Guest guest Posted July 21, 2008 Report Share Posted July 21, 2008 I wish I had a better way to put this but this is not a one time problem. It will occur next year and the next, unless you hire more staff, or hire travelers to cover during their absence each year driving up your overhead for those 3 weeks. Personally I feel 3 consecutive weeks of vacation is more than most professionals ask for and receive, unless it is for some sort of special educational activity or mission work. I can not see how they sit across from you, see your position, and justify placing you in that situation. I understand your frustration with this, and to be honest is the reason I no longer desire being a director. On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Kovacek wrote: > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer of > this posting > ============== > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT & two > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at > each > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace two > contract/travelers. > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs asked to > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take more > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take 2 of > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want to > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it wasn't. > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only > one > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time off, > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT takes > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of PTAs > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT > couple > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time… but > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. > I'd > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma… > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you > let > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > normally > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled vacation? > If so, how large is your staff? > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand by > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you let> them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you normally> allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled vacation?> If so, how large is your staff? I think that if i were in your shoes that would be a hard. I am the director at a critical access hospital and i think that if i hired married PTs i would have to let them take vacation together but if you go down that road why can't others be off at the same time? It does open you up for further problems? It is unrealistic to think that they would not take vacation togethet though.> > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2> outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand by> the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)?I would have issues with this one, being in Iowa you have to have 1 PT per 2 PTAs for supervision rules (1 PT can not supervise more than 2 PTAs on a given day) so with the numbers that you have if you were to have 1 PT off you would really have to give the 2 PTAs off as well because of the ratio. It depends on the state that you are in?? This is something to look into and might give you a good reason not to let the PTs off together? but this might also give them a reason to leave your department which might put you in a worse situation? Good luck with this issue. We are in a location that it is hard to find PTs to work at so we also do bend over backwards for them probably more than we should, but that is they way that it has become in rural settings. Jeff Nolder, PT Director of Physical Medicine Cherokee Regional Medical Center _________________________________________________________________ Use video conversation to talk face-to-face with Windows Live Messenger. http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Ref\ resh_messenger_video_072008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 I feel your pain. Last year I had my only other PT at the time state she wanted to take a MONTH off for vacation. Sure I could have said no but they know they have leverage in today's PT hiring climate. So I had a very hectic month. Sad to say but in my experience the vast majority of PT's really only look out for number one, no matter what they say or seem to project in the interview process. Just reality I guess. Hang in there. Joe Ruzich, PT Pueblo, CO Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems I wish I had a better way to put this but this is not a one time problem. It will occur next year and the next, unless you hire more staff, or hire travelers to cover during their absence each year driving up your overhead for those 3 weeks. Personally I feel 3 consecutive weeks of vacation is more than most professionals ask for and receive, unless it is for some sort of special educational activity or mission work. I can not see how they sit across from you, see your position, and justify placing you in that situation. I understand your frustration with this, and to be honest is the reason I no longer desire being a director. On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Kovacek wrote: > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer of > this posting > ============== > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT & two > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at > each > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace two > contract/travelers. > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs asked to > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take more > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take 2 of > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want to > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it wasn't. > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only > one > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time off, > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT takes > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of PTAs > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT > couple > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time. but > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. > I'd > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma. > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you > let > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > normally > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled vacation? > If so, how large is your staff? > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand by > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 A part of the problem is not " looking out for number one " , it is our American culture. We should have a system in place to allow long vacation breaks for folks to travel to other countries if they wish. A month off is not unreasonable, it is done in many of the European countries and folks have greater job satisfaction and are more productive generally. A week off is not long enough when working in our health care system. Should we all wait until we retire before we travel and take time to enjoy life a bit? I used to work in a hospital in Alaska and I saw what happens to those folks who work hard all their life and wait until retirement to take a long vacation somewhere. By that time most have various medical issues and a percentage end up in the hospital and then flown back home. And the large percentage of the rest that don't end up in the hospital are too out of shape to take a hike through Denali, go sea kayaking, etc.... I personally am all for allowing folks to have some time off while they are fit enough to enjoy it. Wade, PT Oregon Joe Ruzich wrote: > > I feel your pain. Last year I had my only other PT at the time state she > wanted to take a MONTH off for vacation. Sure I could have said no but > they > know they have leverage in today's PT hiring climate. So I had a very > hectic > month. Sad to say but in my experience the vast majority of PT's > really only > look out for number one, no matter what they say or seem to project in the > interview process. Just reality I guess. > Hang in there. > > Joe Ruzich, PT > Pueblo, CO > > Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems > > I wish I had a better way to put this but this is not a one time problem. > It will occur next year and the next, unless you hire more staff, or hire > travelers to cover during their absence each year driving up your overhead > for those 3 weeks. Personally I feel 3 consecutive weeks of vacation > is more > than most professionals ask for and receive, unless it is for some sort of > special educational activity or mission work. I can not see how they sit > across from you, see your position, and justify placing you in that > situation. I understand your frustration with this, and to be honest > is the > reason I no longer desire being a director. > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Kovacek <pkovacek@... > <mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com>> > wrote: > > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer > of > > this posting > > ============== > > > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT > & two > > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at > > each > > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace > two > > contract/travelers. > > > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs > asked to > > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take > more > > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take > 2 of > > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want > to > > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it > wasn't. > > > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only > > one > > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time > off, > > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT > takes > > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of > PTAs > > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT > > couple > > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time. > but > > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. > > I'd > > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma. > > > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you > > let > > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > > normally > > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled > vacation? > > If so, how large is your staff? > > > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand > by > > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 Thank you . . . all too often we see hard-working people put off until retirement to " enjoy " life. I fully agree with you. While work is important, there is a lot to be said for having time to smell the roses. Employers should realize that some employees would prefer a few extra days off over some other benefits. Amy Stelly Clinic Coordinator (Office Manager) LeBlanc, Chamberlain and Physical Therapy Services 4027 I-49 South Service Road Opelousas, Louisiana 70570 Telephone: Facsimile: ________________________________ From: PTManager [PTManager ] On Behalf Of Wade [wade@...] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:49 PM To: PTManager Subject: Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems A part of the problem is not " looking out for number one " , it is our American culture. We should have a system in place to allow long vacation breaks for folks to travel to other countries if they wish. A month off is not unreasonable, it is done in many of the European countries and folks have greater job satisfaction and are more productive generally. A week off is not long enough when working in our health care system. Should we all wait until we retire before we travel and take time to enjoy life a bit? I used to work in a hospital in Alaska and I saw what happens to those folks who work hard all their life and wait until retirement to take a long vacation somewhere. By that time most have various medical issues and a percentage end up in the hospital and then flown back home. And the large percentage of the rest that don't end up in the hospital are too out of shape to take a hike through Denali, go sea kayaking, etc.... I personally am all for allowing folks to have some time off while they are fit enough to enjoy it. Wade, PT Oregon Joe Ruzich wrote: > > I feel your pain. Last year I had my only other PT at the time state she > wanted to take a MONTH off for vacation. Sure I could have said no but > they > know they have leverage in today's PT hiring climate. So I had a very > hectic > month. Sad to say but in my experience the vast majority of PT's > really only > look out for number one, no matter what they say or seem to project in the > interview process. Just reality I guess. > Hang in there. > > Joe Ruzich, PT > Pueblo, CO > > Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems > > I wish I had a better way to put this but this is not a one time problem. > It will occur next year and the next, unless you hire more staff, or hire > travelers to cover during their absence each year driving up your overhead > for those 3 weeks. Personally I feel 3 consecutive weeks of vacation > is more > than most professionals ask for and receive, unless it is for some sort of > special educational activity or mission work. I can not see how they sit > across from you, see your position, and justify placing you in that > situation. I understand your frustration with this, and to be honest > is the > reason I no longer desire being a director. > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Kovacek <pkovacek@...<mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com> > <mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com>> > wrote: > > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer > of > > this posting > > ============== > > > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT > & two > > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at > > each > > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace > two > > contract/travelers. > > > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs > asked to > > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take > more > > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take > 2 of > > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want > to > > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it > wasn't. > > > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only > > one > > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time > off, > > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT > takes > > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of > PTAs > > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT > > couple > > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time. > but > > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. > > I'd > > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma. > > > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you > > let > > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > > normally > > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled > vacation? > > If so, how large is your staff? > > > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand > by > > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 Great answer, except that ususally they want those few extra days off AND all the other benefits!! 'quid pro quo' > > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer > of > > this posting > > ============ == > > > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT > & two > > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at > > each > > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace > two > > contract/travelers. > > > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs > asked to > > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > > this request with 2 stipulations. .. the first is that they don't take > more > > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take > 2 of > > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want > to > > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it > wasn't. > > > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only > > one > > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time > off, > > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT > takes > > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of > PTAs > > (including reassessments/ DCs, etc). > > > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT > > couple > > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time. > but > > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. > > I'd > > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma. > > > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you > > let > > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > > normally > > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled > vacation? > > If so, how large is your staff? > > > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand > by > > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 Don't all fire at once, but shouldn't there be a difference in expectations for professional people who handle the health care of others? What are the patients to do if their therapist is gone for a month? Should their care have to be transferred to another therapist who will likely have some lag time in getting up to speed on their care? I personally don't know of any physicians who have taken a month at a time off unless it is for personal health reasons or for volunteering to provide medical care overseas, etc... If we are to move toward a doctoring profession, we can't have it both ways. I don't think we can have the 9-5 hours of a bank teller plus 1 month of vacation when we have assumed the responsibility to be a primary health care provider. Proffitt, PT Massillon, OH Note: The information contained in this message, including attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, printing, copying or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer and destroying all copies. Warning: Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. ________________________________ From: PTManager on behalf of Amy Stelly Sent: Tue 7/22/2008 3:25 PM To: PTManager Subject: RE: Married PTs and Vacation Problems Thank you . . . all too often we see hard-working people put off until retirement to " enjoy " life. I fully agree with you. While work is important, there is a lot to be said for having time to smell the roses. Employers should realize that some employees would prefer a few extra days off over some other benefits. Amy Stelly Clinic Coordinator (Office Manager) LeBlanc, Chamberlain and Physical Therapy Services 4027 I-49 South Service Road Opelousas, Louisiana 70570 Telephone: Facsimile: ________________________________ From: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> [PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of Wade [wade@... <mailto:wade%40wadeandersonpt.com> ] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:49 PM To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems A part of the problem is not " looking out for number one " , it is our American culture. We should have a system in place to allow long vacation breaks for folks to travel to other countries if they wish. A month off is not unreasonable, it is done in many of the European countries and folks have greater job satisfaction and are more productive generally. A week off is not long enough when working in our health care system. Should we all wait until we retire before we travel and take time to enjoy life a bit? I used to work in a hospital in Alaska and I saw what happens to those folks who work hard all their life and wait until retirement to take a long vacation somewhere. By that time most have various medical issues and a percentage end up in the hospital and then flown back home. And the large percentage of the rest that don't end up in the hospital are too out of shape to take a hike through Denali, go sea kayaking, etc.... I personally am all for allowing folks to have some time off while they are fit enough to enjoy it. Wade, PT Oregon Joe Ruzich wrote: > > I feel your pain. Last year I had my only other PT at the time state she > wanted to take a MONTH off for vacation. Sure I could have said no but > they > know they have leverage in today's PT hiring climate. So I had a very > hectic > month. Sad to say but in my experience the vast majority of PT's > really only > look out for number one, no matter what they say or seem to project in the > interview process. Just reality I guess. > Hang in there. > > Joe Ruzich, PT > Pueblo, CO > > Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems > > I wish I had a better way to put this but this is not a one time problem. > It will occur next year and the next, unless you hire more staff, or hire > travelers to cover during their absence each year driving up your overhead > for those 3 weeks. Personally I feel 3 consecutive weeks of vacation > is more > than most professionals ask for and receive, unless it is for some sort of > special educational activity or mission work. I can not see how they sit > across from you, see your position, and justify placing you in that > situation. I understand your frustration with this, and to be honest > is the > reason I no longer desire being a director. > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Kovacek <pkovacek@... <mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com> <mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com> > <mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com>> > wrote: > > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer > of > > this posting > > ============== > > > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT > & two > > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at > > each > > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace > two > > contract/travelers. > > > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs > asked to > > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take > more > > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take > 2 of > > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want > to > > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it > wasn't. > > > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only > > one > > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time > off, > > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT > takes > > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of > PTAs > > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT > > couple > > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time. > but > > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. > > I'd > > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma. > > > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you > > let > > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > > normally > > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled > vacation? > > If so, how large is your staff? > > > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand > by > > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 >> We should have a system in place to allow long > vacation breaks for folks to travel to other countries if they wish. A > month off is not unreasonable, it is done in many of the European > countries and folks have greater job satisfaction and are more > productive generally. << ----------------------- I wholeheartedly agree with Wade. I would like to comment on this part only, as I have first-hand experience, being a native of Germany and having worked there 10+ years before immigrating to this country.Every person in Germany that works full time gets 6 weeks of vacation per year. Don't ask me how small employers can afford this, I don't know that part of the equation..;-) The last place I worked for over there was for the U.S. Air Force. It was stated in our contract that we HAD TO take 3 of the 6 weeks vacation per year consecutively, as they felt that you needed at least that much time to really relax. Needless to say, coming to the U.S. and working here was an eye-opener for sure. There are many, many people here that work full time without any benefits, which I think is very sad, but that's a whole nother story. Anyway, just thougth I'd give my 2 cents on the subject. Marita Mc Billing Manager Dana Austin Physical Therapy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 This scenario is why a lot of employers choose not to hire relatives or spouses. When you choose to hire a relative or spouse you are taking the risk of having those employees out together either for vacation, deaths in the family, contagious illness, etc. Also, how many of you that are married would take vacation at a time that your spouse could not? Now this does not mean that you cannot control how many weeks in a row that your employees can utilize their PTO, but I think it seems