Guest guest Posted February 6, 2006 Report Share Posted February 6, 2006 Kathy, You state, " If they are going to carry both licenses and practice/bill as a PT and a DC then you are held to the standards of both boards. " This very question, and the assumptions that we're making about what SHOULD happen is exactly my point. DC's I've come in contact with either believe that rehab performed by a DC isn't physical therapy, but rather chiropractic rehab, or that chiropractic envelopes all that physical therapy does --- like a lawyer to a paralegal. Creating DC/DPT's could create a situation where our skills are enveloped by chiropractic, and the " physical therapy is just a part of chiropractic " argument, strengthened. Either way, there is LARGE potential for DC's in states such as land, to complete the program, actually have the same skills that the DPT has, NEVER TAKE THE PT BOARDS, practice as a DPT, saying that it's just chiropractic . . . and then proclaim on a national stage how the program was useless, that it was an incomplete rehash of parts of their chiro education . . . and that all DC's should, in fact, be considered the superior to the DPT subordinate. It will only take ONE DC who slips under the radar of Dr. Paris for such a situation to occur, backed by the ACA's financial warchest. Make no mistake, it's larger in financial support, financial size, and arguably better utilized than the PT PAC. There is large potential for Dr. Paris to, by unintended consequence, create a situation for which clinicians will dearly pay professionally, and the APTA, PT PAC, and state boards of examiners may have to pay financially to fight. Call me an alarmist, call me a pessimist, but I don't think our profession has sufficiently congealed as a clinical doctoring profession that we're ready to handle any potentially negative fallout from even a small group of DC/DPT's with a concealed mission of being the " four horseman of DPT apocalypse. " A program like the one Dr. Paris proposes is a GOOD one, in my opinion, but the timing is, in my opinion, way, way off. We need to think larger about this. The program proposed could have much larger consequences than simply that of the individual DC/DPT. Let's not be naive. Drew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.