RE: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

[Guest guest]

I hear ya man! Lucky you warm as toast out there now *grin*

Regards,

Re: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING

FOR RETIREES

,

You and I _both_ hate the snow and the cold weather. That's why we moved

from Baltimore back here to sunny Southern California. Today it was almost

65. Tomorrow it'll be 72. Even Baltimore has been very cold too, temps down

in the teens in the morning. I don't miss that one bit.

Bill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Guest guest]

I hear ya man! Lucky you warm as toast out there now *grin*

Regards,

Re: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING

FOR RETIREES

,

You and I _both_ hate the snow and the cold weather. That's why we moved

from Baltimore back here to sunny Southern California. Today it was almost

65. Tomorrow it'll be 72. Even Baltimore has been very cold too, temps down

in the teens in the morning. I don't miss that one bit.

Bill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Guest guest]

I hear ya man! Lucky you warm as toast out there now *grin*

Regards,

Re: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING

FOR RETIREES

,

You and I _both_ hate the snow and the cold weather. That's why we moved

from Baltimore back here to sunny Southern California. Today it was almost

65. Tomorrow it'll be 72. Even Baltimore has been very cold too, temps down

in the teens in the morning. I don't miss that one bit.

Bill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Guest guest]

*laugh* forgot about that one!

Regards,

Re: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING

FOR RETIREES

Oh Cy,

Yes there is another job where you can be wrong many times and still keep

the job. As a doctor.

Bill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Guest guest]

*laugh* forgot about that one!

Regards,

Re: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING

FOR RETIREES

Oh Cy,

Yes there is another job where you can be wrong many times and still keep

the job. As a doctor.

Bill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Guest guest]

,

I have a real problem believeing that it ws a Croc. Alligator perhaps

but not likely to be a Croc.

Cy, the Ancient Okie...

Re: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF

DYING FOR RETIREES

ya but pat I don't want to experience the earthquakes lol

there is always Florida but then you got an infestation of bugs, snakes,

and last I seen on the news in Miami is an outbreak of pythons from them

dropping exotic pets into the local swamp from not wanting them! They

had on record a 12 foot python fighting a 30 foot croc for 30 hours! At

the end of the footage, the python and croc split ways and no one won

the fight. nuts!

Regards,

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

interesting info............

457 West #117 San Dimas, CA 91773 USA

Telephone: 909 596-9507 Facsimile: 909 596-9189

www.askbillsardi.com .............Email:

Bsardi@...

For Immediate Release 2/1/2005

LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

Researchers at Columbia University College of Physicians and

Surgeons in New York report a low cholesterol count doubles the risk

of

death among the senior Americans.

The report, published in the February 2005 issue of the

Journal of

the American Geriatrics Society, evaluated 2277 senior Americans,

aged

65 to 98 years, 21% who were taking cholesterol-lowering drugs. It

is

widely believed that elevated blood cholesterol numbers are

associated

with health and blood vessel disease and mortality in middle-aged

populations. Researchers examined whether this was true among senior

adults. [Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005]

Over a period of 3 years, lower total cholesterol and

low-density

cholesterol (LDL) was associated with a greater risk of dying. Use

of

statin cholesterol-lowering drugs seemed to lower this associated

but

did not abolish the elevated risk of death.

Previous studies also confirm this newly published report. In

2001

researchers at the University of Hawaii (Manoa), reported that males

71-93 years of age enrolled in the Honolulu Heart Program with low

levels of cholesterol persisting over 20 years had a higher risk of

dying from all causes. Researchers then said: " We have been unable

to

explain our results. These data cast doubt on the scientific

justification for lowering cholesterol to very low concentrations

in

elderly people. " [Lancet 358: 351-55, 2001]

The largest study conducted to date (ALLHAT) reveals that

cholesterol-lowering drugs only lower mortality rates by

insignificant

0.4% over and above usual medical care. [Journal American Medical

Assn

288: 2998-3007, 2002] The widely reported benefits of cholesterol -

lowering drugs appear to be apparent only when high-risk groups are

included in studies. [Journal American Medical Assn 291:1864-70,

2004]

The idea of lowering cholesterol among retirees, or healthy

middle-aged

adults, appears to be in question.

To learn more about the risks and benefits of

cholesterol-lowering

drugs, and natural alternatives to boost cardiovascular health, see

the

new

e-book: How To Lower Your Cholesterol Phobia by health journalist

Bill

Sardi, at the Natural Health Librarian

Chart From Recent Study Revealing Increased Mortality

Among

Seniors As Cholesterol Numbers Decline

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005

Groups by Range of cholesterol, mg/dL

Age

65 - 74

> 74

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

Cholesterol

1. < 176

283

29 (10.2)

1.5

291

67 (23.0)

1.6

2. 176 - 199

285

26 (9.1)

1.4

277

50 (18.1)

1.0

3. 200 - 226

275

19 (6.9)

0.8

288

39 (13/5)

0.8

4. > 226

281

16 (5.7)

1.0

280

42 (15.0)

1.0

Non-HDL cholesterol

1. < 127

292

31 (10.6)

1.7

284

69 (24.3)

1.9

2. 127 - 151

283

20 (7.1)

1.0

289

41 (14.2)

0.9

3. 152 - 176

276

23 (8.3)

0.9

283

47 (16.6)

1.2

4.> 176

273

16 (5.9)

1.0

280

41(14.6)

1.0

HDL cholesterol

1. < 38

298

30 (10.1)

1.1

309

63 (20.4)

1.4

2. 38 - 46

266

19 (7.1)

11

284

45 (15.8)

1.2

3. 47 - 56

286

22 (7.7)

0.9

259

48 (18.5)

1.2

4. > 56

274

19 (6.9)

1.0

284

42 (14.8)

1.0

Triglycerides

1. < 99

283

26 (9.2)

1.2

284

45 (15.8)

0.8

2. 99.0 - 135.5

280

20 (7.1)

0.9

285

55 (19.3)

1.2

3. 135.6 - 191.2

281

23 (8.2)

1.1

283

51 (18.0)

1.2

4.> 191.2

280

21 (7.5)

1.0

284

47 (16.5)

1.0

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

1.< 97.9

281

28 (10.0)

2.4

287

61 (21.3)

1.6

2.97.9 - 120.6

282

26 (9.2)

1.7

281

57(20.3)

1.3

3. 120.7 - 144

282

22 (7.8)

1.6

285

42 (14.7)

1.1

4.> 144

279

14 (5.0)

1.0

283

38 (13.4)

1.0

*Adjusting for age, sex, ethnic group, education, body

mass

index, apolipoprotein E, diabetes mellitus, heart disease,

hypertension,

stroke, cancer, and smoking.

CI=confidence interval; HDL=high-density lipoprotein.

Rate ratio: numbers above 1.0 indicate increased

relative

risk of dying.

[Guest guest]

correct, alligator.

Regards,

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

interesting info............

457 West #117 San Dimas, CA 91773 USA

Telephone: 909 596-9507 Facsimile: 909 596-9189

www.askbillsardi.com .............Email:

Bsardi@...

For Immediate Release 2/1/2005

LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

Researchers at Columbia University College of Physicians and

Surgeons in New York report a low cholesterol count doubles the risk

of

death among the senior Americans.

The report, published in the February 2005 issue of the

Journal of

the American Geriatrics Society, evaluated 2277 senior Americans,

aged

65 to 98 years, 21% who were taking cholesterol-lowering drugs. It

is

widely believed that elevated blood cholesterol numbers are

associated

with health and blood vessel disease and mortality in middle-aged

populations. Researchers examined whether this was true among senior

adults. [Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005]

Over a period of 3 years, lower total cholesterol and

low-density

cholesterol (LDL) was associated with a greater risk of dying. Use

of

statin cholesterol-lowering drugs seemed to lower this associated

but

did not abolish the elevated risk of death.

Previous studies also confirm this newly published report. In

2001

researchers at the University of Hawaii (Manoa), reported that males

71-93 years of age enrolled in the Honolulu Heart Program with low

levels of cholesterol persisting over 20 years had a higher risk of

dying from all causes. Researchers then said: " We have been unable

to

explain our results. These data cast doubt on the scientific

justification for lowering cholesterol to very low concentrations

in

elderly people. " [Lancet 358: 351-55, 2001]

The largest study conducted to date (ALLHAT) reveals that

cholesterol-lowering drugs only lower mortality rates by

insignificant

0.4% over and above usual medical care. [Journal American Medical

Assn

288: 2998-3007, 2002] The widely reported benefits of cholesterol -

lowering drugs appear to be apparent only when high-risk groups are

included in studies. [Journal American Medical Assn 291:1864-70,

2004]

The idea of lowering cholesterol among retirees, or healthy

middle-aged

adults, appears to be in question.

