Guest guest Posted September 5, 2002 Report Share Posted September 5, 2002 Hi I also just found out after that last post that it was called a 'non communicating half'... does that make it any different? She also had bad endometriosis. Kitty bu su combo metroplasty 2/02 ..5cm left Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2002 Report Share Posted September 5, 2002 Hi , I sent her an email address asking her if she minded if I gave it to you. I also forwarded the link to her to join this group. I will let you know if she emails me back. And maybe she will join too. Her name is . Kitty su bu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2002 Report Share Posted September 5, 2002 Kitty- I have heard of that, but not frequently. Most studies indicate that BU and UD with function quite well and do not require surgical intervention. I have gotten the feeling that the " cure may be worse than the ailment " in the case of repairing a BU, and I haven't heard of repair at all of UD. Primarily because w/ BU and UD the division is true uterine material, not septum. Beth and the others may have more scientific support for this. UD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2002 Report Share Posted September 5, 2002 Well, I was a BU with one side developed and the other side was shedding it's lining but not flowing out the cervix (closed off at the cervix)..so I had a lap to remove the tube and the " extra uterus " which was only 1x1x1cm and removing the wall in between would not have gained anymore uterus woth having..so now i am a UU. It is my left side..which is odd to me since I had a left lazy eye when I was little and I am missing a muscle to write with on that side as well..weird huh?? Anyway, in my case it was the best thing to do since if a baby had implanted in the " bad " side it would have been as bad as an ectopic since the cervix on that side is closed off. I hope that makes sense?? This is still all very new to me..so someone else may have better lingo to explain with proper terms...? I hope that helps? UU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2002 Report Share Posted September 5, 2002 Kitty, That sounds alot my situation...only my horn was communicating..which i have no idea what that means..but Dr. Price didn't like it so he was pretty stricit about no BMS until it was out..the risks were too high. I also had terrible endometreosis which has been ALOT better since he took the horn out...as it was backflowing (VERY PAINFUL) and really creating problems. I still have endo and PCOS but as bad as before my surgery. Do you have her e-mail address?? I would love to talk with her! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2002 Report Share Posted September 5, 2002 Kitty- It sounds like she may have been a UU with a rudimentary horn. Many doctors call any uterine anomaly a BU. I don't really know why UD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2002 Report Share Posted September 5, 2002 Hi Kathyrn, She just sent me an email saying she would probably join us! If she does, I guess she can fill us in on all her history etc. xoxo Kitty bu su combo metroplasty 2/02 ..5cm left Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2002 Report Share Posted September 5, 2002 Hi I also just found out after that last post that it was called a 'non >communicating half'... does that make it any different? She also had bad >endometriosis.>> Kitty, Non-communicating means there is no connection between the uterine halves. The endo could be caused because there is no outlet for the menstrual blood in her non-communicating horn. Again, there could be a problem with terminology here - in some cases UU can have a rudimentary horn. Some doctors like to use " BU " for every MA. Do you know how she was diagnosed? SU resected, bicollis >From: cckidsinc@... >Reply-To: MullerianAnomalies >To: MullerianAnomalies >Subject: Re: removing half of bicornuate uterus? >Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:22:36 EDT > >Hi I also just found out after that last post that it was called a 'non >communicating half'... does that make it any different? She also had bad >endometriosis. > >Kitty >bu su combo >metroplasty 2/02 >.5cm left _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2002 Report Share Posted September 5, 2002 > Again, there could be a problem with > terminology here - in some cases UU can have a rudimentary horn. Some > doctors like to use " BU " for every MA. There is BU with a non-communicating horn as well as UU with same. From what I can tell, BU w/rudimentary horn is very lopsided and the rudimentary horn (whether communicating or non-communicating) is intimately associated with the big horn (See illustration L on the main page). UU with a rudimentary horn has the rudimentary horn widely separated from the big, usable horn by a length of connective tissue. sometimes there is a white ligament running over it, between the horns. With 's post-c-section " turkey " photo, you can see how far away the rudimentary horn is, rather than being stuck right onto the other horn. Beth SU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.