Guest guest Posted May 30, 2001 Report Share Posted May 30, 2001 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!\ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!\ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ABCNEWS WEB Scientists Protest Soy Approval In Unusual Letter, FDA Experts Lay Out Concerns Researchers Doerge and Sheehan, two of the Food and Drug Administration’s experts on soy, signed a letter of protest, which points to studies that show a link between soy and health problems in certain animals. The two say they tried in vain to stop the FDA approval of soy because it could be misinterpreted as a broader general endorsement beyond benefits for the heart. The text of the letter follows. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration National Center For Toxicological Research Jefferson, Ark. 72079-9502 M. Sheehan, Ph.D. Director, Estrogen Base Program Division of Genetic and Reproductive Toxicology and R. Doerge, Ph.D. Division of Biochemical Toxicology February 18, 1999 Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration Rockville, MD 20852 To whom it may concern, We are writing in reference to Docket # 98P-0683; “Food Labeling: Health Claims; Soy Protein and Coronary Heart Disease.” We oppose this health claim because there is abundant evidence that some of the isoflavones found in soy, including genistein and equol, a metabolize of daidzen, demonstrate toxicity in estrogen sensitive tissues and in the thyroid. This is true for a number of species, including humans. Additionally, the adverse effects in humans occur in several tissues and, apparently, by several distinct mechanisms. Genistein is clearly estrogenic; it possesses the chemical structural features necessary for estrogenic activity (; Sheehan and Medlock, 1995; Tong, et al, 1997; Miksicek, 1998) and induces estrogenic responses in developing and adult animals and in adult humans. In rodents, equol is estrogenic and acts as an estrogenic endocrine disruptor during development (Medlock, et al, 1995a,. Faber and (1993) showed alterations in LH regulation following developmental treatment with genistein. Thus, during pregnancy in humans, isoflavones per se could be a risk factor for abnormal brain and reproductive tract development. Furthermore, pregnant Rhesus monkeys fed genistein had serum estradiol levels 50- 100 percent higher than the controls in three different areas of the maternal circulation (on, et al, 1998). Given that the Rhesus monkey is the best experimental model for humans, and that a women’s own estrogens are a very significant risk factor for breast cancer, it is unreasonable to approve the health claim until complete safety studies of soy protein are conducted. Of equally grave concern is the finding that the fetuses of genistein fed monkeys had a 70 percent higher serum estradiol level than did the controls (on, et al, 1998). Development is recognized as the most sensitive life stage for estrogen toxicity because of the indisputable evidence of a very wide variety of frank malformations and serious functional deficits in experimental animals and humans. In the human population, DES exposure stands as a prime example of adverse estrogenic effects during development. About 50 percent of the female offspring and a smaller fraction of male offspring displayed one or more malformations in the reproductive tract, as well as a lower prevalence (about 1 in a thousand) of malignancies. In adults, genistein could be a risk factor for a number of estrogen-associated diseases. Even without the evidence of elevated serum estradiol levels in Rhesus fetuses, potency and dose differences between DES and the soy isoflavones do not provide any assurance that the soy protein isoflavones per se will be without adverse effects. First, calculations, based on the literature, show that doses of soy protein isoflavones used in clinical trials which demonstrated estrogenic effects were as potent as low but active doses of DES in Rhesus monkeys (Sheehan, unpublished data). Second, we have recently shown that estradiol shows no threshold in an extremely large dose-response experiment (Sheehan, et al, 1999), and we subsequently have found 31 dose-response curves for hormone-mimicking chemicals that also fail to show a threshold (Sheehan, 1998a). Our conclusions are that no dose is without risk; the extent of risk is simply a function of dose. These two features support and extend the conclusion that it is inappropriate to allow health claims for soy protein