Guest guest Posted June 20, 2002 Report Share Posted June 20, 2002 > So, how does that sound, all you who are more post-septoplasty than > myself?? Sounds pretty thorough to me. This is the first time I've heard from someone who used US monitoring to control the extent of the operation. I have heard of it, but never knew someone personally to have had it done. It takes a bit of practice, but I think it's better than working blind. Beth SU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2002 Report Share Posted June 20, 2002 > So, how does that sound, all you who are more post-septoplasty than > myself?? Sounds pretty thorough to me. This is the first time I've heard from someone who used US monitoring to control the extent of the operation. I have heard of it, but never knew someone personally to have had it done. It takes a bit of practice, but I think it's better than working blind. Beth SU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2002 Report Share Posted June 20, 2002 > So, how does that sound, all you who are more post-septoplasty than > myself?? Sounds pretty thorough to me. This is the first time I've heard from someone who used US monitoring to control the extent of the operation. I have heard of it, but never knew someone personally to have had it done. It takes a bit of practice, but I think it's better than working blind. Beth SU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2002 Report Share Posted June 21, 2002 > Sounds pretty thorough to me. This is the first time I've heard from > someone who used US monitoring to control the extent of the > operation. I have heard of it, but never knew someone personally to > have had it done. It takes a bit of practice, but I think it's > better than working blind. Then he sounds like a bit of a pro? I remember going into the surgery and thinking it odd that there was a big 3-d ultrasound monitor there - and it was definitely state of the art - not the sort of thing one generally gets to see when having a gynie u/s! He told me, when I asked how long I should need my husband to stay at home and help me out (and I quote) " to date in over 20yrs I've only encountered one patient who was unable to function well after a metroplasty - she had a complication (in the days before we operated under ultrasound)necessitating a laparotomy (her tummy had to be opened)and she spent 4days in hospital and a couple of weeks recovering. She did go on to have three healthy babies vaginally. Since the advent of ultrasound monitoring of the proceedure the women have done well so I suppose this is a long answer to your question.....you would probably appreciate him at home on the day after the op., to fetch and carry tc.( the husbandly tasks!) " I've only just realised he said ultrasound monitoring! Sounds to me as if he's saying it's pretty much standard, if not standard over here, then standard operation with him. There was a student (who, by the way was very impressed by what I knew of my condition, and she had to ask me to define a few of the terms I used) who attended my operation, and before I went under I heard Prof telling her (from my old scans) that it was clearly a septate uterus from the ultrasounds...now why didn't he tell me that at my consultation?? My memory of the operation is becoming more and more clear as the days go on. Straight out in recovery all I could think about was the fact of how long it had taken, and therefore I must have had " the works " done! Another thing I've noticed after I re-read that e-mail - after a laparotomy she went on to deliver 3 babies vaginally. I've had 2 c- sections and a perforated uterus - would I be forever compromised and have to have c-sections, or could I try a vbac? Maybe it would be wise to just go the c-section route. I was told that there's no limit to them these days, unless they're too close together. SU resected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2002 Report Share Posted June 21, 2002 > Sounds pretty thorough to me. This is the first time I've heard from > someone who used US monitoring to control the extent of the > operation. I have heard of it, but never knew someone personally to > have had it done. It takes a bit of practice, but I think it's > better than working blind. Then he sounds like a bit of a pro? I remember going into the surgery and thinking it odd that there was a big 3-d ultrasound monitor there - and it was definitely state of the art - not the sort of thing one generally gets to see when having a gynie u/s! He told me, when I asked how long I should need my husband to stay at home and help me out (and I quote) " to date in over 20yrs I've only encountered one patient who was unable to function well after a metroplasty - she had a complication (in the days before we operated under ultrasound)necessitating a laparotomy (her tummy had to be opened)and she spent 4days in hospital and a couple of weeks recovering. She did go on to have three healthy babies vaginally. Since the advent of ultrasound monitoring of the proceedure the women have done well so I suppose this is a long answer to your question.....you would probably appreciate him at home on the day after the op., to fetch and carry tc.( the husbandly tasks!) " I've only just realised he said ultrasound monitoring! Sounds to me as if he's saying it's pretty much standard, if not standard over here, then standard operation with him. There was a student (who, by the way was very impressed by what I knew of my condition, and she had to ask me to define a few of the terms I used) who attended my operation, and before I went under I heard Prof telling her (from my old scans) that it was clearly a septate uterus from the ultrasounds...now why didn't he tell me that at my consultation?? My memory of the operation is becoming more and more clear as the days go on. Straight out in recovery all I could think about was the fact of how long it had taken, and therefore I must have had " the works " done! Another thing I've noticed after I re-read that e-mail - after a laparotomy she went on to deliver 3 babies vaginally. I've had 2 c- sections and a perforated uterus - would I be forever compromised and have to have c-sections, or could I try a vbac? Maybe it would be wise to just go the c-section route. I was told that there's no limit to them these days, unless they're too close together. SU resected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2002 Report Share Posted June 21, 2002 > Sounds pretty thorough to me. This is the first time I've heard from > someone who used US monitoring to control the extent of the > operation. I have heard of it, but never knew someone personally to > have had it done. It takes a bit of practice, but I think it's > better than working blind. Then he sounds like a bit of a pro? I remember going into the surgery and thinking it odd that there was a big 3-d ultrasound monitor there - and it was definitely state of the art - not the sort of thing one generally gets to see when having a gynie u/s! He told me, when I asked how long I should need my husband to stay at home and help me out (and I quote) " to date in over 20yrs I've only encountered one patient who was unable to function well after a metroplasty - she had a complication (in the days before we operated under ultrasound)necessitating a laparotomy (her tummy had to be opened)and she spent 4days in hospital and a couple of weeks recovering. She did go on to have three healthy babies vaginally. Since the advent of ultrasound monitoring of the proceedure the women have done well so I suppose this is a long answer to your question.....you would probably appreciate him at home on the day after the op., to fetch and carry tc.