To learn more about the risks and benefits of

cholesterol-lowering

drugs, and natural alternatives to boost cardiovascular health, see

the

new

e-book: How To Lower Your Cholesterol Phobia by health journalist

Bill

Sardi, at the Natural Health Librarian

Chart From Recent Study Revealing Increased Mortality

Among

Seniors As Cholesterol Numbers Decline

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005

Groups by Range of cholesterol, mg/dL

Age

65 - 74

> 74

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

Cholesterol

1. < 176

283

29 (10.2)

1.5

291

67 (23.0)

1.6

2. 176 - 199

285

26 (9.1)

1.4

277

50 (18.1)

1.0

3. 200 - 226

275

19 (6.9)

0.8

288

39 (13/5)

0.8

4. > 226

281

16 (5.7)

1.0

280

42 (15.0)

1.0

Non-HDL cholesterol

1. < 127

292

31 (10.6)

1.7

284

69 (24.3)

1.9

2. 127 - 151

283

20 (7.1)

1.0

289

41 (14.2)

0.9

3. 152 - 176

276

23 (8.3)

0.9

283

47 (16.6)

1.2

4.> 176

273

16 (5.9)

1.0

280

41(14.6)

1.0

HDL cholesterol

1. < 38

298

30 (10.1)

1.1

309

63 (20.4)

1.4

2. 38 - 46

266

19 (7.1)

11

284

45 (15.8)

1.2

3. 47 - 56

286

22 (7.7)

0.9

259

48 (18.5)

1.2

4. > 56

274

19 (6.9)

1.0

284

42 (14.8)

1.0

Triglycerides

1. < 99

283

26 (9.2)

1.2

284

45 (15.8)

0.8

2. 99.0 - 135.5

280

20 (7.1)

0.9

285

55 (19.3)

1.2

3. 135.6 - 191.2

281

23 (8.2)

1.1

283

51 (18.0)

1.2

4.> 191.2

280

21 (7.5)

1.0

284

47 (16.5)

1.0

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

1.< 97.9

281

28 (10.0)

2.4

287

61 (21.3)

1.6

2.97.9 - 120.6

282

26 (9.2)

1.7

281

57(20.3)

1.3

3. 120.7 - 144

282

22 (7.8)

1.6

285

42 (14.7)

1.1

4.> 144

279

14 (5.0)

1.0

283

38 (13.4)

1.0

*Adjusting for age, sex, ethnic group, education, body

mass

index, apolipoprotein E, diabetes mellitus, heart disease,

hypertension,

stroke, cancer, and smoking.

CI=confidence interval; HDL=high-density lipoprotein.

Rate ratio: numbers above 1.0 indicate increased

relative

risk of dying.

[Guest guest]

correct, alligator.

Regards,

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

interesting info............

457 West #117 San Dimas, CA 91773 USA

Telephone: 909 596-9507 Facsimile: 909 596-9189

www.askbillsardi.com .............Email:

Bsardi@...

For Immediate Release 2/1/2005

LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

Researchers at Columbia University College of Physicians and

Surgeons in New York report a low cholesterol count doubles the risk

of

death among the senior Americans.

The report, published in the February 2005 issue of the

Journal of

the American Geriatrics Society, evaluated 2277 senior Americans,

aged

65 to 98 years, 21% who were taking cholesterol-lowering drugs. It

is

widely believed that elevated blood cholesterol numbers are

associated

with health and blood vessel disease and mortality in middle-aged

populations. Researchers examined whether this was true among senior

adults. [Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005]

Over a period of 3 years, lower total cholesterol and

low-density

cholesterol (LDL) was associated with a greater risk of dying. Use

of

statin cholesterol-lowering drugs seemed to lower this associated

but

did not abolish the elevated risk of death.

Previous studies also confirm this newly published report. In

2001

researchers at the University of Hawaii (Manoa), reported that males

71-93 years of age enrolled in the Honolulu Heart Program with low

levels of cholesterol persisting over 20 years had a higher risk of

dying from all causes. Researchers then said: " We have been unable

to

explain our results. These data cast doubt on the scientific

justification for lowering cholesterol to very low concentrations

in

elderly people. " [Lancet 358: 351-55, 2001]

The largest study conducted to date (ALLHAT) reveals that

cholesterol-lowering drugs only lower mortality rates by

insignificant

0.4% over and above usual medical care. [Journal American Medical

Assn

288: 2998-3007, 2002] The widely reported benefits of cholesterol -

lowering drugs appear to be apparent only when high-risk groups are

included in studies. [Journal American Medical Assn 291:1864-70,

2004]

The idea of lowering cholesterol among retirees, or healthy

middle-aged

adults, appears to be in question.

To learn more about the risks and benefits of

cholesterol-lowering

drugs, and natural alternatives to boost cardiovascular health, see

the

new

e-book: How To Lower Your Cholesterol Phobia by health journalist

Bill

Sardi, at the Natural Health Librarian

Chart From Recent Study Revealing Increased Mortality

Among

Seniors As Cholesterol Numbers Decline

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005

Groups by Range of cholesterol, mg/dL

Age

65 - 74

> 74

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

Cholesterol

1. < 176

283

29 (10.2)

1.5

291

67 (23.0)

1.6

2. 176 - 199

285

26 (9.1)

1.4

277

50 (18.1)

1.0

3. 200 - 226

275

19 (6.9)

0.8

288

39 (13/5)

0.8

4. > 226

281

16 (5.7)

1.0

280

42 (15.0)

1.0

Non-HDL cholesterol

1. < 127

292

31 (10.6)

1.7

284

69 (24.3)

1.9

2. 127 - 151

283

20 (7.1)

1.0

289

41 (14.2)

0.9

3. 152 - 176

276

23 (8.3)

0.9

283

47 (16.6)

1.2

4.> 176

273

16 (5.9)

1.0

280

41(14.6)

1.0

HDL cholesterol

1. < 38

298

30 (10.1)

1.1

309

63 (20.4)

1.4

2. 38 - 46

266

19 (7.1)

11

284

45 (15.8)

1.2

3. 47 - 56

286

22 (7.7)

0.9

259

48 (18.5)

1.2

4. > 56

274

19 (6.9)

1.0

284

42 (14.8)

1.0

Triglycerides

1. < 99

283

26 (9.2)

1.2

284

45 (15.8)

0.8

2. 99.0 - 135.5

280

20 (7.1)

0.9

285

55 (19.3)

1.2

3. 135.6 - 191.2

281

23 (8.2)

1.1

283

51 (18.0)

1.2

4.> 191.2

280

21 (7.5)

1.0

284

47 (16.5)

1.0

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

1.< 97.9

281

28 (10.0)

2.4

287

61 (21.3)

1.6

2.97.9 - 120.6

282

26 (9.2)

1.7

281

57(20.3)

1.3

3. 120.7 - 144

282

22 (7.8)

1.6

285

42 (14.7)

1.1

4.> 144

279

14 (5.0)

1.0

283

38 (13.4)

1.0

*Adjusting for age, sex, ethnic group, education, body

mass

index, apolipoprotein E, diabetes mellitus, heart disease,

hypertension,

stroke, cancer, and smoking.

CI=confidence interval; HDL=high-density lipoprotein.

Rate ratio: numbers above 1.0 indicate increased

relative

risk of dying.

[Guest guest]

correct, alligator.

Regards,

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

interesting info............

457 West #117 San Dimas, CA 91773 USA

Telephone: 909 596-9507 Facsimile: 909 596-9189

www.askbillsardi.com .............Email:

Bsardi@...

For Immediate Release 2/1/2005

LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

Researchers at Columbia University College of Physicians and

Surgeons in New York report a low cholesterol count doubles the risk

of

death among the senior Americans.

The report, published in the February 2005 issue of the

Journal of

the American Geriatrics Society, evaluated 2277 senior Americans,

aged

65 to 98 years, 21% who were taking cholesterol-lowering drugs. It

is

widely believed that elevated blood cholesterol numbers are

associated

with health and blood vessel disease and mortality in middle-aged

populations. Researchers examined whether this was true among senior

adults. [Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005]

Over a period of 3 years, lower total cholesterol and

low-density

cholesterol (LDL) was associated with a greater risk of dying. Use

of

statin cholesterol-lowering drugs seemed to lower this associated

but

did not abolish the elevated risk of death.

