Guest guest Posted May 29, 2003 Report Share Posted May 29, 2003 Hi Rosemarie; Inulin is an indigestible set of primarily long chain sugars of different lengths.The shortest chain sugars (FOS) and the small amount of regular sugars in it can also be used by the wrong bacteria and yeasts, but the longer chain sugars in it can only be used by the correct bacteria. Increasing Inulin intake restores bowel health in many ways by controlling incorrect bacteria and yeasts in the long run. I've put up a couple of Inulin pages on my website: http://members.shaw.ca/duncancrow/ I also have a 110-page scientific review I'll be scanning in shortly. Native Inulin is easy to get in retail or industrial quantities, on the 'net or in the health food store. If the product is decribed as simply Inulin, it is native inulin. It costs about $16 a pound in retail quantities. Inulin can also be refined to remove regular and the shortest chain sugars for even more specific feeding of the correct bowel bacteria using only the longest chain sugars. This is a distinctly different product that costs about $18 a pound in retail quantities. Long-chain Inulin is the kind I make available because it will not interfere in any way with the candida or IBS diet, which often calls for eliminating all dietary sugars and starches. This Inulin will feed bifidobacteria and lactobacillus strains to restore bowel flora and little else. I'm primarily a practitioner but I do off-sales when I have it. I don't have any left right now but some should be in soon. Duncan Crow > > you mention inulin. this is the second time I've heard of this. what > does it do and where does one purchase it? > > it sounds like something I could use. > > thanks for the help. your email was very helpful. > > rosemarie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2003 Report Share Posted May 29, 2003 Hi Duncan You say you are a practioner... of what? I might have just misread that. Your email addy shows that you are in my neck of the woods.. do you find it difficult to get things here, at decent prices? Diane Re: inulin Hi Rosemarie; Inulin is an indigestible set of primarily long chain sugars of different lengths.The shortest chain sugars (FOS) and the small amount of regular sugars in it can also be used by the wrong bacteria and yeasts, but the longer chain sugars in it can only be used by the correct bacteria. Increasing Inulin intake restores bowel health in many ways by controlling incorrect bacteria and yeasts in the long run. I've put up a couple of Inulin pages on my website: http://members.shaw.ca/duncancrow/ I also have a 110-page scientific review I'll be scanning in shortly. Native Inulin is easy to get in retail or industrial quantities, on the 'net or in the health food store. If the product is decribed as simply Inulin, it is native inulin. It costs about $16 a pound in retail quantities. Inulin can also be refined to remove regular and the shortest chain sugars for even more specific feeding of the correct bowel bacteria using only the longest chain sugars. This is a distinctly different product that costs about $18 a pound in retail quantities. Long-chain Inulin is the kind I make available because it will not interfere in any way with the candida or IBS diet, which often calls for eliminating all dietary sugars and starches. This Inulin will feed bifidobacteria and lactobacillus strains to restore bowel flora and little else. I'm primarily a practitioner but I do off-sales when I have it. I don't have any left right now but some should be in soon. Duncan Crow > > you mention inulin. this is the second time I've heard of this. what > does it do and where does one purchase it? > > it sounds like something I could use. > > thanks for the help. your email was very helpful. > > rosemarie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2003 Report Share Posted July 10, 2003 Duncan Crow sells it and a lot of other stuff, many people on the site tend to purchase from him. Amy <Amelia@...> wrote: What is it? AND where can I buy it? Thanks Amy > Probiotics restore bowel pH. Candida dosen't survive the correct (acid) > pH in the bowel. In addition, probiotics produce toxins that don't affect > you but do effect the " bad " bacteria and yeasts. > > So the short answer is yes, take the lactobacillus. > > But probiotics by themselves don't work exceedingly well. A longer answer > is also eliminate sugar, starch alcohol from all sources and take inulin > or indigestible starch, or some other fermentable fiber, and eat foods > that contain same. > > Duncan Crow > > > I do have some acidop. in the refridgerator, > > but am not sure when or how to take it for the candida. Thanks so much. > > Connie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2003 Report Share Posted July 24, 2003 Hi Tari; If fiber smart is cellulose, clostridia bacteria can