unreasonable to hire spouses and then ask them in retrospect to take their vacations at separate times. In defense of the employer, these employees should have discussed the utilization of PTO at the time of hire or annual review so that everyone was on the same page. Tori Bjornholm Office Manager Riata Therapy Specialists, PLLC 2008 L Don Dodson Drive, Suite 105 Bedford, Texas 76021 ph fx www.riatatherapy.com _____ From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf Of L Proffitt Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:03 PM To: PTManager Subject: RE: Married PTs and Vacation Problems Don't all fire at once, but shouldn't there be a difference in expectations for professional people who handle the health care of others? What are the patients to do if their therapist is gone for a month? Should their care have to be transferred to another therapist who will likely have some lag time in getting up to speed on their care? I personally don't know of any physicians who have taken a month at a time off unless it is for personal health reasons or for volunteering to provide medical care overseas, etc... If we are to move toward a doctoring profession, we can't have it both ways. I don't think we can have the 9-5 hours of a bank teller plus 1 month of vacation when we have assumed the responsibility to be a primary health care provider. Proffitt, PT Massillon, OH Note: The information contained in this message, including attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, printing, copying or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer and destroying all copies. Warning: Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. ________________________________ From: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com on behalf of Amy Stelly Sent: Tue 7/22/2008 3:25 PM To: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com Subject: RE: Married PTs and Vacation Problems Thank you . . . all too often we see hard-working people put off until retirement to " enjoy " life. I fully agree with you. While work is important, there is a lot to be said for having time to smell the roses. Employers should realize that some employees would prefer a few extra days off over some other benefits. Amy Stelly Clinic Coordinator (Office Manager) LeBlanc, Chamberlain and Physical Therapy Services 4027 I-49 South Service Road Opelousas, Louisiana 70570 Telephone: Facsimile: ________________________________ From: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> [PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of Wade [wade@wadeandersonpt <mailto:wade%40wadeandersonpt.com> .com <mailto:wade%40wadeandersonpt.com> ] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:49 PM To: PTManager@yahoogrou <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems A part of the problem is not " looking out for number one " , it is our American culture. We should have a system in place to allow long vacation breaks for folks to travel to other countries if they wish. A month off is not unreasonable, it is done in many of the European countries and folks have greater job satisfaction and are more productive generally. A week off is not long enough when working in our health care system. Should we all wait until we retire before we travel and take time to enjoy life a bit? I used to work in a hospital in Alaska and I saw what happens to those folks who work hard all their life and wait until retirement to take a long vacation somewhere. By that time most have various medical issues and a percentage end up in the hospital and then flown back home. And the large percentage of the rest that don't end up in the hospital are too out of shape to take a hike through Denali, go sea kayaking, etc.... I personally am all for allowing folks to have some time off while they are fit enough to enjoy it. Wade, PT Oregon Joe Ruzich wrote: > > I feel your pain. Last year I had my only other PT at the time state she > wanted to take a MONTH off for vacation. Sure I could have said no but > they > know they have leverage in today's PT hiring climate. So I had a very > hectic > month. Sad to say but in my experience the vast majority of PT's > really only > look out for number one, no matter what they say or seem to project in the > interview process. Just reality I guess. > Hang in there. > > Joe Ruzich, PT > Pueblo, CO > > Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems > > I wish I had a better way to put this but this is not a one time problem. > It will occur next year and the next, unless you hire more staff, or hire > travelers to cover during their absence each year driving up your overhead > for those 3 weeks. Personally I feel 3 consecutive weeks of vacation > is more > than most professionals ask for and receive, unless it is for some sort of > special educational activity or mission work. I can not see how they sit > across from you, see your position, and justify placing you in that > situation. I understand your frustration with this, and to be honest > is the > reason I no longer desire being a director. > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Kovacek <pkovacekptmanager (DOT) <mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com> com <mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com> <mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com> > <mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com>> > wrote: > > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer > of > > this posting > > ============== > > > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT > & two > > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at > > each > > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace > two > > contract/travelers. > > > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs > asked to > > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take > more > > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take > 2 of > > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want > to > > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it > wasn't. > > > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only > > one > > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time > off, > > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT > takes > > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of > PTAs > > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT > > couple > > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time. > but > > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. > > I'd > > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma. > > > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you > > let > > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > > normally > > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled > vacation? > > If so, how large is your staff? > > > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand > by > > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 They're not married to each other . . . Amy Stelly Clinic Coordinator (Office Manager) LeBlanc, Chamberlain and Physical Therapy Services 4027 I-49 South Service Road Opelousas, Louisiana 70570 Telephone: Facsimile: ________________________________ From: PTManager [PTManager ] On Behalf Of Hollier, PT [shollierpt@...] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:53 PM To: PTManager Subject: Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems Amy, If you were the owner/director of personnel I wonder what would happen to the practice if Mr. Jerry Chamberlain, Jude and Errol Leblanc decided to all three go on vacation at the same time? What would you tell the patients as they walked in the door----sorry, the boys are gone for the month to smell the roses? Uh............no. Having the two married PT's taking off together for 3 weeks is selfish and shows no respect for the employer and all that he created prior to them being hired. It may be good for the marriage but bad for the business. Surely there must be a better way. Hollier,PT Abbeville, Louisiana Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems > > I wish I had a better way to put this but this is not a one time problem. > It will occur next year and the next, unless you hire more staff, or hire > travelers to cover during their absence each year driving up your overhead > for those 3 weeks. Personally I feel 3 consecutive weeks of vacation > is more > than most professionals ask for and receive, unless it is for some sort of > special educational activity or mission work. I can not see how they sit > across from you, see your position, and justify placing you in that > situation. I understand your frustration with this, and to be honest > is the > reason I no longer desire being a director. > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Kovacek <pkovacek@...<mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com><mailto:pkovacek%40ptman\ ager.com> > <mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com>> > wrote: > > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer > of > > this posting > > ============== > > > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT > & two > > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at > > each > > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace > two > > contract/travelers. > > > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs > asked to > > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take > more > > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take > 2 of > > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want > to > > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it > wasn't. > > > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only > > one > > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time > off, > > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT > takes > > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of > PTAs > > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT > > couple > > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time. > but > > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. > > I'd > > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma. > > > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you > > let > > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > > normally > > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled > vacation? > > If so, how large is your staff? > > > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand > by > > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 It is rare that someone requires more than 1 week off for vacation - possibly a week and a half. There are certainly ways to accommodate this schedule if the practice employees more than 1-2 therapists. Also, these are professionals and I'm certain measures are taken to ensure their patients receive the level of care they require. We all know we need to work (professionals and support staff alike), but it would be a comfort to know that one is not jeopardizing their career by taking a few extra days off for something that may be a once (or twice) in a lifetime thing. Amy Stelly Clinic Coordinator (Office Manager) LeBlanc, Chamberlain and Physical Therapy Services 4027 I-49 South Service Road Opelousas, Louisiana 70570 Telephone: Facsimile: ________________________________ From: PTManager [PTManager ] On Behalf Of L Proffitt [jproffitt@...] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:02 PM To: PTManager Subject: RE: Married PTs and Vacation Problems Don't all fire at once, but shouldn't there be a difference in expectations for professional people who handle the health care of others? What are the patients to do if their therapist is gone for a month? Should their care have to be transferred to another therapist who will likely have some lag time in getting up to speed on their care? I personally don't know of any physicians who have taken a month at a time off unless it is for personal health reasons or for volunteering to provide medical care overseas, etc... If we are to move toward a doctoring profession, we can't have it both ways. I don't think we can have the 9-5 hours of a bank teller plus 1 month of vacation when we have assumed the responsibility to be a primary health care provider. Proffitt, PT Massillon, OH Note: The information contained in this message, including attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and/or proprietary and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, printing, copying or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer and destroying all copies. Warning: Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. ________________________________ From: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> on behalf of Amy Stelly Sent: Tue 7/22/2008 3:25 PM To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: RE: Married PTs and Vacation Problems Thank you . . . all too often we see hard-working people put off until retirement to " enjoy " life. I fully agree with you. While work is important, there is a lot to be said for having time to smell the roses. Employers should realize that some employees would prefer a few extra days off over some other benefits. Amy Stelly Clinic Coordinator (Office Manager) LeBlanc, Chamberlain and Physical Therapy Services 4027 I-49 South Service Road Opelousas, Louisiana 70570 Telephone: Facsimile: ________________________________ From: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> [PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of Wade [wade@...