Guest guest Posted June 8, 2003 Report Share Posted June 8, 2003 Pierre, First of all, Happy birthday! I just hope i can even make it to that age Sorry to hear about the transplant-but I'm sure you will get another donor..You are in my prayers God Bless- > Working for a company who deals purely with the over 50's it seems this is > when life really does seem to get exciting. Based on their antics I can't wait > to join the club! > > Sorry about the transplant, but things do happen for a reason don't they? > > Frances P.S. That's my twopenneth for a while now. In other words, for > those who don't understand English that well, I'll keep quiet again as long as I > can. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2003 Report Share Posted June 8, 2003 Dear Betsy, I like what you said about turning 50! I will remember that! Also, I'm glad your son got to see the neph he liked. That's so important. Hopefully you can see him/her each time. Glad he's off of Norvasc. From what I have heard, Norvasc can actually increase proteinuria. There are other calcium channel blockers that improve proteinuria though. Take care and my best to your son, Rotghi Betsy Cabell wrote: > Pierre, > Happy Birthday! (ah, to be 50 againS() Actually I found turning 50 to > be very > liberating. Anything I didn¹t want to do, I could say I shouldn¹t have > to do > that because I¹m 50. And anything I did want to do, I could say I > should be > able to do that because I¹m 50. > > Sorry to hear about your donor problem. I know they are extremely thorough > in evaluating donors. I remember being so worried they would find > something > wrong with me that would keep me from donating to my son. By the way, he¹s > doing a bit better. Fluid retention has decreased which certainly > makes him > feel better. Last week he had an intermittent low grade fever and diarrhea > (which seemed to help with getting rid of fluid, actually), and when > he went > in for his clinic appointment, he got to see the neph he particularly > likes > who was willing to spend a lot of time discussing treatment options and > reviewing all his meds (prescribed by several different docs in > hospital and > in clinic). As a result, he is now off Norvasc and back on Lisinopril and > will probably get another round of Cytoxan on Wednesday if lab tests > show no > evidence of any current infection. So we keep our fingers crossedS( > > Betsy > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2003 Report Share Posted June 8, 2003 Pierre, Happy Birthday! (ah, to be 50 againŠ) Actually I found turning 50 to be very liberating. Anything I didn¹t want to do, I could say I shouldn¹t have to do that because I¹m 50. And anything I did want to do, I could say I should be able to do that because I¹m 50. Sorry to hear about your donor problem. I know they are extremely thorough in evaluating donors. I remember being so worried they would find something wrong with me that would keep me from donating to my son. By the way, he¹s doing a bit better. Fluid retention has decreased which certainly makes him feel better. Last week he had an intermittent low grade fever and diarrhea (which seemed to help with getting rid of fluid, actually), and when he went in for his clinic appointment, he got to see the neph he particularly likes who was willing to spend a lot of time discussing treatment options and reviewing all his meds (prescribed by several different docs in hospital and in clinic). As a result, he is now off Norvasc and back on Lisinopril and will probably get another round of Cytoxan on Wednesday if lab tests show no evidence of any current infection. So we keep our fingers crossedŠ Betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2003 Report Share Posted June 8, 2003 --- Dear Pierre, HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!! I am so sorry to hear about your donor problems....but everything is fine in the end, if it's not - it's not the end !!!..Keep the faith please... All the best, Elvira In iga-nephropathy , " Pierre L \(groups\) " <pgl- groups@s...> wrote: > Which do you want, the good news or the bad news first? > > Never mind, there is no good news. > > 1) I just turned 50 today! It's good news that I got there, I guess, but > it's going to take a while to get used to the idea > > 2) My kidney donor has been nixed, virtually at the very end of his > evaluation (he had a CT scan a couple of weeks ago). So, no transplant in > September. > > 3) I'm temporarily suspended from the transplant waiting list until they get > an opinion from my gastroenterologist about the pancreatitis I appear to get > every now and then. When I do get back on it, which I expect won't be too > long, my seniority on the list goes back to the day I started dialysis. > That's good, at least, since I already have 8 months under my belt. > > I'm reminded of the Robbie Burns poem I had to memorize in high school: > > " The best-laid plans of mice and men > Gang aft agley > And leave us naught but grief and pain > For promised joy. " > > In other words, what the heck can you do... > > Pierre > P.S. Getting a live donor transplant successfully is a great accomplishment. > There are so many seemingly minor things that can put the kibosh on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2003 Report Share Posted June 