isolate. Additionally, isoflavones are inhibitors of the thyroid peroxidase which makes T3 and T4. Inhibition can be expected to generate thyroid abnormalities, including goiter and autoimmune thyroiditis. There exists a significant body of animal data that demonstrates goitrogenic and even carcinogenic effects of soy products (cf., Kimura et al., 1976). Moreover, there are significant reports of goitrogenic effects from soy consumption in human infants (cf., Van Wyk et al., 1959; Hydovitz, 1960; Shepard et al., 1960; Pinchers et al., 1965; Chorazy et al., 1995) and adults (McCarrison, 1933; Ishizuki, et al., 1991). Recently, we have identified genistein and daidzein as the goitrogenic isoflavonoid components of soy and defined the mechanisms for inhibition of thyroid peroxidase (TPO)-catalyzed thyroid hormone synthesis in vitro (Divi et al., 1997; Divi et al., 1996). The observed suicide inactivation of TPO by isoflavones, through covalent binding to TPO, raises the possibility of neoantigen formation and because anti-TPO is the principal autoantibody present in auto immune thyroid disease. This hypothetical mechanism is consistent with the reports of Fort et al. (1986, 1990) of a doubling of risk for autoimmune thyroiditis in children who had received soy formulas as infants compared to infants receiving other forms of milk. The serum levels of isoflavones in infants receiving soy formula that are about five times higher than in women receiving soy supplements who show menstrual cycle disturbances, including an increased estradiol level in the follicular phase (Setchell, et al, 1997). Assuming a dose-dependent risk, it is unreasonable to assert that the infant findings are irrelevant to adults who may consume smaller amounts of isoflavones. Additionally, while there is an unambiguous biological effect on menstrual cycle length (Cassidy, et al, 1994), it is unclear whether the soy effects are beneficial or adverse. Furthermore, we need to be concerned about transplacental passage of isoflavones as the DES case has shown us that estrogens can pass the placenta. No such studies have been conducted with genistein in humans or primates. As all estrogens which have been studied carefully in human populations are two-edged swords in humans (Sheehan and Medlock, 1995; Sheehan, 1997), with both beneficial and adverse effects resulting from the administration of the same estrogen, it is likely that the same characteristic is shared by the isoflavones. The animal data is also consistent with adverse effects in humans. Finally, initial data fi-om a robust (7,000 men) long-term (30+ years) prospective epidemiological study in Hawaii showed that Alzheimer’s disease prevalence in Hawaiian men was similar to European-ancestry Americans and to Japanese (White, et al, 1996a). In contrast, vascular dementia prevalence is similar in Hawaii and Japan and both are higher than in European-ancestry Americans. This suggests that common ancestry or environmental factors in Japan and Hawaii are responsible for the higher prevalence of vascular dementia in these locations. Subsequently, this same group showed a significant dose-dependent risk (up to 2.4 fold) for development of vascular dementia and brain atrophy from consumption of tofu, a soy product rich in isoflavones (White, et al, 1996b). This finding is consistent with the environmental causation suggested from the earlier analysis, and provides evidence that soy (tofu) phytoestrogens causes vascular dementia. Given that estrogens are important for maintenance of brain function in women; that the male brain contains aromatase, the enzyme that converts testosterone to estradiol; and that isoflavones inhibit this enzymatic activity (Irvine, 1998), there is a mechanistic basis for the human findings. Given the great difficulty in discerning the relationship between exposures and long latency adverse effects in the human population (Sheehan, 1998b), and the potential mechanistic explanation for the epidemiological findings, this is an important study. It is one of the more robust, well-designed prospective epidemiological studies generally available. We rarely have such power in human studies, as well as a potential mechanism, and thus the results should be interpreted in this context. Does the Asian experience provide us with reassurance that isoflavones are safe? A review of several examples lead to the conclusion “Given the parallels with herbal medicines with respect to attitudes, monitoring deficiencies, and the general difficulty of