use it and that's not so good. If it's not broken down as feed by bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, you'll still need the inulin to feed them. Here's how to treat irritable bowel, crohn's and colitis yourself (besides eliminating problem foods for awhile): Coconut oil (or lauricidin) contains fatty acids that kill lots of bacteria, many of which can cause or aggravate IBS and IBD; coconut oil is nown to reduce symptoms in days. Inulin feeds the good bacteria at the expense of the bad; restoring the bowel bacteria has been proposed to control Crohn's, UC, and IBS. Doing so can start to control symptoms in a week to a few weeks. Foods contain inulin; you can also buy it by itself. Cold-processed whey isolate plus selenium increases the antioxidant glutathione, which is severly depleted in Crohn's patients and can be completely absent at the injured site. A full antioxidant program is better that taking only one. Low glutathione is linked to many diseases. All of the above has been part of the research for years. Probiotics can also be helpful until correct bowel culture is restored. More information is on my website. There's a lot of research material there that proves out the valididty of using this approach. > > I am starting on the threelac program but I am reading a lot about > constipation. If I take Fiber Smart, would I also have the need for > inulin. I have irritable bowel syndrom and don,t know which would be best, > or both. Tari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2003 Report Share Posted July 24, 2003 Thanks for the information Duncan. Fiber Smart put out by Renew life seems to have the neccesary ingredients. I was wondering if coconut oil would be a good addition since I have IBS. I don,t want to overdue it, and the fewer products I have to take I think will be the key as to whether I am successful or not. How is coconut oil presented, and how do you take it. Thanks, Tari Duncan Crow <duncancrow@...> wrote: Hi Tari; If fiber smart is cellulose, clostridia bacteria can use it and that's not so good. If it's not broken down as feed by bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, you'll still need the inulin to feed them. Here's how to treat irritable bowel, crohn's and colitis yourself (besides eliminating problem foods for awhile): Coconut oil (or lauricidin) contains fatty acids that kill lots of bacteria, many of which can cause or aggravate IBS and IBD; coconut oil is nown to reduce symptoms in days. Inulin feeds the good bacteria at the expense of the bad; restoring the bowel bacteria has been proposed to control Crohn's, UC, and IBS. Doing so can start to control symptoms in a week to a few weeks. Foods contain inulin; you can also buy it by itself. Cold-processed whey isolate plus selenium increases the antioxidant glutathione, which is severly depleted in Crohn's patients and can be completely absent at the injured site. A full antioxidant program is better that taking only one. Low glutathione is linked to many diseases. All of the above has been part of the research for years. Probiotics can also be helpful until correct bowel culture is restored. More information is on my website. There's a lot of research material there that proves out the valididty of using this approach. > > I am starting on the threelac program but I am reading a lot about > constipation. If I take Fiber Smart, would I also have the need for > inulin. I have irritable bowel syndrom and don,t know which would be best, > or both. Tari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2003 Report Share Posted July 24, 2003 Hey Tari here, I take coconut oil in the extra virgin form,,,interesting stuff it is..It becomes a liquid at approx 80 degrees and a solid anything below 77 degrees...You do not have to refrig it.... It has a mild taste of coconut... From: tari stoeckelmann <tarijo@...> Reply-candidiasis candidiasis Subject: Re: Re: inulin Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Thanks for the information Duncan. Fiber Smart put out by Renew life seems to have the neccesary ingredients. I was wondering if coconut oil would be a good addition since I have IBS. I don,t want to overdue it, and the fewer products I have to take I think will be the key as to whether I am successful or not. How is coconut oil presented, and how do you take it. Thanks, Tari Duncan Crow <duncancrow@...