Guest guest Posted September 28, 2004 Report Share Posted September 28, 2004 Thanks Crista for posting 's measurements. I don't know 's, but will now ask CT. Marcy & (6 months old) DOC Band baby in NJ Brachy/Plagio > > > If anybody is interested: > > > Started out- Ended- > > > Cranial Vault Asymmetry 8 mm 3 mm > > > Trans Cranial Vault Asym. 10 mm 5 mm > > > Mis-face Asymmetry 6 mm 0 mm > > > Cranial Skull Base Asym. 4.5 mm 0 mm > > > Cranial Width 134mm 131mm > > > Cranial Length 146mm 151mm > > > (Ceph Index 91.7) > > > If you aren't sure what these #'s mean, sorry I can't really help ya > there. If somebody could explain these measurements that would be > awesome. Also, his cranial width actually shrunk which I thought > wasn't possible. I was under the impression once width has been > established all you can do is contain it not minimize. > > Okay, now I'm really confused. Anybody? > > Crista Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2004 Report Share Posted September 28, 2004 Here is a link to the Aetna policy page. It explains some of the measurements. http://www.aetna.com/cpb/data/CPBA0379.html mom to na DOC Grad SC > > > If anybody is interested: > > > Started out- Ended- > > > Cranial Vault Asymmetry 8 mm 3 mm > > > Trans Cranial Vault Asym. 10 mm 5 mm > > > Mis-face Asymmetry 6 mm 0 mm > > > Cranial Skull Base Asym. 4.5 mm 0 mm > > > Cranial Width 134mm 131mm > > > Cranial Length 146mm 151mm > > > (Ceph Index 91.7) > > > If you aren't sure what these #'s mean, sorry I can't really help ya > there. If somebody could explain these measurements that would be > awesome. Also, his cranial width actually shrunk which I thought > wasn't possible. I was under the impression once width has been > established all you can do is contain it not minimize. > > Okay, now I'm really confused. Anybody? > > Crista Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2004 Report Share Posted September 28, 2004 I am so interested! That is just fantastic! We are getting Colin's scan tomorrow so I'll post his stats too. Thank you. Sue Colin, 1 STARband grad 9/15/04 rt plag/brachy Buffalo, NY > > > If anybody is interested: > > > Started out- Ended- > > > Cranial Vault Asymmetry 8 mm 3 mm > > > Trans Cranial Vault Asym. 10 mm 5 mm > > > Mis-face Asymmetry 6 mm 0 mm > > > Cranial Skull Base Asym. 4.5 mm 0 mm > > > Cranial Width 134mm 131mm > > > Cranial Length 146mm 151mm > > > (Ceph Index 91.7) > > > If you aren't sure what these #'s mean, sorry I can't really help ya > there. If somebody could explain these measurements that would be > awesome. Also, his cranial width actually shrunk which I thought > wasn't possible. I was under the impression once width has been > established all you can do is contain it not minimize. > > Okay, now I'm really confused. Anybody? > > Crista Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2004 Report Share Posted October 1, 2004 Crista, I'm glad to see that received some good correction. Way to go!!! I didn't think that cranial width could decrease either. Maybe they were a little off in the beginning or end width measurement. It's really hard to be accurate when your measuring in mm. Maybe it did decrease! Either way his new measurements look good. Dianna Mom to DOC Band 9/13 plagio/brachy In Plagiocephaly , " bobobear4u2000 " <datadatum@c...> wrote: > > > If anybody is interested: > > > Started out- Ended- > > > Cranial Vault Asymmetry 8 mm 3 mm > > > Trans Cranial Vault Asym. 10 mm 5 mm > > > Mis-face Asymmetry 6 mm 0 mm > > > Cranial Skull Base Asym. 4.5 mm 0 mm > > > Cranial Width 134mm 131mm > > > Cranial Length 146mm 151mm > > > (Ceph Index 91.7) > > > If you aren't sure what these #'s mean, sorry I can't really help ya > there. If somebody could explain these measurements that would be > awesome. Also, his cranial width actually shrunk which I thought > wasn't possible. I was under the impression once width has been > established all you can do is contain it not minimize. > > Okay, now I'm really confused. Anybody? > > Crista Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.