Guest guest Posted December 20, 2001 Report Share Posted December 20, 2001 Has anyone ever heard of this?: I know of a 38 year old woman who had a hysterectomy for a fibroid uterus a few months ago. The doctor had wanted to remove her ovaries because she had endometriosis or adhesions (I'm not sure which), but she did not consent to this. Her recovery time was slower than expected, and she found that the hysterectomy did not relieve her pain, although the doctor cleaned up the endo/adhesions as much as he could. According to a relative of this woman, she regrets not having had her ovaries removed. This relative told me last month her doctor started her on a series of five shots of " something " to " kill her ovaries " because they were feeding estrogen to the endo/adhesions. Does this sound like Lupron? This woman's relative is under the impression that these shots will permanently shut down this woman's ovaries. If this is Lupron, what is the chance it will permanently shut down a 38 year old woman's ovaries? If a premenopausal woman goes on Lupron to shrink fibroids before a myo, is there a risk of permanently shutting down the ovaries? Doctors don't tell you these things. I don't understand the point of this woman's treatment at all. If this is just for temporary relief, why go through the potential side effects of Lupron - osteoporosis, hot flashes, memory loss? If this treatment permanently throws her into menopause, what will she do then to treat her menopausal symptoms, go on HRT? How does the doctor know that the endo/adhesions are the cause of her pain and not the hysterectomy itself? This doesn't sound like good medical advice to me. I just don't understand the point of going on HRT forever, either, or why doctors want to yank out the ovaries and then give women artificial hormones. I know several women in their 60's who are on HRT. Do doctors give this to women in their 70's or 80's? Do hot flashes persist forever or do they gradually end a few years after menopause? Couldn't weight lifting and calcium supplements be enough to prevent osteoporosis after menopause? Therese Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2001 Report Share Posted December 21, 2001 OH and another thing... they use Lupron to treat PROSTATE CANCER in men. Sounds like something good to put in your body huh? Kristi --- Therese Barraco wrote: > Has anyone ever heard of this?: > > I know of a 38 year old woman who had a hysterectomy > for a fibroid uterus a > few months ago. The doctor had wanted to remove her > ovaries because she had > endometriosis or adhesions (I'm not sure which), but > she did not consent to > this. Her recovery time was slower than expected, > and she found that the > hysterectomy did not relieve her pain, although the > doctor cleaned up the > endo/adhesions as much as he could. According to a > relative of this woman, > she regrets not having had her ovaries removed. > This relative told me last > month her doctor started her on a series of five > shots of " something " to > " kill her ovaries " because they were feeding > estrogen to the endo/adhesions. > Does this sound like Lupron? > > This woman's relative is under the impression that > these shots will > permanently shut down this woman's ovaries. If this > is Lupron, what is the > chance it will permanently shut down a 38 year old > woman's ovaries? If a > premenopausal woman goes on Lupron to shrink > fibroids before a myo, is there > a risk of permanently shutting down the ovaries? > Doctors don't tell you > these things. I don't understand the point of this > woman's treatment at all. > If this is just for temporary relief, why go through > the potential side > effects of Lupron - osteoporosis, hot flashes, > memory loss? If this > treatment permanently throws her into menopause, > what will she do then to > treat her menopausal symptoms, go on HRT? How does > the doctor know that the > endo/adhesions are the cause of her pain and not the > hysterectomy itself? > This doesn't sound like good medical advice to me. > > I just don't understand the point of going on HRT > forever, either, or why > doctors want to yank out the ovaries and then give > women artificial > hormones. I know several women in their 60's who > are on HRT. Do doctors > give this to women in their 70's or 80's? Do hot > flashes persist forever or > do they gradually end a few years after menopause? > Couldn't weight lifting > and calcium supplements be enough to prevent > osteoporosis after menopause? > > Therese > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2001 Report Share Posted December 21, 2001 OH and another thing... they use Lupron to treat PROSTATE CANCER in men. Sounds like something good to put in your body huh? Kristi --- Therese Barraco wrote: > Has anyone ever heard of this?: > > I know of a 38 year old woman who had a hysterectomy > for a fibroid uterus a > few months ago. The doctor had wanted to remove her > ovaries because she had > endometriosis or adhesions (I'm not sure which), but > she did not consent to > this. Her recovery time was slower than expected, > and she found that the > hysterectomy did not relieve her pain, although the > doctor cleaned up the > endo/adhesions as much as he could. According to a > relative of this woman, > she regrets not having had her ovaries removed. > This relative told me last > month her doctor started her on a series of five > shots of " something " to > " kill her ovaries " because they were feeding > estrogen to the endo/adhesions. > Does this sound like Lupron? > > This woman's relative is under the impression that > these shots will > permanently shut down this woman's ovaries. If this > is Lupron, what is the > chance it will permanently shut down a 38 year old > woman's ovaries? If a > premenopausal woman goes on Lupron to shrink > fibroids before a myo, is there > a risk of permanently shutting down the ovaries? > Doctors don't tell you > these things. I don't understand the point of this > woman's treatment at all. > If this is just for temporary relief, why go through > the potential side > effects of Lupron - osteoporosis, hot flashes, > memory loss? If this > treatment permanently throws her into menopause, > what will she do then to > treat her menopausal symptoms, go on HRT? How does > the doctor know that the > endo/adhesions are the cause of her pain and not the > hysterectomy itself? > This doesn't sound like good medical advice to me. > > I just don't understand the point of going on HRT > forever, either, or why > doctors want to yank out the ovaries and then give > women artificial > hormones. I know several women in their 60's who > are on HRT. Do doctors > give this to women in their 70's or 80's? Do hot > flashes persist forever or > do they gradually end a few years after menopause? > Couldn't weight lifting > and calcium supplements be enough to prevent > osteoporosis after menopause? > > Therese > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2001 Report Share Posted December 21, 2001 OH and another thing... they use Lupron to treat PROSTATE CANCER in men. Sounds like something good to put in your body huh? Kristi --- Therese Barraco wrote: > Has anyone ever heard of this?: > > I know of a 38 year old woman who had a hysterectomy > for a fibroid uterus a > few months ago. The doctor had wanted to remove her > ovaries because she had > endometriosis or adhesions (I'm not sure which), but > she did not consent to > this. Her recovery time was slower than expected, > and she found that the > hysterectomy did not relieve her pain, although the > doctor cleaned up the > endo/adhesions as much as he could. According to a > relative of this woman, > she regrets not having had her ovaries removed. > This relative told me last > month her doctor started her on a series of five > shots of " something " to > " kill her ovaries " because they were feeding > estrogen to the endo/adhesions. > Does this sound like Lupron? > > This woman's relative is under the impression that > these shots will > permanently shut down this woman's ovaries. If this > is Lupron, what is the > chance it will permanently shut down a 38 year old > woman's ovaries? If a > premenopausal woman goes on Lupron to shrink > fibroids before a myo, is there > a risk of permanently shutting down the ovaries? > Doctors don't tell you > these things. I don't understand the point of this > woman's treatment at all. > If this is just for temporary relief, why go through > the potential side > effects of Lupron - osteoporosis, hot flashes, > memory loss? If this > treatment permanently throws her into menopause, > what will she do then to > treat her menopausal symptoms, go on HRT? How does > the doctor know that the > endo/adhesions are the cause of her pain and not the > hysterectomy itself? > This doesn't sound like good medical advice to me. > > I just don't understand the point of going on HRT > forever, either, or why > doctors want to yank out the ovaries and then give > women artificial > hormones. I know several women in their 60's who > are on HRT. Do doctors > give this to women in their 70's or 80's? Do hot > flashes persist forever or > do they gradually end a few years after menopause? > Couldn't weight lifting > and calcium supplements be enough to prevent > osteoporosis after menopause? > > Therese > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2001 Report Share Posted December 22, 2001 Men have a captain of industry, former junk bond king Milken....who was diagnosed with prostate cancer...and quickly marshalled millions into the search for a cure for prostate