<mailto:wade%40wadeandersonpt.com> <mailto:wade%40wadeandersonpt.com> ] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 1:49 PM To: PTManager <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:PTManager%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems A part of the problem is not " looking out for number one " , it is our American culture. We should have a system in place to allow long vacation breaks for folks to travel to other countries if they wish. A month off is not unreasonable, it is done in many of the European countries and folks have greater job satisfaction and are more productive generally. A week off is not long enough when working in our health care system. Should we all wait until we retire before we travel and take time to enjoy life a bit? I used to work in a hospital in Alaska and I saw what happens to those folks who work hard all their life and wait until retirement to take a long vacation somewhere. By that time most have various medical issues and a percentage end up in the hospital and then flown back home. And the large percentage of the rest that don't end up in the hospital are too out of shape to take a hike through Denali, go sea kayaking, etc.... I personally am all for allowing folks to have some time off while they are fit enough to enjoy it. Wade, PT Oregon Joe Ruzich wrote: > > I feel your pain. Last year I had my only other PT at the time state she > wanted to take a MONTH off for vacation. Sure I could have said no but > they > know they have leverage in today's PT hiring climate. So I had a very > hectic > month. Sad to say but in my experience the vast majority of PT's > really only > look out for number one, no matter what they say or seem to project in the > interview process. Just reality I guess. > Hang in there. > > Joe Ruzich, PT > Pueblo, CO > > Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems > > I wish I had a better way to put this but this is not a one time problem. > It will occur next year and the next, unless you hire more staff, or hire > travelers to cover during their absence each year driving up your overhead > for those 3 weeks. Personally I feel 3 consecutive weeks of vacation > is more > than most professionals ask for and receive, unless it is for some sort of > special educational activity or mission work. I can not see how they sit > across from you, see your position, and justify placing you in that > situation. I understand your frustration with this, and to be honest > is the > reason I no longer desire being a director. > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Kovacek <pkovacek@...<mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com> <mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com> <mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com> > <mailto:pkovacek%40ptmanager.com>> > wrote: > > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer > of > > this posting > > ============== > > > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT > & two > > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at > > each > > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace > two > > contract/travelers. > > > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs > asked to > > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take > more > > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take > 2 of > > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want > to > > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it > wasn't. > > > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only > > one > > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time > off, > > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT > takes > > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of > PTAs > > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT > > couple > > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time. > but > > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. > > I'd > > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma. > > > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you > > let > > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > > normally > > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled > vacation? > > If so, how large is your staff? > > > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand > by > > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 I have been on both sides of this, as an employee seeking to take a month off (to go to Europe after 4 years of employment, and little vacation taken) and as a manager with 4 married couples at one time in a (larger) department. I agree that it takes 2 weeks for vacations- a week to decompress and a second to really enjoy yourself. In my last job we had a written policy that you could not take off more than two consecutive weeks- so I had to request an exception. My husband and I purposefully scheduled our trip at a time that was less popular ( September- October) for vacations. And we compromised at 3 weeks which I thought was very gracious on the part of our employer. ( It was the trip of a lifetime!) In preparation for leaving, we made sure that the therapist picking up our patients had detailed notes ( even beyond the chart) and that we had had a face to face meeting ( off company time) to answer any questions. I don't think that is so unreasonable to expect the therapists to be willing to do- It is Just Good ( Professional) Practice! I think if you explain the hardship that the 3rd week together imposes on your practice then your therapists will be professional and reasonable. Then , I would suggest that you get something into your employee handbook about limits and exceptions processes, even in a smaller practice. As a manager, I feel your pain, but appealing to professionalism really helped, and worked when I had 2 couples each requesting the same 2 weeks off, and off the same team..... The next time we looked at hiring a husband and wife team, I was very relieved that at least they would be on different teams and locations. It works both ways and I think you are doing a great job by allowing them the 2 weeks. I hope they recognize that! Good luck! Marcy Stalvey, PT, NCS Edwin Shaw Rehab Akron OH >>> ppt4you@... 07/22/08 03:54PM >>> Great answer, except that ususally they want those few extra days off AND all the other benefits!! 'quid pro quo' > > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer > of > > this posting > > ============ == > > > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT > & two > > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at > > each > > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace > two > > contract/travelers. > > > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs > asked to > > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > > this request with 2 stipulations. .. the first is that they don't take > more > > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take > 2 of > > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want > to > > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it > wasn't. > > > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only > > one > > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time > off, > > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT > takes > > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of > PTAs > > (including reassessments/ DCs, etc). > > > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT > > couple > > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time. > but > > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. > > I'd > > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma. > > > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you > > let > > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > > normally > > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled > vacation? > > If so, how large is your staff? > > > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand > by > > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 " I personally don't know of any physicians who have taken a month at a time off... " You need to qualify this with " in America " . Don't blame " selfish " employees, look at the current system. Plenty of health care folks take 4 to 6 weeks off at a time in other countries. I have relatives in Canada and England who work in health care, they take long vacations to travel around visiting other countries. Have a plan to hire contractors to cover vacations. Patients can be treated and employees can take long vacations. I do know of a MD who found locum coverage for his practice so he could find some time to take his wife and kids on a much needed adventure - a cross country bicycle tour. His life was much better for it! Wade, PT OR We are the ones being selfish when we don't allow employees an appropriate balance L Proffitt wrote: > > Don't all fire at once, but shouldn't there be a difference in > expectations for professional people who handle the health care of > others? What are the patients to do if their therapist is gone for a > month? Should their care have to be transferred to another therapist > who will likely have some lag time in getting up to speed on their > care? I personally don't know of any physicians who have taken a month > at a time off unless it is for personal health reasons or for > volunteering to provide medical care overseas, etc... If we are to > move toward a doctoring profession, we can't have it both ways. I > don't think we can have the 9-5 hours of a bank teller plus 1 month of > vacation when we have assumed the responsibility to be a primary > health care provider. > > Proffitt, PT > Massillon, OH > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 Sometimes we have to make choices between two or more less than ideal options. Is 3 weeks of scheduling difficulties worse than losing 2 PT's? Can you get agency help to cover their vacation? Though it is expensive, 3 weeks (x2) of agency fees is cheaper than long term agency while trying to fill two FT vacancies. Expecting a married couple to take separate vacations is unrealistic. The manager/director that hired the married PT's should have had anticipated this situation before he/she hired the couple. The manager/director should feel some responsibility for taking a major role in creating this situation in the first place. If the therapists are foreign trained (ie. from China or India, etc), their request to take 3 weeks off makes more sense. The list serve needs more information to make a sound judgement regarding their 3 week request. Also, if this IS the scenario, it is doubtful that the PT couple would request a 3 week long vacation every year. Finally, to answer your questions: #1. Yes. I would let them vacation together. We do not let more than tw0 outpatient PT's off during the same week(s). We have 3 FT PT's in a small outpatient clinic (2 prn PT's that help out occassionally). We often have to use agency to cover vacations. If you request that your employees give ample notice when requesting time off, you stand a better chance to get agency coverage. Sometimes, our clinic was short staffed for a week or two as a result of simultaneous vacations. Being short staffed in the short run is better than losing a good employee in this current market (IMHO). PS. Could the clinic manager pitch in and see patients (if not already doing so) during their time off? Be creative. #2 My answer depends on the quality of the therapists. If they are both valuable employees and I thought that being unyielding might result in their resignations, then yes, I would be more accommodating. It's