Guest guest Posted October 22, 2001 Report Share Posted October 22, 2001 Hi , I'm so sorry to hear about you mother, but I received an email saying the shot was like being on a transplant list. I have the same question you did about the voice. I know of no ALS person whose voice has not been affected. I met several people with PLS who talk just fine though. You mentioned your mother went down hill fast, how long did it take for a diagnosis. I have not been diagnosis yet. My foot drags occasionally when I don't concentrate, and my voice slurs when I'm tired. How did your mother's happen, and at what rate did she go down hill? Did it take her months, or a year? The reason I'm curious is because a year ago, I first noticed my symptoms, and I'm still living a normal life; however I received a call that my spinal fluid was abnormal, and I'm trying to figure out my future. Any help you have time to give me would be deeply appreciated. Especially when it refers to the time progression of the disease. My prayer are with you, Donna Into/jennifer movie/stem cells hi there, This is my first post. I take care of my mom who was diagnosed with ALS 8/99 she has gone down hill pretty quickly and she has pretty much said she will not make it to her 50th birthday (a year and a half away). She does not want a bi-pap, trak (sp?), feeding tube, or anything that keeps her alive longer than she can do on her own. Anyway, I saw the movie tonight too and I thought it was a great movie. I was only surprised that her voice was still as good as it was in the movie. I know that with some people it is different, but I have not seen many people that had a voice that was still good. My mom is really hard to understand now she is getting a voice translator machine Monday and that should help some. I would hope that stem cells are going to be tested on humans soon. But I wonder when the movie was made because they were still saying 9months to a year. I like the idea of stem cells being used but I know there is a lot of arguments about the stem cells and I can not help but wonder if that might stop/slow things down. That is all for now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2001 Report Share Posted October 22, 2001 , Blessings to you and your mom. I am so very sorry that she is not doing so well. I was surprised with 's voice too, as I know that is not the usual. I really wish the Stem Cell " shot " would hurry up and get here too. (((((Hugs))))) to you and your mom. I'll pray for both of you. Laurel Into/jennifer movie/stem cells > hi there, > This is my first post. I take care of my mom who was > diagnosed with ALS 8/99 she has gone down hill pretty quickly > and she has pretty much said she will not make it to her 50th > birthday (a year and a half away). She does not want a bi-pap, > trak (sp?), feeding tube, or anything that keeps her alive longer > than she can do on her own. > > Anyway, I saw the movie tonight too and I thought it > was a great movie. I was only surprised that her voice was still > as good as it was in the movie. I know that with some people it > is different, but I have not seen many people that had a voice > that was still good. My mom is really hard to understand now > she is getting a voice translator machine Monday and that > should help some. > > I would hope that stem cells are going to be tested on humans > soon. But I wonder when the movie was made because they > were still saying 9months to a year. I like the idea of stem cells > being used but I know there is a lot of arguments about the > stem cells and I can not help but wonder if that might stop/slow > things down. > > That is all for now > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2001 Report Share Posted October 22, 2001 My mom noticed it in her hand first. She was having problems using the computer/mouse. She never had her spinal fluid tested so she does not know about that. She suggests thatyou get your doctor to sign you over to a nerologist. Hope this helps ******************************** Look into the past, you could see the future! ******************************** http://www.visi.com/~design1 > Hi , > I'm so sorry to hear about you mother, but I received an email saying the shot was like being on a transplant list. I have the same question you did about the voice. I know of no ALS person whose voice has not been affected. I met several people with PLS who talk just fine though. You mentioned your mother went down hill fast, how long did it take for a diagnosis. I have not been diagnosis yet. My foot drags occasionally when I don't concentrate, and my voice slurs when I'm tired. How did your mother's happen, and at what rate did she go down hill? Did it take her months, or a year? The reason I'm curious is because a year