Guest guest Posted December 22, 2003 Report Share Posted December 22, 2003 No. I try to be reasonable and rational (and bty Gene, I think your comments were too), and stay away from things like " wow, this woman has issues " and the like (and a jury would NOT rule on whether she had issues, they'd rule on WHAT she did and why). But again, why are WE discussing this? Gossip I think. But on to a new topic. My plumber overcharged me and didn't fix the leak!! Wow, does HE have issues? I'm sure we want to discuss that too???? After all, this is " Dear EMS " isn't it? Happy Holidays all. I DO enjoy all these discussions, even if some of you aren't as ENLIGHTENED as I am! HA! =Steve= Rev. Farrell wrote: >So what if this went to a jury trial. The people on the jury are not >going to be all law enforcement experts. we can discuss this with the >video we know. " a picture is worth a thousand words " . > >Wasn't is you who brought this up? > >sean > > >On Friday, Dec 19, 2003, at 16:27 US/Central, Steve composed: > > > >>Exactly. So would we react so well if a police officer made some >> " objective observations about the code " ? >>But why, oh why, on a EMS board, are we even talking about this? THAT >>makes it gossip. If the trooper had shot someone, then did CPR, we are >>within our area of expertise to discuss the CPR. But we just can't >>escape the fact that, by carrying on about another field, one in which >>as a group we don't have expertise, we are gossiping. >> >>=Steve = >> >> >> > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.