a difficult business decision. What couple wouldn't want to vacation together? What manager couldn't foresee this situation before hireing the PT couple? Devil's advocate, Jon Mark Pleasant, PT > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer of > this posting > ============== > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT & two > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at each > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace two > contract/travelers. > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs asked to > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take more > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take 2 of > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want to > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it wasn't. > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only one > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time off, > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT takes > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of PTAs > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT couple > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time… but > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. I'd > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma… > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you let > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you normally > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled vacation? > If so, how large is your staff? > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand by > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 This sounds to me like a problem with Accountability. With that, here's a few ideas: 1) Ask the married couple what they would like to do to make sure their patients are covered. (but in a serious, professional way, of course) 2) Go through the above discussion with them, and if no good conclusion is reached where everyone is happy, let them know you will bring this up to the whole group during the next department meeting for discussion (maybe get both clinics together for a monthly meeting to review vacation policies AND this particular issue). 3) While in the department meeting, ask ALL of the therapists how they might handle this issue. Make them all accountable (because everyone will have to step up to cover if both therapists take 3 weeks off at the same time) - and be sure not to take a side or a stance either way until they've given you some good solutions to consider (you can do this while making sure they know certain stipulations have to be met). 4) If there is still no resolution to this (and you cannot or do not want to resort to Agency staff), consider taking " whole clinic vacations " , whereby both clinics are closed over 2 or 3 weeks during Christmas/New Years, or you have a 2 week closure during the summer and a one weeker during Christmas/New Years. This can work only if you set it up early and keep your physicians/community in the loop. It can be very beneficial because that way you do not have to mess with variable vacations throughout the year, shuffling patients, etc. The savings (both financially and clinically) here make up for the potential costs of shutting down the clinic for a few weeks at a time - because you might not only have those two weeks without charges, but you might also have to ramp down care, then ramp it back up. Just some thoughts- Ty Keeter DPT, MHA Director of Rehabilitation Boulder, CO Once these discu > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer of > this posting > ============== > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT & two > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at each > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace two > contract/travelers. > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs asked to > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take more > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take 2 of > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want to > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it wasn't. > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only one > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time off, > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT takes > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of PTAs > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT couple > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time… but > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. I'd > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma… > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you let > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you normally > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled vacation? > If so, how large is your staff? > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand by > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 I think we are looking, to some extent, at the wrong question. We should not be focusing on the employer solely.  There needs to be some responsibility subscribed to the two employees.  As professionals, should they even ask for 3-weeks at the same time?  If the line of thinking is the patients will not be damaged by not having our services for a short time or modified services for a short time we do a disservice to our profession.  In fact, we limit and marginalizes the benefits that can come from physical therapy.  Do we want to be taken more seriously as a profession, then we need to behave in like manner.  How do we view our profession?  Why do we do what we do?  Does what physical therapy has to provide actually beneficial for the patient? Or, is it simply a well paying job?  Often times the answers to these questions will identify who you work with or who you hire. I cannot answer your question.  However, it seems that your two PT's who have (as I understood your scenario) have decided to place self above others.  Granted, the vacation might and probably is warranted, yet it tells me more about them as people than it does as professionals.  Yet, it hints to their professionalism.  I do not mean to sound so harsh, but the scenario sounds self-centered (that is if you as the employer has dealt with them in good fait; that is only for the originator of this question to decide). Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems Sometimes we have to make choices between two or more less than ideal options. Is 3 weeks of scheduling difficulties worse than losing 2 PT's? Can you get agency help to cover their vacation? Though it is expensive, 3 weeks (x2) of agency fees is cheaper than long term agency while trying to fill two FT vacancies. Expecting a married couple to take separate vacations is unrealistic. The manager/director that hired the married PT's should have had anticipated this situation before he/she hired the couple. The manager/director should feel some responsibility for taking a major role in creating this situation in the first place. If the therapists are foreign trained (ie. from China or India, etc), their request to take 3 weeks off makes more sense. The list serve needs more information to make a sound judgement regarding their 3 week request. Also, if this IS the scenario, it is doubtful that the PT couple would request a 3 week long vacation every year. Finally, to answer your questions: #1. Yes. I would let them vacation together. We do not let more than tw0 outpatient PT's off during the same week(s). We have 3 FT PT's in a small outpatient clinic (2 prn PT's that help ou t occassionally). We often have to use agency to cover vacations. If you request that your employees give ample notice when requesting time off, you stand a better chance to get agency coverage. Sometimes, our clinic was short staffed for a week or two as a result of simultaneous vacations. Being short staffed in the short run is better than losing a good employee in this current market (IMHO). PS. Could the clinic manager pitch in and see patients (if not already doing so) during their time off? Be creative. #2 My answer depends on the quality of the therapists. If they are both valuable employees and I thought that being unyielding might result in their resignations, then yes, I would be more accommodating. It's a difficult business decision. What couple wouldn't want to vacation together? What manager couldn't foresee this situation before hireing the PT couple? Devil's advocate, Jon Mark Pleasant, PT > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer of > this posting > ============== > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT & two > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. 0A> > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at each > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace two > contract/travelers. > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs asked to > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take more > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take 2 of > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want to > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it wasn't. > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only one > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time off, > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT takes > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of PTAs > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > business as a whole. From a20pure business standpoint, our married PT couple > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time… but > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. I'd > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma… > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you let > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you normally > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled vacation? > If so, how large is your staff? > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand by > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 As an employer, I grant earned leave time. Regardless of whether an employee is married or not, they get X amount of earned leave. They earn their earned leave every month. Period. If they have 3 weeks of earned leave accumulated, they have 3 weeks of earned leave to use. I give it with no strings attached. If they are an employee, they have earned it as per my employment agreement. I have 8 employees working for me. We have a policy in place that a request for earned leave be made in writing so many days before it is taken. If all 8 employees choose to take off at the same time, I can choose to allow as few or many as I want to to be off at the same time. Every year around the Christmas and Easter Holidays we have a higher number of people wanting to take their earned leave. If it becomes a hardship to my clients' service, then earned leave is allowed on a first come first served basis. All that said, 3 weeks out of 52 is more than 5% of the year and less than 10%. I state that to offer perspective. I suspect with all of the feedback you are probably forming your own opinion. But I think you will probably be able to formulate a policy based upon the feedback you have received. Okay, off my soapbox now. By the way, for those that have been concerned about me the city of Cedar Rapids and the state of Iowa-we have sustained several billion dollars of damage this year from tornados and flooding. We are working to return to some level of normalcy. For many in my city, they are facing a life changing situation. But the people from around the US that have appeared out of nowhere to help has been tremendous. There are many months of hard work ahead. But the people of Iowa are ready to meet the challenge..., much like the population of the Gulf Coast did after Katrina. We are working hard to restore our lives and livelihood, but continue to ask for your prayers. Thank you to all who have called and emailed. The support has been welcome and a blessing. With your encouragement, prayers and support, we will be back up and running within the next year. As for my business, we had to temporarily relocate to another section of town, but are hoping to receive word that we can move back into our downtown offices within the next 5-10 business days. We are pretty lucky in comparison to many other businesses. The building we work in was beyond the 500 year flood plain and yet the basement was flooded and the first floor had between 3-5 feet of water in it. Floors 2-6 will be opened back up in the next few weeks, but the build out for the basement and first floor will take about 6 months. It is amazing how much we all take for granted. Jim Hall, CPA <///>< General Manager Rehab Management Services, LLC Cedar Rapids, IA Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems This sounds to me like a problem with Accountability. With that, here's a few ideas: 1) Ask the married couple what they would like to do to make sure their patients are covered. (but in a serious, professional way, of course) 2) Go through the above discussion with them, and if no good conclusion is reached where everyone is happy, let them know you will bring this up to the whole group during the next department meeting for discussion (maybe get both clinics together for a monthly meeting to review vacation policies AND this particular issue). 