Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Hi everyone, Interesting report. I would hope that the APTA and the Private Practice section have investigated this and determined if the therapists involved are members or not. I think that if they are not members, it would be in the interest of the organization to put out a statement distancing themselves from them. I would imagine because of the size of the refund required, this could make national news. If they are members, then damage control would be helpful. In my opinion, I would like to see the APTA develop a Director of Communication position. There needs to be more visible response to both positive and negative media involving physical therapy. For instance, almost every year there are media reports of big research news coming out of the AMA convention. How come we never see anything like this from the APTA convention or about PT research at all?? The Director could handle things like this OIG report and make sure that the public gets the truth about it. Just my humble opinion... Tom Howell, P.T., M.P.T. Howell Physical Therapy Eagle, ID howellpt@... This email and any files transmitted with it may contain PRIVILEGED or CONFIDENTIAL information and may be read or used only by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of the email or any of its attachments, please be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any attached files is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately purge it and all attachments and notify the sender by reply email. OIG Report List Serve, Interesting report released by the OIG concerning outpatient PT and OT provided by PCH Health Systems. http://www.oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region9/90400069.pdf Rick Gawenda, PT HPA Government Affairs & Practice Committee __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Rick, I'd say a nearly $10million payback makes this a must read. Take note that the significant errors found resulting in recovery was for failure of documentation, including evidence the patient had visited their physician q30 days and the demonstration of medical necessity. , PT Therapeutics OIG Report List Serve, Interesting report released by the OIG concerning outpatient PT and OT provided by PCH Health Systems. http://www.oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region9/90400069.pdf Rick Gawenda, PT HPA Government Affairs & Practice Committee __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 Hello Tom, Great idea! Has this been proposed to APTA in the past? Either way, we should encourage our leadership to consider such a position--which is crucial in today's world. A Director of Communication could position our profession well, give a good picture to others, and create a positive sound for all to hear. We can all make a positive difference by sharing this idea with any APTA Leaders that we know. Thank you for sharing this great idea...maybe one day we can have an award (The Tom Howell Award?) honoring a therapist that communicated our profession most positively in the past year! Bob Latz, PT, DPT Florence, KY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2006 Report Share Posted July 25, 2006 Hi all What I find very troubling in the report is that none of the claims was substantiated. The largest portion of claims reportedly did not support being Medically reasonable and necessary. Maybe I'm an optimist, but I would hope that a portion of the claims would be found to be reasonable for coverage. I'm also concerned about the reviews being too black and white and that the human component of treatment is thrown into the garbage. The Medicare population is certainly not cut and dry and there are many times when their pace of recovery is slower than I believe Medicare likes to cover, or " significant recovery " is relative. I did not see a way of digging deeper into the claims reviewed to see what they were basing decisions on, but I would bet we would all see some of our past clients and circumstances mirrored there. I think we need to be very careful about condemning the therapists and figure out a way to find out a little more about the process and the reviewers. There are two sides to every story. I wish everyone a great day Vicki Vicki Tilley PT,GCS President ElderFit In Home Rehab, North Carolina (919) 644-6646 vicki@... www.elderfitpt.com In a message dated 7/24/2006 9:36:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, DPT@... writes: Rick, I'd say a nearly $10million payback makes this a must read. Take note that the significant errors found resulting in recovery was for failure of documentation, including evidence the patient had visited their physician q30 days and the demonstration of medical necessity. , PT Therapeutics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 25, 2006 Report Share Posted July 25, 2006 I don’t know the company but would agree on the surface that there may be a technical issue at work. Maybe claims were not submitted with all requested documentation, or there were massive billing technical issues. I am sure it’s possible to have essentially 100% denials due to not following prescription requirements, etc (we have seen examples of this with non-traditional providers like school systems). I would suspect a technical or bookkeeping error. I also suspect someone is feeling pretty stressed right now about writing a 10 million check. Ouch I feel for them. Steve Passmore PT Healthy Recruiting Tools HYPERLINK " mailto:spass@... " spass@... _____ From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf Of VSTilley@... Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 7:18 AM To: PTManager Subject: Re: OIG Report Hi all What I find very troubling in the report is that none of the claims was substantiated. The largest portion of claims reportedly did not support being Medically reasonable and necessary. Maybe I'm an optimist, but I would hope that a portion of the claims would be found to be reasonable for coverage. I'm also concerned about the reviews being too black and white and that the human component of treatment is thrown into the garbage. The Medicare population is certainly not cut and dry and there are many times when their pace of recovery is slower than I believe Medicare likes to cover, or " significant recovery " is relative. I did not see a way of digging deeper into the claims reviewed to see what they were basing decisions on, but I would bet we would all see some of our past clients and circumstances mirrored there. I think we need to be very careful about condemning the therapists and figure out a way to find out a little more about the process and the reviewers. There are two sides to every story. I wish everyone a great day Vicki Vicki Tilley PT,GCS President ElderFit In Home Rehab, North Carolina HYPERLINK " mailto:vicki%40elderfitpt.com " vickielderfitpt (DOT) -com www.elderfitpt.-com In a message dated 7/24/2006 9:36:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, HYPERLINK " mailto:DPT%40aol.com " DPTaol (DOT) -com writes: Rick, I'd say a nearly $10million payback makes this a must read. Take note that the significant errors found resulting in recovery was for failure of documentation, including evidence the patient had visited their physician q30 days and the demonstration of medical necessity. , PT Therapeutics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 2006 Report Share Posted July 26, 2006 Having worked for a Medicare Intermediary in my former life, I probably need to weigh in on this issue a bit. Times have changed and I don't know if procedures have changed or not (someone else on the list might find something different than what I am about to tell). Back in the late 80's, Mutual of Omaha (my employer) was under subcontract to HCFA (now known as CMS) to audit Hospitals, Physciatric Facilites and Rehab Agencies. Whenever we did an audit, if we had potential fraud situation, we had to issue Management Comments to the Healthcare Facility and prove financial damages over a certain dollar amount before something could be turned over to the OIG (unless it was an absolutely fraud). The Provider had to disregard the Management comments for 2 consecutive years before we could turn the case over to OIG. While I don't know any more details than anyone else on this list, there was a protocol at that time to follow before OIG became involved and usually a pattern of disregard was demonstrated. Again, I don't know any more details about this particular case than anyone else, but way back when, there was definitely issues before anything ever made it to the OIG. Jim Hall, CPA <///>< General Manager Rehab Management Services, LLC Cedar Rapids, IA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2006 Report Share Posted August 25, 2006 the sad part of this is that public needs to know this and put a stop to this. We know of someone in our location who sent this article to our local paper and asked them to publish it and it never happened. I am sure it was they did not want to offend any of those gold diggers. It is such a shame that we all struggle to do what is right and we barely make it and then this report comes out and they still keep doing the POPTS. Pardon my sarcasm, it has been one of those weeks. Bubba Klostermann OT, CVE, CEAS CEO, WORK & REHAB 4546 South 14 th Abilene, Texas 79605 phone: fax: email: bubklo@... This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of WORK & REHAB, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2006 Report Share Posted August 25, 2006 If memory serves me correctly, the CMS/APTA agreement to require therapy services provided by a physician to be under direct supervision of a licensed therapist, was made public on November 3, 2004, so perhaps no current data is available to prove that things have changed. The message below states " OIG found that approximately 91 percent of physical therapy billed by physicians in the first 6 months of 2002 did not meet program requirements " . I'm hoping this is in part why a licensed therapist is now required. I've heard of lots of docs who have closed down their PT because they can't find staff or don't want to pay for it. That's great for business. Doug Doug Sparks Advanced Physical Therapy Concepts / APTC www.aptc.biz<http://www.aptc.biz/> doug@... OIG Report IG today posts three reports to the website. As always, selecting the link immediately following the report title will take you directly to the full document. Physical Therapy Billed by Physicians (OEI-09-02-00200) http://www.oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-09-02-00200.pdf<http://www.oig.hhsgov/oei\ /reports/oei-09-02-00200.pdf> OIG found that approximately 91 percent of physical therapy billed by physicians in the first 6 months of 2002 did not meet program requirements. These inappropriately paid services cost the program and its beneficiaries approximately $136 million. Because of inadequate documentation, reviewers had difficulty assessing the quality of the therapy