8, 2003 Oh Pierre. I'm so sorry to hear that news. Believe me, I know how you feel. I went through the same thing twice (donors being nixed). In both incidents, it was at the very end of the testing as well. I pray that things will look up for you soon. After both of my brothers were nixed, I began to feel more trapped and hopeless. I had two large prayer groups praying on my behalf (people from my work). One day a colleague told me not to worry. God will know the right time to intervene. It wasn't long after that when my cousin contacted me interesting in donating and things have been great since then. Yesterday, I was out in the yard doing a lot of work when I realized it had been so long since I'd done so much physical work. When I was done with that, I jumped in the pool. It was the first time I was able to swim since my kidneys had failed. First, I had the abdominal catheter for PD then it was cardiovascular catheters for hemo. I'm not intending to whine. Just letting you know that things will work out. Marty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2003 Report Share Posted June 8, 2003 Oh, Pierre, I can say for sure that I know what you are going through. The rejection of a potential doner is such a hard thing to go through. I cannot tell you how very sorry I am that you recieved that news. And yes, there are so many things that can stop a potential doner from giving a kidney. Keep that faith though, you will be suprised what will happen. My husband keeps telling me that it will work out. Hpoefully it will for you. Oh, and 50? Man it is great!!! Back to the drawing board > Which do you want, the good news or the bad news first? > > Never mind, there is no good news. > > 1) I just turned 50 today! It's good news that I got there, I guess, but > it's going to take a while to get used to the idea > > 2) My kidney donor has been nixed, virtually at the very end of his > evaluation (he had a CT scan a couple of weeks ago). So, no transplant in > September. > > 3) I'm temporarily suspended from the transplant waiting list until they get > an opinion from my gastroenterologist about the pancreatitis I appear to get > every now and then. When I do get back on it, which I expect won't be too > long, my seniority on the list goes back to the day I started dialysis. > That's good, at least, since I already have 8 months under my belt. > > I'm reminded of the Robbie Burns poem I had to memorize in high school: > > " The best-laid plans of mice and men > Gang aft agley > And leave us naught but grief and pain > For promised joy. " > > In other words, what the heck can you do... > > Pierre > P.S. Getting a live donor transplant successfully is a great accomplishment. > There are so many seemingly minor things that can put the kibosh on it. > > > > To edit your settings for the group, go to our Yahoo Group > home page: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iga-nephropathy/ > Visit our companion website at www.igan.ca. The site is entirely supported by donations. If you would like to help, go to: > http://www.igan.ca/id62.htm > > Thank you > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2003 Report Share Posted June 9, 2003 Pierre, Your experience and 's are a sharp reminder to all of us about what miraculous thing live donor transplants are. There is nothing in this messy business that can be taken too much for granted... In our house we're celebrating, so we've thrown your birthday into the pile of reasons to raise a glass. You'll never be nixeds from our... highest esteem Cy and Back to the drawing board > Which do you want, the good news or the bad news first? > > Never mind, there is no good news. > > 1) I just turned 50 today! It's good news that I got there, I guess, but > it's going to take a while to get used to the idea > > 2) My kidney donor has been nixed, virtually at the very end of his > evaluation (he had a CT scan a couple of weeks ago). So, no transplant in > September. > > 3) I'm temporarily suspended from the transplant waiting list until they get > an opinion from my gastroenterologist about the pancreatitis I appear to get > every now and then. When I do get back on it, which I expect won't be too > long, my seniority on the list goes back to the day I started dialysis. > That's good, at least, since I already have 8 months under my belt. > > I'm reminded of the Robbie Burns poem I had to memorize in high school: > > " The best-laid plans of mice and men > Gang aft agley > And leave us naught but grief and pain > For promised joy. " > > In other words, what the heck can you do... > > Pierre > P.S. Getting a live donor transplant successfully is a great accomplishment. > There are so many seemingly minor things that can put the kibosh on it. > > > > To edit your settings for the group, go to our Yahoo Group > home page: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iga-nephropathy/ > Visit our companion website at www.igan.ca. The site is entirely supported by donations. If you would like to help, go to: > http://www.igan.ca/id62.htm > > Thank you > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2003 Report Share Posted June 11, 2003 Hi Betsy, Hopefully will continue to stay stabile. Hopefully will be able to maintain that 35 GFR. Quote from Betsy " Statistically, IgAN is less likely to