Guest guest Posted November 30, 2003 Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 In a message dated 11/30/2003 8:33:45 PM Central Standard Time, mnewcomb@... writes: I have a question regarding overtime. I worked an overnight dispatch shift when the clocks were pushed back an hour last month. According to the roster, I worked the regular 11-7 shift, 8 hours. However, I was obviously on the desk for 9 hours (we are not entitled to breaks). It was not my scheduled shift; I was on overtime, filling in for someone out sick. How does the FLSA or case law cover this? Thanks, -Mike If you had worked that schedule in Chicago...the union says you would get paid time and 1/2 for both the time change hour and your " lunch " that you worked through but were entitled to. Chicago 9-1-1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2003 Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 >The actual specifics are covered by individual agency bargaining units memorandums of understanding.< Your memorandums of understanding or bargaining units CANNOT supersede the FLSA.... Your union or bargaining unit can give MORE but not less than FLSA. Anything over 40 hours per week time and one half, pay or comp.. your choice. Your term " non-exempt " is correct, meaning they are entitled to overtime, and you're also correct that if you use a vacation or sick day... there goes your 40 hour work week... and no overtime. My Dispatchers work week was 37.5 hours, they did not get paid the 30 minute lunch break, so if they worked an overtime day 2.5 of it was straight time, the other 5 hours time and one half.... Used to really upset me to work an overtime day, knowing about the 2.5 hour straight time... just didn't seem right. Weintraut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2003 Report Share Posted December 3, 2003 The issue of " breaks " and the FLSA is addressed by the following from the DOL web site (link below). As with many things " legal " State laws must also be reviewed since they may address topics not covered by Federal laws (per paragraph 2 below). " The FLSA does not require an employer to provide meal periods or rest breaks for their employees. Many employers, however, do provide breaks and/or meal periods. Breaks of short duration, from 5 to 20 minutes, are common. As a general rule, rest breaks are considered hours worked and bona fide meal periods are not considered hours worked. Some states do have laws requiring rest breaks and/or meal periods. Such state requirements will prevail over the silence of the FLSA on this subject. In those situations where an employee is subject to both the FLSA and state labor laws, the employee is entitled to the most beneficial provisions of each law. " http://www.dol.gov/elaws/esa/flsa/hoursworked/screenEE4.asp Re: 911:: FLSA - Overtime Question > BY law you have to be paid for the hours that you work. No breaks? You're entitled to two 15 minute breaks per 8 hour shift. > > > --- " Newcomb, " wrote: > I have a question regarding overtime. I worked an overnight dispatch > shift when the clocks were pushed back an hour last month. According to > the roster, I worked the regular 11-7 shift, 8 hours. However, I was > obviously on the desk for 9 hours (we are not entitled to breaks). It > was not my scheduled shift; I was on overtime, filling in for someone > out sick. > > How does the FLSA or case law cover this? > > Thanks, > -Mike > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2003 Report Share Posted December 3, 2003 >You're entitled to two 15 minute breaks per 8 hour shift. You sure about that? I'm not sure any employer has to pay for break or meal time. If you don't GET the meal time, work through or whatever, they yes.. you should be paid. Weintraut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2003 Report Share Posted December 3, 2003 > >You're entitled to two 15 minute breaks per 8 hour shift. > You sure about that? > I'm not sure any employer has to pay for break or meal time. > If you don't GET the meal time, work through or whatever, > they yes.. you should be paid. > > Weintraut ******************************************************************** Our contract says the same thing with this caveat, adequate or suitable relief. Lunch is not paid. My beef now is smokers breaks. Since they are still on the clock for this, the work load shifts to the non-smoker (or person left on the panel). Smokers should be entitled to a break, but that time should be made up at the end of the shift. For example, we have 1 smoker that takes a 10 minute break every 2 hours. So this person gets 30 minutes paid for standing outside smoking. Grossly unfair to non-smokers. But I don't see any relief in site. Iowa State Patrol Communications, Cedar Rapids Werling NØXZY Anamosa, IA scott@... My 2002 Olympic Pics http://www.photoisland.com login: Ridgeroader password: blah My Family Genealogy at http://www.n-connect.net/scott/index.htm THE WIZARD OF OZ: Transported to a surreal landscape, a young girl kills the first person she meets and then teams up with three strangers to kill again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2003 Report Share Posted December 3, 2003 