Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 Hi, I had an ultrasound done a couple of weeks ago and they didn't tell me to have my bladder full. Perhaps the way they do the procedure nowadays has changed. The examination was over before I knew it and there was nothing to it. Kir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 Hi, I had an ultrasound done a couple of weeks ago and they didn't tell me to have my bladder full. Perhaps the way they do the procedure nowadays has changed. The examination was over before I knew it and there was nothing to it. Kir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 Sorry. Ultrasound still requires a full bladder. You should not avoid this necessary diagnostic test. When I get to the radiologist's office I remind the receptionist that I have a full bladder because I am having ultra sound and I insist on going first. I even say, " I am about to burst. " Also discuss your concerns with the technician. Perhaps if you are that concerned about peeing on yourself you should bring Depends and place them underneath you on the table. I know it is uncomfortable but don't avoid it. Ultrasound is necessary. Good luck to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 Sorry. Ultrasound still requires a full bladder. You should not avoid this necessary diagnostic test. When I get to the radiologist's office I remind the receptionist that I have a full bladder because I am having ultra sound and I insist on going first. I even say, " I am about to burst. " Also discuss your concerns with the technician. Perhaps if you are that concerned about peeing on yourself you should bring Depends and place them underneath you on the table. I know it is uncomfortable but don't avoid it. Ultrasound is necessary. Good luck to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 Dawn, I just had transvaginal ultrasound this week and they made me empty my bladder before they started. The procedure wasn't bad, except when she tried to move my fibroid out of the way to see if she could find my left ovary. I had expected that they would run something over my stomach like you see in all the tv shows when they do ultrasounds for pregnancies, so I was startled that it was a vaginal and even more so when I saw the probe until the technician told me they don't use the whole length. On another note, I'm very glad I found this mailing list. The technician at my ultrasound Wednesday diagnosed me with " a big honkin fibroid " , but I haven't been back to see my doctor yet, so I don't know exactly how big it is or what we are going to do about it. It's very nice to know there are others out there to talk to about it. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 Dawn, I just had transvaginal ultrasound this week and they made me empty my bladder before they started. The procedure wasn't bad, except when she tried to move my fibroid out of the way to see if she could find my left ovary. I had expected that they would run something over my stomach like you see in all the tv shows when they do ultrasounds for pregnancies, so I was startled that it was a vaginal and even more so when I saw the probe until the technician told me they don't use the whole length. On another note, I'm very glad I found this mailing list. The technician at my ultrasound Wednesday diagnosed me with " a big honkin fibroid " , but I haven't been back to see my doctor yet, so I don't know exactly how big it is or what we are going to do about it. It's very nice to know there are others out there to talk to about it. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 In a message dated 01-03-03 08:49:58 EST, you write: << Sorry. Ultrasound still requires a full bladder. You should not avoid this necessary diagnostic test. When I get to the radiologist's office I remind the receptionist that I have a full bladder because I am having ultra sound and I insist on going first. I even say, " I am about to burst. " Also discuss your concerns with the technician. Perhaps if you are that concerned about peeing on yourself you should bring Depends and place them underneath you on the table. I know it is uncomfortable but don't avoid it. Ultrasound is necessary. Good luck to you. >> I think it depends on what they're scanning and how. I've had transabdominal ultrasounds for my fibroids, and didn't have to have full bladder. They even asked me if I wanted to go to the bathroom first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 In a message dated 01-03-03 08:49:58 EST, you write: << Sorry. Ultrasound still requires a full bladder. You should not avoid this necessary diagnostic test. When I get to the radiologist's office I remind the receptionist that I have a full bladder because I am having ultra sound and I insist on going first. I even say, " I am about to burst. " Also discuss your concerns with the technician. Perhaps if you are that concerned about peeing on yourself you should bring Depends and place them underneath you on the table. I know it is uncomfortable but don't avoid it. Ultrasound is necessary. Good luck to you. >> I think it depends on what they're scanning and how. I've had transabdominal ultrasounds for my fibroids, and didn't have to have full bladder. They even asked me if I wanted to go to the bathroom first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 A trans-vaginal ultrasound does not require a full bladder - in fact, it requires an empty one. The only down-side to this procedure is that one's modesty is not preserved. The technician uses a long probe (outfitted with a condom, no less!) placed inside the vagina and he/she must move it around a lot to get the best views of ovaries & fibroids. Difficult to make " small-talk " under these circumstances... Cori Re: Looking for answers re: ultrasound Sorry. Ultrasound still requires a full bladder. You should not avoid this necessary diagnostic test. When I get to the radiologist's office I remind the receptionist that I have a full bladder because I am having ultra sound and I insist on going first. I even say, " I am about to burst. " Also discuss your concerns with the technician. Perhaps if you are that concerned about peeing on yourself you should bring Depends and place them underneath you on the table. I know it is uncomfortable but don't avoid it. Ultrasound is necessary. Good luck to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 A trans-vaginal ultrasound does not require a full bladder - in fact, it requires an empty one. The only down-side to this procedure is that one's modesty is not