Guest guest Posted December 22, 2003 Report Share Posted December 22, 2003 , I think that is great news! To just NOT have to see the doctors thru the holidays is something to be thankful for! I hope you enjoy every day! Just to update you and everyone: My Brother will be seeing a team of doctors at Markey CC in Lexington KY tomorrow. He has " gathered together " all of his tests over the past 2 years, Pet/CT scans, results from resection in 2001, CEA, -et. al and will see surgeon, onc. radiologist team, who will recommend and/or approve his next action--does he have operation first, do a couple of radiation treatments on his new met, start another chemo regime? I am so anxious for him to do something, since it has been a month since discovery of latest tumor near aorta. His wife has had 10 radiation treatments so far--sailing thru them without any symptoms at all. She indicates she feels better now than she can remember in a long time. What wonderful news. They are both worried that if my brother has surgery soon she would not be able to take care of him.. Merry Christmas and have a wonderful holiday. Gurlstar (betty) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2003 Report Share Posted December 22, 2003 - Just wondering what the reason is that they won't do radiation concurrent with the Xeloda therapy? My husband had daily (5X a week) radiation for 6 weeks during his 5FU/Leu chemotherapy and it was never a consideration to do it separately. Since Xeloda is oral 5FU/leu I was curious about what they might have told you about the reasons for needing to stop the Xeloda before doing the radiation. Peggy altman23 wrote: > > Having just started cycle #3 of Xeloda therapy, the rad onc seems to > be recommending completing it BEFORE beginning any radiation to > spinal mets. I guess her " take " is that the spine mets are > not " crisis " stage just yet, and perhaps it is not a good idea to > break off the Xeloda in mid-cycle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2003 Report Share Posted December 22, 2003 Thanks, Betty! <<and will see surgeon, onc. radiologist team, who will recommend and/or approve his next action--does he have operation first, do a couple of radiation treatments on his new met, start another chemo regime?>> I'm not sure...it seems there are a variety of " ways " you can go. I suppose for " soft tissue " mets, they sometimes reduce the size with surgery before going for resection. Regardless, the good news is that it sounds like they are going to do SOMETHING, so he is in a rather positive situation, don't you think ;o) Wishing you & your family ( & everyone here!) a joyous holiday season! Best, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2003 Report Share Posted December 22, 2003 Hi Peggy, Peggy wrote: <<Just wondering what the reason is that they won't do radiation concurrent with the Xeloda therapy?>> Yes, I was wondering the same thing too. When I asked, the rad onc said she was afraid the Xeloda dose was too high (3000mg/day), and would likely cause significant GI toxicity when done in combination with the radiation therapy (for those of you on much higher Xeloda doses, you have to remember that dose is weight based and I am pretty light right now at around 116 according to doc scales today...and the heavier coat I was wearing while being weighed!). I think some of this has to do with the location of the L4 lumbar met and the projected radiation beam path (going to hit intestine, I suppose). Normally, radiation is considered synergistic with radiation (makes it work better), so this was a disappointment to me. Because the Xeloda appears to already be working, I feel very reluctant to go off it altogether. And because there is a week off at the end of each Xeloda cycle, starting radiation at the same time my current cycle ends would imply only 1 week " off " rather than 2. But the rad onc also said that MAYBE the dose could be reduced to 1800mg/day instead of a complete halt to the therapy. Both of these sounded like good ideas. Oh...now here is another odd twist. In addition to the Xeloda, it was mentioned that the Decadron i'm on (steroid to reduce swelling) could contribute to diarrhea/GI tox at my current dose(4 mg 4xperday). She told me to cut back to 3/day, and said to be sure to take plenty of stomach acid blockers with this drug (a tidbit not emphasized by oncologist!!!) Gee, I hadn't looked real hard at this before, but that dang stuff looks a bit nastier than I first thought WRT side effect! http://www.healthsquare.com/newrx/dec1118.htm Hmmm...I wonder if this has been partly responsible for some other recent side effects (e.g. " mood swings " , bit of depression and such?). I just have not " felt " myself these last couple days. So now I've got an excuse for my rambling posts too lol! Why does everything have to be so darn complicated (sigh!) Best, > - Just wondering what the reason is that they won't do radiation > concurrent with the Xeloda therapy? My husband had daily (5X a week) > radiation for 6 weeks during his 5FU/Leu chemotherapy and it was never a > consideration to do it separately. Since Xeloda is oral 5FU/leu I was > curious about what they might have told you about the reasons for > needing to stop the Xeloda before doing the