Guest guest Posted June 3, 2006 Report Share Posted June 3, 2006 Dear FORUM It is indeed strange that we are debating at the Highest level whether 5.7 [uNAIDS] or 5.206 [NACO] million is right. It is high time we look as these no.s as humans and not as mere statistics . Estimates state that only 7 % [if that figure is right] of Indians who require ART got it last year: This is something which the policy makers should seriously delve into rather than splitting hair about estimated statistics. I beleive that if HOPE is provided to PLWHA in the form of free [ or atleast subsidised ] ART they will come out for therapy. Do not diagnose them and expect them to take ART at their Expense ! I wonder , do we have to diagnose them at all ; if we cannot treat them; how does that justify our medical ethics ? Mathews m e-mail:<docmathews@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.