Previous studies also confirm this newly published report. In

2001

researchers at the University of Hawaii (Manoa), reported that males

71-93 years of age enrolled in the Honolulu Heart Program with low

levels of cholesterol persisting over 20 years had a higher risk of

dying from all causes. Researchers then said: " We have been unable

to

explain our results. These data cast doubt on the scientific

justification for lowering cholesterol to very low concentrations

in

elderly people. " [Lancet 358: 351-55, 2001]

The largest study conducted to date (ALLHAT) reveals that

cholesterol-lowering drugs only lower mortality rates by

insignificant

0.4% over and above usual medical care. [Journal American Medical

Assn

288: 2998-3007, 2002] The widely reported benefits of cholesterol -

lowering drugs appear to be apparent only when high-risk groups are

included in studies. [Journal American Medical Assn 291:1864-70,

2004]

The idea of lowering cholesterol among retirees, or healthy

middle-aged

adults, appears to be in question.

To learn more about the risks and benefits of

cholesterol-lowering

drugs, and natural alternatives to boost cardiovascular health, see

the

new

e-book: How To Lower Your Cholesterol Phobia by health journalist

Bill

Sardi, at the Natural Health Librarian

Chart From Recent Study Revealing Increased Mortality

Among

Seniors As Cholesterol Numbers Decline

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005

Groups by Range of cholesterol, mg/dL

Age

65 - 74

> 74

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

Cholesterol

1. < 176

283

29 (10.2)

1.5

291

67 (23.0)

1.6

2. 176 - 199

285

26 (9.1)

1.4

277

50 (18.1)

1.0

3. 200 - 226

275

19 (6.9)

0.8

288

39 (13/5)

0.8

4. > 226

281

16 (5.7)

1.0

280

42 (15.0)

1.0

Non-HDL cholesterol

1. < 127

292

31 (10.6)

1.7

284

69 (24.3)

1.9

2. 127 - 151

283

20 (7.1)

1.0

289

41 (14.2)

0.9

3. 152 - 176

276

23 (8.3)

0.9

283

47 (16.6)

1.2

4.> 176

273

16 (5.9)

1.0

280

41(14.6)

1.0

HDL cholesterol

1. < 38

298

30 (10.1)

1.1

309

63 (20.4)

1.4

2. 38 - 46

266

19 (7.1)

11

284

45 (15.8)

1.2

3. 47 - 56

286

22 (7.7)

0.9

259

48 (18.5)

1.2

4. > 56

274

19 (6.9)

1.0

284

42 (14.8)

1.0

Triglycerides

1. < 99

283

26 (9.2)

1.2

284

45 (15.8)

0.8

2. 99.0 - 135.5

280

20 (7.1)

0.9

285

55 (19.3)

1.2

3. 135.6 - 191.2

281

23 (8.2)

1.1

283

51 (18.0)

1.2

4.> 191.2

280

21 (7.5)

1.0

284

47 (16.5)

1.0

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

1.< 97.9

281

28 (10.0)

2.4

287

61 (21.3)

1.6

2.97.9 - 120.6

282

26 (9.2)

1.7

281

57(20.3)

1.3

3. 120.7 - 144

282

22 (7.8)

1.6

285

42 (14.7)

1.1

4.> 144

279

14 (5.0)

1.0

283

38 (13.4)

1.0

*Adjusting for age, sex, ethnic group, education, body

mass

index, apolipoprotein E, diabetes mellitus, heart disease,

hypertension,

stroke, cancer, and smoking.

CI=confidence interval; HDL=high-density lipoprotein.

Rate ratio: numbers above 1.0 indicate increased

relative

risk of dying.

[Guest guest]

The earthquakes rarely hurt anyone-not nearly as much as tornadoes or floods

or blizzards do in Ohio! When I first moved to CA in 1978, the first

earthquake I heard of took place in Lake Erie-the first one in 50 years or

something like that! It was pretty funny.

Re: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF

DYING FOR RETIREES

ya but pat I don't want to experience the earthquakes lol

there is always Florida but then you got an infestation of bugs, snakes, and

last I seen on the news in Miami is an outbreak of pythons from them

dropping exotic pets into the local swamp from not wanting them! They had on

record a 12 foot python fighting a 30 foot croc for 30 hours! At the end of

the footage, the python and croc split ways and no one won the fight. nuts!

Regards,

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

interesting info............

457 West #117 San Dimas, CA 91773 USA

Telephone: 909 596-9507 Facsimile: 909 596-9189

www.askbillsardi.com .............Email: Bsardi@...

For Immediate Release 2/1/2005

LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

Researchers at Columbia University College of Physicians and

Surgeons in New York report a low cholesterol count doubles the risk of

death among the senior Americans.

The report, published in the February 2005 issue of the Journal of

the American Geriatrics Society, evaluated 2277 senior Americans, aged

65 to 98 years, 21% who were taking cholesterol-lowering drugs. It is

widely believed that elevated blood cholesterol numbers are associated

with health and blood vessel disease and mortality in middle-aged

populations. Researchers examined whether this was true among senior

adults. [Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226, 2005]

Over a period of 3 years, lower total cholesterol and low-density

cholesterol (LDL) was associated with a greater risk of dying. Use of

statin cholesterol-lowering drugs seemed to lower this associated but

did not abolish the elevated risk of death.

Previous studies also confirm this newly published report. In 2001

researchers at the University of Hawaii (Manoa), reported that males

71-93 years of age enrolled in the Honolulu Heart Program with low

levels of cholesterol persisting over 20 years had a higher risk of

dying from all causes. Researchers then said: " We have been unable to

explain our results. These data cast doubt on the scientific

justification for lowering cholesterol to very low concentrations in

elderly people. " [Lancet 358: 351-55, 2001]

The largest study conducted to date (ALLHAT) reveals that

cholesterol-lowering drugs only lower mortality rates by insignificant

0.4% over and above usual medical care. [Journal American Medical Assn

288: 2998-3007, 2002] The widely reported benefits of cholesterol -

lowering drugs appear to be apparent only when high-risk groups are

included in studies. [Journal American Medical Assn 291:1864-70, 2004]

The idea of lowering cholesterol among retirees, or healthy middle-aged

adults, appears to be in question.

To learn more about the risks and benefits of cholesterol-lowering

drugs, and natural alternatives to boost cardiovascular health, see the

new

e-book: How To Lower Your Cholesterol Phobia by health journalist Bill

Sardi, at the Natural Health Librarian

Chart From Recent Study Revealing Increased Mortality Among

Seniors As Cholesterol Numbers Decline

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005

Groups by Range of cholesterol, mg/dL

Age

65 - 74

> 74

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

Cholesterol

1. < 176

283

29 (10.2)

1.5

291

67 (23.0)

1.6

2. 176 - 199

285

26 (9.1)

1.4

277

50 (18.1)

1.0

3. 200 - 226

275

19 (6.9)

0.8

288

39 (13/5)

0.8

4. > 226

281

16 (5.7)

1.0

280

42 (15.0)

1.0

Non-HDL cholesterol

1. < 127

292

31 (10.6)

1.7

284

69 (24.3)

1.9

2. 127 - 151

283

20 (7.1)

1.0

289

41 (14.2)

0.9

3. 152 - 176

276

23 (8.3)

0.9

283

47 (16.6)

1.2

4.> 176

273

16 (5.9)

1.0

280

41(14.6)

1.0

HDL cholesterol

1. < 38

298

30 (10.1)

1.1

309

63 (20.4)

1.4

2. 38 - 46

266

19 (7.1)

11

284

45 (15.8)

1.2

3. 47 - 56

286

22 (7.7)

0.9

259

48 (18.5)

1.2

4. > 56

274

19 (6.9)

1.0

284

42 (14.8)

1.0

Triglycerides

1. < 99

283

26 (9.2)

1.2

284

45 (15.8)

0.8

2. 99.0 - 135.5

280

20 (7.1)

0.9

285

55 (19.3)

1.2

3. 135.6 - 191.2

281

23 (8.2)

1.1

283

51 (18.0)

1.2

4.> 191.2

280

21 (7.5)

1.0

284

47 (16.5)

1.0

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

1.< 97.9

281

28 (10.0)

2.4

287

61 (21.3)

1.6

2.97.9 - 120.6

282

26 (9.2)

1.7

281

57(20.3)

1.3

3. 120.7 - 144

282

22 (7.8)

1.6

285

42 (14.7)

1.1

4.> 144

279

14 (5.0)

1.0

283

38 (13.4)

1.0

*Adjusting for age, sex, ethnic group, education, body mass

index, apolipoprotein E, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, hypertension,

stroke, cancer, and smoking.

CI=confidence interval; HDL=high-density lipoprotein.

Rate ratio: numbers above 1.0 indicate increased relative

risk of dying.

[Guest guest]

The earthquakes rarely hurt anyone-not nearly as much as tornadoes or floods

or blizzards do in Ohio! When I first moved to CA in 1978, the first

earthquake I heard of took place in Lake Erie-the first one in 50 years or

something like that! It was pretty funny.