reoccur in a cadaveric kidney " It's really strange but my Neph told me that IgAN is MORE likely to reoccur in a cadaveric kidney. When I asked him why that was, he told me that it was because of the emotional connection that you have with the living donor verses a stranger. That people tend to protect the new kidney since they know the donor, patients tend to do the right things, like taking their meds, etc. Anyone really have any stats out there on this topic? Not that I'm doubting you at all, but now you have me interested... Connie Co-Moderator, USA Re: Re: Back to the drawing board Pierre, Just to throw a new thought into this transplant discussion, I wanted to mention that my son¹s neph told us that when he needs a new transplant, they would want to use a cadaveric kidney even if there were another living donor available. Statistically, IgAN is less likely to reccur in a cadaveric kidney, and since his reccurance has been more aggressive than expected, they would want to take that precaution. And the next time, he¹ll go on the list just as soon as he gets to 20%, instead of waiting and saying he really didn¹t feel that bad, etc. like he did before. Now he knows. is doing better now and will get another round of Cytoxan today (lower dose and taking him off Rapamune for a week or so). For whatever reason, he lost quite a lot of the water weight last week. He¹s still a bit puffy with edema but not nearly as bad as before. Last 24 hr. urine collection showed GFR of 35 not great but manageable. So we are hopeful the continued treatment will at least stabilize things or even better, actually improve kidney function. Betsy > Hi Connie. > > I don't think that plan would work in practice. There are a great many > aspects to matching a donor and a recipient. There's a lot more to it than > just blood type. The idea behind putting the recipient on hold from the > waiting list is that the live donor kidney would be much better than a > cadaveric one. They last longer, and require less medication. That seems > reasonable to me, and I wouldn't mind that, if the evaluation was done more > quickly. This is one area where you guys in the U.S. have it better than us. > Here, we don't really have actual transplant centres, just hospitals that > happen to do kidney transplants, and the resources are shared with every > other department. That means waits are sometimes necessary for things like > CT scans. My own evaluation went pretty quickly though. It was mostly done > within a couple of days - but it took a while to get to that point after the > referral. What took longer was things like appointments with the social > worker and the transplant surgeon. The Christmas holiday season added to it > too. > > A nuclear scan is just a scan that's done after injection of a special > radioactive dye. It's to map out the blood vessels that supply the kidneys, > and it's the very last procedure in the donor evaluation. In my donor's > case, they found he had what they call " complex arteries " . It's not a > medical problem for the donor in normal life, but it makes removal of the > kidney too risky for the donor. Plus, even if they went ahead with it > anyway, it would be impossible to connect up the kidney in the recipient so > as to give it the same kind of blood supply - so it would have a high risk > of failure. > > I had some pancreatitis before my evaluation. I'm not sure why they suddenly > decided that it is an issue to look at now. If it were severe enough, it > could be a showstopper. A severe, acute pancreatitis apparently can be a > serious thing in a transplant patient. However, I've never had pancreatitis > that bad, and I know my gastro-enterologist already cleared me this past > November. It's a little upsetting, but I guess they just want to cover all > the bases. > > We can see now that getting a transplant from a live donor is not as easy as > it sounds. We've seen many people in this group have a number of potential > donors turned down. Some also decide not to go ahead with it once they have > the risks explained to them (which is done early in the evaluation process). > Some don't get past the social worker and/or psychiatrist. Donating a kidney > is not without significant risk, and they make sure the donation is being > done for the right reasons. > > There are also some dialysis patients who choose not to be on the waiting > list at all. I know some personally. They would rather just stay on dialysis > rather than take the risks that come with a transplant (increased risk of > cancer, prednisone for life, etc.). > > Pierre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2003 Report Share Posted June 11, 2003 Thanks for citing those articles Betsy! I would be very curious about you and 's A2 status. This is very intrusting to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2003 Report Share Posted June 11, 2003 Oops, I mean that to be it is very INTERESTING to me not intrusting! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2003 Report Share Posted June 11, 2003 Betsy, What a great idea to write that letter to ! I frequently write letters to my loved ones as it is hard to say in person what I'm really trying to say. When you said you would've done it anyway evening knowing the future, that is wonderful. I just really enjoyed your post. Thanks! Dana In a message dated 6/11/03 6:24:12 PM Central Daylight Time, bcabell@... writes: << To Pierre and others contemplating transplantation - For whatever it¹s worth, I would like for you all to know that as a donor I truly have no regrets. Even now when IgAN has reared its ugly head again and the transplant may not last as long as we had hoped, I still have no regrets. I don¹t miss the kidney at all, meaning I can¹t tell any difference functionally. Now if it had failed right away or soon after the transplant, I¹ll admit that would have been depressing, mostly because it would have been so disappointing, and I might have felt like it was somehow my fault. And I know worried about that too. I wrote him a letter and gave it to him the night before the surgery saying basically, the kidney is yours, given freely and with love, hope it works well but don¹t feel bad no matter what happens. The great pleasure I have gotten seeing how well he has done since the transplant made it all worth while, no matter what happens in the future. His transplant nephrologist felt so bad telling us that the IgAN was back, but I told him I would have done it anyway even if I¹d known what was ahead. Good luck with getting a cadaveric kidney. There are advantages there too. Your relative or friend doesn¹t get the joy of giving, but the family of the donor often feels great comfort in knowing some good came from their tragedy and their loved one ³lives on² in a sense. I believe that would be very comforting to me. Betsy >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2003 Report Share Posted June 11, 2003 To Pierre and others contemplating transplantation - For whatever it¹s worth, I would like for you all to know that as a donor I truly have no regrets. Even now when IgAN has reared its ugly head again and the transplant may not last as long as we had hoped, I still have no regrets. I don¹t miss the kidney at all, meaning I can¹t tell any difference functionally. Now if it had failed right away or soon after the transplant, I¹ll admit that would have been depressing, mostly because it would have been so disappointing, and I might have felt like it was somehow my fault. And I know worried about that too. I wrote him a letter and gave it to him the night before the surgery saying basically, the kidney is yours, given freely and with love, hope it works well but don¹t feel bad no matter what happens. The great pleasure I have gotten seeing how well he has done since the transplant made it all worth while, no matter what happens in the future. His transplant nephrologist felt so bad telling us that the IgAN was back, but I told him I would have done it anyway even if I¹d known what was ahead. Good luck with getting a cadaveric kidney. There are advantages there too. Your relative or friend doesn¹t get the joy of giving, but the family of the donor often feels great comfort in knowing some good came from their tragedy and their loved one ³lives on² in a sense. I believe that would be very comforting to me. Betsy > Hi Betsy. > > Thanks for the birthday wishes. Right now, I'm 50, feeling more like 70. I > can't wait for the Epo to start quicking-in > > I'm glad to hear is doing better. > > From the potential recipient's point of view, and this is a feeling I share > with just about everyone I've talked to whi is in the same situation (or has > been), the possibility of rejecting a kidney donated by a relative weighs > heavily on the mind. I can't imagine how bad I would feel if that happened. > A second time would seem almost unbearable to me. The social workers try to > ease those kinds of concerns, but when you get right down to it, they are > just meaningless words. In total honesty, in this respect, I almost feel > relieved since my donor was disqualified. > > I always appreciate your insightful thoughts. > > Pierre > > > Re: Re: Back to the drawing board > > > Pierre, > Just to throw a new thought into this transplant discussion, I wanted to > mention that my son¹s neph told us that when he needs a new transplant, they > would want to use a cadaveric kidney even if there were another living donor > available. Statistically, IgAN is less likely to reccur in a cadaveric > kidney, and since his reccurance has been more aggressive than expected, > they would want to take that precaution. And the next time, he¹ll go on the > list just as soon as he gets to 20%, instead of waiting and saying he really > didn¹t feel that bad, etc. like he did before. Now he knows. > > is doing better now and will get another round of Cytoxan today (lower > dose and taking him off Rapamune for a week or so). For whatever reason, he > lost quite a lot of the water weight last week. He¹s still a bit puffy with > edema but not nearly as bad as before. Last 24 hr. urine collection showed > GFR of 35 not great but manageable. So we are hopeful the continued > treatment will at least stabilize things or even better, actually improve > kidney function. > > Betsy > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2003 Report Share Posted June 11, 2003 Hi Connie, I think we talking about two different things here: (1) problems from recurrence and (2) problems from not taking care of the kidney. I've read that the chance of recurrence may be higher with a related donor