detecting toxicities with long Iatencies, I am unconvinced that the long history of apparent safe use of soy products can provide confidence that they are indeed without risk.” (Sheehan, 1998b). It should also be noted that the claim on p. 62978 that soy protein foods are GRAS is in conflict with the recent return by CFSAN to Archer s Midland of a petition for GRAS status for soy protein because of deficiencies in reporting adverse effects in the petition. Thus GRAS status has not been granted. Kahl can provide you with details. It would seem appropriate for FDA to speak with a single voice regarding soy protein isolate. Taken together, the findings presented here are self-consistent and demonstrate that genistein and other isoflavones can have adverse effects in a variety of species, including humans. Animal studies are the front line in evaluating toxicity, as they predict, with good accuracy, adverse effects in humans. For the isoflavones, we additionally have evidence of two types of adverse effects in humans, despite the very few studies that have addressed this subject. While isoflavones may have beneficial effects at some ages or circumstances, this cannot be assumed to be true at all ages. Isoflavones are like other estrogens in that they are two-edged swords, conferring both benefits and risk (Sheehan and Medlock, 1995; Sheehan, 1997). The health labeling of soy protein isolate for foods needs to considered just as would the addition of any estrogen or goitrogen to foods, which are bad ideas. Estrogenic and goitrogenic drugs are regulated by FDA, and are taken under a physician’s care. Patients are informed of risks, and are monitored by their physicians for evidence of toxicity. There are no similar safeguards in place for foods, so the public will be put at potential risk from soy isoflavones in soy protein isolate without adequate warning and information. Finally, NCTR is currently conducting a long-term multigeneration study of genistein administered in feed to rats. The analysis of the dose range-finding studies are near-complete or complete now. As preliminary data, which is still confidential, maybe relevant to your decision, I suggest you contact Dr. Barry Delclos at the address on the letterhead, or email him. Sincerely, M. Sheehan R. Doerge Enclosures cc: Dr. Bernard Schwetz, Director, NCTR Dr. Barry Delclos REFERENCES Cassidy, A, Bingham, S, and Setchell, KDR. Biological effects of soy protein rich in isoflavones on the menstrual cycle of premenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 60, 333- 340, 1994. Chorazy, P.A., Himelhoch, S., Hopwood, N, J., Greger, N. G., and Postellon, D.C. Persistent hypothyroidism in an infant receiving a soy formula: Case report and review of the literature. Pediatrics 148-150, 1995. Divi, R. L., Chang, H. C., and Doerge, D.R. Identification, characterization and mechanisms of anti-thyroid activity of isoflavones from soybean. Biochem. Pharrnacol. 54, 1087-1096, 1997. Divi, R.L. and Doerge, D.R. Inhibition of thyroid peroxidase by dietary flavonoids. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 9, 16-23, 1996. Levy, JR, Faber, FA,Ayyash, L, and , CL. The effect of prenatal exposure to phytoestrogen genistein on sexual differentiation in rats. Proc. Sot. Exp. Biol. Med. 208, 60-66, 1995. Fort, P., Lanes, R., Dahlem, S., Reeker, B., Weyman-Daum, M., Pugliese, M., and Lifshitz, F. Breast feeding and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in children. J. Am. Coil. Nutr. 5,439-441, 1986. Fort, P, Moses, N., Fasano, M, Goldberg, T, and Lifshitz, F. Breast and soy-formula feedings in early infancy and the prevalence of autoimmune thyroid disease in children. J. Am. Coil. Nutr. 9, 164-167, 1990. on, R. M.. pi, P. P., and Henson, M.C. Effects of genistein on estradiol production in pregnant Rhesus monkeys (A4acaca Mulatta). Am. J. Primatology 45, 183, 1998. Hydovitz, JD, Occurrence of goiter in an infant on a soy diet. New Eng. J. Med. 262, 351-353, 1960. Irvine, CHG, Fitzpatrick, MG, and , SL. Phytoestrogens in soy-based infant foods: Concentrations, daily intake, and possible biological effects. Proc. Sot. Exp. Biol. Med. 217,247-253, 1998. Ishizuki, Y., Hirooka, Y., Murata, Y., and Togasho, K. The effects on the thyroid gland of soybeans administered experimentally to healthy subjects. Nippon Naibunpi gakkai Zasshi 67,622-629, 1991. Kimura, S, Suwa, J, Ito, B and Sate, H. Development of malignant goiter by defatted soybean with iodine-free diet in rats. Gann 67, 763-765, 1976. McCarrison, R. The