Guest guest Posted April 2, 2007 Report Share Posted April 2, 2007 " ...Coconut oil is high in salicylates, which many people are sensitive too, and stevia has some questionable side effects in animals like depressing testosterone, and cinnamon is full of a variety of foreign chemicals that could theoretically produce adverse effects in some people. " i find the above statement disturbing... i take all of them...is there anything that IS safe? *sigh* diana -- love is all there is... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2007 Report Share Posted April 2, 2007 plants evolve toxic defences to stop things eating them. and we evolve defences against the toxins - that's what the liver does. that's a usual situation, not unusual. unless you have a specific allergy or intolerance, the amount that you need to worry about these natural foodstuffs, consumed in ordinary amounts, is negligible compared to the risks from manmade toxins in food like trans-fats. stick with them and enjoy! --- In , " diana gia " <babygirl.di@...> wrote: > > " ...Coconut oil is high in salicylates, which many people are sensitive too, > and stevia has some questionable side effects in animals like depressing > testosterone, and cinnamon is full of a variety of foreign chemicals that > could theoretically produce adverse effects in some people. " > > i find the above statement disturbing... i take all of them...is there > anything that IS safe? *sigh* > > diana > > > -- > love is all there is... > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2007 Report Share Posted April 2, 2007 , > " ...Coconut oil is high in salicylates, which many people are sensitive too, > and stevia has some questionable side effects in animals like depressing > testosterone, and cinnamon is full of a variety of foreign chemicals that > could theoretically produce adverse effects in some people. " > > i find the above statement disturbing... i take all of them...is there > anything that IS safe? *sigh* No, there isn't a single thing on the face of the earth that is safe for everyone. So relax. :-) Chris -- The Truth About Cholesterol Find Out What Your Doctor Isn't Telling You: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2007 Report Share Posted April 2, 2007 Yes, I like the phrase, " all things in moderation " . Allyn _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Masterjohn Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 12:11 PM Subject: Re: Re: coconut oil, stevia and cinnamon , > " ...Coconut oil is high in salicylates, which many people are sensitive too, > and stevia has some questionable side effects in animals like depressing > testosterone, and cinnamon is full of a variety of foreign chemicals that > could theoretically produce adverse effects in some people. " > > i find the above statement disturbing... i take all of them...is there > anything that IS safe? *sigh* No, there isn't a single thing on the face of the earth that is safe for everyone. So relax. :-) Chris -- The Truth About Cholesterol Find Out What Your Doctor Isn't Telling You: http://www.choleste <http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com> rol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2007 Report Share Posted April 2, 2007 Allyn, > Yes, I like the phrase, " all things in moderation " . That's not really what I meant. Some people can't tolerate moderate amounts of certain things, and, although I agree with you in the sense that most people can tolerate most things in moderation, what I was trying to say was that virtually any given thing has some group of people who don't tolerate it well, so one cannot fear everything that isn't tolerated by some group of people or there will be nothing to eat. At the same time, if you have a health problem that you can't get to the bottom of, you may need to consider removing certain things from your diet or limiting them with more strict moderation than the typical person would consider to be moderate. As to the general virtue of moderation, I find it interesting that mice who perpetually alternate fasting one day with eating twice as much food as normal the other day live longer (two extremes), have lower rates of cancer and have protection from excitotoxic injury to the nervous system compared to mice who eat moderate amounts of food every day. Chris -- The Truth About Cholesterol Find Out What Your Doctor Isn't Telling You: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2007 Report Share Posted April 2, 2007 > >> > As to the general virtue of moderation, I find it interesting that > mice who perpetually alternate fasting one day with eating twice as > much food as normal the other day live longer (two extremes), have > lower rates of cancer and have protection from excitotoxic injury >to > the nervous system compared to mice who eat moderate amounts of >food > every day. > I love that idea, think of the time saved not having to make meals and eat every other day! Just one problem, how do people actually go for a day with out eating - and still be able to keep your mind on work, etc with out fighting with your stomach about how empty it is? Or, am I the only one who actually gets hunger Pains? I suppose I could just be 'weak', but then I had a home-birth and I don't think I could call that any where near pain-free! ~Jan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2007 Report Share Posted April 2, 2007 --- Masterjohn <chrismasterjohn@...