radiation. > > Peggy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2003 Report Share Posted December 22, 2003 , Peggy got the jump on me. I was just getting ready to ask the same question. The did not take off the Xeloda while doing the radiation to his lung mets. Maybe it's a different type of radiation or just a difference in doctors opinion. Glad to hear you at least will have Christmas at home with your wife and little girl. Wishing you a Merry Christmas Joyce > > > > > Having just started cycle #3 of Xeloda therapy, the rad onc seems to > > be recommending completing it BEFORE beginning any radiation to > > spinal mets. I guess her " take " is that the spine mets are > > not " crisis " stage just yet, and perhaps it is not a good idea to > > break off the Xeloda in mid-cycle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2003 Report Share Posted December 22, 2003 Hi - It sounds nice to be able to spend the time at home on Christmas Eve. I am wondering if the rad onc discussed all this stuff with your medical oncologist today? It sounded like your med onc was pretty anxious about getting you started with some treatment ASAP. I am a bit suprised that even if they weren't going to start treatment, that they didn't do a planning CT so that the dosimetrists could be starting on treatment planning. 5FU like stuff potentiates radiation. I don't know if anyone has any information to say that there would be less radiation damage to normal tissue because of the greater uptake of Xeloda into tumor tissue versus normal tissue. How many fractions are they planning to give you? For the regular pre- op radiation for my rectal tumor I got 30 over 6 wks. For palliative radiation to my aortic nodes, they did 25 because my radiation oncologist was worried about giving me larger doses with all the surgery I had had. I got the impression that perhaps they would have done larger doses and fewer treatments if I had not had surgery. If you get treatments like that, they would overlap your Xeloda treatment. One thing that may be useful to ask is whether they are going to hit your stomach. They did mine. They warned me that I might vomit after treatment. I figured that would only happen as the dose built up, but nope- I vomited each day a little while after treatment. I did start losing weight. Since I was pretty low weight to start with, I went back on TPN for a few weeks so that I would be in better shape to start chemo again. I get Decadron as part of antiemetic treatment with my oxaliplatin. I don't sleep well the night of treatment I am pretty certain that is a result of the Decadron. I wonder if it is worth hashing over with your medical oncologist if steroids are still necessary, since you seem to be doing better since on the Xeloda. However, I guess that steroids are supposed to give you the munchies. Good when you are trying to gain weight. There are drugs, misoprostol for one, that help control the gastric side effects of steroids. Maybe it is worth asking if they would want to use something like that during radiation if they are concerned about the steroids, before you get signs? Best wishes, Kris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 Hi Kris, Thanks so much for your thoughtful reply. Yes, the rad onc did call the oncologist during my visit to her yesterday. She was planning on a total of 10 fractions (1 per day), which sounded consistent with what some others here seem to have received (e.g. Mark). From what she indicated, the radiation planning did not seem difficult...1 beam directly at the tumor could be done pretty much immediately. If things worsened between now and the planned therapy start, I suppose that is what they would have to do. Kris wrote: <<For the regular pre- op radiation for my rectal tumor I got 30 over 6 wks. For palliative radiation to my aortic nodes, they did 25 because my radiation oncologist was worried about giving me larger doses with all the surgery I had had. I got the impression that perhaps they would have done larger doses and fewer treatments if I had not had surgery.>> That sounds right for primary rectal tumors...but I think things get a lot more variable for spot hits in the lungs and elsewhere. Supposedly, larger doses of radiation will result in better tumor kill at the expense of more side effects. And, larger doses of course have the advantage of getting the treatment over with quicker! In thinking of the big picture here, I believe that much of what oncologists (including radiation oncs!) do is based on what they perceive the patient prognosis to be. Since my hospitalization in Sept., I have never sensed a lot of optimism for my case. I can accept this - so long as what they actually DO is " close to " the only things which COULD conceivably be done. If there is a better way of stopping a spinal met than they have planned, I would want to know about it and I would do it regardless of how the rad onc felt. But, I must admit that I am SO looking forward to a " doctor free " Christmas that I am probably not protesting as much as I normally would about the aggressiveness of treatment. My friend and his wife are coming over for dinner tonight...so happy that the afternoon won't be wasted on waiting in the doctors office to make me late getting home, etc! Being aware of the close prognosis/treatment