> wrote: Hi Tari; If fiber smart is cellulose, clostridia bacteria can use it and that's not so good. If it's not broken down as feed by bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, you'll still need the inulin to feed them. Here's how to treat irritable bowel, crohn's and colitis yourself (besides eliminating problem foods for awhile): Coconut oil (or lauricidin) contains fatty acids that kill lots of bacteria, many of which can cause or aggravate IBS and IBD; coconut oil is nown to reduce symptoms in days. Inulin feeds the good bacteria at the expense of the bad; restoring the bowel bacteria has been proposed to control Crohn's, UC, and IBS. Doing so can start to control symptoms in a week to a few weeks. Foods contain inulin; you can also buy it by itself. Cold-processed whey isolate plus selenium increases the antioxidant glutathione, which is severly depleted in Crohn's patients and can be completely absent at the injured site. A full antioxidant program is better that taking only one. Low glutathione is linked to many diseases. All of the above has been part of the research for years. Probiotics can also be helpful until correct bowel culture is restored. More information is on my website. There's a lot of research material there that proves out the valididty of using this approach. > > I am starting on the threelac program but I am reading a lot about > constipation. If I take Fiber Smart, would I also have the need for > inulin. I have irritable bowel syndrom and don,t know which would be best, > or both. Tari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2003 Report Share Posted December 18, 2003 Hi Duncan,I have been using inulin for about 3 weeks now.At first it caused me to be quite constipated but now I'm having regular bowl movements each morning.I have noticed that my stool has what I think are fine bits of yeast on it,like a scant fur coat(excuse the graphics).Is this a die off or a sign of something else?Also,I've noticed bits of undigested food.Any suggestions?Thanks,Donna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2003 Report Share Posted December 19, 2003 > > Hi Duncan,I have been using inulin for about 3 weeks now.At first it > caused me to be quite constipated but now I'm having regular bowl > movements each morning.I have noticed that my stool has what I think are > fine bits of yeast on it,like a scant fur coat(excuse the graphics).Is > this a die off or a sign of something else?Also,I've noticed bits of > undigested food.Any suggestions?Thanks,Donna > Hi Donna, Certainly sounds like it may be a wholesale slaughter, a changing of the guard so to speak, doesn't it? If you notice undigested food particles it's a sign that you should chew your food better. Digestion requires it. Inulin reduces transit time in constipated individuals provided they drink enough water, and increases fecal bulking somewhat in diarrhea, but digestion itself is the responsibility of enzymes and teeth. Digestive enzymes do not get very far into unchewed food. Really, I'm not making fun... glad to the hear the sugar-free inulin is working already (we knew it would Duncan Crow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2004 Report Share Posted January 7, 2004 > > Un fortunately I have asked at a number of healthfood shops both in london and > in Leeds where I live and it is impossible to get hold of as I have been told > that the owners can't obtain a license to sell as it is unproven here. The > only I have come across is an addition to a Lanes week long detox kit they > sell in Sainsbury's. I am trying to do it naturally by taking artichoke > tablets & other permissible veg although unfortunately chicory based coffee > also includes the coffee itself so planning on using dandelion root instead > hope that helps > > dawn > Hi Hi Dawn, Although inulin may be unavailable at the health food shop, it is used in a large industrial scale in the UK as a proven bifidogenic fiber additive in bread. Perhaps the Bakery will sell you a sack of it. To get enough artichoke tablets to be useful as an inulin supplement, bear in mind the dose you're aiming for is 12-15 grams daily of the inulin component. Dandelion or chicory root will be fine. To extract the inulin, smash and boil it, and use the broth, just as they did in ancient Greece. You'll need quite a lot though. Perhaps you should consider buying my sugar-free inulin; I've sent several packages to the UK just fine. Duncan Crow http://members.shaw.ca/duncancrow/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2004 Report Share Posted January 7, 2004 Here is some Inulin info that someone from the Leaky Gut forum posted: Chris Bucking the System Health Sciences Institute e-Alert December 15, 2003 ************************************************************** You have received this e-mail because you signed up to receive the HSI e-Alert through a special arrangement with Dr. Mercola's e-Healthy News e-letter. If you wish to permanently remove yourself from this mailing list, follow the instructions at the bottom of this page. Thank You. ************************************************************** Dear Reader, When I sent you an e-Alert last June about the nutritional value of buckwheat as a possible prebiotic (a carbohydrate that prompts the growth of " friendly " bacteria in the