ago, I first noticed my symptoms, and I'm still living a normal life; however I received a call that my spinal fluid was abnormal, and I'm trying to figure out my future. Any help you have time to give me would be deeply appreciated. Especially when it refers to the time progression of the disease. > My prayer are with you, > Donna > Into/jennifer movie/stem cells > > > hi there, > This is my first post. I take care of my mom who was > diagnosed with ALS 8/99 she has gone down hill pretty quickly > and she has pretty much said she will not make it to her 50th > birthday (a year and a half away). She does not want a bi-pap, > trak (sp?), feeding tube, or anything that keeps her alive longer > than she can do on her own. > > Anyway, I saw the movie tonight too and I thought it > was a great movie. I was only surprised that her voice was still > as good as it was in the movie. I know that with some people it > is different, but I have not seen many people that had a voice > that was still good. My mom is really hard to understand now > she is getting a voice translator machine Monday and that > should help some. > > I would hope that stem cells are going to be tested on humans > soon. But I wonder when the movie was made because they > were still saying 9months to a year. I like the idea of stem cells > being used but I know there is a lot of arguments about the > stem cells and I can not help but wonder if that might stop/slow > things down. > > That is all for now > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2001 Report Share Posted October 22, 2001 Donna, Your request for info on progression time of ALS/PLS is one even ALS specialists can't answer. Some people die within 6 months, others live 20 years or more. There are some statistice on the ALS Survival Guide http://www.lougehrigsdisease.net/als_vital_stats.htm 50% of ALS patients die within 18 months of diagnosis. 80% of ALS patients die within 5 years of diagnosis. 10% live more than 10 years. PLS is another big question mark. The average course of PLS is 20 years, but can vary greatly. Since most PLSers develop the disease later in life, a 20 year span does not normally shorten their life. But for a person with onset earlier in life, it might be a different story. There is also another issue involved. The truth of the matter is that there is not widely accepted (or followed) diagnostic criteria of what PLS is. Recent posts regarding studies of 20 PLSers in Paris (Does PLS Exist) compared with the 10 patient study in the Netherlands (Primary lateral sclerosis: clinical, neurophysiological, and magnetic resonance findings) is a good example. In the Paris study, all participants showed some kind of pseudobulbar symptoms (dysarthria and compulsive laughing or crying). The criteria was: " the main clinical feature was a tetrapyramidal syndrome (tetra means 4) with hyperactive deep tendon reflexes and bilateral Babinski and Hoffman signs. In the Netherlands study, while saying that the eventual development of pseudobulbar symtpoms was necessary in a PLS diagnosis, only half of the participants actually showed pseudobulbar symptoms. And one person in the study that showed no pseudobulbar symptoms had a disease duration of 35 years. But the report states: " The main finding in all patients was severe spasticity with accompanying corticospinal tract signs such as hyperreflexia, Babinski's sign, pseudobulbar reflexes, and masseter hyperreflexia. " They say " such as " , not that they showed all of these signs. Later in the report: " Hereditary spastic paralysis was ruled out by a meticulous family history. " HSP causes " severe spasticity with accompanying corticospinal tract signs such as hyperreflexia " and as stated in Dr. Fink's paper: " it is an important element in the diagnosis of uncomplicated HSP that the upper extremities, speech, swallowing, and cranial nerves remain functionally normal. " We have learned that HSP can and does occur sporadically. So are the 5 patients in the Netherland study that did not develop bulbar symptoms a more benign PLS or are they a sporadic form of HSP? Is HSP really a form of PLS? Is PLS really a form of ALS. There is now concrete evidence of a genetic link to ALS thanks to Dr. Siddiques discovery of the first PLS gene. Will they find subsequent links to HSP? Until some of these questions are answered, the prognosis for PLS will be cloudy. How can anyone say what the progression will be when there are possibly two groups of people being included in the study? I think it is important to develop firm diagnostic criteria that is recognized globally. If it is found that there are two PLS syndromes, then studies need to be targeted at one syndrome or the other, not a mixed bag. Just my humble opinion! ===== Thomson, Solana