kidney, but haven't seen any data. With respect to MPGN (particularly MPGN 2 which has a high graph loss due to the 95-100% recurrence rate), docs are reluctant to use a related donor if a first kidney is lost. However, the numbers with MPGN at least, the data just ain't there (believe me, I've looked!) I have been wondering, however, if the higher recurrence rate with related donor kidney is something that was said once, and then repeated multiple times on the net. From my understanding, the problem isn't with the kidney, but an immune defect. Since the problem does not seem to involve receptor proteins on the kidney, I don't understand (please underscore that - I don't understand!), now the risk of recurrence could be higher with the donor. There is a very good paper in my files on recurrence that I will try to dig out. Cy Re: Re: Back to the drawing board Pierre, Just to throw a new thought into this transplant discussion, I wanted to mention that my son¹s neph told us that when he needs a new transplant, they would want to use a cadaveric kidney even if there were another living donor available. Statistically, IgAN is less likely to reccur in a cadaveric kidney, and since his reccurance has been more aggressive than expected, they would want to take that precaution. And the next time, he¹ll go on the list just as soon as he gets to 20%, instead of waiting and saying he really didn¹t feel that bad, etc. like he did before. Now he knows. is doing better now and will get another round of Cytoxan today (lower dose and taking him off Rapamune for a week or so). For whatever reason, he lost quite a lot of the water weight last week. He¹s still a bit puffy with edema but not nearly as bad as before. Last 24 hr. urine collection showed GFR of 35 not great but manageable. So we are hopeful the continued treatment will at least stabilize things or even better, actually improve kidney function. Betsy > Hi Connie. > > I don't think that plan would work in practice. There are a great many > aspects to matching a donor and a recipient. There's a lot more to it than > just blood type. The idea behind putting the recipient on hold from the > waiting list is that the live donor kidney would be much better than a > cadaveric one. They last longer, and require less medication. That seems > reasonable to me, and I wouldn't mind that, if the evaluation was done more > quickly. This is one area where you guys in the U.S. have it better than us. > Here, we don't really have actual transplant centres, just hospitals that > happen to do kidney transplants, and the resources are shared with every > other department. That means waits are sometimes necessary for things like > CT scans. My own evaluation went pretty quickly though. It was mostly done > within a couple of days - but it took a while to get to that point after the > referral. What took longer was things like appointments with the social > worker and the transplant surgeon. The Christmas holiday season added to it > too. > > A nuclear scan is just a scan that's done after injection of a special > radioactive dye. It's to map out the blood vessels that supply the kidneys, > and it's the very last procedure in the donor evaluation. In my donor's > case, they found he had what they call " complex arteries " . It's not a > medical problem for the donor in normal life, but it makes removal of the > kidney too risky for the donor. Plus, even if they went ahead with it > anyway, it would be impossible to connect up the kidney in the recipient so > as to give it the same kind of blood supply - so it would have a high risk > of failure. > > I had some pancreatitis before my evaluation. I'm not sure why they suddenly > decided that it is an issue to look at now. If it were severe enough, it > could be a showstopper. A severe, acute pancreatitis apparently can be a > serious thing in a transplant patient. However, I've never had pancreatitis > that bad, and I know my gastro-enterologist already cleared me this past > November. It's a little upsetting, but I guess they just want to cover all > the bases. > > We can see now that getting a transplant from a live donor is not as easy as > it sounds. We've seen many people in this group have a number of potential > donors turned down. Some also decide not to go ahead with it once they have > the risks explained to them (which is done early in the evaluation process). > Some don't get past the social worker and/or psychiatrist. Donating a kidney > is not without significant risk, and they make sure the donation is being > done for the right reasons. > > There are also some dialysis patients who choose not to be on the waiting > list at all. I know some personally. They would rather just stay on dialysis > rather than take the risks that come with a transplant (increased risk of > cancer, prednisone for life, etc.). > > Pierre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2003 Report Share Posted June 11, 2003 Connie, There are some research articles, two of which were previously cited in this group. One from The Netherlands, entitled ³Favorable outcome of renal transplantation in patients with IgA nephropathy,² reported 4% recurrence in transplants from cadavers and 20% from living related donors, but that recurrence had negligible influence on 5 and 10 year graft