digestive tract), I didn't imagine that I'd have more to say about buckwheat just a few months later. Now a new study shows that buckwheat may also help diabetics lower blood glucose levels. And when you consider that buckwheat is also rich in omega-3 fatty acids, B vitamins, minerals, and essential amino acids, then you've got a food product that's primed and ready to become the next health- food superstar. ------------------------------------------------------------- Something in the mix ------------------------------------------------------------- As I told you in the e-Alert " To the Waffle House " (6/18/03), buckwheat is not a type of wheat or even a grain. In fact, technically it's a fruit. And because previous studies have shown that buckwheat may help increase insulin sensitivity, researchers at the Department of Human Nutritional Sciences at the University of Manitoba (UM) in Canada devised a study to examine the effects of buckwheat on elevated blood glucose levels. The UM scientists chemically induced type 1 diabetes in about 40 laboratory rats. The rats were fed either buckwheat extract or a placebo. When their blood glucose concentrations were measured, the rats given the buckwheat had glucose levels that were reduced 12 to 19 percent. There was no reduction of glucose concentration in any of the rats that received only placebo. The next step for the UM team will be to duplicate the test in rats induced with type 2 diabetes. The researchers predict that buckwheat will also lower glucose concentrations in the type 2 test. This prediction is based in part on previous studies that have shown how a component of buckwheat called chiro-inositol may prompt cells to become more insulin-sensitive. In a news release issued by the American Chemical Society, the lead author of the study, Carla G. , said their research demonstrates that buckwheat may provide diabetics with a " safe, easy and inexpensive way to lower glucose levels and reduce the risk of complications. " But until research can be done with human subjects, the researchers can't yet estimate just how much buckwheat would need to be eaten to create a beneficial effect on glucose levels. ------------------------------------------------------------- Helping the good guys ------------------------------------------------------------- Whether you eat buckwheat products to help with glucose concentrations or to reap the benefits of B vitamins and omega-3 fatty acids, there is another potential health benefit to eating buckwheat. As I said in the June e-Alert, researchers in Madrid, Spain, used a trial with rats to demonstrate that buckwheat may act as a prebiotic, encouraging the growth of probiotics - or friendly bacteria - in the digestive tract. At HSI we've written many times about the necessity of probiotic organisms. In a healthy individual, these beneficial bacteria inhabit the digestive tract in massive numbers, crowding out harmful bacteria, aiding digestion, and supporting immune function. This healthy " gut flora " produces valuable nutrients (including certain B vitamins and omega-3 fatty acids), digestive enzymes like lactase, and immune chemicals that fight harmful bacteria and even cancer cells. But this critical ecosystem is fragile and can be easily disturbed by any number of factors, including poor nutrition, stress, surgery, parasitic infestation, and synthetic drugs. When the number or activity level of your good bacteria drops too low, it opens the door for harmful bacteria to proliferate, allowing the opportunity for diseases to develop. Sufficient amounts of intestinal flora can be maintained through dietary sources such as cultured products like yogurt and kefir, and lignans such as flaxseed, carrots, spinach, cauliflower, broccoli, millet, and... buckwheat! ------------------------------------------------------------- The way of the buckwheat ------------------------------------------------------------- I asked HSI Panelist Allan Spreen, M.D., for his opinion on buckwheat, and he reminded me of the acronym " BROW, " which can help us remember which grains pose potential problems for diabetics. Dr. Spreen said: " Barley, rye, oat, and wheat (BROW) are the high-gluten grains, so buckwheat would be fine in their stead, as it is not a gluten-containing product. Buckwheat is a good flour to use for lots of purposes because it is difficult to refine, so to my knowledge they don't bother. " As an aside, for those who are trying to go 'gluten-free,' oat seems to not bother gluten-sensitive people that much, though it's in the BROW group. Personally, I've seen lots of people allergic to wheat but able to tolerate both barley and oat. Unprocessed forms are better, of course. " A search on the Internet will quickly turn up several sources that sell buckwheat. And many of those web sites also provide buckwheat recipes that go