goitrogenic action of soybean and groundnut. Indian J. Med. Res. 21, 179-181, 1933. Medlock, K. L., Branham, W. S., Sheehan, D.M. The effects of phytoestrogens on neonatal rat uterine growth and development. Proc. Sot. Exp. Biol. Med. 208:307-313, 1995. Medlock, K.L., Branham, W. S., Sheehan, D.M. Effects of coumestrol and equol on the developing reproductive tract of the rat. Proc. Sot. Exp. Biol. Med., 208:67-1, 1995. Miksicek, RJ. Estrogenic flavonoids: Structural requirements for biological activity. Proc. Sot. Exp. Biol. Med. 208,44-50, 1995. Pinchers, A, MacGillivray, MH, Crawford, JD, and Freeman, AG. Thyroid refractoriness in an athyreotic cretin fed soybean formula, New Eng. J. Med., 265, 83-87, 1965. Setchell, KDR, Zimmer-Nechemias, L, Cai, J, and Heubi, JE. Exposure of infants to phyto-estrogens from soy-based infant formula. Lancet, 350,23-27, 1997. Sheehan, D.M. Literature analysis of no-threshold dose-response curves for endocrine disrupters. Teratology, 57,219, 1998a. Sheehan, D.M. Herbal medicines and phytoestrogens: risklbenefit considerations. Proc. Sot. Exp. Biol. Med., 217,379-385, 1998b. Sheehan, D.M. Isoflavone content of breast milk and soy formulas: Benefits and risks. Clin. Chem., 43:850, 1997. Sheehan, D.M. and Medlock, K.L. Current issues regarding phytoestrogens. Polyphenols Actualities, 13:22-24, 1995. Sheehan, D. M., Willingham, E., Gaylor, D., Bergeron, J. M., and Crews, D. No threshold dose for oestradiol-induced sex reversal of turtle embryos: How little is too much? Environmental Health Perspectives, February, 1999 issue, in press. Shepard, TH, Pyne, GE, Kirschvink, JF, and McLean, CM. Soybean goiter. New Eng. J. Med. 262, 1099-1103, 1960. Tong, W, Perkins, R, Xing, L, Welsh, WJ, and Sheehan, DM. QSAR models for binding of estrogenic compounds to estrogen receptor alpha and beta subtypes. Endo. 138, 4022- 4025, 1997. Van Wyk, JJ, Arnold, MB, Wynn, J, and Pepper, F. The effects of a soybean product on thyroid function in humans, Pediatrics 24,752-760, 1959. White, L, Petrovitch, H, Ross, GW, and Masaki. Association of mid-life consumption of tofu with late life cognitive impairment and dementia: The Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. The Neurobiol. of Aging, 17 (suppl 4), S 121, 1996a. White, L, Petrovich, H, Ross, GW, Masaki, KH, Abbot, RD, Teng, EL, , BL, Blanchette, PL, Havlik, RJ, Wergowske, G, Chiu, D, Foley, DJ, Murdaugh, C, and Curb, JD. Prevalence of dementia in older Japanese-American men in Hawaii, JAMA 276, 955-960, 1996b. SEARCH ABCNEWS.com FOR MORE ON … Copyright ©2000 ABC News Internet Ventures. Click here for Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and Internet Safety Information applicable to this site. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!\ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!\ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & -------------- NOTES FROM MARY --------------- I've written about soy before, and how the overconsumption of soy products - this current craze for more and more isoflavone pills and powders - can contribute to thyroid problems. (See " The Downsides of Soy, " at http://thyroid.about.com/library/weekly/aa083099.htm). I eat some soy foods myself, but won't touch isoflavone supplements or soy protein powders because of concern for my thyroid health. Now, even the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is questioning whether the current soy craze is entirely healthy. From a new FDA Report: " While isoflavones may have beneficial effects at some ages or circumstances, this cannot be assumed to be true at all ages. Isoflavones are like other estrogens in that they are two-edged swords, conferring both benefits and risks. " Read this excellent pro and con overview of soy products, at: " Soy: Health Claims for Soy Protein, " http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2000/300_soy.html Even more questions about soy are popping up. Here's a quote from FoxNews. . . " Because phytoestrogens sometimes act like a hormone, they have the potential to produce health benefits -- but there are also potential dangers. There's always a trade-off; there's no free lunch. . . We're not talking just about nutrients, but pharmacological agents which have the opportunity to adjust the metabolism of our cells. " Quoted from " Soy Is Heralded by Nutrition Experts, But Not Without Concerns, " located at http://www.foxnews.com/health/042800/soysick.sml & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Soy Online Service