Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: recurrence

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Theresa -

Not sure that it really answers the specific question that you

asked but when we spoke to the geneticist, she gave us an article

about this and it seems that the source for the repeat risk was

different than the source that the Foundation lists in the manual

(as I recall, the Foundation used it's own membership and thus

included more children) but the risk was the same for both sources.

I'm sure Meg can more clearly answer your question tho'.

Good luck,

Debbie

From the keyboard of Troupe:

> Hi everyone.

>

> We are still pondering having more children (we

> have 3 and I would like a couple more) and get

> lots of questions about recurrence. We tell the

> people asking (concerned family) what the manual

> says. But does anyone know how many families

> are on the list and #'s such as how many kids in

> family and how many of those are CHARGErs. We're

> just curious about the " real " people out there

> not just statistics. It's all a gamble whether

> you have a healthy child or not anyway

> " normally " , but obviously our odds are not as

> great.

>

> I try to read tag lines of posts because I too

> have a hard time keeping all the stories and

> families straight. It is hard for me with no

> face to put with the names, hopefully that will

> improve after Cleveland.

>

> Thanks

>

> Theresa in Michigan -- we have Hannah 8,

> 6, and 16 months our CHARGEr

>

--

+ Debbie Tropiano -- debbie@... -- http://www.icus.com/personal.html +

| Mommy to b: 8/17/1995, ^Sara^ b: 10/25/2000 d: 11/7/2000 & |

| Leah b: 10/17/2001 a: 9/26/2002 " God shows His opposition to cancer and |

| birth defects, not by eliminating them or making them happen only to bad |

| people (He can't do that), but by summoning forth friends and neighbors |

+ to ease the burden and to fill the emptiness. " -- Harold S. Kushner +

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theresa -

Not sure that it really answers the specific question that you

asked but when we spoke to the geneticist, she gave us an article

about this and it seems that the source for the repeat risk was

different than the source that the Foundation lists in the manual

(as I recall, the Foundation used it's own membership and thus

included more children) but the risk was the same for both sources.

I'm sure Meg can more clearly answer your question tho'.

Good luck,

Debbie

From the keyboard of Troupe:

> Hi everyone.

>

> We are still pondering having more children (we

> have 3 and I would like a couple more) and get

> lots of questions about recurrence. We tell the

> people asking (concerned family) what the manual

> says. But does anyone know how many families

> are on the list and #'s such as how many kids in

> family and how many of those are CHARGErs. We're

> just curious about the " real " people out there

> not just statistics. It's all a gamble whether

> you have a healthy child or not anyway

> " normally " , but obviously our odds are not as

> great.

>

> I try to read tag lines of posts because I too

> have a hard time keeping all the stories and

> families straight. It is hard for me with no

> face to put with the names, hopefully that will

> improve after Cleveland.

>

> Thanks

>

> Theresa in Michigan -- we have Hannah 8,

> 6, and 16 months our CHARGEr

>

--

+ Debbie Tropiano -- debbie@... -- http://www.icus.com/personal.html +

| Mommy to b: 8/17/1995, ^Sara^ b: 10/25/2000 d: 11/7/2000 & |

| Leah b: 10/17/2001 a: 9/26/2002 " God shows His opposition to cancer and |

| birth defects, not by eliminating them or making them happen only to bad |

| people (He can't do that), but by summoning forth friends and neighbors |

+ to ease the burden and to fill the emptiness. " -- Harold S. Kushner +

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theresa -

Not sure that it really answers the specific question that you

asked but when we spoke to the geneticist, she gave us an article

about this and it seems that the source for the repeat risk was

different than the source that the Foundation lists in the manual

(as I recall, the Foundation used it's own membership and thus

included more children) but the risk was the same for both sources.

I'm sure Meg can more clearly answer your question tho'.

Good luck,

Debbie

From the keyboard of Troupe:

> Hi everyone.

>

> We are still pondering having more children (we

> have 3 and I would like a couple more) and get

> lots of questions about recurrence. We tell the

> people asking (concerned family) what the manual

> says. But does anyone know how many families

> are on the list and #'s such as how many kids in

> family and how many of those are CHARGErs. We're

> just curious about the " real " people out there

> not just statistics. It's all a gamble whether

> you have a healthy child or not anyway

> " normally " , but obviously our odds are not as

> great.

>

> I try to read tag lines of posts because I too

> have a hard time keeping all the stories and

> families straight. It is hard for me with no

> face to put with the names, hopefully that will

> improve after Cleveland.

>

> Thanks

>

> Theresa in Michigan -- we have Hannah 8,

> 6, and 16 months our CHARGEr

>

--

+ Debbie Tropiano -- debbie@... -- http://www.icus.com/personal.html +

| Mommy to b: 8/17/1995, ^Sara^ b: 10/25/2000 d: 11/7/2000 & |

| Leah b: 10/17/2001 a: 9/26/2002 " God shows His opposition to cancer and |

| birth defects, not by eliminating them or making them happen only to bad |

| people (He can't do that), but by summoning forth friends and neighbors |

+ to ease the burden and to fill the emptiness. " -- Harold S. Kushner +

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are in dale. 15 minutes from between

Grand Rapids and Lake Michigan

Theresa

KAV427@... wrote:

> Theresa,

> Where are you located in

> Michigan? I am in Flushing Michigan

> with a 19 year old CHARGE son.

>

>

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

>

>

> Membership of this email support groups does

> not constitute membership in the CHARGE

> Syndrome Foundation.

> For information about the CHARGE Syndrome

> Foundation or to become a member (and get the

> newsletter)

> please contact marion@... or

> visit

> the CHARGE Syndrome Foundation web page

> at http://www.chargesyndrome.org

> 6th International CHARGE Syndrome Conference,

> Cleveland, Ohio,

> July 25-27, 2003. Information will be

> available at our website

> www.chargesyndrome.org or by calling

> 1-.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...