beyond pancakes, waffles, and noodles; the three food items that buckwheat is most well known for. But if you do whip up some buckwheat waffles, you might try sweetening them with buckwheat honey, which happens to have much higher antioxidant levels than typical lighter honeys. It seems you just can't go wrong when you go with the buckwheat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2004 Report Share Posted January 7, 2004 About the buckwheat article, which says correctly enough that buckwheat is a prebiotic..... Sure it's a prebiotic, but natural prebiotics contain a lot of natural sugars and starches that the yeast and unwanted bacteria will thank you for, very much! Not only that, but most prebiotics also contain enough short-chained FOS that many unwanted bacteria can use. Following advice like " eat buckwheat " leads into the trap of continued bowel dysbiosis, the double whammy you want to avoid, that a lot of practitioners don't know about yet. If you use these foods at all, which is unwise for a candida patient, you'd have to use sugar-free inulin to try and provide a preponderance of prebiotic that only the bifidobacteria and to a certain extent, lactobacilli, can eat. Duncan Crow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 8, 2004 Report Share Posted January 8, 2004 Duncan, I think (I'm not trying to speak for you) might be a little frustrated about the wealth of information found here and probably just wants to start feeling better! I can sympathize with her on that. But I also would like to say that I appreciate all of your free advice. I know that you reference your website about some products that you sell, but I also know that your website offers general knowledge about products, too, and that you almost always offer other places to find similar items (in other words, you're not just pushing your product!). Thanks again - > > > > Isn't buckwheat a grain? So we cant eat grains now either? Surely we're > > not meant to subsist solely on doses of inulin we buy from you? > > > > , of course you can't use grains. That's what booze is brewed from, > using yeast, which uses starches and sugars. > > There still remain 200 vegetables that you can use safely even if you have > candida. Just remove the bulk of the starch and sugar from your diet. How > hard could it be? > > Help everybody, I think is picking on me ... Please, , > just take a look at the information the rest of the group has posted. I can > assure you I'm not making anything up. > > Duncan Crow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 6, 2005 Report Share Posted May 6, 2005 Jeanne, see our files for the article " Prebiotics FOS & Inulin Not Recommended " . Adding them to products seems to be the latest greatest marketing ploy. Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2005 Report Share Posted June 12, 2005 > I decided to use Glucomannan other than Inulin, to help reseed the > gut, but have seen no real results. > http://www.breakingtheviciouscycle.info/knowledge_base/kb/inulin.htm Yeah, that link has been kicking around the health groups for a long time... ly I think it's a lot of non-science and emotionally charged junk opinion. It's a poor piece, Imo. I'm sure the scd pundits would be against anything that promotes any microbial activity in the gut in any way including glucomannan. I don't think you would see much difference in prebiotic activity between the various long chain oligosaccharides. > All the Glyconutrients have so much hype attached to them that I am > leery of even the " research " they refer to. > Ambrotose ka$$ching. Open to better info on this one. Glyconutrients are another area of interest, they are essential sugars that the body needs and can't make. They are involved with the immune system and the healing of autoimmune disease. This is a good site: www.glycoscience.org Bruce > --Terry > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Huh. That was interesting, Bruce. There were several long threads about inulin on some other lists and I don't think I saw your viewpoint represented. Off to see Sandor Katz in Pennsylvania.... Ron > > I decided to use Glucomannan other than Inulin, to help reseed the > > gut, but have seen no real results. > > > http://www.breakingtheviciouscycle.info/knowledge_base/kb/inulin.htm > > Yeah, that link has been kicking around the health groups for a long > time... ly I think it's a lot of non-science and emotionally > charged junk opinion. It's a poor piece, Imo. > > I'm sure the scd pundits would be against anything > that promotes any microbial activity in the gut in any way including > glucomannan. I don't think you would see much difference in prebiotic > activity between the various long chain oligosaccharides. > > > All the Glyconutrients have so much hype attached to them that I am > > leery of even the " research " they refer