services. In addition, we identified aberrances in physicians' billing patterns and unusually high volumes of claims that suggest physical therapy is vulnerable to abuse. Finally, physical therapy billed " incident to " physicians' professional services and rendered by unskilled and/or unlicensed personnel represent a vulnerability that could be placing beneficiaries at risk of receiving services that do not meet professionally recognized standards of care. To address these issues, we recommend CMS should consider revisions, clarifications, and further study of the " incident to " rule to ensure that Medicare beneficiaries are recei! ving skilled services from appropriately trained and licensed staff and that the services meet professionally recognized standards of care. Rick Gawenda, PT Director PM & R Detroit Receiving Hospital www.gawendaseminars.com<http://www.gawendaseminars.com/> HPA Government Affairs & Practice Committee __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2006 Report Share Posted August 28, 2006 Rick, Startling statistic. Thank you for sharing it. My understanding was that delivering PT with ' " unskilled " staff (anyone other than PT or PTA) to Medicare patients was prohibited even with proper documentation? Joe Ruizch Pueblo, CO _____ From: PTManager [mailto:PTManager ] On Behalf Of Agan, Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:49 PM To: PTManager Subject: RE: OIG Report OIG Report IG today posts three reports to the website. As always, selecting the link immediately following the report title will take you directly to the full document. Physical Therapy Billed by Physicians (OEI-09-02-00200) http://www.oig. <http://www.oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-09-02-00200.pdf> hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-09-02-00200.pdf OIG found that approximately 91 percent of physical therapy billed by physicians in the first 6 months of 2002 did not meet program requirements. These inappropriately paid services cost the program and its beneficiaries approximately $136 million. Because of inadequate documentation, reviewers had difficulty assessing the quality of the therapy services. In addition, we identified aberrances in physicians' billing patterns and unusually high volumes of claims that suggest physical therapy is vulnerable to abuse. Finally, physical therapy billed " incident to " physicians' professional services and rendered by unskilled and/or unlicensed personnel represent a vulnerability that could be placing beneficiaries at risk of receiving services that do not meet professionally recognized standards of care. To address these issues, we recommend CMS should consider revisions, clarifications, and further study of the " incident to " rule to ensure that Medicare beneficiaries are recei! ving skilled services from appropriately trained and licensed staff and that the services meet professionally recognized standards of care. Rick Gawenda, PT Director PM & R Detroit Receiving Hospital www.gawendaseminars.com HPA Government Affairs & Practice Committee __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2006 Report Share Posted August 28, 2006 Rick, Interesting. Do you remember back in 1998 when the Medicare wedge audits were performed on different aspects of the different disciplines of therapy; PT, OT, and ST as part of Bill Clinton's BBA to review Medicare abuse? Our state was one chosen for review of 10 charts which were Part A claims. If the audit found " inappropriate billing " , the facility had to pay medicare back for the services. Is this what medicare is imposing on the 91% of the claims they found here? Would sound fair. Matt Dvorak, PT Yankton, SD ________________________________ From: PTManager on behalf of Agan, Sent: Fri 8/25/2006 2:48 PM To: PTManager Subject: RE: OIG Report OIG Report IG today posts three reports to the website. As always, selecting the link immediately following the report title will take you directly to the full document. Physical Therapy Billed by Physicians (OEI-09-02-00200) http://www.oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-09-02-00200.pdf <http://www.oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-09-02-00200.pdf> OIG found that approximately 91 percent of physical therapy billed by physicians in the first 6 months of 2002 did not meet program requirements. These inappropriately paid services cost the program and its beneficiaries approximately $136 million. Because of inadequate documentation, reviewers had difficulty assessing the quality of the therapy services. In addition, we identified aberrances in physicians' billing patterns and unusually high volumes of claims that suggest physical therapy is vulnerable to abuse. Finally, physical therapy billed " incident to " physicians' professional services and rendered by unskilled and/or unlicensed personnel represent a vulnerability that could be placing beneficiaries at risk of receiving services that do not meet professionally recognized standards of care. To address these issues, we recommend CMS should consider revisions, clarifications, and further study of the " incident to " rule to ensure that Medicare beneficiaries are recei! ving skilled services from appropriately trained and licensed staff and that the services meet professionally recognized standards of care. Rick Gawenda, PT Director PM & R Detroit Receiving Hospital www.gawendaseminars.com HPA Government Affairs & Practice Committee __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.