survival. A more recent study from Hong Kong, entitled ³Recurent IgA nephropathy in renal transplant allografts,² reported 3% for cadaveric or unrelated living donors and 21% from living related donors and suggests IgAN recurrence may be a significant contributor to graft loss. Speculation is that in related donors there may be some genetic vulnerability. One explanation mentioned in the Hong Kong article is that the presence of the A2 antigen (part of the HLA matching system) appears to protect from recurrent IgAN. So if donor and recipient are related, perhaps they are both missing that antigen. I think we have a copy somewhere of the results of the HLA matching for and me, and I¹ll try to find out our A2 status. I do think what your neph said is true also; you might feel more obligated to be compliant with meds, etc. when you know the donor. Betsy > Hi Betsy, > > Hopefully will continue to stay stabile. Hopefully will be able to > maintain that 35 GFR. > > Quote from Betsy > " Statistically, IgAN is less likely to reoccur in a cadaveric kidney " > > It's really strange but my Neph told me that IgAN is MORE likely to reoccur > in a cadaveric kidney. When I asked him why that was, he told me that it > was because of the emotional connection that you have with the living donor > verses a stranger. That people tend to protect the new kidney since they > know the donor, patients tend to do the right things, like taking their > meds, etc. Anyone really have any stats out there on this topic? Not that > I'm doubting you at all, but now you have me interested... > > Connie > Co-Moderator, USA > > Re: Re: Back to the drawing board > > > Pierre, > Just to throw a new thought into this transplant discussion, I wanted to > mention that my son¹s neph told us that when he needs a new transplant, they > would want to use a cadaveric kidney even if there were another living donor > available. Statistically, IgAN is less likely to reccur in a cadaveric > kidney, and since his reccurance has been more aggressive than expected, > they would want to take that precaution. And the next time, he¹ll go on the > list just as soon as he gets to 20%, instead of waiting and saying he really > didn¹t feel that bad, etc. like he did before. Now he knows. > > is doing better now and will get another round of Cytoxan today (lower > dose and taking him off Rapamune for a week or so). For whatever reason, he > lost quite a lot of the water weight last week. He¹s still a bit puffy with > edema but not nearly as bad as before. Last 24 hr. urine collection showed > GFR of 35 not great but manageable. So we are hopeful the continued > treatment will at least stabilize things or even better, actually improve > kidney function. > > Betsy > > > >> > Hi Connie. >> > >> > I don't think that plan would work in practice. There are a great many >> > aspects to matching a donor and a recipient. There's a lot more to it than >> > just blood type. The idea behind putting the recipient on hold from the >> > waiting list is that the live donor kidney would be much better than a >> > cadaveric one. They last longer, and require less medication. That seems >> > reasonable to me, and I wouldn't mind that, if the evaluation was done > more >> > quickly. This is one area where you guys in the U.S. have it better than > us. >> > Here, we don't really have actual transplant centres, just hospitals that >> > happen to do kidney transplants, and the resources are shared with every >> > other department. That means waits are sometimes necessary for things like >> > CT scans. My own evaluation went pretty quickly though. It was mostly done >> > within a couple of days - but it took a while to get to that point after > the >> > referral. What took longer was things like appointments with the social >> > worker and the transplant surgeon. The Christmas holiday season added to > it >> > too. >> > >> > A nuclear scan is just a scan that's done after injection of a special >> > radioactive dye. It's to map out the blood vessels that supply the > kidneys, >> > and it's the very last procedure in the donor evaluation. In my donor's >> > case, they found he had what they call " complex arteries " . It's not a >> > medical problem for the donor in normal life, but it makes removal of the >> > kidney too risky for the donor. Plus, even if they went ahead with it >> > anyway, it would be impossible to connect up the kidney in the recipient > so >> > as to give it the same kind of blood supply - so it would have a high risk >> > of failure. >> > >> > I had some pancreatitis before my evaluation. I'm not sure why they > suddenly >> > decided that it is an issue to look at now. If it were severe enough, it >> > could be a showstopper. A severe, acute pancreatitis apparently can be a >> > serious thing in a transplant patient. However, I've never had > pancreatitis >> > that bad, and I know my gastro-enterologist already cleared me this past >> > November. It's a little upsetting, but I guess they just want to cover all >> > the bases. >> > >> > We can see now that getting a transplant from a live donor is not as easy > as >> > it sounds. We've seen many people in this group have a number of potential >> > donors turned down. Some also decide not to go ahead with it once they > have >> > the risks explained to