cancer. Made a nice splash on US NEWS & WORLD REPORT a couple of years ago, and probably various other media. A noble cause....would have done the same, sans prostate cancer? Nevertheless, dollars are there for this disease-- <A HREF= " http://www.cancerwise.org/archive/august_2001/cancer_newsline/nerve.html " >\ CancerWise - Nerve replacement surgery during prostatectomy is an option for http://www.capcure.org/aboutcapcure/ </A>impotence? nerve sparing procedures that enable men to continue their erectile function for intercourse...is of course already available.... <A HREF= " http://www.cancerwise.org/archive/august_2001/cancer_newsline/nerve.html " > CancerWise - Nerve replacement surgery during prostatectomy is an option for some men</A> http://www.cancerwise.org/archive/august_2001/cancer_newsline/nerve.html for women with fibroids, a public health epidemic... where is our captain of industry....billionaire Oprah...did she have a myomectomy for fibroids? if so, why is she mute? why did our pleas for help from her fall on deaf ears? hysterectomy....nerve sparing surgery? it's not even on the radar of your average surgeon with the exception of the Bermans at UCLA.... how long before the development of pelvic uterine nerve sparing surgery? who knows. just don't get me started on this topic.....i'm angry about the severe disparities of women's and men's health care.... In a message dated 12/22/01 6:28:01 AM Eastern Standard Time, cailleach@... writes: > Another thing about prostate. I often think about this when women go > overboard in saying there would be better treatment if this happened to > men. Men over 50 are very prone to enlarged prostate glands, even moreso > than women over 40 are prone to enlarged uteri. Like us, they suffer from > the pressure on their bladders and they have the fear that the growth may > be cancer. Rectal examination of the prostate gland is undignified and > uncomfortable. Medical and surgical treatments for prostate conditions can > have severe consequences such as incontinence and impotence. --- I don't > deny the existence of misogyny but it isn't fair to blame all our problems > with treatment for fibroids on a male-dominated profession treating a > female condition. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2001 Report Share Posted December 22, 2001 Men have a captain of industry, former junk bond king Milken....who was diagnosed with prostate cancer...and quickly marshalled millions into the search for a cure for prostate cancer. Made a nice splash on US NEWS & WORLD REPORT a couple of years ago, and probably various other media. A noble cause....would have done the same, sans prostate cancer? Nevertheless, dollars are there for this disease-- <A HREF= " http://www.cancerwise.org/archive/august_2001/cancer_newsline/nerve.html " >\ CancerWise - Nerve replacement surgery during prostatectomy is an option for http://www.capcure.org/aboutcapcure/ </A>impotence? nerve sparing procedures that enable men to continue their erectile function for intercourse...is of course already available.... <A HREF= " http://www.cancerwise.org/archive/august_2001/cancer_newsline/nerve.html " > CancerWise - Nerve replacement surgery during prostatectomy is an option for some men</A> http://www.cancerwise.org/archive/august_2001/cancer_newsline/nerve.html for women with fibroids, a public health epidemic... where is our captain of industry....billionaire Oprah...did she have a myomectomy for fibroids? if so, why is she mute? why did our pleas for help from her fall on deaf ears? hysterectomy....nerve sparing surgery? it's not even on the radar of your average surgeon with the exception of the Bermans at UCLA.... how long before the development of pelvic uterine nerve sparing surgery? who knows. just don't get me started on this topic.....i'm angry about the severe disparities of women's and men's health care.... In a message dated 12/22/01 6:28:01 AM Eastern Standard Time, cailleach@... writes: > Another thing about prostate. I often think about this when women go > overboard in saying there would be better treatment if this happened to > men. Men over 50 are very prone to enlarged prostate glands, even moreso > than women over 40 are prone to enlarged uteri. Like us, they suffer from > the pressure on their bladders and they have the fear that the growth may > be cancer. Rectal examination of the prostate gland is undignified and > uncomfortable. Medical and surgical treatments for prostate conditions can > have severe consequences such as incontinence and impotence. --- I don't > deny the existence of misogyny but it isn't fair to blame all our problems > with treatment for fibroids on a male-dominated profession treating a > female condition. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2001 Report Share Posted December 22, 2001 Men have a captain of industry, former junk bond king Milken....who was diagnosed with prostate cancer...and quickly marshalled millions into the search for a cure for prostate cancer. Made a nice splash on US NEWS & WORLD REPORT a couple of years ago, and probably various other media. A noble cause....would have done the same, sans prostate cancer? Nevertheless, dollars are there for this disease-- <A HREF= " http://www.cancerwise.org/archive/august_2001/cancer_newsline/nerve.html " >\ CancerWise - Nerve replacement surgery during prostatectomy is an option for http://www.capcure.org/aboutcapcure/ </A>impotence? nerve sparing procedures that enable men to continue their erectile function for intercourse...is of course already available.... <A HREF= " http://www.cancerwise.org/archive/august_2001/cancer_newsline/nerve.html " > CancerWise - Nerve replacement surgery during prostatectomy is an option for some men</A> http://www.cancerwise.org/archive/august_2001/cancer_newsline/nerve.html for women with fibroids, a public health epidemic... where is our captain of industry....billionaire Oprah...did she have a myomectomy for fibroids? if so, why is she mute? why did our pleas for help from her fall on deaf ears? hysterectomy....nerve sparing surgery? it's not even on the radar of your average surgeon with the exception of the Bermans at UCLA.... how long before the development of pelvic uterine nerve sparing surgery? who knows. just don't get me started on this topic.....i'm angry about the severe disparities of women's and men's health care.... In a message dated 12/22/01 6:28:01 AM Eastern Standard Time, cailleach@... writes: > Another thing about prostate. I often think about this when women go > overboard in saying there would be better treatment if this happened to > men. Men over 50 are very prone to enlarged prostate glands, even moreso > than women over 40 are prone to enlarged uteri. Like us, they suffer from > the pressure on their bladders and they have the fear that the growth may > be cancer. Rectal examination of the prostate gland is undignified and > uncomfortable. Medical and surgical treatments for prostate conditions can > have severe consequences such as incontinence and impotence. --- I don't > deny the existence of misogyny but it isn't fair to blame all our problems > with treatment for fibroids on a male-dominated profession treating a > female condition. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2001 Report Share Posted December 22, 2001 Kr. wrote " OH and another thing... they use Lupron to treat PROSTATE CANCER in men. Sounds like something good to put in your body huh? " There are obviously lots of drawbacks to Lupron, but I wouldn't reject something just on the basis that it is also used to treat prostate cancer. Thalidomide caused birth defects, but is now being considered for other applications (but not to be given to pregnant women, of course). RU-486 can be used to induce abortion, but in smaller doses may be a good medication for shrinking fibroids. I mentioned it to my gynaecologist as something she should look out for in future. I told her that they are also looking into use of this drug for treating prostate ailments and she replied that it was a sort of poetic justice because drugs developed for prostate had been found useful for treating gynaecologic problems. This isn't altogether surprising as all these conditions are responsive to sex hormones. Another thing about prostate. I often think about this when women go overboard in saying there would be better treatment if this happened to men. Men over 50 are very prone to enlarged prostate glands, even moreso than women over 40 are prone to enlarged uteri. Like us, they suffer from the pressure on their bladders and they have the fear that the growth may be cancer. Rectal examination of the prostate gland is undignified and uncomfortable. Medical and surgical treatments for prostate conditions can have severe consequences such as incontinence and impotence. --- I don't deny the existence of misogyny but it isn't fair to blame all our problems with treatment for fibroids on a male-dominated profession treating a female condition. Back to Lupron. Do any of you know how Lupron compares with closely-related drugs such as Synarel, Prostap, Zoladex? What are the reasons - esp medical rather than economic and availability - of choosing one over another? For instance, could it be that Zoladex is more costly but has less undesirable side effects? Or are they all much the same? I understand Synarel is given nasally rather than by long-lasting injection, so you can stop taking it and get the drug out of your system more quickly if the bad effects outweigh the desirable ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.