In a message dated 12/3/2003 3:35:58 PM Central Standard Time, scott@... writes: For example, we have 1 smoker that takes a 10 minute break every 2 hours. So this person gets 30 minutes paid for standing outside smoking. Grossly unfair to non-smokers. SCOTT, has anyone told you, you can't go on 10 min break every 2 hrs too? I don't get the beef between smokers and non-smokers.. i see non-smokers complaining to high heaven about the smokers getting more breaks..the smokers are not telling you, you can't go on a break.. if I were a non-smoker Id take breaks just like a smoker.. I don't see the big deal jamie in iowa DCSO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2003 Report Share Posted December 4, 2003 In a message dated 12/4/2003 10:07:58 AM Central Standard Time, scott@... writes: But it boils down to one group of people getting an extra break that I, as a non-smoker, am not allowed to take. Iowa State Patrol Communications, Cedar Rapids Werling NØXZY Anamosa, IA What I ask was. Are they saying non-smokers can't have the same breaks as smokers?? if thats the case, thats is WRONG. jamie in iowa DCSO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2003 Report Share Posted December 4, 2003 > SCOTT, has anyone told you, you can't go on 10 min break every 2 hrs too? > I don't get the beef between smokers and non-smokers.. i see non-smokers > complaining to high heaven about the smokers getting more breaks..the smokers are > not telling you, you can't go on a break.. if I were a non-smoker Id take > breaks just like a smoker.. I don't see the big deal > > jamie in iowa > DCSO ******************************************************************** What we have been told is that smokers can take breaks but not abuse them. No idea what that is supposed to mean (abuse them). As for me, I work by myself 7 of my 10 hour shifts. So that isn't effected. Those other 3 hours are a hoge poge of breaks or no breaks depending on who is working. But the specific beef is that smokers can take as many breaks as they like as long as they don't abuse it. Our contract says a 15 min break every 4 hour period " with adequate relief. " Smokers are not tied to the relief thing since there is no language to it. Since I work by myself so much I can't take any breaks. It's a bit confusing without knowing my schedule. But it boils down to one group of people getting an extra break that I, as a non-smoker, am not allowed to take. Iowa State Patrol Communications, Cedar Rapids Werling NØXZY Anamosa, IA scott@... My 2002 Olympic Pics http://www.photoisland.com login: Ridgeroader password: blah My Family Genealogy at http://www.n-connect.net/scott/index.htm THE WIZARD OF OZ: Transported to a surreal landscape, a young girl kills the first person she meets and then teams up with three strangers to kill again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2003 Report Share Posted December 4, 2003 Let's not leave any addictions out. Obese people can no longer eat and coffee drinkers can no longer drink coffee > >Reply-To: 911console >To: <911console > >Subject: Re: 911:: FLSA - Overtime Question >Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 10:09:51 -0600 > >Easy solution. Outlaw smoking and cigarettes. _________________________________________________________________ Get holiday tips for festive fun. http://special.msn.com/network/happyholidays.armx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2003 Report Share Posted December 4, 2003 Not the case in Oklahoma, we give the employees an 8 hour shift with a PAID lunch break, means if they work during it so be it. ACCORDING TO OUR FLSA ATTORNEYS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2003 Report Share Posted December 4, 2003 What I ask was. Are they saying non-smokers can't have the same breaks as smokers?? if thats the case, thats is WRONG. jamie in iowa DCSO ******************************************************************** They aren't saying anything and therein lies the root problem. All employees should be treated, and supervised equally. In this case some are not. While those that make the rules still smoke, it won't change. And ours is a smoke free building. Iowa State Patrol Communications, Cedar Rapids Werling NØXZY Anamosa, IA scott@... My 2002 Olympic Pics http://www.photoisland.com login: Ridgeroader password: blah My Family Genealogy at http://www.n-connect.net/scott/index.htm When I was in college I had a bumper sticker that said " Repeal Ohms Law. " People would ask me where they could sign the petition. I told them we expected to encounter a lot of resistance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2003 Report Share Posted December 5, 2003 >we give the employees an 8 hour shift with a PAID lunch break, means if they work during it so be it. Your agency can always give MORE than FLSA requires, they just can't give less. Paying for the lunch break solves the " what if I work through lunch " time keeping problem. You must be paid for the hours you work, but the employer is not required to pay for your lunch or breaks, unless the issue is covered in an employee or union contract. Weintraut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.