goes to and people like him that would not settle for less. We will keep this practice going and wait for the rest of the world to catch up or fight like hell as they try to pull us back down to where they are. Andy Foote Manager City of Beaumont EMS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 In a message dated 1/18/2004 6:08:44 PM Central Standard Time, moutlaw@... writes: Dear Mr. Foote, I will agree it is very hard to keep paramedics who want to spend their careers on the ambulance in fire dept systems. However I don't feel all fire department based EMS " fumble through Paramedicine " . We are part of the fire department and we have very good parmedics on our ambulances. Thank you, Marty Outlaw Humble Fire Department Dear Mr. Foote, I will agree it is very hard to keep paramedics who want to spend their careers on the ambulance in fire dept systems. However I don't feel all fire department based EMS " fumble through Paramedicine " . We are part of the fire department and we have very good parmedics on our ambulances. Thank you, Marty Outlaw Humble Fire Department I will agree with you on this one. One of my paramedics works for that department and it is run ENTIRELY different than most Fire Based systems. I have done my research and I know from which I speak. This is not common. It is just like many private systems saying that they took the same test as my paramedics and the only difference is the color of our ambulances. I have hired too many of THEIR paramedics who go through a 9 month training program with us and tell me that there is NO comparison to the type of medicine we do and where they left. I have a 376 page protocol book. I have over 60 meds that our people give, not just carry in the ambulance. I have medicines that cost $500 a vial that no one in our area carries and I have seen the run sheets of medics from Fire Based EMS and private EMS systems that prove me correct. They all have good reasons for not using them (NOT) and always have excuses to why they do not use what they had on their truck. It basically comes down to money or the Medical Director does not care enough to push forward with medical treatments. Andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 As usual, Andy makes salient points. With the apparent impending break-up of TDH, it is essential that the EMS community in Texas come together and push their mayors, county judges, state representatives, and state senators to establish a Texas Board of EMS that will be run by EMS personnel (as is present ins several other progressive states). To make this work, EMS personnel must recruit the support of the Texas Medical Association, Texas Osteopathic Medical Association, Texas College of Emergency Physicians and other influential organizations. Otherwise, as occurred in some states that did not heed the warnings of the enlightened, Texas EMS will soon fall under the Department of Public Safety (where it will be a step-child to law enforcement [as in Ohio]) or to the State Fire Commission (where it will be a step-child to fire [as in New Hampshire]). The fate of Texas EMS is in the hands of Texas EMS providers--all 50,000+ of you, not just the 1,300 of you on this list serve. BEWARE THE IDES OF MARCH! Bledsoe, DO, FACEP Midlothian, TX Don't miss EMStock 2004! http://www.emstock.com Re: Texas EMS: Past Medical Hx and Hx of the Present Illness In a message dated 1/17/2004 11:41:53 PM Central Standard Time, wegandy1938@... writes: but in a profession that cannot pay its employees a living wage across the board, the prospect of doing basic research to confirm that we do some good is slim to none. There's no money for it. And it's hard to do randomized studies with people who are trying their best to die within the next 5 minutes and we're trying to keep them from it. In my judgment Texas EMS is in crisis. We face many difficult and threatening situations. The currently ongoing reorganization of Texas Health and Human Services and Texas Department of Health will probably result in the breakup of the Bureau of Emergency Management and its functions being divided among several other sub-agencies. If that happens, there will be no one agency focused on EMS in Texas. Who will look out for our interests? Who will explain our needs and functions to the bureaucrats? What will happen to GETAC? What we do in the next two years and in the next legislative session will mark our course for the next 10 to 15 years. Are we ready for the challenge? This oh so true. You cannot compete against systems that continuously bid $0 for transport contracts and continue to pay the slave labor prices. FD EMS systems are basically out for your budget money and more IAFF membership dues and continue to fumble through the act of paramedicine til they (paramedics) can get on an engine and get out of the system. My City is very stringent on qualifications for our department (3rd service Public Health) and have just about depleted the local area for paramedics that we can find to continue our high standards or at least teach the medicine it takes to make people well. This would be different from making sure they stay alive til we get them to the hospital. In a few short weeks we will start hiring Intermediates that can keep the level of stress down on our paramedics and still manage to get trucks on the streets and maintain our high level of medicine. It does not make money and thankfully