Guest guest Posted December 14, 2000 Report Share Posted December 14, 2000 Poor Mike, he has a deformed boner. Jeff W. My MRI OK guys and gals, here is my MRI report. Have not heard back from Dr. Chen yet. Mike History: Type ii Neurofibromatosis. Bilateral internal auditory canal acoustic neuromas with previous surgery. History of neuromas of righ hypoglossal nerve. History of biternporal craniotomies. Previous surgery was in 1995 and 1996. Previous study of 3/1/99 is not available for comparison. There is some deformity and increased signal over the cilvus, nonspecific. There is also bony deformity of the internal auditory canals consistent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2000 Report Share Posted December 14, 2000 Wow, that's interesting! But good! What is the change with the hypoglossal? That's a nerve, isn't it? marie Re: My MRI >Just heard from Dr. Chen, the only real change was the hypoglossal nerve, >and that we are just going to keep an eye on. >Mike > >At 09:45 AM 12/14/2000 -0500, you wrote: > >>OK guys and gals, here is my MRI report. Have not heard back from Dr. Chen >>yet. >>Mike >> >> >>History: Type ii Neurofibromatosis. Bilateral internal auditory canal >>acoustic neuromas with previous surgery. History of neuromas of righ >>hypoglossal nerve. History of biternporal craniotomies. Previous surgery >>was in 1995 and 1996. >> >>Previous study of 3/1/99 is not available for comparison. >> >>There is some deformity and increased signal over the cilvus, nonspecific. >> >>There is also bony deformity of the internal auditory canals consistent >>with previous surgery, with mild enhancement. This was noted on the >>previous study of 1999, and recurrent neurofibromas cannot be excluded on >>the basis of this study. Also, there is curvilinear increased signal in the >>region of the right hypoglossal canal measuring approximately 10 x 14 x 14 >>mm, consistent with patients history of neurofibroma. This apparently >>measured 8 x 13 mm in length on the precious study. >> >>There is question of some enhancement in the region of the jugular foramen >>bilaterally. >> >>The ventricles are in the midline. No definite midline shift or mass >>effect. The diffusion images appear unremarkable. >> >>Impression: >> 1.) Post-surgical changes with bony deformity of the internal auditory >>canals bilaterally. >> 2.) Mild enhancement of the internal auditory canals bilaterally, >>suggestive of recurrent neurofibromas. >> 3.) Approximate 10 X 14 X 14 mm enhancing density, right hypoglossal >>canal consistent with a neuroma > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2000 Report Share Posted December 14, 2000 Wow, that's interesting! But good! What is the change with the hypoglossal? That's a nerve, isn't it? marie Re: My MRI >Just heard from Dr. Chen, the only real change was the hypoglossal nerve, >and that we are just going to keep an eye on. >Mike > >At 09:45 AM 12/14/2000 -0500, you wrote: > >>OK guys and gals, here is my MRI report. Have not heard back from Dr. Chen >>yet. >>Mike >> >> >>History: Type ii Neurofibromatosis. Bilateral internal auditory canal >>acoustic neuromas with previous surgery. History of neuromas of righ >>hypoglossal nerve. History of biternporal craniotomies. Previous surgery >>was in 1995 and 1996. >> >>Previous study of 3/1/99 is not available for comparison. >> >>There is some deformity and increased signal over the cilvus, nonspecific. >> >>There is also bony deformity of the internal auditory canals consistent >>with previous surgery, with mild enhancement. This was noted on the >>previous study of 1999, and recurrent neurofibromas cannot be excluded on >>the basis of this study. Also, there is curvilinear increased signal in the >>region of the right hypoglossal canal measuring approximately 10 x 14 x 14 >>mm, consistent with patients history of neurofibroma. This apparently >>measured 8 x 13 mm in length on the precious study. >> >>There is question of some enhancement in the region of the jugular foramen >>bilaterally. >> >>The ventricles are in the midline. No definite midline shift or mass >>effect. The diffusion images appear unremarkable. >> >>Impression: >> 1.) Post-surgical changes with bony deformity of the internal auditory >>canals bilaterally. >> 2.) Mild enhancement of the internal auditory canals bilaterally, >>suggestive of recurrent neurofibromas. >> 3.) Approximate 10 X 14 X 14 mm enhancing density, right hypoglossal >>canal consistent with a neuroma > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2000 Report Share Posted December 14, 2000 Wow, that's interesting! But good! What is the change with the hypoglossal? That's a nerve, isn't it? marie Re: My MRI >Just heard from Dr. Chen, the only real change was the hypoglossal nerve, >and that we are just going to keep an eye on. >Mike > >At 09:45 AM 12/14/2000 -0500, you wrote: > >>OK guys and gals, here is my MRI report. Have not heard back from Dr. Chen >>yet. >>Mike >> >> >>History: Type ii Neurofibromatosis. Bilateral