3) While in the department meeting, ask ALL of the therapists how they might handle this issue. Make them all accountable (because everyone will have to step up to cover if both therapists take 3 weeks off at the same time) - and be sure not to take a side or a stance either way until they've given you some good solutions to consider (you can do this while making sure they know certain stipulations have to be met). 4) If there is still no resolution to this (and you cannot or do not want to resort to Agency staff), consider taking " whole clinic vacations " , whereby both clinics are closed over 2 or 3 weeks during Christmas/New Years, or you have a 2 week closure during the summer and a one weeker during Christmas/New Years. This can work only if you set it up early and keep your physicians/community in the l oop. It can be very beneficial because that way you do not have to mess with variable vacations throughout the year, shuffling patients, etc. The savings (both financially and clinically) here make up for the potential costs of shutting down the clinic for a few weeks at a time - because you might not only have those two weeks without charges, but you might also have to ramp down care, then ramp it back up. Just some thoughts- Ty Keeter DPT, MHA Director of Rehabilitation Boulder, CO Once these discu > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer of > this posting > ============== > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT & two > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at each > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace two > contract/travelers. > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs asked to > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take more > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can onl y take 2 of > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want to > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it wasn't. > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only one > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time off, > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT takes > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of PTAs > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT couple > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time… but > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. I'd > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma… > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you let > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you normally > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled vacation? > If so, how large is your staff? > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand by > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2008 Report Share Posted July 23, 2008 Though I may see the initial suggestion for #2 & #3, it immediately strikes me as inappropriate and slightly unprofessional for a manager. In this case, it is now an issue of discussion between the therapists (PT couple) and the manager with details being very specific to this couple and what they are requesting. Sometimes managers need to manage and use input from staff when it is appropriate. Opening up conversation down the road, a little after the resolution of this specific situation, would be appropriate if the manager is looking at a vacation policy change that will effect all employees. I do work in education and in clinical practice. Robyn Wilhelm, PT, MPT, DCE Director of Clinical Education- PTA Program Pima Medical Institute 957 S. Dobson Rd. Mesa, AZ 85202 From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf Of Tyler Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:15 PM To: PTManager Subject: Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems This sounds to me like a problem with Accountability. With that, here's a few ideas: 1) Ask the married couple what they would like to do to make sure their patients are covered. (but in a serious, professional way, of course) 2) Go through the above discussion with them, and if no good conclusion is reached where everyone is happy, let them know you will bring this up to the whole group during the next department meeting for discussion (maybe get both clinics together for a monthly meeting to review vacation policies AND this particular issue). 3) While in the department meeting, ask ALL of the therapists how they might handle this issue. Make them all accountable (because everyone will have to step up to cover if both therapists take 3 weeks off at the same time) - and be sure not to take a side or a stance either way until they've given you some good solutions to consider (you can do this while making sure they know certain stipulations have to be met). 4) If there is still no resolution to this (and you cannot or do not want to resort to Agency staff), consider taking " whole clinic vacations " , whereby both clinics are closed over 2 or 3 weeks during Christmas/New Years, or you have a 2 week closure during the summer and a one weeker during Christmas/New Years. This can work only if you set it up early and keep your physicians/community in the loop. It can be very beneficial because that way you do not have to mess with variable vacations throughout the year, shuffling patients, etc. The savings (both financially and clinically) here make up for the potential costs of shutting down the clinic for a few weeks at a time - because you might not only have those two weeks without charges, but you might also have to ramp down care, then ramp it back up. Just some thoughts- Ty Keeter DPT, MHA Director of Rehabilitation Boulder, CO Once these discu > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer of > this posting > ============== > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT & two > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at each > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace two > contract/travelers. > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs asked to > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take more > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take 2 of > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want to > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it wasn't. > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only one > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time off, > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT takes > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of PTAs > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT couple > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time... but > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. I'd > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma... > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you let > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you normally > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled vacation? > If so, how large is your staff? > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand by > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2008 Report Share Posted July 23, 2008 I have one therapist who takes 3-4 weeks off each summer to visit family in Ireland and Sweden. It has to be okayed by the entire PT staff by asking them to set their vacation dates in March and April then she works her days off around that schedule. This gives me enough planning time to see if I need to increase use of my perdiems and offer overtime to the rest of the staff to keep up coverage. It has worked out every year with everyone working together. Shari France Subject: RE: Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems To: PTManager Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 8:30 AM Though I may see the initial suggestion for #2 & #3, it immediately strikes me as inappropriate and slightly unprofessional for a manager. In this case, it is now an issue of discussion between the therapists (PT couple) and the manager with details being very specific to this couple and what they are requesting. Sometimes managers need to manage and use input from staff when it is appropriate. Opening up conversation down the road, a little after the resolution of this specific situation, would be appropriate if the manager is looking at a vacation policy change that will effect all employees. I do work in education and in clinical practice. Robyn Wilhelm, PT, MPT, DCE Director of Clinical Education- PTA Program Pima Medical Institute 957 S. Dobson Rd. Mesa, AZ 85202 From: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com [mailto:PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com] On Behalf Of Tyler Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:15 PM To: PTManager@yahoogrou ps.com Subject: Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems This sounds to me like a problem with Accountability. With that, here's a few ideas: 1) Ask the married couple what they would like to do to make sure their patients are covered. (but in a serious, professional way, of course) 2) Go through the above discussion with them, and if no good conclusion is reached where everyone is happy, let them know you will bring this up to the whole group during the next department meeting for discussion (maybe get both clinics together for a monthly meeting to review vacation policies AND this particular issue). 3) While in the department meeting, ask ALL of the therapists how they might handle this issue. Make them all accountable (because everyone will have to step up to cover if both therapists take 3 weeks off at the same time) - and be sure not to take a side or a stance either way until they've given you some good solutions to consider (you can do this while making sure they know certain stipulations have to be met). 4) If there is still no resolution to this (and you cannot or do not want to resort to Agency staff), consider taking " whole clinic vacations " , whereby both clinics are closed over 2 or 3 weeks during Christmas/New Years, or you have a 2 week closure during the summer and a one weeker during Christmas/New Years. This can work only if you set it up early and keep your physicians/communit y in the loop. It can be very beneficial because that way you do not have to mess with variable vacations throughout the year, shuffling patients, etc. The savings (both financially and clinically) here make up for the potential costs of shutting down the clinic for a few weeks at a time - because you might not only have those two weeks without charges, but you might also have to ramp down care, then ramp it back up. Just some thoughts- Ty Keeter DPT, MHA Director of Rehabilitation Boulder, CO Once these discu > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer of > this posting > ============ == > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT & two > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at each > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace two > contract/travelers. > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs asked to > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > this request with 2 stipulations. .. the first is that they don't take more > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take 2 of > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want to > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it wasn't. > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only one > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time off, > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT takes > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of PTAs > (including reassessments/ DCs, etc). > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT couple > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time... but > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. I'd > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma... > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you let > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you normally > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled vacation? > If so, how large is your staff? > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand by > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2008 Report Share Posted July 23, 2008 You do have a tough situation, but I would stick to your guns. They already have two weeks off together going to 3 weeks means you have a total of 6 weeks in 3 blocks when you have 2 of your 3 therapists off. That's too much with 2 clinics. I have more PTs ( at least 2 in each site). If one from each clinic wants time off at the same time, each must get the other PT at each site to sign off and take responsibility for the others load. The remaining PTs can then split up the load with any PTA's at each site ( based, of course, on the patients and their needs). If they don't understand that then maybe one needs to leave. I know it's a risk, but if they significantly slow your operation down by both being off you get hurt every year they are with you. Is it worth it in the long run? Good luck Deane W. Deane Rehabilitations Services Finger Lakes Health 196 North St. Geneva, New York, 14456 Tel: Fax: E-Mail: deane.butler@... >>> " Steve Marcum PT " 07/21/08 8:51 PM >>> I wish I had a better way to put this but this is not a one time problem. It will occur next year and the next, unless you hire more staff, or hire travelers to cover during their absence each year driving up your overhead for those 3 weeks. Personally I feel 3 consecutive weeks of vacation is more than most professionals ask for and receive, unless it is for some sort of special educational activity or mission work. I can not see how they sit across from you, see your position, and justify placing you in that situation. I understand your frustration with this, and to be honest is the reason I no longer desire being a director. On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Kovacek wrote: > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer of > this posting > ============== > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT & two > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at > each > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace two > contract/travelers. > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs asked to > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take more > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take 2 of > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want to > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it wasn't. > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only > one > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time off, > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT takes > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of PTAs > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT > couple > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time… but > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. > I'd > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma… > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you > let > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > normally > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled vacation? > If so, how large is your staff? > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand by > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2008 Report Share Posted July 23, 2008 Here's my point: A partner in a law firm does not go to a " manager " to ask for time off... A physician in a practice does not go to a " manager " to ask for time off... They work together with their partners to figure out how to do it; they do not ask someone else to figure it out for them. Do we want to be " employees " , or do we want to be " autonomous practitioners " (as we state in Vision 2020)? We must change our own culture first if we want the rest of society to change their views. Shari at Carlton Rehab is on the right track. This is all just my opinion. (By the way, we take many Denver PIMA PTA students and find them to be very well prepared!) Ty Keeter DPT, MHA Boulder, Colorado > > > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the > writer of > > this posting > > ============== > > > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT > & two > > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four > PTAs. > > > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them > at each > > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to > replace two > > contract/travelers. > > > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs > asked to > > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We > agreed to > > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't > take more > > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take > 2 of > > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they > want to > > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should > have > > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it > wasn't. > > > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that > only one > > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes > time off, > > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT > takes > > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but > it > > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision > of PTAs > > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the > same > > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married > PT couple > > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation > time... but > > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their > request. I'd > > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma... > > > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would > you let > > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > normally > > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled > vacation? > > If so, how large is your staff? > > > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you > stand by > > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2008 Report Share Posted July 23, 2008 Stellar comeback Amy! Hats Off. For those who are harping on primary care responsibilites, a doctor is more than well compensated for that level of care that he provides with minimal vacation time. Those who have stated employer side of the equation, it is called cost of doing business. Calling a professional selfish on these grounds, is selfish. Employees have agreed to a service, not sold their souls. Market forces notwithstanding, PT is a professional service, and should be able to provide level of service commensurate with compensation. Service expectations should be stellar while on the job. From service delivery, to productivity, to professional advancement. Salaried professionals should not complain on hours. The neurosurgeon making a million dollars has to trade off on his sleep. And does not complain about it. As far as those who do not make benefits, we all feel for them. But then, that is why we went to professional school. For the employer, long-range planning is paramount. Where there are problems, there are solutions. Costs more for sure. But then, as I said, it is, cost of doing business. Cheers, Bose PT MHS > > > > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > > > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the writer > > of > > > this posting > > > ============== > > > > > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > > > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT > > & two > > > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four PTAs. > > > > > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them at > > > each > > > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace > > two > > > contract/travelers. > > > > > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs > > asked to > > > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed to > > > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take > > more > > > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take > > 2 of > > > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they want > > to > > > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should have > > > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it > > wasn't. > > > > > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that only > > > one > > > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time > > off, > > > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT > > takes > > > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but it > > > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of > > PTAs > > > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > > > > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > > > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the same > > > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > > > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married PT > > > couple > > > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation time. > > but > > > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their request. > > > I'd > > > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma. > > > > > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would you > > > let > > > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > > > normally > > > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled > > vacation? > > > If so, how large is your staff? > > > > > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > > > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you stand > > by > > > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2008 Report Share Posted July 23, 2008 In my opinion, as it relates to hiring a married couple, stipulations as to how employees choose to use their benefits (which they earn) should be discussed BEFORE hiring not after. I find it absurd for one PT to judge another PT (with very limited facts) as unprofessional or self-centered for wanting to take some time off. Without knowing all the facts, one cannot proclaim someone as unprofessional or self-centered. Mucho Judgemental! Statistically, Americans take less time off than most of the world. Perhaps we are the foolish ones! Life requires balance. All work and no play makes Jon a dull boy. In order to NOT hurt our delicate profession, i'm henceforth abandoning all time off. In addition, i'm going to start working 7 days a week in order to be 2 days more professional than I have been previously. Finally, when i'm on my death bed, i'm going to lament not putting more time in at the office. Just kidding. Those of you who get upset by this reply might need a vacation. Jon Mark Pleasant, PT > > > > > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > > > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the > > writer of > > > this posting > > > ============== > > > > > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > > > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT & > > two > > > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four > > PTAs. > 0A> > > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them > > at each > > > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace > > two > > > contract/travelers. > > > > > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs > > asked to > > > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed > > to > > > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't take > > more > > > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take 2 > > of > > > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they > > want to > > > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should > > have > > > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it > > wasn't. > > > > > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that > > only one > > > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time > > off, > > > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT > > takes > > > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but > > it > > > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of > > PTAs > > > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > > > > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > > > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the > > same > > > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > > > business as a whole. From a20pure business standpoint, our married PT > > couple > > > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation > > time… but > > > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their > > request. I'd > > > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma… > > > > > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would > > you let > > > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > > normally > > > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled > > vacation? > > > If so, how large is your staff? > > > > > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > > > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you > > stand by > > > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 I have tried to read all the lists regarding this subject matter and apologize in advance if I have missed one and someone has already offered the following considerations: 1. There is a great deal of value in married PTs, married MDs, or administrative/support staff married to PTs or MDs that work for the same employer. My experience in working with married couples that are employed by the same practice/employer is that they tend to be more committed, more responsible, and more reliable. They have to be, as their entire family income depends on it. 2. Married couples who work together take their job home each and every day. They discuss patient problems, staffing problems, and the day-to-day challenges we all face working in a fully managed care environment. They discuss these problems on their drive to and from work, over dinner, in bed, and even on their vacation! 