Thyroid Disease: The Dangerous Downside of Soy Products Dateline: 08/30/99 It seems that there's isn't a newspaper, magazine or news program that hasn't recently featured a story on the amazing health benefits of soy food products and soy/isoflavone supplements. Soy is promoted as a healthy alternative to estrogen replacement for some women, as a possibly way to reduce the risk of breast cancer, as a way to minimize menopause symptoms, and as a healthier, low-fat protein alternative for meats and poultry. But what all the positive stories fail to mention is that there is a very real -- but very overlooked -- downside to the heavy or long-term use of soy products. Soy products increase the risk of thyroid disease. And this danger is particularly great for infants on soy formula. This is not information that the powerful and profitable U.S. soy industry wants you to know. The sale of soy products is big business, and the increasing demand for soy protein products, soy powders and soy isoflavone supplements is making that an even more profitable business than ever before. In researching my upcoming book, which covers the issue of soy products and the thyroid in great depth, I talked to Dr. Mike Fitzpatrick, an environmental scientist and phytoestrogen researcher who has conducted in-depth studies on soy, particularly the use of soy formulas. Dr. Fitzpatrick makes it clear that soy products can have a detrminental affect on both adults and infants. In particular, he firmly believe that soy formula manufacturers should remove the isoflavones -- that part of the soy products that act as anti-thyroid agents -- from their products. Researchers have identified that the isoflavones act as potent anti-thyroid agents, and are capable of suppressing thyroid function, and causing or worsening hypothyroidism. Soy is a phytoestrogen, and therefore acts in the body much like a hormone, so it's no surprise that it interacts with the delicate balance of the thyroid's hormonal systems. High consumption of soy products are also proven to cause goiter, (Anti-thyroid isoflavones from soybean: isolation, characterization, and mechanisms of action, Divi RL; Chang HC; Doerge DR, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA, Biochem Pharmacol, 1997 Nov, 54:10, 1087-96) Note: The best source of information on soy and its negative impact on health can be found at the Soy Online Service, and in particular, its page on phytoestrogenic effects of soy, and impact on the thyroid. Isoflavones belong to the flavonoid or bioflavonoid family of chemicals, and are considered endocrine disruptors -- plants or other products that act as hormones, disrupting the endocrine system, and in some cases, this disruption involves acting as an anti-thyroid agent. (The grain millet, for example, contains high levels of flavonoids, and is commonly known as problematic for thyroid function). Flavonoids inhibit thyroid peroxidase (TPO), which disturbs proper thyroid function. The March 1999 issue of Natural Health magazine has a feature on soy that quotes R. Doerge, Ph.D., a researcher at the Food and Drug Aministration's National Center for Toxicological Research. Dr. Doerge has researched soy's anti-thyroid properties, and has said " ...I see substantial risks from taking soy supplements or eating huge amounts of soyfoods for their putative disease preventive value. There is definitely potential for interaction with the thyroid. " One UK study of premenopausal women gave 60 grams of soy protein per day for one month. This was found to disrupt the menstrual cycle, with the effects of the isoflavones continuing for a full three months after stopping the soy in the diet. Isoflavones are also known to modify fertility and change sex hormone status. Isoflavones have been shown to have serious health effects -- including infertility, thyroid disease or liver disease -- on a number of mammals. Dr. Fitzpatrick believes that people with hypothyroidism should avoid soy products, because, " any inhibition of TPO will clearly work against anyone trying to correct an hypothyroid state. " In addition, he believes that the current promotion of soy as a health food will result in an increase in thyroid disorders. The Dangers of Soy Formulas Since the late 1950's, it has been known that soy formulas contain anti-thyroid agents. Infants on soy formula are particularly vulnerable to developing autoimmune thyroid disease when exposed to high exposure of isoflavones over time. ( Breast and soy-formula feedings in early