link, I went ahead and " bit the bullet " by asking the rad onc HER perception of " how I was doing " , etc (not really wanting to hear the answer). And her reply was more-or-less what I had expected...she thought I " had maybe 3-6 months left " , and that the " progression of cancer " is currently " rapid and significant " . Here, I suppose she is referring primarily to the growth of visible mets (lumps/bumps) on my back (which incidently seem to have slowed following Xeloda therapy start). Well, hey - when I was in the hospital (Sept), they " said " I had maybe 5 weeks left (deadline come and gone lol!), so I know you can't take these things TOO seriously! And, as this is the first time I have had chemo, I'm not quite as quick to throw in the towel as the oncologists might be. But this I think is partial motivation for WHY the rad onc acts the way she does (Sometimes appearence of " lack of concern " . I read somewhere that oncs in general tend to overinflate projected survival times when talking to patients by about 1/3...so she really thinks I " have " 2-4 months. Obviously, it would therefore make no sense in her eyes to give treatments which take up a significant amount of that time!) There was also a bit of confusion in what the rad onc said regarding " how ill " the radiation would likely make me. Didn't seem to think it would result in a lot of vomiting (contradiction?!), but just a concern about the meds taken WITH the radiation treatments. Guess I had better call her and try to probe this more carefully. She is not always the easiest to talk to...Spain is her native country, and there have always been some language problems during our discussions. Kris wrote: <<I get Decadron as part of antiemetic treatment with my oxaliplatin. I don't sleep well the night of treatment I am pretty certain that is a result of the Decadron.>> How much/how many times per day were you on Decadron? I cut back a pill yesterday, and seemed to do a little better (now taking 4mg 3 x day) sleepwise/emotionally. I have just been really surprised by how much this stuff has affected my own sleep patterns. Last night was the first night since starting Decadron I slept all the way thru without significant " awake time " . Thanks again for your taking the time to reply. I'll have to check into the misoprostol (and anything else I can dig up on steroid side effect!) Best Wishes, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 Hi keith- I hear you about excaping from the doctors for a little while. I begged a few days off from chemotherapy a few weeks ago so that I could go to some professional meetings in Chicago. Then, to get me back on the " routine schedule " I am getting treated this Friday, insead of tomorrow. Hurrah for both small favors. Smaller, but more numerous doses of radiation tend to cause more acute effects but lesser long term side effects, some times not showing up until years down the line. Smaller numbers of high doses have the oposite effect. Some regular tissues exhibit fewer bad late side effects so they can get away with doing higher doses. If they don't have to have as big a field they can get away with more also. If they are only going to treat a very small area, and especially if it won't involve the stomach, I bet gi signs won't be an issue for you. I was getting treatment of my whole abdominal aortic chain of nodes down to my pelvis. I still am so impressed that you have gone so very long with no chemotherapy. I was just reading elsewhere about a 42 old lady with 20 plus lung mets, 5 liver mets plus some lymph node involvment at initial diagnosis who is now 14mth later NED on PET/CT with oxaliplatin/5FU and liver nodule resection. So I'm with you, don't give up hope for some sort of longer term remission. My radiation oncologist treated me on weekends when his tech was coming in to treat other people just to get me done faster. Although he did not want to treat the large lymph node in my chest (he didn't want to damage more of my bone marrow), he did treatment planning in case he had to treat me on an emergency basis. It was growing so fast they were worried I might get compression of my trachea before I could move to Wisconsin within a few weeks. Here I am 7 mth later doing well ! Hopefully your radiation oncology center is close by. Once set up was done, I think they were the most efficient of any of my appointments. I could be in and out in 15 minutes! As for the Decadron, I only get it along with Anzemat as an IV infusion just before oxaliplatin. It helps with nausea, although apparently no one knows why. The other thing that steroids do is make me urinate larger amounts. That does not help with getting sleep either. Have a wonderful Christmas with friends and family. Tis the season of miracles. Best wishes Kris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 Best wishes back at you....Hope everything stays in place,pain susides,and no untoward growths appear. This is the season and You have given us all a Reason so now let all our prayers and positive energies sustain you,sharing is caring and you have carried all of us at one time or another. The " Littlest ANel cried and her tears became the jewels in His Crown,so now it's your turn to gather the harvest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.