to. > > Ambrotose ka$$ching. Open to better info on this one. > > Glyconutrients are another area of interest, they are essential sugars > that the body needs and can't make. They are involved with the immune > system and the healing of autoimmune disease. This is a good > site: www.glycoscience.org > > Bruce > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --Terry > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 > That was interesting, Bruce. There were several long threads about > inulin on some other lists and I don't think I saw your viewpoint > represented. I weighed in early to mixed reviews. ;-) I do think the scd diet can be a useful method of treatment for inflammatory bowel disorders. I have recommended it to people in the health food store where I used to work. I just don't think it is a good management strategy for long term bowel health. Bruce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2005 Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 Would " He " be the infamous Duncan Crow? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2005 Report Share Posted August 13, 2005 On Aug 12, 2005, at 10:05 PM, theindiancreek@... wrote: > Would " He " be the infamous Duncan Crow? Yes. It is Duncan Crow. A lot of people seem to have something against this guy. What is the deal with him and inulin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2005 Report Share Posted August 13, 2005 > On Aug 12, 2005, at 10:05 PM, theindiancreek@a... wrote: > > > Would " He " be the infamous Duncan Crow? > > Yes. It is Duncan Crow. A lot of people seem to have something against this guy. What is the deal with him and inulin? Dear Mark & , I've had many disagreements with Duncan Crow and his ideas/product pushing. When I had more time I was a regular contributor on the Candidiasis Group, but when I started working full time I couldn't keep up with both groups. So I am very familiar with Duncan Crow. A number of my articles are posted in the Candidiasis Group files - see Bee's Folder. The moderator and I have had many discussions off-line, and she initally requested my articles for the group. I went to Duncan's website and found that some of the products he pushes he also sells. Interesting no? Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2005 Report Share Posted August 13, 2005 InSulin??? Or what is Inulin? [ ] Inulin To Bee or anyone else: There is quite a debate raging on another candida group about the benefits or lack thereof of inulin. Specifically, there is a wholistic practitioner on the group who believes that the body needs inulin as a prebiotic in order for probiotics to flourish. His belief is that inulin is an important part of the natural diet, and that it is lacking from the modern diet. He goes on to say that most people who believe that inulin feeds yeast have not realized that it is often confused with and/or mixed with FOS, and/or sugars. His belief is that only pure isolated inulin works if it cannot otherwise be obtained from natural sources, and that it is an important supplement in returning the natural balance of flora to the intestines. This all sounds very logical to me, but there are some people on the list who are very vocal in their ciriticsm of this belief and of the practitioner who preaches it. I have heard that probiotics are useless if there is no prebiotic in place and that most of the probiotics don't make it past the stomach. I have also heard that the probiotics are already there, but need to be fed. If this is true than maybe inulin would be helpful. If not, then I would likke to hear that. I would be very interested to hear what you, Bee, and anyone else on the list thinks about all this. -MM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2005 Report Share Posted August 13, 2005 Dear Caroline - it's not insulin, it's inulin. See the article I posted above to find out what it is. Bee > InSulin??? Or what is Inulin? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 Bill- scroll down this link about inulin and allergic reactions for a list of foods that naturally contain inulin: http://allergies.about.com/cs/inulin/a/aa051500a.htm g > Anyone tell me what the natural sources (food?) are for inulin? > > gracias > > Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2005 Report Share Posted August 16, 2005 > scroll down this link about inulin and allergic reactions for a list > of foods that naturally contain inulin: > > http://allergies.about.com/cs/inulin/a/aa051500a.htm > > g G wrote today that he dislikes the very idea of inulin, then he identifies for us this article which is emotional, speculative and with little substance. The similarity did not escape me. The article listed just a few veggies although ALL vegetables contain inulin. SOME vegetables produce allergic reactions, but this may not have anything to do with the