them (which is done early in the evaluation > process). >> > Some don't get past the social worker and/or psychiatrist. Donating a > kidney >> > is not without significant risk, and they make sure the donation is being >> > done for the right reasons. >> > >> > There are also some dialysis patients who choose not to be on the waiting >> > list at all. I know some personally. They would rather just stay on > dialysis >> > rather than take the risks that come with a transplant (increased risk of >> > cancer, prednisone for life, etc.). >> > >> > Pierre > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2003 Report Share Posted June 11, 2003 Betsy, Thanks for the numbers! It certainly suggests that my earlier idea was incorrect. Cy Re: Re: Back to the drawing board > > > Pierre, > Just to throw a new thought into this transplant discussion, I wanted to > mention that my son¹s neph told us that when he needs a new transplant, they > would want to use a cadaveric kidney even if there were another living donor > available. Statistically, IgAN is less likely to reccur in a cadaveric > kidney, and since his reccurance has been more aggressive than expected, > they would want to take that precaution. And the next time, he¹ll go on the > list just as soon as he gets to 20%, instead of waiting and saying he really > didn¹t feel that bad, etc. like he did before. Now he knows. > > is doing better now and will get another round of Cytoxan today (lower > dose and taking him off Rapamune for a week or so). For whatever reason, he > lost quite a lot of the water weight last week. He¹s still a bit puffy with > edema but not nearly as bad as before. Last 24 hr. urine collection showed > GFR of 35 not great but manageable. So we are hopeful the continued > treatment will at least stabilize things or even better, actually improve > kidney function. > > Betsy > > > >> > Hi Connie. >> > >> > I don't think that plan would work in practice. There are a great many >> > aspects to matching a donor and a recipient. There's a lot more to it than >> > just blood type. The idea behind putting the recipient on hold from the >> > waiting list is that the live donor kidney would be much better than a >> > cadaveric one. They last longer, and require less medication. That seems >> > reasonable to me, and I wouldn't mind that, if the evaluation was done > more >> > quickly. This is one area where you guys in the U.S. have it better than > us. >> > Here, we don't really have actual transplant centres, just hospitals that >> > happen to do kidney transplants, and the resources are shared with every >> > other department. That means waits are sometimes necessary for things like >> > CT scans. My own evaluation went pretty quickly though. It was mostly done >> > within a couple of days - but it took a while to get to that point after > the >> > referral. What took longer was things like appointments with the social >> > worker and the transplant surgeon. The Christmas holiday season added to > it >> > too. >> > >> > A nuclear scan is just a scan that's done after injection of a special >> > radioactive dye. It's to map out the blood vessels that supply the > kidneys, >> > and it's the very last procedure in the donor evaluation. In my donor's >> > case, they found he had what they call " complex arteries " . It's not a >> > medical problem for the donor in normal life, but it makes removal of the >> > kidney too risky for the donor. Plus, even if they went ahead with it >> > anyway, it would be impossible to connect up the kidney in the recipient > so >> > as to give it the same kind of blood supply - so it would have a high risk >> > of failure. >> > >> > I had some pancreatitis before my evaluation. I'm not sure why they > suddenly >> > decided that it is an issue to look at now. If it were severe enough, it >> > could be a showstopper. A severe, acute pancreatitis apparently can be a >> > serious thing in a transplant patient. However, I've never had > pancreatitis >> > that bad, and I know my gastro-enterologist already cleared me this past >> > November. It's a little upsetting, but I guess they just want to cover all >> > the bases. >> > >> > We can see now that getting a transplant from a live donor is not as easy > as >> > it sounds. We've seen many people in this group have a number of potential >> > donors turned down. Some also decide not to go ahead with it once they > have >> > the risks explained to them (which is done early in the evaluation > process). >> > Some don't get past the social worker and/or psychiatrist. Donating a > kidney >> > is not without significant risk, and they make sure the donation is being >> > done for the right reasons. >> > >> > There are also some dialysis patients who choose not to be on the waiting >> > list at all. I know some personally. They would rather just stay on > dialysis >> > rather than take the risks that come with a transplant (increased risk of >> > cancer, prednisone for life, etc.). >> > >> > Pierre > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2003 Report Share Posted June 12, 2003 That is so interesting! Fascinating how the mind works! Rotghi > > Date: 2003/06/11 Wed PM 03:48:53 EDT > To: <iga-nephropathy > > Subject: RE: Re: Back to the drawing board > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.