> wrote: > No, there isn't a single thing on the face of the earth that is safe > for everyone. So relax. :-) Yes, even water can kill you. Too much or too little. Read about that nasty DHMO here: http://www.dhmo.org/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2007 Report Share Posted April 3, 2007 I'd like to see who did the research against stevia. If you get a chance to see " Sweet Remedy " they have a whole segment about when Monsanto owned Nutrasweet and was trying to keep stevia from being accepted as a sweetener because of the competition it would have caused for their product (which has known excitotoxic effects!). They are the reason that stevia cannot be marketed as a sweeter and must be sold as a " health supplement " ! I'd bet that they are the ones who did the study against stevia. They're very good at making " research " come out with the results they want. > > " ...Coconut oil is high in salicylates, which many people are sensitive too, > and stevia has some questionable side effects in animals like depressing > testosterone, and cinnamon is full of a variety of foreign chemicals that > could theoretically produce adverse effects in some people. " > > i find the above statement disturbing... i take all of them...is there > anything that IS safe? *sigh* > > diana > > > -- > love is all there is... > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2007 Report Share Posted April 3, 2007 Renate, > I'd like to see who did the research against stevia. If you get a > chance to see " Sweet Remedy " they have a whole segment about when > Monsanto owned Nutrasweet and was trying to keep stevia from being > accepted as a sweetener because of the competition it would have > caused for their product (which has known excitotoxic effects!). > They are the reason that stevia cannot be marketed as a sweeter and > must be sold as a " health supplement " ! I'd bet that they are the > ones who did the study against stevia. They're very good at > making " research " come out with the results they want. While I consider it much more likely that the stevia research was a conspiracy than the excitotoxin research because I, like everyone else, hate Monsanto, I don't think it would hurt the few people getting tired after raw egg shakes to try raw eggs alone and to consider the possibility that one of the other components in the shake, including the stevia, could be the problem. Chris -- The Truth About Cholesterol Find Out What Your Doctor Isn't Telling You: http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2007 Report Share Posted April 3, 2007 Jan wrote: Just one problem, how do people actually > go for a day with out eating - and still be able to keep your mind > on work, etc with out fighting with your stomach about how empty it > is? Or, am I the only one who actually gets hunger Pains? > > I suppose I could just be 'weak', but then I had a home-birth and I > don't think I could call that any where near pain-free! > > ~Jan > Hi Jan, In my experience, if you're used to eating at specific times of day, your stomach releases acid at those times and creates that sick, empty feeling of " hunger " . It will usually pass with time, or after drinking mineral water or a bit of baking soda mixed with water. My other guess is that it could have something to do with a blood sugar/insulin imbalance, although that's my layperson's opinion, not scientific/medical proof, I've never measured my blood sugar/insulin. -Kyra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2007 Report Share Posted April 5, 2007 > > > Just one problem, how do people actually > > go for a day with out eating - and still be able to keep your >mind > > on work, etc with out fighting with your stomach about how empty >it > > is? Or, am I the only one who actually gets hunger Pains? > > >>> Hi Jan, >>> In my experience, if you're used to eating at specific times of >>>day, >>> your stomach releases acid at those times and creates that sick, >>>empty >>> feeling of " hunger " . It will usually pass with time, or after >>>drinking >>> mineral water or a bit of baking soda mixed with water. >>> My other guess is that it could have something to do with a blood >>> sugar/insulin imbalance, although that's my layperson's opinion, >>>not > >>scientific/medical proof, I've never measured my blood >>>sugar/insulin. > >>> -Kyra > Kyra, I've always had widely different meal times (for better or worse )so I don't think it's that, but I think there is something to the sugar issue. I notice if I stay away from complex carbs (I already stay away from sugars, I really have that roller coaster effect from them), like grains, potatoes and rice, I am able to go for much longer times without feeling like I'm starving - which I'm of course NOT, but just feel like it. Anything will do at those times, I don't crave a certain item -like carbs- I think when I do reach for carbs, it's just because it's fast. Of course then the cycle starts again, so I found I have to be very careful in making time to choose high fat, protien with veggies to go longer times between eating. ~Jan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.