Beach, CA www.geocities.com/mdmfoo/pls.html __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2001 Report Share Posted October 22, 2001 : It's so good that you're actively interested and asking questions that may help your mom. I know my family's interest and support gives me a boost like nothing else could. In the support group of about 8 ALSers that I go to (Plano, TX) only one has voice problems, and they all have different lengths of time since dx. Go figure. About the movie, check out the website http://www.projectals.org in Texas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2001 Report Share Posted October 28, 2001 Dear , Thanks so much for your help. I just got out of the hospital for a five day treatment of MS. That is what they think I have. A tad better that the alternative, but still not good. Thanks for all your help and support, keep up the wonderful work. Donna Re: Into/jennifer movie/stem cells Donna, Your request for info on progression time of ALS/PLSis one even ALS specialists can't answer. Some peopledie within 6 months, others live 20 years or more. There are some statistice on the ALS Survival Guide http://www.lougehrigsdisease.net/als_vital_stats.htm50% of ALS patients die within 18 months of diagnosis.80% of ALS patients die within 5 years of diagnosis.10% live more than 10 years.PLS is another big question mark. The average courseof PLS is 20 years, but can vary greatly. Since mostPLSers develop the disease later in life, a 20 yearspan does not normally shorten their life. But for aperson with onset earlier in life, it might be adifferent story. There is also another issueinvolved.The truth of the matter is that there is not widelyaccepted (or followed) diagnostic criteria of what PLSis. Recent posts regarding studies of 20 PLSers inParis (Does PLS Exist) compared with the 10 patientstudy in the Netherlands (Primary lateral sclerosis:clinical, neurophysiological, and magnetic resonancefindings) is a good example. In the Paris study, all participants showed some kindof pseudobulbar symptoms (dysarthria and compulsivelaughing or crying). The criteria was:"the mainclinical feature was a tetrapyramidal syndrome (tetrameans 4) with hyperactive deep tendon reflexes andbilateral Babinski and Hoffman signs. In theNetherlands study, while saying that the eventualdevelopment of pseudobulbar symtpoms was necessary ina PLS diagnosis, only half of the participantsactually showed pseudobulbar symptoms. And one personin the study that showed no pseudobulbar symptoms hada disease duration of 35 years. But the reportstates:"The main finding in all patients was severespasticity with accompanying corticospinal tract signssuch as hyperreflexia, Babinski's sign, pseudobulbarreflexes, and masseter hyperreflexia." They say "suchas", not that they showed all of these signs. Laterin the report: "Hereditary spastic paralysis was ruledout by a meticulous family history." HSP causes"severe spasticity with accompanying corticospinaltract signs such as hyperreflexia" and as stated inDr. Fink's paper:"it is an important element in thediagnosis of uncomplicated HSP that the upperextremities, speech, swallowing, and cranial nervesremain functionally normal." We have learned that HSPcan and does occur sporadically. So are the 5patients in the Netherland study that did not developbulbar symptoms a more benign PLS or are they asporadic form of HSP? Is HSP really a form of PLS? Is PLS really a form of ALS. There is now concreteevidence of a genetic link to ALS thanks to Dr.Siddiques discovery of the first PLS gene. Will theyfind subsequent links to HSP?Until some of these questions are answered, theprognosis for PLS will be cloudy. How can anyone saywhat the progression will be when there are possiblytwo groups of people being included in the study? Ithink it is important to develop firm diagnosticcriteria that is recognized globally. If it is foundthat there are two PLS syndromes, then studies need tobe targeted at one syndrome or the other, not a mixedbag.Just my humble opinion!===== Thomson, Solana Beach, CAwww.geocities.com/mdmfoo/pls.html__________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2001 Report Share Posted October 28, 2001 Donna, I am so very glad to hear it's probably MS! I am so glad there is treatment and hope it works well. Keep us posted. Lavon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2001 Report Share Posted October 28, 2001 Thanks so much Lavon, I've been with all of you through my dx and appreciate all of your help. My best to you as well. Donna Re: Into/jennifer movie/stem cells Donna, I am so very glad to hear it's probably MS! I am so glad there is treatment and hope it works well. Keep us posted. Lavon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.