our City Manager doesn't care right now. He wants us to maintain that level of care and he will do whatever it takes to keep the trucks on the streets. I feel that intermediates can take that ball and help us. I am proud that our ROSC rate was 37.5% for 2003. I am proud that the CHF'er get to the hospital with virtually all of their symptoms gone by our giving the meds we do pre-hospital. I am not proud that I have to pay them what I do and we will continue to try and improve that. I am not proud that certain services feel that this type of treatment is unnecessary and too expensive to try and implement in on their trucks. You can bet that the ER doctors at our hospitals know and respect the paramedics on my trucks. A lot of this goes to and people like him that would not settle for less. We will keep this practice going and wait for the rest of the world to catch up or fight like hell as they try to pull us back down to where they are. Andy Foote Manager City of Beaumont EMS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 >>From: Bledsoe >>The fate of Texas EMS is in the hands of Texas EMS providers--all 50,000+ >>of you, not just the 1,300 of you on this list serve. >>BEWARE THE IDES OF MARCH! I could not agree more, but the other thing we need to bring up, is what the average Joe Paramedic can do, beyond writing letters and making menacing phone calls to their elected officials. One voice is not a lot, matter of fact, in politics, one voice is near worthless, as it is often drowned out in the sea of BS. Combined however, we can be heard a little better. I know this has been hashed and re-hashed time and time again, but it stands true still, we need to organize. The only organization in Texas that represents EMS personnel on a political basis, is EMSAT. I have heard a lot of reasons, and I have offered many as well as to why people would not, or do not join. We need the unison, we need to go forth and say, " This is the voice of 50,000 dedicated professionals, and you need to listen " , we can only do that if in fact we have that many voices. EMSAT has a lobbyist, which can do good and powerful things, but they need the average Joe support as well. Not sure what 'your' reasons are for not joining, but shoot an email to one of the board members, and see if you can't get the issue bridged. I don't care if you agree with my thoughts on certain issues in EMS, but the ultimate goal of progressing EMS in Texas and to be recognized as professionals, we need to set the personal issues aside. EMSAT elected now board members at the conference in San , it's a new era, while we appreciate all the work that was accomplished by the past boards and it's members, many of us are welcoming in new blood with fresh ideas and a renewed vigor. Just my thoughts.... Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 Perhaps a member of the EMSAT BOD can update a list as to the very positive things that happened at the BOD meeting in San . Bledsoe, DO, FACEP Midlothian, TX Don't miss EMStock 2004! http://www.emstock.com RE: Texas EMS: Past Medical Hx and Hx of the Present Illness >>From: Bledsoe >>The fate of Texas EMS is in the hands of Texas EMS providers--all 50,000+ >>of you, not just the 1,300 of you on this list serve. >>BEWARE THE IDES OF MARCH! I could not agree more, but the other thing we need to bring up, is what the average Joe Paramedic can do, beyond writing letters and making menacing phone calls to their elected officials. One voice is not a lot, matter of fact, in politics, one voice is near worthless, as it is often drowned out in the sea of BS. Combined however, we can be heard a little better. I know this has been hashed and re-hashed time and time again, but it stands true still, we need to organize. The only organization in Texas that represents EMS personnel on a political basis, is EMSAT. I have heard a lot of reasons, and I have offered many as well as to why people would not, or do not join. We need the unison, we need to go forth and say, " This is the voice of 50,000 dedicated professionals, and you need to listen " , we can only do that if in fact we have that many voices. EMSAT has a lobbyist, which can do good and powerful things, but they need the average Joe support as well. Not sure what 'your' reasons are for not joining, but shoot an email to one of the board members, and see if you can't get the issue bridged. I don't care if you agree with my thoughts on certain issues in EMS, but the ultimate goal of progressing EMS in Texas and to be recognized as professionals, we need to set the personal issues aside. EMSAT elected now board members at the conference in San , it's a new era, while we appreciate all the work that was accomplished by the past boards and it's members, many of us are welcoming in new blood with fresh ideas and a renewed vigor. Just my thoughts.... Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 Dear Mr. Foote, I will agree it is very hard to keep paramedics who want to spend their careers on the ambulance in fire dept systems. However I don't feel all fire department based EMS " fumble through Paramedicine " . We are part of the fire department and we have very good parmedics on our ambulances. Thank you, Marty Outlaw Humble Fire Department Re: Texas EMS: Past Medical Hx and Hx of the Present Illness > In a message dated 1/17/2004 11:41:53 PM Central Standard Time, > wegandy1938@... writes: > > but in a profession that cannot pay its employees a living wage across the > board, the prospect of doing basic research to confirm that we do some good > is > slim to none. There's no money for it. And it's hard to do randomized > studies > with people who are trying their best to die within the next 5 minutes and > we're trying to keep them from it. > > In my judgment Texas EMS is in crisis. We face many difficult and > threatening situations. The currently ongoing reorganization of Texas Health > and Human > Services and Texas Department of Health will probably result in the breakup > of > the Bureau of Emergency Management and its functions being divided among > several other sub-agencies. If that happens, there will be no one agency > focused > on EMS in Texas. Who will look out for our interests? Who will explain our > > needs and functions to the bureaucrats? What will happen to GETAC? > > What we do in the next two years and in the next legislative session will > mark our course for the next 10 to 15 years. Are we ready for the challenge? > This oh so true. You cannot compete against systems that continuously bid $0 > for transport contracts and continue to pay the slave labor prices. FD EMS > systems are basically out for your budget money and more IAFF membership dues > and continue to fumble through the act of paramedicine til they (paramedics) > can get on an engine and get out of the system. My City is very stringent on > qualifications for our department (3rd service Public Health) and have just > about depleted the local area for paramedics that we can find to continue our high > standards or at least teach the medicine it takes to make people well. This > would be different from making sure they stay alive til we get them to the > hospital. > > In a few short weeks we will start hiring Intermediates that can keep the > level of stress down on our paramedics and still manage to get trucks on the > streets and maintain our high level of medicine. It does not make money and > thankfully our City Manager doesn't care right now. He wants us to maintain that > level of care and he will do whatever it takes to keep the trucks on the > streets. I feel that intermediates can take that ball and help us. > > I am proud that our ROSC rate was 37.5% for 2003. I am proud that the CHF'er > get to the hospital with virtually all of their symptoms gone by our giving > the meds we do pre-hospital. > I am not proud that I have to pay them what I do and we will continue to try > and improve that. > > I am not proud that certain services feel that this type of treatment is > unnecessary and too expensive to try and implement in on their trucks. You can > bet that the ER doctors at our hospitals know and respect the paramedics on my > trucks. A lot of this goes to and people like him that would > not settle for less. We will keep this practice going and wait for the rest of > the world to catch up or fight like hell as they try to pull us back down to > where they are. > > > Andy Foote > Manager > City of Beaumont EMS > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 HB-2292 passed by the 78th Legislature requires the consolidation of 11 Health and Human Services (HHS) departments into 4 new departments. The Texas Department of Health and 3 other agencies will become the Department of State Health Services. If you look at the HHSC proposed organigram for DSHS you will see that portions of EMS will probably fall under at least three different sections of the new setup. Can we afford such fragmentation? <http://www.hhsc.state.tx.us/Consolidation/News/dshs_org/Structure.html> http://www.hhsc.state.tx.us/Consolidation/News/dshs_org/Structure.html Folks, we don't have time to debate the small stuff or argue over turf any more. We had better put our petty differences aside and real quickly learn how to get along if we don't want to see in Texas that which has already happened in New Hampshire and Ohio. Regards, Donn ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ D.E. (Donn) , LP, NREMT-P ....your educators can be only your liberators... - Friedrich Nietzsche, " Untimely Meditations " _____ From: Marty Outlaw Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 6:05 PM To: Subject: Re: Texas EMS: Past Medical Hx and Hx of the Present Illness Dear Mr. Foote, I will agree it is very hard to keep paramedics who want to spend their careers on the ambulance in fire dept systems. However I don't feel all fire department based EMS " fumble through Paramedicine " . We are part of the fire department and we have very good parmedics on our ambulances. Thank you, Marty Outlaw Humble Fire Department Re: Texas EMS: Past Medical Hx and Hx of the Present Illness > In a message dated 1/17/2004 11:41:53 PM Central Standard Time, > wegandy1938@... writes: > > but in a profession that cannot pay its employees a living wage across the > board, the prospect of doing basic research to confirm that we do some good > is > slim to none. There's no money for it. And it's hard to do randomized > studies > with people who are trying their best to die within the next 5 minutes and > we're trying to keep them from it. > > In my judgment Texas EMS is in crisis. We face many difficult and > threatening situations. The currently ongoing reorganization of Texas Health > and Human > Services and Texas Department of Health will probably result in the breakup > of > the Bureau of