Smuckers Toppings Caramel Flavored

[Guest guest]

Is this gf? Their phone line is closed due to some construction to it or something. Does anyone happen to know?

[Guest guest]

Yes it is. I just called last week. All Smucker's toppings EXCEPT for

twix and magic shell are gf. I had it on a sundae the other night!

Enjoy!!

Great! Thank you!

[Guest guest]

Yes it is. I just called last week. All Smucker's toppings EXCEPT for

twix and magic shell are gf. I had it on a sundae the other night!

Enjoy!!Readingracer22@... wrote:

Is this gf? Their phone line is closed due to some construction to it or something. Does anyone happen to know?

Discover Yahoo! Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news more. Check it out!

[Guest guest]

Yes, I verified it last Friday.

On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:18:40 EDT, Readingracer22 wrote

>

> Is this gf?  Their phone line is closed due to some construction to it or something.  Does anyone happen to know? >

-- WOW! Homepage (http://www.wowway.com)

[Guest guest]

Yes, I verified it last Friday.

Thank you, as well

[Guest guest]

Do you mean that all Magic Shell flavors aren't GF or that just the Twix

Magic Shell isn't GF.

Thanks,

Cari

>

>Reply-To: SillyYaks

>To: SillyYaks

>Subject: Re: Smuckers Toppings Caramel Flavored

>Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:14:07 -0700 (PDT)

>

>Yes it is. I just called last week. All Smucker's toppings EXCEPT for

>twix and magic shell are gf. I had it on a sundae the other night!

>Enjoy!!

>

>Readingracer22@... wrote:

>Is this gf? Their phone line is closed due to some construction to it or

>something. Does anyone happen to know?

>

>

>---------------------------------

>

[Guest guest]

I'm honestly not sure. I took it as we couldn't have any magic shell

and we also couldn't have the twix magic shell. Not sure though. I honestly didn't even look at the ingredients when I bought the caramel and hot fudge!

Sorry

Cari Dorsey wrote:

Do you mean that all Magic Shell flavors aren't GF or that just the Twix Magic Shell isn't GF.Thanks,Cari>>Reply-To: SillyYaks >To: SillyYaks >Subject: Re: Smuckers Toppings Caramel Flavored>Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:14:07 -0700 (PDT)>>Yes it is. I just called last week. All Smucker's toppings EXCEPT for>twix and magic shell are gf. I had it on a sundae the other night!>Enjoy!!>>Readingracer22@... wrote:>Is this gf? Their phone line is closed due to some construction to it or >something. Does anyone happen to know?>>>--------------------------------->

[Guest guest]

You guys got me curious, so I went to the cubbard and found 4 bottles

of the stuff (must have been on sale or something ). The label

lists sugar, partially hydrogenated soybean oil, whole milk solids,

cocoa processed with alkali, soy lecithin, salt and vanilla. The milk

and soy words are bolded, so it looks like they are identifying

allergens that way. Appears OK, and with the bolding of allergens I

would look at this as a " good " label and trust that there isn't wheat

in it, and there aren't any catch-alls where malt would be hiding.

Sue in Denver

> Do you mean that all Magic Shell flavors aren't GF or that just the

Twix

> Magic Shell isn't GF.

> Thanks,

> Cari

[Guest guest]

My husband just brought home a thing of Magic Shell a few nights ago. We

haven't had it in years. The ingredients looked fine. Soy was in bold and

no one reacted to it. I had read that Magic Shell was ok, but not Twix

Magic Shell.

Cari

>

>Reply-To: SillyYaks

>To: SillyYaks

>Subject: Re: Smuckers Toppings Caramel Flavored

>Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:30:39 -0000

>

>You guys got me curious, so I went to the cubbard and found 4 bottles

>of the stuff (must have been on sale or something ). The label

>lists sugar, partially hydrogenated soybean oil, whole milk solids,

>cocoa processed with alkali, soy lecithin, salt and vanilla. The milk

>and soy words are bolded, so it looks like they are identifying

>allergens that way. Appears OK, and with the bolding of allergens I

>would look at this as a " good " label and trust that there isn't wheat

>in it, and there aren't any catch-alls where malt would be hiding.