Re: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF

DYING FOR RETIREES

ya but pat I don't want to experience the earthquakes lol

there is always Florida but then you got an infestation of bugs, snakes, and

last I seen on the news in Miami is an outbreak of pythons from them

dropping exotic pets into the local swamp from not wanting them! They had on

record a 12 foot python fighting a 30 foot croc for 30 hours! At the end of

the footage, the python and croc split ways and no one won the fight. nuts!

Regards,

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

interesting info............

457 West #117 San Dimas, CA 91773 USA

Telephone: 909 596-9507 Facsimile: 909 596-9189

www.askbillsardi.com .............Email: Bsardi@...

For Immediate Release 2/1/2005

LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

Researchers at Columbia University College of Physicians and

Surgeons in New York report a low cholesterol count doubles the risk of

death among the senior Americans.

The report, published in the February 2005 issue of the Journal of

the American Geriatrics Society, evaluated 2277 senior Americans, aged

65 to 98 years, 21% who were taking cholesterol-lowering drugs. It is

widely believed that elevated blood cholesterol numbers are associated

with health and blood vessel disease and mortality in middle-aged

populations. Researchers examined whether this was true among senior

adults. [Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226, 2005]

Over a period of 3 years, lower total cholesterol and low-density

cholesterol (LDL) was associated with a greater risk of dying. Use of

statin cholesterol-lowering drugs seemed to lower this associated but

did not abolish the elevated risk of death.

Previous studies also confirm this newly published report. In 2001

researchers at the University of Hawaii (Manoa), reported that males

71-93 years of age enrolled in the Honolulu Heart Program with low

levels of cholesterol persisting over 20 years had a higher risk of

dying from all causes. Researchers then said: " We have been unable to

explain our results. These data cast doubt on the scientific

justification for lowering cholesterol to very low concentrations in

elderly people. " [Lancet 358: 351-55, 2001]

The largest study conducted to date (ALLHAT) reveals that

cholesterol-lowering drugs only lower mortality rates by insignificant

0.4% over and above usual medical care. [Journal American Medical Assn

288: 2998-3007, 2002] The widely reported benefits of cholesterol -

lowering drugs appear to be apparent only when high-risk groups are

included in studies. [Journal American Medical Assn 291:1864-70, 2004]

The idea of lowering cholesterol among retirees, or healthy middle-aged

adults, appears to be in question.

To learn more about the risks and benefits of cholesterol-lowering

drugs, and natural alternatives to boost cardiovascular health, see the

new

e-book: How To Lower Your Cholesterol Phobia by health journalist Bill

Sardi, at the Natural Health Librarian

Chart From Recent Study Revealing Increased Mortality Among

Seniors As Cholesterol Numbers Decline

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005

Groups by Range of cholesterol, mg/dL

Age

65 - 74

> 74

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

Cholesterol

1. < 176

283

29 (10.2)

1.5

291

67 (23.0)

1.6

2. 176 - 199

285

26 (9.1)

1.4

277

50 (18.1)

1.0

3. 200 - 226

275

19 (6.9)

0.8

288

39 (13/5)

0.8

4. > 226

281

16 (5.7)

1.0

280

42 (15.0)

1.0

Non-HDL cholesterol

1. < 127

292

31 (10.6)

1.7

284

69 (24.3)

1.9

2. 127 - 151

283

20 (7.1)

1.0

289

41 (14.2)

0.9

3. 152 - 176

276

23 (8.3)

0.9

283

47 (16.6)

1.2

4.> 176

273

16 (5.9)

1.0

280

41(14.6)

1.0

HDL cholesterol

1. < 38

298

30 (10.1)

1.1

309

63 (20.4)

1.4

2. 38 - 46

266

19 (7.1)

11

284

45 (15.8)

1.2

3. 47 - 56

286

22 (7.7)

0.9

259

48 (18.5)

1.2

4. > 56

274

19 (6.9)

1.0

284

42 (14.8)

1.0

Triglycerides

1. < 99

283

26 (9.2)

1.2

284

45 (15.8)

0.8

2. 99.0 - 135.5

280

20 (7.1)

0.9

285

55 (19.3)

1.2

3. 135.6 - 191.2

281

23 (8.2)

1.1

283

51 (18.0)

1.2

4.> 191.2

280

21 (7.5)

1.0

284

47 (16.5)

1.0

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

1.< 97.9

281

28 (10.0)

2.4

287

61 (21.3)

1.6

2.97.9 - 120.6

282

26 (9.2)

1.7

281

57(20.3)

1.3

3. 120.7 - 144

282

22 (7.8)

1.6

285

42 (14.7)

1.1

4.> 144

279

14 (5.0)

1.0

283

38 (13.4)

1.0

*Adjusting for age, sex, ethnic group, education, body mass

index, apolipoprotein E, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, hypertension,

stroke, cancer, and smoking.

CI=confidence interval; HDL=high-density lipoprotein.

Rate ratio: numbers above 1.0 indicate increased relative

risk of dying.

[Guest guest]

Hate to veer off on another rabbit trail, but I'll take this moment to help

enlighten many folks who don't know just what a blizzard is. I live in

Pennsylvania, and snow storms often receive the tag of the blizzard or whatever,

and this has become a pet peeve over the years. A blizzard is a very special

creature and is largely reserved for the upper-mid west, but sometimes other

parts of the mid-west, as well as parts of the northern rockies. Now, this is

not that other places in the country have never seen a real blizzard, we have

here on rare occasions, but I am talking in the context of where blizzards are

common. My figures may not be exact, but I believe there are 3 conditions that

must be met for a snowstorm to earn the title of blizzard. One, the

temperature must never be any higher than 20 degrees. Two, snow must fall at a

very high rate, perhaps 2 or 3 inches an hour. And three, winds must be

sustained, not just gusting, but sustained at 30, or perhaps it's 40, miles an

hour. Those are very rough conditions as any person in the Dakotas or

Minnessotta or Iowa or those places will tell you.

For the rest of us, while we may experience blizzard conditions for minutes at a

time, or white outs with drifting snow, these a blizzard do not make. And, I

think you probably haven't really experienced the essence of the cruelty of a

winter storm unless you've experienced a blizzard that lasts for not hours, but

days. I haven't, and I hope I don't ever.

Dave

RE: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING

FOR RETIREES

That's okay , Monday morning we were told what a wonderful week we

were going to have. Tuesday morning the Jolly Weatherman said we were

going to have a killer blizzard starting late Tuesday night and lasting

through Wednesday about noon.

*snip*

[Guest guest]

Hate to veer off on another rabbit trail, but I'll take this moment to help

enlighten many folks who don't know just what a blizzard is. I live in

Pennsylvania, and snow storms often receive the tag of the blizzard or whatever,

and this has become a pet peeve over the years. A blizzard is a very special

creature and is largely reserved for the upper-mid west, but sometimes other

parts of the mid-west, as well as parts of the northern rockies. Now, this is

not that other places in the country have never seen a real blizzard, we have

here on rare occasions, but I am talking in the context of where blizzards are

common. My figures may not be exact, but I believe there are 3 conditions that

must be met for a snowstorm to earn the title of blizzard. One, the

temperature must never be any higher than 20 degrees. Two, snow must fall at a

very high rate, perhaps 2 or 3 inches an hour. And three, winds must be

sustained, not just gusting, but sustained at 30, or perhaps it's 40, miles an

hour. Those are very rough conditions as any person in the Dakotas or

Minnessotta or Iowa or those places will tell you.

For the rest of us, while we may experience blizzard conditions for minutes at a

time, or white outs with drifting snow, these a blizzard do not make. And, I

think you probably haven't really experienced the essence of the cruelty of a

winter storm unless you've experienced a blizzard that lasts for not hours, but

days. I haven't, and I hope I don't ever.

Dave

RE: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING

FOR RETIREES

That's okay , Monday morning we were told what a wonderful week we

were going to have. Tuesday morning the Jolly Weatherman said we were

going to have a killer blizzard starting late Tuesday night and lasting

through Wednesday about noon.

*snip*

[Guest guest]

Out of so much good in the field of medicine must come a certain amount of bad.

The astounding number of studies out there these days suggests to me that

there's good money in it. If you're smart, it's probably pretty easy money.

Just come up with a niche concept, apply for a grant or sell the idea to some

folks of like minded fortune seeking blood, and you could be pondering case

studies all the way to the bank. I wonder some times if colleges aren't

developeing degrees for creating research studies, more specifically, raising

the money to perform research studies. Hey, it's a job. Is this the voice of a

synic? Absolutely.

