Guest guest Posted November 13, 2006 Report Share Posted November 13, 2006 Friends, The World Bank's Integrated Safeguard Data Sheet for India's national AIDS Control Project III avers that infection control is in good shape in India (para IIA4): " NACO commissioned a study to focus on the risk of HIV transmission in health-care facilities owing to inadequate and unsafe infection control and waste management practices, and to assess current infection control and waste management practices. Through primary and secondary qualitative and quantitative data and a field based survey in three states, it was found that awareness and implementation of infection control practices are reasonably good. " Although this statement is in a section dealing with environmental issues (read: waste management), the term " infection control " includes behaviors related to injection safety, sterilization, and other precautions to prevent patient-to-patient transmission of HIV. The World Bank's statement conflicts with findings from IPEN's 2002-03 Assessment of Injection Practices in India, which reports -- after a national study involving more than 900 researchers -- that 31.6% of injections are a risk to transmit bloodborne viruses (see p viii, http://www.ipen.org.in/). I would like to hear an explanation from World Bank staff about how their assessment of infection control practices appears to be at odds with findings from the IPEN study. Also, in what way were the IPEN findings considered- if at all- in the design of the project? Best regards, e-mail: <david_gisselquist@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2006 Report Share Posted November 14, 2006 Friends, It is really amazing to say that infection control appears OK in India! There cannot be anything farther from the truth. It is well known that 35 to 50 % used palstic syringes come back in circulation as new injecton equipment. It is also true that no worthwhile nation wide research has been undrtaken in India to measure hospital acquired infection, specially transmission of infection due to improper management of infectious hospital waste. The statement that infection control is OK in India also conflicts with WHO studies on injection practices & safety in India. Moreover there is no national policy on use of antibiotics, and intravenous procedures in India. It is well known that more than 50 % of injections are unnecessary, and a large proportion of Intravenous procedures could have been avoided. Under these circumstances how can one surmise that infection control in India is in good shape? Lalji K Verma MBBS, PGD (Env & Ecology), psc, FRSA 253, AFNO Enclave, Plot-11, Sector- 7, Dwarka New Delhi - 110075 Tele - +91-11-25094702, 9312626462 e-mail: <lkv2005@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 15, 2006 Report Share Posted November 15, 2006 Dear FORUM, I do agree Dr. Vama's comments and it is a cause of major concern for our patients who are the worst affected. The medical profession should learn to adapt to the changing scenario due to sudden rise of Blood born infections and must follow a strict infection control practice with carefully segregated waste disposal as per the standard guidelines available. As undergraduates, about 26 years back, not much emphasis was put by our medical college teachers. But now, we are facing newer challenges and must study and learn these things properly by attending CMEs or going to back to ones medical college to aquire the knowledge. What's wrong in learning things you do not know? In fact, there is a huge community of family physicians from various 'pathies' who show total disinterest when such CMEs are held. Today, at our Jyothis AIDS charitable trust, we had organised an HIV-AIDS awareness workshop free of charge. Out of the 35 G.P.s 17 signed the circular for attending it but not a single doctor turned up. And when you see the mis-management of the HIV patients by them(they do not refuse any patient whether they are capable of treating them or not), your heart bleeds. No pre-test / post-test counselling, no diagnosis,treatment of opportunistic infections, straight ' TRIMUNE 1 BD' Is it not scary? The medical counsil of india should make it compulsory for all doctors to appear for required examinations from time to time to test their knowledge in the field. If the doctor fails, his lisence should be cancelled. This way we can overcome lots of problems faced by the patients. But, it does not look like that anything similar might happen in the near future. so, till that time, all the best for the common man who does not question his doctor as to why he is being poked and what has been pushed in his body. Dr. Divya Mithel, M.O. Jyothis Care center, Kalamboli E-MAIL: <d_mithel@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 Dear Forum, I agree with Dr. Lalji K Verma's observation " It is really amazing to say that infection control appears OK in India!There cannot be anything farther from the truth " . Same is the case with Blood and blood products. With our experience it seems people are afraid of talking about these issues as this opens up a can of worms. Medical fratenity is an organized union and a forum and every body will join hands if any one approaches them or questions them. With our rich experience of working in the hospitals like AIIMS and other Tertiary institutes, Infection control with in a hospital is a issue of concern. Have you ever heard of sterilizing 150 women under the family planning programm in merely two hours with only two laproscopes available to the implementing staff?. We have still saved that article which appeared in Today and Week as it was a footage done in districts where we lived and worked. After a small protest the issue was supressed in the files and the practice continues across the districts, state and the nation. Reason: The targets has to be met. It brings Hepatitis B, HCV or HIV, no one is bothered. The targets are met. It is basically a situation where we want to change the scenario of HIV AIDS but cannot make structural changes and only want to stick to awareness and training programmes without making anyone responsible or discuss all these issues at the national and international forums and workshops. I will thank again for raising this issue but most of us will say " I know this happens, but what can I do in this " . The same thing was once said by the very senior health secretary at the National level behind the closed doors. Alternative is someone has to fix the responsibility of someone and not bent to the political pressures at the Gram panchayat, block, district, state or at the national level if we all want to see the changes in the scenario. We have to make some structural changes or live with the situation. Regards, Sanjeev Jain e-mail: <sparshaids@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.