infancy and the prevalence of autoimmune thyroid disease in children. Fort P; Moses N; Fasano M; Goldberg T; Lifshitz F Department of Pediatrics, North Shore University Hospital-Cornell University Medical College, Manhasset, New York 11030. J Am Coll Nutr, 1990 Apr, 9:2, 164-7) This study found that the frequency of feedings with soy-based milk formulas in early life was noticeably higher in children with autoimmune thyroid disease, and thyroid problems were almost triple in those soy formula-fed children compared to their siblings and healthy unrelated children. Dr. Fitzpatrick even believes that long-term feeding with soy formulas inhibits TPO to such an extent that long-term elevated TSH levels can also raise the risk of thyroid cancer. Not much is being done in the U.S. to make parents aware of the thyroid-related dangers of soy formulas, or to alert the public that heavy soy consumption may be a danger to thyroid function. Other countries, however, are far ahead of the U.S. In July of 1996, the British Department of Health issued a warning that the phytoestrogens found in soy-based infant formulas could adversely affect infant health. The warning was clear, indicating that soy formula should only be given to babies on the advice of a health professional. They advised that babies who cannot be breastfed or who have allergies to other formulas be given alternatives to soy-based formulas. Why more information is not available about these concerns is probably a function of the tremendous strength of the large agricultural companies that dominate America's soy market. One thing is clear, however. At the same time that health experts, and nearly every radio and television health program in the nation touts soy as the miracle health food of the new millenium, the United States pediatric and medical community needs to get more on top of this issue, and begin to counsel their patients regarding the serious impact use of soy products can have on thyroid function. How Much Soy is Safe? According to the Soy Online Service, for infants, any soy is too much. For adults, just 30 mg of soy isoflavones per day is the amount found to have a negative impact on thyroid function. This amount of soy isoflavones is found in just 5-8 ounces of soy milk, or 1.5 ounces of miso. For more information on how much soy is too much, see the Soy Online Service guidance page. The USDA has launched a website that is promoting the health benefits of use of soy and soy foods. The USDA site lists the isoflavone content of a total of 128 foods, including foods such as vegetarian hot dogs soybeans, chickpeas and tofu. This can help you in deciding how much soy to include in your diet. More information For more information on soy products, see: Soy Online Service Soy's Negative Impact on The Thyroid: Thyroid Disease Net Links, a comprehensive listing I've developed All About Soy, About.com's Nutrition Guide Rick Hall's excellent list of soy-related resources Food and Drug Administration Approves New Health Claim for Foods Containing Soy, October 1999 article discussing this FDA approval, from About.com Nutrition Guide, Rick Hall. Concerns Regarding Soybeans, from the Rheumatic Diseases website Are Soy Products Dangerous?, from the Gerson Healing Newsletter, Vol. 11, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 1997 About.com's Vegetarian Guide covers " The Joy of Soy " Guide to Soy Isoflavones Soy to the World: A Guide to Incorporating Soy into Your Diet ________________________________________________________________ SOS Guidance What we think you should be doing about phytoestrogens and soy. How much soy is safe to eat? For infants, we believe any soy is too much soy. Adults consuming soy should also exercise caution. The observations from the Ishizuki Thyroid Clinic study indicate significant, goitrogenic effects in subjects fed 30 g soybeans per day. Based on the concentrations of isoflavones found in Japanese soybeans, 30 g of soybeans could contribute up to 23 mg total genistein and 10 mg of total daidzein. For a 70 kg adult this would equate to an intake of 0.33 mg/kg-body weight of genistein and 0.14 mg/kg-body weight of daidzein per day. This amount of isoflavone consumption is approximately three times higher than the amount typically consumed in Japan, which is 0.08 to 0.13 mg/kg-body weight of total genistein per day for a 70 kg adult. For infants fed soy-formulas, the exposure to isoflavones is greater than in any other population group. Infants less than 6 months of age who are