Dave

---- Original Message -----

From: Cy

To: blind-diabetics

Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 11:19 AM

Subject: RE: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING

FOR RETIREES

I am beginning to think that modern medicine is probably worse and more

inaccurate than weather forecasting.

Cy, the Ancient Okie...

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF

DYING FOR RETIREES

Newsletter

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

interesting info............

457 West #117 San Dimas, CA 91773 USA

Telephone: 909 596-9507 Facsimile: 909 596-9189

www.askbillsardi.com .............Email: Bsardi@...

For Immediate Release 2/1/2005

LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

Researchers at Columbia University College of Physicians and

Surgeons in New York report a low cholesterol count doubles the risk of

death among the senior Americans.

The report, published in the February 2005 issue of the Journal of

the American Geriatrics Society, evaluated 2277 senior Americans, aged

65 to 98 years, 21% who were taking cholesterol-lowering drugs. It is

widely believed that elevated blood cholesterol numbers are associated

with health and blood vessel disease and mortality in middle-aged

populations. Researchers examined whether this was true among senior

adults. [Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226, 2005]

Over a period of 3 years, lower total cholesterol and low-density

cholesterol (LDL) was associated with a greater risk of dying. Use of

statin cholesterol-lowering drugs seemed to lower this associated but

did not abolish the elevated risk of death.

Previous studies also confirm this newly published report. In 2001

researchers at the University of Hawaii (Manoa), reported that males

71-93 years of age enrolled in the Honolulu Heart Program with low

levels of cholesterol persisting over 20 years had a higher risk of

dying from all causes. Researchers then said: " We have been unable to

explain our results. These data cast doubt on the scientific

justification for lowering cholesterol to very low concentrations in

elderly people. " [Lancet 358: 351-55, 2001]

The largest study conducted to date (ALLHAT) reveals that

cholesterol-lowering drugs only lower mortality rates by insignificant

0.4% over and above usual medical care. [Journal American Medical Assn

288: 2998-3007, 2002] The widely reported benefits of cholesterol -

lowering drugs appear to be apparent only when high-risk groups are

included in studies. [Journal American Medical Assn 291:1864-70, 2004]

The idea of lowering cholesterol among retirees, or healthy middle-aged

adults, appears to be in question.

To learn more about the risks and benefits of cholesterol-lowering

drugs, and natural alternatives to boost cardiovascular health, see the

new

e-book: How To Lower Your Cholesterol Phobia by health journalist Bill

Sardi, at the Natural Health Librarian

Chart From Recent Study Revealing Increased Mortality Among

Seniors As Cholesterol Numbers Decline

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005

Groups by Range of cholesterol, mg/dL

Age

65 - 74

> 74

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

Cholesterol

1. < 176

283

29 (10.2)

1.5

291

67 (23.0)

1.6

2. 176 - 199

285

26 (9.1)

1.4

277

50 (18.1)

1.0

3. 200 - 226

275

19 (6.9)

0.8

288

39 (13/5)

0.8

4. > 226

281

16 (5.7)

1.0

280

42 (15.0)

1.0

Non-HDL cholesterol

1. < 127

292

31 (10.6)

1.7

284

69 (24.3)

1.9

2. 127 - 151

283

20 (7.1)

1.0

289

41 (14.2)

0.9

3. 152 - 176

276

23 (8.3)

0.9

283

47 (16.6)

1.2

4.> 176

273

16 (5.9)

1.0

280

41(14.6)

1.0

HDL cholesterol

1. < 38

298

30 (10.1)

1.1

309

63 (20.4)

1.4

2. 38 - 46

266

19 (7.1)

11

284

45 (15.8)

1.2

3. 47 - 56

286

22 (7.7)

0.9

259

48 (18.5)

1.2

4. > 56

274

19 (6.9)

1.0

284

42 (14.8)

1.0

Triglycerides

1. < 99

283

26 (9.2)

1.2

284

45 (15.8)

0.8

2. 99.0 - 135.5

280

20 (7.1)

0.9

285

55 (19.3)

1.2

3. 135.6 - 191.2

281

23 (8.2)

1.1

283

51 (18.0)

1.2

4.> 191.2

280

21 (7.5)

1.0

284

47 (16.5)

1.0

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

1.< 97.9

281

28 (10.0)

2.4

287

61 (21.3)

1.6

2.97.9 - 120.6

282

26 (9.2)

1.7

281

57(20.3)

1.3

3. 120.7 - 144

282

22 (7.8)

1.6

285

42 (14.7)

1.1

4.> 144

279

14 (5.0)

1.0

283

38 (13.4)

1.0

*Adjusting for age, sex, ethnic group, education, body mass

index, apolipoprotein E, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, hypertension,

stroke, cancer, and smoking.

CI=confidence interval; HDL=high-density lipoprotein.

Rate ratio: numbers above 1.0 indicate increased relative

risk of dying.

[Guest guest]

Out of so much good in the field of medicine must come a certain amount of bad.

The astounding number of studies out there these days suggests to me that

there's good money in it. If you're smart, it's probably pretty easy money.

Just come up with a niche concept, apply for a grant or sell the idea to some

folks of like minded fortune seeking blood, and you could be pondering case

studies all the way to the bank. I wonder some times if colleges aren't

developeing degrees for creating research studies, more specifically, raising

the money to perform research studies. Hey, it's a job. Is this the voice of a

synic? Absolutely.

Dave

---- Original Message -----

From: Cy

To: blind-diabetics

Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 11:19 AM

Subject: RE: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING

FOR RETIREES

I am beginning to think that modern medicine is probably worse and more

inaccurate than weather forecasting.

Cy, the Ancient Okie...

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF

DYING FOR RETIREES

Newsletter

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

interesting info............

457 West #117 San Dimas, CA 91773 USA

Telephone: 909 596-9507 Facsimile: 909 596-9189

www.askbillsardi.com .............Email: Bsardi@...

For Immediate Release 2/1/2005

LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

Researchers at Columbia University College of Physicians and

Surgeons in New York report a low cholesterol count doubles the risk of

death among the senior Americans.

The report, published in the February 2005 issue of the Journal of

the American Geriatrics Society, evaluated 2277 senior Americans, aged

65 to 98 years, 21% who were taking cholesterol-lowering drugs. It is

widely believed that elevated blood cholesterol numbers are associated

with health and blood vessel disease and mortality in middle-aged

populations. Researchers examined whether this was true among senior

adults. [Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226, 2005]

Over a period of 3 years, lower total cholesterol and low-density

cholesterol (LDL) was associated with a greater risk of dying. Use of

statin cholesterol-lowering drugs seemed to lower this associated but

did not abolish the elevated risk of death.

Previous studies also confirm this newly published report. In 2001

researchers at the University of Hawaii (Manoa), reported that males

71-93 years of age enrolled in the Honolulu Heart Program with low

levels of cholesterol persisting over 20 years had a higher risk of

dying from all causes. Researchers then said: " We have been unable to

explain our results. These data cast doubt on the scientific

justification for lowering cholesterol to very low concentrations in

elderly people. " [Lancet 358: 351-55, 2001]

The largest study conducted to date (ALLHAT) reveals that

cholesterol-lowering drugs only lower mortality rates by insignificant

0.4% over and above usual medical care. [Journal American Medical Assn

288: 2998-3007, 2002] The widely reported benefits of cholesterol -

lowering drugs appear to be apparent only when high-risk groups are

included in studies. [Journal American Medical Assn 291:1864-70, 2004]

The idea of lowering cholesterol among retirees, or healthy middle-aged

adults, appears to be in question.

