Guest guest Posted November 3, 2011 Report Share Posted November 3, 2011 The simplified formula was tested vs the standard harris-benedict formula and vs indirect calorimetry. There is no significant difference between using the rule of the thumb (that is what we call that formula here in europe) and estimated energy needs by indirect calorimetry and harris-benedict. ESPEN recommends it and from my knowledge also GANEP (Brazilian office of parenteral and enteral nutrition). There are several studies published with the comparison you can find those references in ESPEN guidelines. Cátia Borges, nutricionista ARS Norte, Portugal > > > Hi All and sorry for the cross-posting, > > We are all using the formula for estimating needs : 25-30 Kcal/kg etc. > Does this formula has a name? > > Thanks > > > Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDN, CSG > A dietitian, not the food police. > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi > > > > > > > " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the moments that take your breath away. " - Carlin > " People don't forget the truth, they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road) > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2011 Report Share Posted November 3, 2011 Except I've read for years that -Benedict has poor correlation to direct calorimetry. So it's very low on the ADA's evidence-analysis library list of predictive equations. I think I've heard that name before " rule of thumb " . Haven't seen published studies validating it yet. But Europe & America often do things differently. Holly ---------- Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com 301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009) >________________________________ > >To: rd-usa >Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2011 2:46 AM >Subject: Re: Is this formula have a name? > > > > > > >The simplified formula was tested vs the standard harris-benedict formula and vs indirect calorimetry. There is no significant difference between using the rule of the thumb (that is what we call that formula here in europe) and estimated energy needs by indirect calorimetry and harris-benedict. ESPEN recommends it and from my knowledge also GANEP (Brazilian office of parenteral and enteral nutrition). There are several studies published with the comparison you can find those references in ESPEN guidelines. > >Cátia Borges, nutricionista >ARS Norte, Portugal > >> >> >> Hi All and sorry for the cross-posting, >> >> We are all using the formula for estimating needs : 25-30 Kcal/kg etc. >> Does this formula has a name? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDN, CSG >> A dietitian, not the food police. >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi >> >> >> >> >> >> >> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the moments that take your breath away. " - Carlin >> " People don't forget the truth, they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road) >> >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2011 Report Share Posted November 3, 2011 Except I've read for years that -Benedict has poor correlation to direct calorimetry. So it's very low on the ADA's evidence-analysis library list of predictive equations. I think I've heard that name before " rule of thumb " . Haven't seen published studies validating it yet. But Europe & America often do things differently. Holly ---------- Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com 301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009) >________________________________ > >To: rd-usa >Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2011 2:46 AM >Subject: Re: Is this formula have a name? > > > > > > >The simplified formula was tested vs the standard harris-benedict formula and vs indirect calorimetry. There is no significant difference between using the rule of the thumb (that is what we call that formula here in europe) and estimated energy needs by indirect calorimetry and harris-benedict. ESPEN recommends it and from my knowledge also GANEP (Brazilian office of parenteral and enteral nutrition). There are several studies published with the comparison you can find those references in ESPEN guidelines. > >Cátia Borges, nutricionista >ARS Norte, Portugal > >> >> >> Hi All and sorry for the cross-posting, >> >> We are all using the formula for estimating needs : 25-30 Kcal/kg etc. >> Does this formula has a name? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDN, CSG >> A dietitian, not the food police. >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi >> >> >> >> >> >> >> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the moments that take your breath away. " - Carlin >> " People don't forget the truth, they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road) >> >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2011 Report Share Posted November 3, 2011 Except I've read for years that -Benedict has poor correlation to direct calorimetry. So it's very low on the ADA's evidence-analysis library list of predictive equations. I think I've heard that name before " rule of thumb " . Haven't seen published studies validating it yet. But Europe & America often do things differently. Holly ---------- Holly Lee Brewer, MS RD CDE Pediatric Dietitian, Diabetes Educator Medical Nutrition Therapist, Las Vegas, NV Maj Holly Brewer, USAFR BSC http://hollyinbalad.blogspot.com 301st MDS, NAS JRB Fort Worth (Carswell), TX Joint Base Balad, Iraq (Jan-Jul 2009) >________________________________ > >To: rd-usa >Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2011 2:46 AM >Subject: Re: Is this formula have a name? > > > > > > >The simplified formula was tested vs the standard harris-benedict formula and vs indirect calorimetry. There is no significant difference between using the rule of the thumb (that is what we call that formula here in europe) and estimated energy needs by indirect calorimetry and harris-benedict. ESPEN recommends it and from my knowledge also GANEP (Brazilian office of parenteral and enteral nutrition). There are several studies published with the comparison you can find those references in ESPEN guidelines. > >Cátia Borges, nutricionista >ARS Norte, Portugal > >> >> >> Hi All and sorry for the cross-posting, >> >> We are all using the formula for estimating needs : 25-30 Kcal/kg etc. >> Does this formula has a name? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Merav Levi, RD, MS, CDN, CSG >> A dietitian, not the food police. >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/meravlevi >> >> >> >> >> >> >> " Life is not measured by the number of breath you take, but by the moments that take your breath away. " - Carlin >> " People don't forget the truth, they just become better in lying " (Revolutionary Road) >> >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.