Re: Complaint to Egroups

[Guest guest]

n a message dated 4/18/00 5:44:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time,

awatt04@... writes:

> ather shows the paranoia of the writer and thir cognitively challenged

> status imo. unless they are the same, egroups will have treated this

> drivel with what it deserves.

AH ! Why did I have to see the post now. I was all set to go and see

American Beauty with my girlfriend. Now I have to respond to your delayed

email. Oh well, here I go 1 more time. {sigh}

with all due respect, I think you came into a discussion without

knowing all the facts. The post you quoted was written over a week ago. If

you had taken the trouble to read my post when I came back to the group and

's post to me, I doubt you would be posting this. I was not " banned " or

thrown off. A few people in this group continue to offer suport to me.

So please, can it with the personal insults. They really poision a mailing

list, no matter what kind it is, and brings the discussion down to a juvenile

level of discourse.

If you don't like me becasue I continue to go to AA, fine. I'm not here to

promote AA. I am here because there are a few people on this list that seem

to have a good intellect and I have a lot of problems with AA myself these

days.

So , enjoy the night. Things go so much better when you treat people the

way you would like to be treated.

>

[Guest guest]

Ai I have already pointed out to Mike privately, I rather think he is

is the one who ought to have 'taken the trouble' to find out the

facts

before spamming everyone with his paranoia. In fact Mike I HAD read

your more recent posts, and funnily enough to you perhaps, it doesnt

change my reaction to your earlier one one bit.

I also commented that you have in fact promoted AA although you say

it

is not your intention. I am relieved, however, that you seem now to

be

making posts more appropriate for this forum.

P.

> n a message dated 4/18/00 5:44:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time,

> awatt04@... writes:

>

> > ather shows the paranoia of the writer and thir cognitively

challenged

> > status imo. unless they are the same, egroups will have treated

this

> > drivel with what it deserves.

>

> AH ! Why did I have to see the post now. I was all set to go

and see

> American Beauty with my girlfriend. Now I have to respond to your

delayed

> email. Oh well, here I go 1 more time. {sigh}

>

> with all due respect, I think you came into a discussion

without

> knowing all the facts. The post you quoted was written over a week

ago. If

> you had taken the trouble to read my post when I came back to the

group and

> 's post to me, I doubt you would be posting this. I was not

" banned " or

> thrown off. A few people in this group continue to offer suport to

me.

>

> So please, can it with the personal insults. They really poision a

mailing

> list, no matter what kind it is, and brings the discussion down to

a

juvenile

> level of discourse.

>

> If you don't like me becasue I continue to go to AA, fine. I'm not

here to

> promote AA. I am here because there are a few people on this list

that seem

> to have a good intellect and I have a lot of problems with AA

myself

these

> days.

>

> So , enjoy the night. Things go so much better when you treat

people the

> way you would like to be treated.

>

>

> >