To learn more about the risks and benefits of cholesterol-lowering

drugs, and natural alternatives to boost cardiovascular health, see the

new

e-book: How To Lower Your Cholesterol Phobia by health journalist Bill

Sardi, at the Natural Health Librarian

Chart From Recent Study Revealing Increased Mortality Among

Seniors As Cholesterol Numbers Decline

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005

Groups by Range of cholesterol, mg/dL

Age

65 - 74

> 74

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

Cholesterol

1. < 176

283

29 (10.2)

1.5

291

67 (23.0)

1.6

2. 176 - 199

285

26 (9.1)

1.4

277

50 (18.1)

1.0

3. 200 - 226

275

19 (6.9)

0.8

288

39 (13/5)

0.8

4. > 226

281

16 (5.7)

1.0

280

42 (15.0)

1.0

Non-HDL cholesterol

1. < 127

292

31 (10.6)

1.7

284

69 (24.3)

1.9

2. 127 - 151

283

20 (7.1)

1.0

289

41 (14.2)

0.9

3. 152 - 176

276

23 (8.3)

0.9

283

47 (16.6)

1.2

4.> 176

273

16 (5.9)

1.0

280

41(14.6)

1.0

HDL cholesterol

1. < 38

298

30 (10.1)

1.1

309

63 (20.4)

1.4

2. 38 - 46

266

19 (7.1)

11

284

45 (15.8)

1.2

3. 47 - 56

286

22 (7.7)

0.9

259

48 (18.5)

1.2

4. > 56

274

19 (6.9)

1.0

284

42 (14.8)

1.0

Triglycerides

1. < 99

283

26 (9.2)

1.2

284

45 (15.8)

0.8

2. 99.0 - 135.5

280

20 (7.1)

0.9

285

55 (19.3)

1.2

3. 135.6 - 191.2

281

23 (8.2)

1.1

283

51 (18.0)

1.2

4.> 191.2

280

21 (7.5)

1.0

284

47 (16.5)

1.0

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

1.< 97.9

281

28 (10.0)

2.4

287

61 (21.3)

1.6

2.97.9 - 120.6

282

26 (9.2)

1.7

281

57(20.3)

1.3

3. 120.7 - 144

282

22 (7.8)

1.6

285

42 (14.7)

1.1

4.> 144

279

14 (5.0)

1.0

283

38 (13.4)

1.0

*Adjusting for age, sex, ethnic group, education, body mass

index, apolipoprotein E, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, hypertension,

stroke, cancer, and smoking.

CI=confidence interval; HDL=high-density lipoprotein.

Rate ratio: numbers above 1.0 indicate increased relative

risk of dying.

[Guest guest]

Dave,

It is probably much like the Business community in the early/mid

Seventies. The influx of the MBA grads hit the business world and

nothing has been the same since.

I worked for at least to major corporations which were very solvent -

until - they hired some of the " New Thinkers " . Somehow in a matter of a

couple of years these large companies went from financial solvency to

bankrupcy and at least one finally folded after more than 80 years of

successful operation.

Yes, there are lots of good, sincere and dedicated researchers out there

who have, over the years, made some remarkable discoveries but many of

these folks are under the control of others who are not nearly as

dedicated to medical advancement as they are to financial gain.

The thing which bothers me is the number of studies which directly

contradict other studies which are quite recent. The reason I mention

the fact that the studies which have been contradicted as being " recent "

is that both groups had access to the same technology but came up with

results which were 180 degrees apart.

Oh, by the way, grant writing is a college course.

Cy, the Ancient Okie..

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF

DYING FOR RETIREES

Newsletter

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

interesting info............

457 West #117 San Dimas, CA 91773 USA

Telephone: 909 596-9507 Facsimile: 909 596-9189

www.askbillsardi.com .............Email:

Bsardi@...

For Immediate Release 2/1/2005

LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

Researchers at Columbia University College of Physicians and

Surgeons in New York report a low cholesterol count doubles the risk

of

death among the senior Americans.

The report, published in the February 2005 issue of the Journal

of

the American Geriatrics Society, evaluated 2277 senior Americans,

aged

65 to 98 years, 21% who were taking cholesterol-lowering drugs. It is

widely believed that elevated blood cholesterol numbers are

associated

with health and blood vessel disease and mortality in middle-aged

populations. Researchers examined whether this was true among senior

adults. [Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005]

Over a period of 3 years, lower total cholesterol and

low-density

cholesterol (LDL) was associated with a greater risk of dying. Use of

statin cholesterol-lowering drugs seemed to lower this associated but

did not abolish the elevated risk of death.

Previous studies also confirm this newly published report. In

2001

researchers at the University of Hawaii (Manoa), reported that males

71-93 years of age enrolled in the Honolulu Heart Program with low

levels of cholesterol persisting over 20 years had a higher risk of

dying from all causes. Researchers then said: " We have been unable to

explain our results. These data cast doubt on the scientific

justification for lowering cholesterol to very low concentrations in

elderly people. " [Lancet 358: 351-55, 2001]

The largest study conducted to date (ALLHAT) reveals that

cholesterol-lowering drugs only lower mortality rates by insignificant

0.4% over and above usual medical care. [Journal American Medical Assn

288: 2998-3007, 2002] The widely reported benefits of cholesterol -

lowering drugs appear to be apparent only when high-risk groups are

included in studies. [Journal American Medical Assn 291:1864-70,

2004]

The idea of lowering cholesterol among retirees, or healthy

middle-aged

adults, appears to be in question.

To learn more about the risks and benefits of

cholesterol-lowering

drugs, and natural alternatives to boost cardiovascular health, see

the

new

e-book: How To Lower Your Cholesterol Phobia by health journalist Bill

Sardi, at the Natural Health Librarian

Chart From Recent Study Revealing Increased Mortality

Among

Seniors As Cholesterol Numbers Decline

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005

Groups by Range of cholesterol, mg/dL

Age

65 - 74

> 74

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

Cholesterol

1. < 176

283

29 (10.2)

1.5

291

67 (23.0)

1.6

2. 176 - 199

285

26 (9.1)

1.4

277

50 (18.1)

1.0

3. 200 - 226

275

19 (6.9)

0.8

288

39 (13/5)

0.8

4. > 226

281

16 (5.7)

1.0

280

42 (15.0)

1.0

Non-HDL cholesterol

1. < 127

292

31 (10.6)

1.7

284

69 (24.3)

1.9

2. 127 - 151

283

20 (7.1)

1.0

289

41 (14.2)

0.9

3. 152 - 176

276

23 (8.3)

0.9

283

47 (16.6)

1.2

4.> 176

273

16 (5.9)

1.0

280

41(14.6)

1.0

HDL cholesterol

1. < 38

298

30 (10.1)

1.1

309

63 (20.4)

1.4

2. 38 - 46

266

19 (7.1)

11

284

45 (15.8)

1.2

3. 47 - 56

286

22 (7.7)

0.9

259

48 (18.5)

1.2

4. > 56

274

19 (6.9)

1.0

284

42 (14.8)

1.0

Triglycerides

1. < 99

283

26 (9.2)

1.2

284

45 (15.8)

0.8

2. 99.0 - 135.5

280

20 (7.1)

0.9

285

55 (19.3)

1.2

3. 135.6 - 191.2

281

23 (8.2)

1.1

283

51 (18.0)

1.2

4.> 191.2

280

21 (7.5)

1.0

284

47 (16.5)

1.0

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

1.< 97.9

281

28 (10.0)

2.4

287

61 (21.3)

1.6

2.97.9 - 120.6

282

26 (9.2)

1.7

281

57(20.3)

1.3

3. 120.7 - 144

282

22 (7.8)

1.6

285

42 (14.7)

1.1

4.> 144

279

14 (5.0)

1.0

283

38 (13.4)

1.0

*Adjusting for age, sex, ethnic group, education, body

mass

index, apolipoprotein E, diabetes mellitus, heart disease,

hypertension,

stroke, cancer, and smoking.

CI=confidence interval; HDL=high-density lipoprotein.

Rate ratio: numbers above 1.0 indicate increased relative

risk of dying.

[Guest guest]

Dave,

It is probably much like the Business community in the early/mid

Seventies. The influx of the MBA grads hit the business world and

nothing has been the same since.

I worked for at least to major corporations which were very solvent -

until - they hired some of the " New Thinkers " . Somehow in a matter of a

couple of years these large companies went from financial solvency to

bankrupcy and at least one finally folded after more than 80 years of

successful operation.

Yes, there are lots of good, sincere and dedicated researchers out there

who have, over the years, made some remarkable discoveries but many of

these folks are under the control of others who are not nearly as

dedicated to medical advancement as they are to financial gain.

The thing which bothers me is the number of studies which directly

contradict other studies which are quite recent. The reason I mention

the fact that the studies which have been contradicted as being " recent "

is that both groups had access to the same technology but came up with

results which were 180 degrees apart.

Oh, by the way, grant writing is a college course.

Cy, the Ancient Okie..

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF

DYING FOR RETIREES

Newsletter

Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

interesting info............

457 West #117 San Dimas, CA 91773 USA

Telephone: 909 596-9507 Facsimile: 909 596-9189

www.askbillsardi.com .............Email:

Bsardi@...

For Immediate Release 2/1/2005

LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF DYING FOR RETIREES

Researchers at Columbia University College of Physicians and

Surgeons in New York report a low cholesterol count doubles the risk

of

death among the senior Americans.

The report, published in the February 2005 issue of the Journal

of

the American Geriatrics Society, evaluated 2277 senior Americans,

aged

65 to 98 years, 21% who were taking cholesterol-lowering drugs. It is

widely believed that elevated blood cholesterol numbers are

associated

with health and blood vessel disease and mortality in middle-aged

populations. Researchers examined whether this was true among senior

adults. [Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005]

Over a period of 3 years, lower total cholesterol and

low-density

cholesterol (LDL) was associated with a greater risk of dying. Use of

statin cholesterol-lowering drugs seemed to lower this associated but

did not abolish the elevated risk of death.