Emergency Management and its functions being divided among > several other sub-agencies. If that happens, there will be no one agency > focused > on EMS in Texas. Who will look out for our interests? Who will explain our > > needs and functions to the bureaucrats? What will happen to GETAC? > > What we do in the next two years and in the next legislative session will > mark our course for the next 10 to 15 years. Are we ready for the challenge? > This oh so true. You cannot compete against systems that continuously bid $0 > for transport contracts and continue to pay the slave labor prices. FD EMS > systems are basically out for your budget money and more IAFF membership dues > and continue to fumble through the act of paramedicine til they (paramedics) > can get on an engine and get out of the system. My City is very stringent on > qualifications for our department (3rd service Public Health) and have just > about depleted the local area for paramedics that we can find to continue our high > standards or at least teach the medicine it takes to make people well. This > would be different from making sure they stay alive til we get them to the > hospital. > > In a few short weeks we will start hiring Intermediates that can keep the > level of stress down on our paramedics and still manage to get trucks on the > streets and maintain our high level of medicine. It does not make money and > thankfully our City Manager doesn't care right now. He wants us to maintain that > level of care and he will do whatever it takes to keep the trucks on the > streets. I feel that intermediates can take that ball and help us. > > I am proud that our ROSC rate was 37.5% for 2003. I am proud that the CHF'er > get to the hospital with virtually all of their symptoms gone by our giving > the meds we do pre-hospital. > I am not proud that I have to pay them what I do and we will continue to try > and improve that. > > I am not proud that certain services feel that this type of treatment is > unnecessary and too expensive to try and implement in on their trucks. You can > bet that the ER doctors at our hospitals know and respect the paramedics on my > trucks. A lot of this goes to and people like him that would > not settle for less. We will keep this practice going and wait for the rest of > the world to catch up or fight like hell as they try to pull us back down to > where they are. > > > Andy Foote > Manager > City of Beaumont EMS > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2004 Report Share Posted January 19, 2004 I have seen several people on the list ask the question what is EMSAT doing about the present BEM situation. My question to everyone is what are you doing about EMSAT? A board with-out a large population base to back it's moment is like a trolling motor moving a 24 foot barge. Things move slow or not at all. If EMS people on this list and off this list wish to be heard you need to be willing to make a little sacrifice. We need every EMS certified person in Texas to be a member of EMSAT. $35.00 is a small price to pay to help try to move EMS in Texas in the Direction it needs to go, but we can't stop at that. We need some of your time also. Every member of the EMS community needs to be contacting their elected officials soon and often. Try to get your local news media to do a story on our plight. We need public opinion on our side not tomorrow but right now. I'll get off my soap box now, but will continue to work toward a resolution to our common problem. Concerned, Nacogdoches County EMS. " D.E. (Donn) " wrote: > HB-2292 passed by the 78th Legislature requires the consolidation of 11 > Health and Human Services (HHS) departments into 4 new departments. The > Texas Department of Health and 3 other agencies will become the Department > of State Health Services. If you look at the HHSC proposed organigram for > DSHS you will see that portions of EMS will probably fall under at least > three different sections of the new setup. Can we afford such fragmentation? > > <http://www.hhsc.state.tx.us/Consolidation/News/dshs_org/Structure.html> > http://www.hhsc.state.tx.us/Consolidation/News/dshs_org/Structure.html > > Folks, we don't have time to debate the small stuff or argue over turf any > more. We had better put our petty differences aside and real quickly learn > how to get along if we don't want to see in Texas that which has already > happened in New Hampshire and Ohio. > > Regards, > Donn > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > D.E. (Donn) , LP, NREMT-P > > ...your educators can be only your liberators... > - Friedrich Nietzsche, " Untimely Meditations " > > > > _____ > > From: Marty Outlaw > Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 6:05 PM > To: > Subject: Re: Texas EMS: Past Medical Hx and Hx of the Present > Illness > > Dear Mr. Foote, > I will agree it is very hard to keep paramedics who want to spend their > careers on the ambulance in fire dept systems. However I don't feel all fire > department based EMS " fumble through Paramedicine " . We are part of the > fire department and we have very good parmedics on our ambulances. > > Thank you, > Marty Outlaw > Humble Fire Department > Re: Texas EMS: Past Medical Hx and Hx of the Present > Illness > > > In a message dated 1/17/2004 11:41:53 PM Central Standard Time, > > wegandy1938@... writes: > > > > but in a profession that cannot pay its employees a living wage across