( the husbandly tasks!) " I've only just realised he said ultrasound monitoring! Sounds to me as if he's saying it's pretty much standard, if not standard over here, then standard operation with him. There was a student (who, by the way was very impressed by what I knew of my condition, and she had to ask me to define a few of the terms I used) who attended my operation, and before I went under I heard Prof telling her (from my old scans) that it was clearly a septate uterus from the ultrasounds...now why didn't he tell me that at my consultation?? My memory of the operation is becoming more and more clear as the days go on. Straight out in recovery all I could think about was the fact of how long it had taken, and therefore I must have had " the works " done! Another thing I've noticed after I re-read that e-mail - after a laparotomy she went on to deliver 3 babies vaginally. I've had 2 c- sections and a perforated uterus - would I be forever compromised and have to have c-sections, or could I try a vbac? Maybe it would be wise to just go the c-section route. I was told that there's no limit to them these days, unless they're too close together. SU resected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2002 Report Share Posted June 21, 2002 Hi , Sounds like he did a good job to me. My surgeon is supposedly a big shot here at Harvard, and has written articles on how to do these things, but he didn't use u/s or a lap. He just went in with a hyst and cut! He said he felt " very confident " that he got it all and that he didn't feel the " necessity " of " putting me through " the lap. The operative pics look good, I'm cramp free this AF, and so, I'm feeling pretty sure he must have got it. I'll know for sure in a month when I get an office hysteroscopy. As for your uterus, I believe if you have ever had a perferation you should get c-sections. Talk to your dr., but I know that once you have perferated a little, your chances of blowing your whole uterus up in labor are higher. Scary. And believe me, I hate the thought of a c section myself...I'd love to give birth naturally in a birth center! But if I had a perferation, I'd go straight under the knife, I do believe. Good luck, and best wishes for a non-bleeding recovery! take it easy! Jill SU resected 5/21/02 I've had 2 c- > sections and a perforated uterus - would I be forever compromised and > have to have c-sections, or could I try a vbac? Maybe it would be > wise to just go the c-section route. I was told that there's no > limit to them these days, unless they're too close together. > > > SU resected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2002 Report Share Posted June 21, 2002 Hi , Sounds like he did a good job to me. My surgeon is supposedly a big shot here at Harvard, and has written articles on how to do these things, but he didn't use u/s or a lap. He just went in with a hyst and cut! He said he felt " very confident " that he got it all and that he didn't feel the " necessity " of " putting me through " the lap. The operative pics look good, I'm cramp free this AF, and so, I'm feeling pretty sure he must have got it. I'll know for sure in a month when I get an office hysteroscopy. As for your uterus, I believe if you have ever had a perferation you should get c-sections. Talk to your dr., but I know that once you have perferated a little, your chances of blowing your whole uterus up in labor are higher. Scary. And believe me, I hate the thought of a c section myself...I'd love to give birth naturally in a birth center! But if I had a perferation, I'd go straight under the knife, I do believe. Good luck, and best wishes for a non-bleeding recovery! take it easy! Jill SU resected 5/21/02 I've had 2 c- > sections and a perforated uterus - would I be forever compromised and > have to have c-sections, or could I try a vbac? Maybe it would be > wise to just go the c-section route. I was told that there's no > limit to them these days, unless they're too close together. > > > SU resected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2002 Report Share Posted June 21, 2002 Hi , Sounds like he did a good job to me. My surgeon is supposedly a big shot here at Harvard, and has written articles on how to do these things, but he didn't use u/s or a lap. He just went in with a hyst and cut! He said he felt " very confident " that he got it all and that he didn't feel the " necessity " of " putting me through " the lap. The operative pics look good, I'm cramp free this AF, and so, I'm feeling pretty sure he must have got it. I'll know for sure in a month when I get an office hysteroscopy. As for your uterus, I believe if you have ever had a perferation you should get c-sections. Talk to your dr., but I know that once you have perferated a little, your chances of blowing your whole uterus up in labor are higher. Scary. And believe me, I hate the thought of a c section myself...I'd love to give birth naturally in a birth center! But if I had a perferation, I'd go straight under the knife, I do believe. Good luck, and best wishes for a non-bleeding recovery! take it easy! Jill SU resected 5/21/02 I've had 2 c- > sections and a perforated uterus - would I be forever compromised and > have to have c-sections, or could I try a vbac? Maybe it would be > wise to just go the c-section route. I was told that there's no > limit to them these days, unless they're too close together. > > > SU resected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2002 Report Share Posted June 21, 2002 > before I went under I heard Prof telling her (from my > old scans) that it was clearly a septate uterus from the > ultrasounds...now why didn't he tell me that at my consultation?? Perhaps because US is still such a shaky bet. My several US were clearly septate, too. I do mean clear. But my surgeon was not willing to commit himself totally, and also did the laparoscopy to verify. Beth SU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.