Previous studies also confirm this newly published report. In

2001

researchers at the University of Hawaii (Manoa), reported that males

71-93 years of age enrolled in the Honolulu Heart Program with low

levels of cholesterol persisting over 20 years had a higher risk of

dying from all causes. Researchers then said: " We have been unable to

explain our results. These data cast doubt on the scientific

justification for lowering cholesterol to very low concentrations in

elderly people. " [Lancet 358: 351-55, 2001]

The largest study conducted to date (ALLHAT) reveals that

cholesterol-lowering drugs only lower mortality rates by insignificant

0.4% over and above usual medical care. [Journal American Medical Assn

288: 2998-3007, 2002] The widely reported benefits of cholesterol -

lowering drugs appear to be apparent only when high-risk groups are

included in studies. [Journal American Medical Assn 291:1864-70,

2004]

The idea of lowering cholesterol among retirees, or healthy

middle-aged

adults, appears to be in question.

To learn more about the risks and benefits of

cholesterol-lowering

drugs, and natural alternatives to boost cardiovascular health, see

the

new

e-book: How To Lower Your Cholesterol Phobia by health journalist Bill

Sardi, at the Natural Health Librarian

Chart From Recent Study Revealing Increased Mortality

Among

Seniors As Cholesterol Numbers Decline

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 219-226,

2005

Groups by Range of cholesterol, mg/dL

Age

65 - 74

> 74

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

At-Risk Population

Number of Deaths (%)

Rate Ratio

Cholesterol

1. < 176

283

29 (10.2)

1.5

291

67 (23.0)

1.6

2. 176 - 199

285

26 (9.1)

1.4

277

50 (18.1)

1.0

3. 200 - 226

275

19 (6.9)

0.8

288

39 (13/5)

0.8

4. > 226

281

16 (5.7)

1.0

280

42 (15.0)

1.0

Non-HDL cholesterol

1. < 127

292

31 (10.6)

1.7

284

69 (24.3)

1.9

2. 127 - 151

283

20 (7.1)

1.0

289

41 (14.2)

0.9

3. 152 - 176

276

23 (8.3)

0.9

283

47 (16.6)

1.2

4.> 176

273

16 (5.9)

1.0

280

41(14.6)

1.0

HDL cholesterol

1. < 38

298

30 (10.1)

1.1

309

63 (20.4)

1.4

2. 38 - 46

266

19 (7.1)

11

284

45 (15.8)

1.2

3. 47 - 56

286

22 (7.7)

0.9

259

48 (18.5)

1.2

4. > 56

274

19 (6.9)

1.0

284

42 (14.8)

1.0

Triglycerides

1. < 99

283

26 (9.2)

1.2

284

45 (15.8)

0.8

2. 99.0 - 135.5

280

20 (7.1)

0.9

285

55 (19.3)

1.2

3. 135.6 - 191.2

281

23 (8.2)

1.1

283

51 (18.0)

1.2

4.> 191.2

280

21 (7.5)

1.0

284

47 (16.5)

1.0

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

1.< 97.9

281

28 (10.0)

2.4

287

61 (21.3)

1.6

2.97.9 - 120.6

282

26 (9.2)

1.7

281

57(20.3)

1.3

3. 120.7 - 144

282

22 (7.8)

1.6

285

42 (14.7)

1.1

4.> 144

279

14 (5.0)

1.0

283

38 (13.4)

1.0

*Adjusting for age, sex, ethnic group, education, body

mass

index, apolipoprotein E, diabetes mellitus, heart disease,

hypertension,

stroke, cancer, and smoking.

CI=confidence interval; HDL=high-density lipoprotein.

Rate ratio: numbers above 1.0 indicate increased relative

risk of dying.

[Guest guest]

Dave,

I am not sure about the temperature requirements but I think you are

right on about the snow and wind requirements. I lived in Colorado for

nearly 30 years and endured probably three storms which were Blizzards.

In December, 1973, December 1982 and late November 1983 we experienced

some unbelievable snow storms.

In all of these cases the snow drifts between some of the homes were

well above 14 feet. In 1973 I lived on the North edge of a mobile home

park. The snow was above my Mobile home and it was level for about five

homes to the South. My car which was parked between my home and the next

one South had a good 7 or so feet of snow piled on top when we finally

got the vehicles dug out. The storm did not last more than about a day

but it was truly unbelievable.

In 1982 the storm struck on December 24. It started snowing early in the

morning and was a beautiful thing to watch. It was snowing about two

inches per hour but there was no wind - yet.

By noon the wind began to come up and the snow continued to fall. By

1:00 P.M. most of the stores (absolutely unbelievable) closed leaving

those folks, yours truly included, who put off shopping until the

absolute last minute in an awful bind.

The wind continued to rise and the snow continued to fall. By dark the

snow was a good two feet on the level (if you could find that condition)

and it was more like 4 to 6 feet deep inmost places.

By late Christmas Eve the snow had ceased and everything was impassible.

Not even my trusty ancient Jeep Wagoneer could get underway. The reason

I remember this so clearly is that I was courting my sweetie and had

planned for her to come over and spend Christmas Eve with me. She lived

about 3 or 4 blocks away in an apartment. Around 10:00 P.M. I decided to

(true love is so motivating) go over to her house. I saddled up my

trusty Guide Dog, put on my ski gear and struck out for the West.

As I rounded the corner of my house to head for the main street which

was to my South I realized that there was no way I could make it because

the snow was over my head in most places. I then made another discovery,

my Guide, a humongous Black Lab loved the snow and would jump into the

drifts breaking a trail for me to follow. I gave up the harness and went

to long leash traveling following Happy's trail.

The main street was almost passable and progress was much easier.

When we reached Barb's apartment building we were again confronted with

impassable conditions so good old Happy went back into action breaking a

trail from the street where the snow was only about 2 feet deep to the

South edge of the building where there was little or no snow.

When I appeared at Barb's door she was absolutely stunned. I was packed

with snow from head to foot and poor Happy was a white dog.

Tell you what, I did not try to get back home that night. The next day

which was Christmas we dug out the Jeep which was at Barb's and plowed

our way back to my house.

If the storm had lasted much longer it would have been a total disaster.

The storm did qualify as a Blizzard although it did not last all that

long.

Thanksgiving 1983 was a warm and beautiful day. It was so mild we ate

Thanksgiving dinner on our patio and enjoyed the heat from the Sun.

The next morning was like we have moved to another part of theEarth. The

snow was falling at a rate of at least 2 inches per hour and the wind

was howling. Same story, nothing moved for about two days.

Cy, theAncient Okie...

Re: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF

DYING FOR RETIREES

Hate to veer off on another rabbit trail, but I'll take this moment to

help enlighten many folks who don't know just what a blizzard is. I

live in Pennsylvania, and snow storms often receive the tag of the

blizzard or whatever, and this has become a pet peeve over the years. A

blizzard is a very special creature and is largely reserved for the

upper-mid west, but sometimes other parts of the mid-west, as well as

parts of the northern rockies. Now, this is not that other places in

the country have never seen a real blizzard, we have here on rare

occasions, but I am talking in the context of where blizzards are

common. My figures may not be exact, but I believe there are 3

conditions that must be met for a snowstorm to earn the title of

blizzard. One, the temperature must never be any higher than 20

degrees. Two, snow must fall at a very high rate, perhaps 2 or 3 inches

an hour. And three, winds must be sustained, not just gusting, but

sustained at 30, or perhaps it's 40, miles an hour. Those are very

rough conditions as any person in the Dakotas or Minnessotta or Iowa or

those places will tell you.

For the rest of us, while we may experience blizzard conditions for

minutes at a time, or white outs with drifting snow, these a blizzard do

not make. And, I think you probably haven't really experienced the

essence of the cruelty of a winter storm unless you've experienced a

blizzard that lasts for not hours, but days. I haven't, and I hope I

don't ever.

Dave

RE: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK

OF DYING FOR RETIREES

That's okay , Monday morning we were told what a wonderful week

we

were going to have. Tuesday morning the Jolly Weatherman said we were

going to have a killer blizzard starting late Tuesday night and

lasting

through Wednesday about noon.

*snip*

[Guest guest]

Dave,

I am not sure about the temperature requirements but I think you are

right on about the snow and wind requirements. I lived in Colorado for

nearly 30 years and endured probably three storms which were Blizzards.

In December, 1973, December 1982 and late November 1983 we experienced

some unbelievable snow storms.