internal auditory canal >>acoustic neuromas with previous surgery. History of neuromas of righ >>hypoglossal nerve. History of biternporal craniotomies. Previous surgery >>was in 1995 and 1996. >> >>Previous study of 3/1/99 is not available for comparison. >> >>There is some deformity and increased signal over the cilvus, nonspecific. >> >>There is also bony deformity of the internal auditory canals consistent >>with previous surgery, with mild enhancement. This was noted on the >>previous study of 1999, and recurrent neurofibromas cannot be excluded on >>the basis of this study. Also, there is curvilinear increased signal in the >>region of the right hypoglossal canal measuring approximately 10 x 14 x 14 >>mm, consistent with patients history of neurofibroma. This apparently >>measured 8 x 13 mm in length on the precious study. >> >>There is question of some enhancement in the region of the jugular foramen >>bilaterally. >> >>The ventricles are in the midline. No definite midline shift or mass >>effect. The diffusion images appear unremarkable. >> >>Impression: >> 1.) Post-surgical changes with bony deformity of the internal auditory >>canals bilaterally. >> 2.) Mild enhancement of the internal auditory canals bilaterally, >>suggestive of recurrent neurofibromas. >> 3.) Approximate 10 X 14 X 14 mm enhancing density, right hypoglossal >>canal consistent with a neuroma > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2000 Report Share Posted December 14, 2000 CELEBRATE..CELEBRATE!! DANCE TO THE MUSIC!! We'll watch ya! hee hee! Congradulations Mike! where is the hypoglossal nerve? Carol ashley wrote: Just heard from Dr. Chen, the only real change was the hypoglossal nerve, and that we are just going to keep an eye on. Mike At 09:45 AM 12/14/2000 -0500, you wrote: >OK guys and gals, here is my MRI report. Have not heard back from Dr. Chen >yet. >Mike > > >History: Type ii Neurofibromatosis. Bilateral internal auditory canal >acoustic neuromas with previous surgery. History of neuromas of righ >hypoglossal nerve. History of biternporal craniotomies. Previous surgery >was in 1995 and 1996. > >Previous study of 3/1/99 is not available for comparison. > >There is some deformity and increased signal over the cilvus, nonspecific. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2000 Report Share Posted December 16, 2000 Jeff, you been peeking? You're not a rump ranger are you? <hehe> At 06:40 PM 12/14/2000 -0600, you wrote: >Poor Mike, he has a deformed boner. > >Jeff W. > > My MRI > > > >OK guys and gals, here is my MRI report. Have not heard back from Dr. Chen >yet. >Mike > > >History: Type ii Neurofibromatosis. Bilateral internal auditory canal >acoustic neuromas with previous surgery. History of neuromas of righ >hypoglossal nerve. History of biternporal craniotomies. Previous surgery >was in 1995 and 1996. > >Previous study of 3/1/99 is not available for comparison. > >There is some deformity and increased signal over the cilvus, nonspecific. > >There is also bony deformity of the internal auditory canals consistent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2000 Report Share Posted December 16, 2000 EFAX is nice, had them fax it to me as soon as they got it done. Mike At 07:14 PM 12/14/2000 -0500, you wrote: >Oh CRAP! I am amazed you got that report so quick!! Let us know what Dr. >Chen says. Marie > My MRI > > > > > >OK guys and gals, here is my MRI report. Have not heard back from Dr. Chen >yet. > >Mike > > > > > >History: Type ii Neurofibromatosis. Bilateral internal auditory canal > >acoustic neuromas with previous surgery. History of neuromas of righ > >hypoglossal nerve. History of biternporal craniotomies. Previous surgery > >was in 1995 and 1996. > > > >Previous study of 3/1/99 is not available for comparison. > > > >There is some deformity and increased signal over the cilvus, nonspecific. > > > >There is also bony deformity of the internal auditory canals consistent > >with previous surgery, with mild enhancement. This was noted on the > >previous study of 1999, and recurrent neurofibromas cannot be excluded on > >the basis of this study. Also, there is curvilinear increased signal in the > >region of the right hypoglossal canal measuring approximately 10 x 14 x 14 > >mm, consistent with patients history of neurofibroma. This apparently > >measured 8 x 13 mm in length on the precious study. > > > >There is question of some enhancement in the region of the jugular foramen > >bilaterally. > > > >The ventricles are in the midline. No definite midline shift or mass > >effect. The diffusion images appear unremarkable. > > > >Impression: > > 1.) Post-surgical changes with bony deformity of the internal auditory > >canals bilaterally. > > 2.) Mild enhancement of the internal auditory canals bilaterally, > >suggestive of recurrent neurofibromas. > > 3.) Approximate 10 X 14 X 14 mm enhancing density, right hypoglossal > >canal consistent with a neuroma > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.