3. Married couples recognize the importance of working together as a team. They also recognize that they are judged not only by their own actions and performance, but also by the actions and performance of their spouse. It is increasingly challenging to find employees who will assume responsibility for their own actions and performance, much less for the actions and performance of others. Should this married couple be allowed to take two consecutive weeks of vacation together? My response is YES. Many businesses require employees take two consecutive weeks of vacation and accordingly, plan ahead to ensure there is proper coverage for employees during their absence. Unfortunately, the reasoning behind this decision is not based on what is in the best interest of the employee, but instead what is in the best interest of the business, particularly those employees who have financial responsibilities to the business. It is far easier to note discrepancies in cash/revenue when an employee has been out for two weeks than it is to note these same discrepancies when an employee has been out for one day or one week. Should this marred couple be allowed to take three consecutive weeks of vacation together? My response is NO. My reasoning has nothing to do with lost revenue to the practice, 'selfish/self-centered' interest on the part of the employee or employer, or who is and who is not entitled to vacation based on their professional designation, whether it be a PT or MD. Conversely, my reasoning has to do with the sanctity of marriage and the need for couples who work together to take the time to focus solely on themselves and spend time with family and friends outside of work. I speak from experience. For more than 10 years of our 24 years of marriage, my husband and I have worked side-by-side as business partners. Moreover, for the past 6 years, I have employed my mother, sister, brother-in-law and two daughters. My only regret is that I am running out of family members trained and/or willing to be trained to work in health care! I predict that we will see more and more medical and health care employers hiring family members in the future, as there are significant tax breaks for employers who hire their spouse, children, and family members. Additionally, I predict these same employers will relax or completely do away with nepotism policies and recruit new employees from family members of existing employees. Let us never forget the value of family. D. Cavitt, President Medical Legal Alliance, L.L.C. In a message dated 7/24/2008 7:29:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time, jsppleasant@... writes: In my opinion, as it relates to hiring a married couple, stipulations as to how employees choose to use their benefits (which they earn) should be discussed BEFORE hiring not after. I find it absurd for one PT to judge another PT (with very limited facts) as unprofessional or self-centered for wanting to take some time off. Without knowing all the facts, one cannot proclaim someone as unprofessional or self-centered. Mucho Judgemental! Statistically, Americans take less time off than most of the world. Perhaps we are the foolish ones! Life requires balance. All work and no play makes Jon a dull boy. In order to NOT hurt our delicate profession, i'm henceforth abandoning all time off. In addition, i'm going to start working 7 days a week in order to be 2 days more professional than I have been previously. Finally, when i'm on my death bed, i'm going to lament not putting more time in at the office. Just kidding. Those of you who get upset by this reply might need a vacation. Jon Mark Pleasant, PT > > > > > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > > > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the > > writer of > > > this posting > > > ============ = > > > > > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > > > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT & > > two > > > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four > > PTAs. > 0A> > > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them > > at each > > > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to replace > > two > > > contract/travelers. > > > > > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs > > asked to > > > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We agreed > > to > > > this request with 2 stipulations. this request with 2 stipul take > > more > > > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take 2 > > of > > > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they > > want to > > > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should > > have > > > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it > > wasn't. > > > > > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that > > only one > > > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes time > > off, > > > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT > > takes > > > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but > > it > > > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision of > > PTAs > > > (including reassessments/ (including re > > > > > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > > > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the > > same > > > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > > > business as a whole. From a20pure business standpoint, our married PT > > couple > > > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation > > time… but > > > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their > > request. I'd > > > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma… > > > > > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would > > you let > > > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > > normally > > > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled > > vacation? > > > If so, how large is your staff? > > > > > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > > > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you > > stand by > > > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > > > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 I agree with you regarding the shifting of the culture within our field first to then be able to present it to society. Good point. We (all PTs especially and PTAs) need to emulate what we talk about and goals we set (2020). In the situation at hand, with a structure involving a manager and being in the midst of an annual review, it seemed logical that they would be asking the manager as part of job benefit negotiation. I am glad to hear that your experience with Pima PTA students has been good. My understanding is that they run a good program there and we are striving to do the same here in Mesa, AZ. Our anticipated start date for our inaugural class is November 08. I have worked in PTA education in Ohio as well before moving to AZ. I am looking forward to assisting in the education to produce ethical, entry-level, competent PTAs that can be the licensed, supportive professionals we want to have assisting PTs in the clinic. Robyn Wilhelm, PT, MPT, DCE Director of Clinical Education- PTA Program Pima Medical Institute 957 S. Dobson Rd. Mesa, AZ 85202 From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf Of Tyler Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 4:20 PM To: PTManager Subject: Re: Married PTs and Vacation Problems Here's my point: A partner in a law firm does not go to a " manager " to ask for time off... A physician in a practice does not go to a " manager " to ask for time off... They work together with their partners to figure out how to do it; they do not ask someone else to figure it out for them. Do we want to be " employees " , or do we want to be " autonomous practitioners " (as we state in Vision 2020)? We must change our own culture first if we want the rest of society to change their views. Shari at Carlton Rehab is on the right track. This is all just my opinion. (By the way, we take many Denver PIMA PTA students and find them to be very well prepared!) Ty Keeter DPT, MHA Boulder, Colorado > > > > I have been asked to post this for a member - for obvious reasons > > Please respond to the list - not to me personally as I am not the > writer of > > this posting > > ============== > > > > I'm a department administrator at a small, rural hospital with two > > outpatient rehab clinics. One clinic in the smaller town has one PT > & two > > PTAs and the other clinic in the larger town has two PTs and four > PTAs. > > > > Last year we hired two PTs (a married couple) and placed one of them > at each > > clinic. We already had one full-time staff PT and were able to > replace two > > contract/travelers. > > > > When their one-year employment anniversary arrived, our " new " PTs > asked to > > have their paid vacation increased from 10 days to 15 days. We > agreed to > > this request with 2 stipulations... the first is that they don't > take more > > than 1 week off at a time, and the second is that they can only take > 2 of > > the 3 weeks off concurrently. They rejected stipulation #2 as they > want to > > be able to take all three weeks off together. I realize this should > have > > been negotiated at or before the time of hire but unfortunately it > wasn't. > > > > Because we're a small department, our practice has always been that > only one > > person at a time can have scheduled vacation. When one PTA takes > time off, > > that leaves 8 clinicians to absorb his or her patients. When one PT > takes > > vacation, some of his patients may be able to be moved to a PTA, but > it > > still falls on the remaining PTs to take over evals and supervision > of PTAs > > (including reassessments/DCs, etc). > > > > Since PTs remain in very short supply (especially in rural areas), we > > generally try to give our therapists whatever they ask for. At the > same > > time, we try to look out for the best interest of our patients and the > > business as a whole. From a pure business standpoint, our married > PT couple > > probably shouldn't be permitted to take any simultaneous vacation > time... but > > then again I can understand where they're coming from in their > request. I'd > > like to ask the listserv for some input on this dilemma... > > > > Question #1: If you hired a married PT couple at your clinic, would > you let > > them have all or some of their scheduled vacation together? Do you > normally > > allow multiple employees to be off at the same time for scheduled > vacation? > > If so, how large is your staff? > > > > Question #2: If you were in my shoes with 3 PTs and 6 PTAs to cover 2 > > outpatient clinics, would you give in to this request or would you > stand by > > the previous decision (and risk losing both of them)? > > > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts & comments. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.