In all of these cases the snow drifts between some of the homes were

well above 14 feet. In 1973 I lived on the North edge of a mobile home

park. The snow was above my Mobile home and it was level for about five

homes to the South. My car which was parked between my home and the next

one South had a good 7 or so feet of snow piled on top when we finally

got the vehicles dug out. The storm did not last more than about a day

but it was truly unbelievable.

In 1982 the storm struck on December 24. It started snowing early in the

morning and was a beautiful thing to watch. It was snowing about two

inches per hour but there was no wind - yet.

By noon the wind began to come up and the snow continued to fall. By

1:00 P.M. most of the stores (absolutely unbelievable) closed leaving

those folks, yours truly included, who put off shopping until the

absolute last minute in an awful bind.

The wind continued to rise and the snow continued to fall. By dark the

snow was a good two feet on the level (if you could find that condition)

and it was more like 4 to 6 feet deep inmost places.

By late Christmas Eve the snow had ceased and everything was impassible.

Not even my trusty ancient Jeep Wagoneer could get underway. The reason

I remember this so clearly is that I was courting my sweetie and had

planned for her to come over and spend Christmas Eve with me. She lived

about 3 or 4 blocks away in an apartment. Around 10:00 P.M. I decided to

(true love is so motivating) go over to her house. I saddled up my

trusty Guide Dog, put on my ski gear and struck out for the West.

As I rounded the corner of my house to head for the main street which

was to my South I realized that there was no way I could make it because

the snow was over my head in most places. I then made another discovery,

my Guide, a humongous Black Lab loved the snow and would jump into the

drifts breaking a trail for me to follow. I gave up the harness and went

to long leash traveling following Happy's trail.

The main street was almost passable and progress was much easier.

When we reached Barb's apartment building we were again confronted with

impassable conditions so good old Happy went back into action breaking a

trail from the street where the snow was only about 2 feet deep to the

South edge of the building where there was little or no snow.

When I appeared at Barb's door she was absolutely stunned. I was packed

with snow from head to foot and poor Happy was a white dog.

Tell you what, I did not try to get back home that night. The next day

which was Christmas we dug out the Jeep which was at Barb's and plowed

our way back to my house.

If the storm had lasted much longer it would have been a total disaster.

The storm did qualify as a Blizzard although it did not last all that

long.

Thanksgiving 1983 was a warm and beautiful day. It was so mild we ate

Thanksgiving dinner on our patio and enjoyed the heat from the Sun.

The next morning was like we have moved to another part of theEarth. The

snow was falling at a rate of at least 2 inches per hour and the wind

was howling. Same story, nothing moved for about two days.

Cy, theAncient Okie...

Re: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF

DYING FOR RETIREES

Hate to veer off on another rabbit trail, but I'll take this moment to

help enlighten many folks who don't know just what a blizzard is. I

live in Pennsylvania, and snow storms often receive the tag of the

blizzard or whatever, and this has become a pet peeve over the years. A

blizzard is a very special creature and is largely reserved for the

upper-mid west, but sometimes other parts of the mid-west, as well as

parts of the northern rockies. Now, this is not that other places in

the country have never seen a real blizzard, we have here on rare

occasions, but I am talking in the context of where blizzards are

common. My figures may not be exact, but I believe there are 3

conditions that must be met for a snowstorm to earn the title of

blizzard. One, the temperature must never be any higher than 20

degrees. Two, snow must fall at a very high rate, perhaps 2 or 3 inches

an hour. And three, winds must be sustained, not just gusting, but

sustained at 30, or perhaps it's 40, miles an hour. Those are very

rough conditions as any person in the Dakotas or Minnessotta or Iowa or

those places will tell you.

For the rest of us, while we may experience blizzard conditions for

minutes at a time, or white outs with drifting snow, these a blizzard do

not make. And, I think you probably haven't really experienced the

essence of the cruelty of a winter storm unless you've experienced a

blizzard that lasts for not hours, but days. I haven't, and I hope I

don't ever.

Dave

RE: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK

OF DYING FOR RETIREES

That's okay , Monday morning we were told what a wonderful week

we

were going to have. Tuesday morning the Jolly Weatherman said we were

going to have a killer blizzard starting late Tuesday night and

lasting

through Wednesday about noon.

*snip*

[Guest guest]

Dave,

I am not sure about the temperature requirements but I think you are

right on about the snow and wind requirements. I lived in Colorado for

nearly 30 years and endured probably three storms which were Blizzards.

In December, 1973, December 1982 and late November 1983 we experienced

some unbelievable snow storms.

In all of these cases the snow drifts between some of the homes were

well above 14 feet. In 1973 I lived on the North edge of a mobile home

park. The snow was above my Mobile home and it was level for about five

homes to the South. My car which was parked between my home and the next

one South had a good 7 or so feet of snow piled on top when we finally

got the vehicles dug out. The storm did not last more than about a day

but it was truly unbelievable.

In 1982 the storm struck on December 24. It started snowing early in the

morning and was a beautiful thing to watch. It was snowing about two

inches per hour but there was no wind - yet.

By noon the wind began to come up and the snow continued to fall. By

1:00 P.M. most of the stores (absolutely unbelievable) closed leaving

those folks, yours truly included, who put off shopping until the

absolute last minute in an awful bind.

The wind continued to rise and the snow continued to fall. By dark the

snow was a good two feet on the level (if you could find that condition)

and it was more like 4 to 6 feet deep inmost places.

By late Christmas Eve the snow had ceased and everything was impassible.

Not even my trusty ancient Jeep Wagoneer could get underway. The reason

I remember this so clearly is that I was courting my sweetie and had

planned for her to come over and spend Christmas Eve with me. She lived

about 3 or 4 blocks away in an apartment. Around 10:00 P.M. I decided to

(true love is so motivating) go over to her house. I saddled up my

trusty Guide Dog, put on my ski gear and struck out for the West.

As I rounded the corner of my house to head for the main street which

was to my South I realized that there was no way I could make it because

the snow was over my head in most places. I then made another discovery,

my Guide, a humongous Black Lab loved the snow and would jump into the

drifts breaking a trail for me to follow. I gave up the harness and went

to long leash traveling following Happy's trail.

The main street was almost passable and progress was much easier.

When we reached Barb's apartment building we were again confronted with

impassable conditions so good old Happy went back into action breaking a

trail from the street where the snow was only about 2 feet deep to the

South edge of the building where there was little or no snow.

When I appeared at Barb's door she was absolutely stunned. I was packed

with snow from head to foot and poor Happy was a white dog.

Tell you what, I did not try to get back home that night. The next day

which was Christmas we dug out the Jeep which was at Barb's and plowed

our way back to my house.

If the storm had lasted much longer it would have been a total disaster.

The storm did qualify as a Blizzard although it did not last all that

long.

Thanksgiving 1983 was a warm and beautiful day. It was so mild we ate

Thanksgiving dinner on our patio and enjoyed the heat from the Sun.

The next morning was like we have moved to another part of theEarth. The

snow was falling at a rate of at least 2 inches per hour and the wind

was howling. Same story, nothing moved for about two days.

Cy, theAncient Okie...

Re: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK OF

DYING FOR RETIREES

Hate to veer off on another rabbit trail, but I'll take this moment to

help enlighten many folks who don't know just what a blizzard is. I

live in Pennsylvania, and snow storms often receive the tag of the

blizzard or whatever, and this has become a pet peeve over the years. A

blizzard is a very special creature and is largely reserved for the

upper-mid west, but sometimes other parts of the mid-west, as well as

parts of the northern rockies. Now, this is not that other places in

the country have never seen a real blizzard, we have here on rare

occasions, but I am talking in the context of where blizzards are

common. My figures may not be exact, but I believe there are 3

conditions that must be met for a snowstorm to earn the title of

blizzard. One, the temperature must never be any higher than 20

degrees. Two, snow must fall at a very high rate, perhaps 2 or 3 inches

an hour. And three, winds must be sustained, not just gusting, but

sustained at 30, or perhaps it's 40, miles an hour. Those are very

rough conditions as any person in the Dakotas or Minnessotta or Iowa or

those places will tell you.

For the rest of us, while we may experience blizzard conditions for

minutes at a time, or white outs with drifting snow, these a blizzard do

not make. And, I think you probably haven't really experienced the

essence of the cruelty of a winter storm unless you've experienced a

blizzard that lasts for not hours, but days. I haven't, and I hope I

don't ever.

Dave

RE: Fw: LOWERING CHOLESTEROL DOUBLES RISK

OF DYING FOR RETIREES

That's okay , Monday morning we were told what a wonderful week

we

were going to have. Tuesday morning the Jolly Weatherman said we were

going to have a killer blizzard starting late Tuesday night and

lasting

through Wednesday about noon.

*snip*