>

>Sue in Denver

>

>

> > Do you mean that all Magic Shell flavors aren't GF or that just the

>Twix

> > Magic Shell isn't GF.

> > Thanks,

> > Cari

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

When I called Smuckers last week, I was inquiring about the GF status of the carmel topping (which was GF).  The customer service rep took it one step farther and clarified that all Smuckers products with the exception of Uncrustables and Magic Shell (twix flavor only) were GF.  Hope this helps.

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:22:22 +0000, Cari Dorsey wrote

> My husband just brought home a thing of Magic Shell a few nights ago.  We > haven't had it in years.  The ingredients looked fine.  Soy was in bold and > no one reacted to it.  I had read that Magic Shell was ok, but not Twix > Magic Shell.

> Cari

> > >

> >Reply-To: SillyYaks

> >To: SillyYaks

> >Subject: Re: Smuckers Toppings Caramel Flavored

> >Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:30:39 -0000

> >

> >You guys got me curious, so I went to the cubbard and found 4 bottles

> >of the stuff (must have been on sale or something ).  The label

> >lists sugar, partially hydrogenated soybean oil, whole milk solids,

> >cocoa processed with alkali, soy lecithin, salt and vanilla.  The milk

> >and soy words are bolded, so it looks like they are identifying

> >allergens that way.  Appears OK, and with the bolding of allergens I

> >would look at this as a " good " label and trust that there isn't wheat

> >in it, and there aren't any catch-alls where malt would be hiding.

> >

> >Sue in Denver

> >

> >

> > > Do you mean that all Magic Shell flavors aren't GF or that just the

> >Twix

> > > Magic Shell isn't GF.

> > > Thanks,

> > > Cari

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

-- WOW! Homepage (http://www.wowway.com)

[Guest guest]

That has been my understanding also. That all Smuckers products were GF,

except Crustables and Magic Shell Twix Flavor. All other Magic Shells

flavors are GF.

Thanks,

Cari

>From: lucky3668@...

>Reply-To: SillyYaks

>To: SillyYaks

>Subject: RE: Re: Smuckers Toppings Caramel Flavored

>Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:24:24 -0600

>

>When I called Smuckers last week, I was inquiring about the GF status of

>the carmel topping (which was GF).  The customer service rep took it one

>step farther and clarified that all Smuckers products with the exception of

>Uncrustables and Magic Shell (twix flavor only) were GF.  Hope this helps.

>

>On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:22:22 +0000, Cari Dorsey wrote

> > My husband just brought home a thing of Magic Shell a few nights ago. 

>We

> > haven't had it in years.  The ingredients looked fine.  Soy was in bold

>and

> > no one reacted to it.  I had read that Magic Shell was ok, but not Twix

> > Magic Shell.

> > Cari

> >

> > >

> > >Reply-To: SillyYaks

> > >To: SillyYaks

> > >Subject: Re: Smuckers Toppings Caramel Flavored

> > >Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:30:39 -0000

> > >

> > >You guys got me curious, so I went to the cubbard and found 4 bottles

> > >of the stuff (must have been on sale or something ).  The label

> > >lists sugar, partially hydrogenated soybean oil, whole milk solids,

> > >cocoa processed with alkali, soy lecithin, salt and vanilla.  The milk

> > >and soy words are bolded, so it looks like they are identifying

> > >allergens that way.  Appears OK, and with the bolding of allergens I

> > >would look at this as a " good " label and trust that there isn't wheat

> > >in it, and there aren't any catch-alls where malt would be hiding.

> > >

> > >Sue in Denver

> > >

> > >

> > > > Do you mean that all Magic Shell flavors aren't GF or that just the

> > >Twix

> > > > Magic Shell isn't GF.

> > > > Thanks,

> > > > Cari

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

>

>--

>WOW! Homepage (http://www.wowway.com)

>

>-----------------------------------------------------------------------

>

>