Guest guest Posted October 19, 2006 Report Share Posted October 19, 2006 Dear FORUM, I posted my comments in continuation of debate on Cd4 testing etc. this was in response to Dr swami iyer's poser to Ravi Saini. I am not sure whether they were delivered or not. So I am sending you atleast one article regarding " Who is an HIV specialist? " question worrying him Rakesh Bharti E-MAIL:<rakeshbharti1@...> ____________________________ Necessary Experience for Treating HIV Patients? Question What is the current expert consensus on the necessary qualifications for a clinician with HIV patients in his/her practice? Is there agreement on how much and what type of experience or formal training clinicians need for responsible HIV care? Response from G. Powderly, MD Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. There is increasing interest in the issue of HIV expertise. Several studies have shown that outcomes for patients are better if care is provided by physicians with experience in HIV infection.[1,2] This has led to legislative efforts in some jurisdictions to attempt to ensure that HIV-infected patients have access to " experts. " What has not been settled is the definition of such experts. Recently, the HIV Medicine Association (HIVMA) of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, which was established in 2000 as a forum for physicians and others interested in HIV disease, developed a definition of HIV expertise based on experience and continuing education. This definition suggested that to be an HIV specialist, an individual should be able to document: clinical management of at least 25 HIV-infected patients during a 1-year period a minimum of 15 hours of HIV-specific continuing medical education (including at least 5 hours related to antiretroviral therapy) per year These criteria are similar to those being developed by other HIV physician groups. The HIVMA document also noted that these criteria represented an ongoing professional commitment to HIV medicine. Currently, for example, training in infectious diseases in the United States provides sufficient experience to allow newly qualified trainees to classify themselves as HIV experts. However, the HIVMA document goes on to state that given the rapid pace of change in HIV medicine, board certification in infectious diseases does not guarantee sufficient knowledge to assure that an ID specialist will remain an expert in HIV disease. Therefore, to retain HIV specialty credentialing, all physicians (including ID physicians) must meet the experience-based criteria on an annual basis. It is difficult to obtain formal training in HIV disease in the United States except in the context of an infectious diseases fellowship. Informal training can be obtained, however, in AIDS clinics and at some centers where there is a more formal AIDS program. Definitions of specialty based on experience, education, and professional interest should allow physicians, whatever their background, to be identified as experts in HIV disease. References Kitahata MM, Koepsell TD, Deyo RA, Maxwell CL, Dodge WT, Wagner EH. Physicians' experience with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome as a factor in patients' survival. N Engl J Med 1996;334:701-706. Kitahata MM, Van Rompaey SE, Shields AW. Physician experience in the care of HIV-infected persons is associated with earlier adoption of new antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000;24:106-114. Medscape HIV/AIDS 7(1), 2001. © 2001 Medscape http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/413238 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.