Guest guest Posted October 29, 2004 Report Share Posted October 29, 2004 I hope I am not veering too far off topic with this one. If I am, I apologize. One of the things I would like to do for my daughter if we decide against doing a gluten challenge is to eliminate the possibility that she has a wheat allergy. But I have heard that allergy testing under a certain age (2, I think?) can be iffy and that some types of tests require that you have been consuming the substance, similar to the issues that come up when testing for antigliadin antibodies. If anyone is knowledgable on this topic, could you please fill me in on how early one can reliably test, the basic types of tests, etc.? If this is too far off topic, feel free to e-mail me if you prefer. By the way, it occurred to me I could feed her some rye (which she has never had) and draw some conclusions based on that (bad reaction - gluten is the problem assuming no cc, no reaction - wheat is the problem), but I'm starting to feel like a bit of a mad scientist and thought I'd better check in (-: Thanks. And thank you for the feedback thus far on our initial consult. You guys are really invaluable, and I will keep you posted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2004 Report Share Posted October 31, 2004 My son was allergy tested at 18months old and ruled out tons of things including wheat and dust mites and dust. At 7 years of age he was tested and had such a bad dust and dust mite allergy (4.5 out of 5.0) that they had to keep him at the hospital for a few hours to get the swelling down. This leads me to believe that testing at such a young age may not be reliable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2004 Report Share Posted November 1, 2004 I don't think testing a baby would be very accurate either. It can also be necessary to repeat testing occasionally, since some people outgrow certain allergies and develop new ones. I was very allergic to cigarette smoke, house dust, dust mites, animal dander and fur when I was a child. Now I am severely allergic to dust mites and alfalfa, and mildly allergic to just about every other thing on the skin test! Go figure. I didn't show a big reaction to animals anymore, but more than a few minutes in a room with a cat or dog and I start to get itchy eyes and nasal congestion. And the tests for the top 8 food allergies came out only as allergic to soy, which I definitely am. I'm thinking about doing the York Allergy food intolerance testing, since I know there are other foods bothering me and I just have not been successful at keeping a food log... God bless, nn ozonasusan@... wrote: My son was allergy tested at 18months old and ruled out tons of things including wheat and dust mites and dust. At 7 years of age he was tested and had such a bad dust and dust mite allergy (4.5 out of 5.0) that they had to keep him at the hospital for a few hours to get the swelling down. This leads me to believe that testing at such a young age may not be reliable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.