inulin. The article is titled " Inulin May Trigger an Allergic Reaction " to capur the audience and add drama. The story however does not live up to the drama because the article itself says " ...there are no other reports on inulin reactions.... " , referring to the only anaphylaxis case ever documented in what has been five millennia of continual use. Anaphylaxis is a potentially fatal allergic reaction, not a mere food sensitivity. We know that anaphylactic shock is rarely due to the inulin itself because obviously if all vegetables contain it (even wheat, albeit at trace amounts), if a person ate any vegetables at all, particularly the higher inulin-containing foods, he'd have a serious reaction. Nevertheless, the article charges on and recommends labeling based on the single inulin allergy. I doubt labeling will not save many more than one life in the next millennia or so. Duncan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2005 Report Share Posted August 16, 2005 Duncan- so the individual cited had a reaction appears to be a simple fact, funny that it would bother you. the page does indeed have the foods listed and a good general discription of inulin. not sure why you would have a problem with that. besides, my beef with inulin has nothing to do with allergies, just that it doesn't work to clear a candida overgrowth. Where is an article that says it will? or even a real person who says so? My recollection of being on this forum for a few years was that not a single person claimed that inulin helped them overcome candida. that sums up my problem with it. your sales tactics are what they are. thankfully with google, anyone who does want to experiment with things like inulin does not have to pay your outrageous prices. so back to a point I raised earlier, since you are here to help, where is your plan for overcoming candida? with all the posts you do here about inulin, whey and other products, surely you have time to lay out a simple strategy for overcoming candada? a book? you could even sell that. maybe its just me, but some might find that helpful. john g > > scroll down this link about inulin and allergic reactions for a list > > of foods that naturally contain inulin: > > > > http://allergies.about.com/cs/inulin/a/aa051500a.htm > > > > g > > G wrote today that he dislikes the very idea of inulin, then he > identifies for us this article which is emotional, speculative and > with little substance. The similarity did not escape me. > > The article listed just a few veggies although ALL vegetables contain > inulin. SOME vegetables produce allergic reactions, but this may not > have anything to do with the inulin. > > The article is titled " Inulin May Trigger an Allergic Reaction " to > capur the audience and add drama. The story however does not live up > to the drama because the article itself says " ...there are no other > reports on inulin reactions.... " , referring to the only anaphylaxis > case ever documented in what has been five millennia of continual > use. Anaphylaxis is a potentially fatal allergic reaction, not a mere > food sensitivity. > > We know that anaphylactic shock is rarely due to the inulin itself > because obviously if all vegetables contain it (even wheat, albeit at > trace amounts), if a person ate any vegetables at all, particularly > the higher inulin-containing foods, he'd have a serious reaction. > > Nevertheless, the article charges on and recommends labeling based on > the single inulin allergy. I doubt labeling will not save many more > than one life in the next millennia or so. > > Duncan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 > Duncan, could you please comment on this infprmation? it comes from an > article on the westonprice-site. thank you, Andreea > " Of course all table sugar should be avoided as well as high fructose > corn syrup. (Fructose is a monosaccharide, but high fructose corn > syrup also contains sucrose, which is a disaccharide.) Also a problem > for those with digestive prolems are potatoes and corn—considered > vegetables, but, when cooked, are really starches. One of the worst > foods for those with digestive problems is the Jerusalem artichoke > (tubers from the sunflower family). These contain complex > carbohydrates called inulins, which are extremely difficult to break > down. " The passage is either out of context or misses the point. From a digestive standpoint mentioned in the piece, inulins are supposed to be difficult to break down, as mammals do not produce the specific enzymes required to do it. Inulins are a class of indigestible soluble fiber that feeds probiotic bacteria that correct bowel problems. As the inulin is fermented by bacteria they produce short chain fatty acids, bacteriocins, acetic and lactic acids, and anti-cancer enzymes. Duncan Crow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.