solely fed soy formula have an intake of up to 5.4 mg/kg-body weight of genistein and 2.3 mg/kg-body weight basis of daidzein per day. Hence, soy formula fed infants are exposed to approximately 16 times greater levels of isoflavones than the subjects in the Ishizuki study. The concentrations of isoflavones found in soy products can vary but studies from New Zealand indicate that a diet of 500g of soy milk plus 200g tofu per day would result in the consumption of up to 135 mg total genistein and 80 mg total daidzein. For a 70 kg adult this equates to an intake of 1.9 mg/kg-body weight of genistein and 1.1 mg/kg-body weight of daidzein per day. This degree of exposure to isoflavones is more than five times that of subjects in the investigation by Ishizuki. Users of isoflavone supplements may consume up to 40 mg of genistein per day. For a 70 kg adult this is equivalent to 0.57 mg/kg-body weight basis of genistein per day which is about 1.7 times more than that found to have goitrogenic effects. Therefore, soy formula fed infants, high soy consumers and users of isoflavone supplements might exhibit classic hypothyroid symptoms without recognising a dietary connection. Unfortunately there is little data as what constitutes an appropriate level of soy intake, although it appears that some western consumers may now be eating far greater amounts of soy than that taken as part of a traditional Asian diet. Soy users should be aware of the potency of just 30 mg soy isoflavones per day. Thyroid disorders (see above for discussion on the active dose in the Ishizuki Thyroid Clinic study) and other biological effects have been observed at dose around this level. As an approximate guide 30 mg of soy isoflavones can be found in: Soybeans and soyflours: 9 - 20g (0.3 - 0.7oz). Soy mince: 12g (0.4oz). Tofu: 50 - 110g (1.8 - 3.9oz). Soy milks: 150 - 240g (5.3 - 8.5oz). Miso: 35 - 45g (1.2 - 1.6oz). Soybean sprouts: 80g (2.8oz). What products contain soy? As well as obvious soyfoods like tofu, soy milk and miso, and other soy products such as isolated soy protein (ISP) and soy protein concentrate (SPC), very many processed foods contain soy, some examples are: Biscuits Breads Vegetarian burgers Cakes Crackers Bakery products Pastries Meat substitutes Pancakes Chicken nuggets Legume meal Fish fingers Pies Meat extenders Hydrolysed vegetable protein (HVP) Yoghurt Breakfast cereals Sausages Soups Baby foods Doughnuts Vegetarian meats Sandwich spreads Baby rusks Pet Foods Animal feeds Textured vegetable protein (TVP) Why isn't this information readily available? People deserve the right to know about what they are eating and what they are feeding their children. So why are government agencies so reluctant to share information with the public? New Zealand environmental scientist and phytoestrogen researcher Dr Mike Fitzpatrick met with California DHS staff in June 1998 to express his concerns about soy, and particularly soy formulas. He received a written response from DHS toxicologist Dr Loscutoff. Loscutoff stated: " I agree that high levels of dietary exposures to isoflavones in infants fed soy-based formulas is cause for concern " . " I do not agree that parents have a right to know that soy-based formulas contain isoflavones and the kinds of toxicities isoflavones might demonstrate in infants, since parents would not know how to interpret the information. " This kind of response it quite typical of agencies fearing a severe backlash from the soy lobby should they alert the public to the potential health concerns of soy isoflavones. What else can I do? Write to your National or State Health Department representatives demanding information on the risks associated with the consumption of soy isoflavones, especially by infants, and the safety of isoflavone supplements/OTC-drugs. Write to potentially sympathetic politicians (e.g. in the US Senator Barbara Boxer or Senator Fred Lautenberg), and express your concern about the presence of isoflavones in soy formulas. Ask for clarification regarding the safety of soy formulas and soy isoflavone supplements/OTC drugs. Share this information with your health professionals and friends. Be prepared for a 'no evidence of harm' response from government agencies. The facts, however, tell a different story. Support our work. Contact Soy Online Service if you can help. Home Introduction History Phytoestrogens Soy Toxins Soy Politics SOS_Guidance Downloads Links Hot News Regulators Big Ugly Bull $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.