the > > board, the prospect of doing basic research to confirm that we do some > good > > is > > slim to none. There's no money for it. And it's hard to do randomized > > studies > > with people who are trying their best to die within the next 5 minutes and > > we're trying to keep them from it. > > > > In my judgment Texas EMS is in crisis. We face many difficult and > > threatening situations. The currently ongoing reorganization of Texas > Health > > and Human > > Services and Texas Department of Health will probably result in the > breakup > > of > > the Bureau of Emergency Management and its functions being divided among > > several other sub-agencies. If that happens, there will be no one agency > > focused > > on EMS in Texas. Who will look out for our interests? Who will explain > our > > > > needs and functions to the bureaucrats? What will happen to GETAC? > > > > What we do in the next two years and in the next legislative session will > > mark our course for the next 10 to 15 years. Are we ready for the > challenge? > > This oh so true. You cannot compete against systems that continuously bid > $0 > > for transport contracts and continue to pay the slave labor prices. FD > EMS > > systems are basically out for your budget money and more IAFF membership > dues > > and continue to fumble through the act of paramedicine til they > (paramedics) > > can get on an engine and get out of the system. My City is very stringent > on > > qualifications for our department (3rd service Public Health) and have > just > > about depleted the local area for paramedics that we can find to continue > our high > > standards or at least teach the medicine it takes to make people well. > This > > would be different from making sure they stay alive til we get them to the > > hospital. > > > > In a few short weeks we will start hiring Intermediates that can keep the > > level of stress down on our paramedics and still manage to get trucks on > the > > streets and maintain our high level of medicine. It does not make money > and > > thankfully our City Manager doesn't care right now. He wants us to > maintain that > > level of care and he will do whatever it takes to keep the trucks on the > > streets. I feel that intermediates can take that ball and help us. > > > > I am proud that our ROSC rate was 37.5% for 2003. I am proud that the > CHF'er > > get to the hospital with virtually all of their symptoms gone by our > giving > > the meds we do pre-hospital. > > I am not proud that I have to pay them what I do and we will continue to > try > > and improve that. > > > > I am not proud that certain services feel that this type of treatment is > > unnecessary and too expensive to try and implement in on their trucks. > You can > > bet that the ER doctors at our hospitals know and respect the paramedics > on my > > trucks. A lot of this goes to and people like him that > would > > not settle for less. We will keep this practice going and wait for the > rest of > > the world to catch up or fight like hell as they try to pull us back down > to > > where they are. > > > > > > Andy Foote > > Manager > > City of Beaumont EMS > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2004 Report Share Posted January 19, 2004 is exactly right. EMSAT can really do very little without the membership to back it up. When EMSAT speaks, it speaks for the members more than anything. That is not a derogatory comment because, yes, EMSAT does try and respresent the EMS community as a whole. However, when EMSAT goes forth and attempts to fight things for this EMS community, the state reps and legislators want to know how many people it represents. Truthfully, they can only really count the folks who are members. That voice is not very strong. As a professional community, we HAVE to all jump on board SOMETHING common right now to fight the fight that it appears to be coming our way. EMSAT HAS fought for us on numerous issues. (EMSAT was responsible for helping to negotiate the new fees down from unreasonable to tolerable. EMSAT was responsible for lobbying state reps and encouraging folks to lobby state reps to block the DUI blood alcohol draws by EMS. EMSAT has been keeping its ear to the ground and bringing forth many issues because only TAA and EMSAT have been paying lobbyists to help us be aware of issues that concern EMS at the legislative level. I am sure there are many more things, but these are the first that jump to my mind.) Anyway, if we as a community expect ANYTHING to help us now, we all will HAVE to unite. (And, like someone else on the list said recently, that is NOT just the 1300 or so we have on this list. There are, what, approximately 55,000 of us? That sure would carry a lot of weight and actually could have helped us before now.) Anyway, there is no excuse not to join now. There is a pretty much new Board. There is now available a free $10,000 life insurance plan available through VFIS when you join. AFLAC is available if you are a member and your company that you work for offers no gap plan - or if you just want it. And we have a common thing that we MUST fight for - our future in Texas. Talk to everyone in EMS you know. Let us get together finally and DO something. And plan to make the EMSAT meeting in Austin at the Red Lion at 1 p.m. on February 11th. Come on, folks, let's do this - TOGETHER!!!! Jane Hill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.