preserved. The technician uses a long probe (outfitted with a condom, no less!) placed inside the vagina and he/she must move it around a lot to get the best views of ovaries & fibroids. Difficult to make " small-talk " under these circumstances... Cori Re: Looking for answers re: ultrasound Sorry. Ultrasound still requires a full bladder. You should not avoid this necessary diagnostic test. When I get to the radiologist's office I remind the receptionist that I have a full bladder because I am having ultra sound and I insist on going first. I even say, " I am about to burst. " Also discuss your concerns with the technician. Perhaps if you are that concerned about peeing on yourself you should bring Depends and place them underneath you on the table. I know it is uncomfortable but don't avoid it. Ultrasound is necessary. Good luck to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 > A trans-vaginal ultrasound does not require a full bladder - in fact, it > requires an empty one. The only down-side to this procedure is that one's > modesty is not preserved. The technician uses a long probe (outfitted with > a condom, no less!) placed inside the vagina and he/she must move it around > a lot to get the best views of ovaries & fibroids. Difficult to make > " small-talk " under these circumstances... > > Cori I agree with Cori about the lack of modesty with the vaginal ultrasound but it also gives a better picture of whats going on. Its not painful at all and does not require the full bladder. I had mine done at a medical center. I don't know if most gynecologists have this equipment. > > Re: Looking for answers re: ultrasound > > > Sorry. Ultrasound still requires a full bladder. You should not avoid this > necessary diagnostic test. When I get to the radiologist's office I remind > the receptionist that I have a full bladder because I am having ultra sound > and I insist on going first. I even say, " I am about to burst. " Also discuss > your concerns with the technician. Perhaps if you are that concerned about > peeing on yourself you should bring Depends and place them underneath you on > the table. > > I know it is uncomfortable but don't avoid it. Ultrasound is necessary. Good > luck to you. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 > A trans-vaginal ultrasound does not require a full bladder - in fact, it > requires an empty one. The only down-side to this procedure is that one's > modesty is not preserved. The technician uses a long probe (outfitted with > a condom, no less!) placed inside the vagina and he/she must move it around > a lot to get the best views of ovaries & fibroids. Difficult to make > " small-talk " under these circumstances... > > Cori I agree with Cori about the lack of modesty with the vaginal ultrasound but it also gives a better picture of whats going on. Its not painful at all and does not require the full bladder. I had mine done at a medical center. I don't know if most gynecologists have this equipment. > > Re: Looking for answers re: ultrasound > > > Sorry. Ultrasound still requires a full bladder. You should not avoid this > necessary diagnostic test. When I get to the radiologist's office I remind > the receptionist that I have a full bladder because I am having ultra sound > and I insist on going first. I even say, " I am about to burst. " Also discuss > your concerns with the technician. Perhaps if you are that concerned about > peeing on yourself you should bring Depends and place them underneath you on > the table. > > I know it is uncomfortable but don't avoid it. Ultrasound is necessary. Good > luck to you. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 Dawn, I had an abdominal ultrasound 3 weeks ago. I only had to drink a quart of water starting one hour before the procedure. I was surprised that it wasn't that bad at all. Then I was able to empty my bladder and have the vaginal ultrasound which was painless. I had a male technician with a radiology nurse in the room. I was fully draped and he let me insert the probe, then took over. We all talked during the procedure and it was fine, really! Good Luck Anita Looking for answers re: ultrasound > Hi, > I'm Dawn and have been lurking on this list for awhile to find out more > about fibriods and different treatments. I have researched Endometrial > Ablation and that sounds like a viable alternative for me and after years of > very heavy periods (I'm 47), it seems like a dream come true that there > would be procedure that could leave my uterus intact yet still decrease the > heavy bleeding. I have not actually been diagnosed with fibroids because my > biggest fear at this point, believe it or not, is the ultrasound... I know > that sounds crazy, but I had an ultrasound 20 years ago and had to have my > bladder so full that it was painful and I was petrified that I was going to > wet the table while the technician was doing the procedure. She allowed me > to go to the bathroom a few times but only to relieve " some " of the > discomfort not to completely empty it. So I'm wondering if they have > improved the ultrasound procedure enough that you don't need to have your > bladder that full... . > > Dawn > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 Dawn, You poor thing!!! A full bladder is requested for an abdominal ultrasound but not a transvaginal ultrasound. I never drank the entire required amount of water that was suggested (I got too full) and during the ultrasound the tech mentioned that my bladder was not full but she had no problem doing the scan. Request a vaginal ultrasound only if this worries you still. Having an ultrasound should be painless and relatively easy. It's nerve wracking in and of itself having to have these scans done to note new fibroid growth and worrying about peeing shouldn't be a part of it! Amy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 --- Poppet wrote: > > Dawn, I just had transvaginal ultrasound this week > and they made me empty my > bladder before they started. The procedure wasn't > bad, except when she > tried to move my fibroid out of the way to see if > she could find my left > ovary. I had expected that they would run something > over my stomach > like you see in all the tv shows when they do > ultrasounds for > pregnancies, so I was startled that it was a vaginal > and even more so > when I saw the probe until the technician told me > they don't use the > whole length. > > On another note, I'm very glad I found this mailing > list. The > technician at my ultrasound Wednesday diagnosed me > with " a big honkin > fibroid " , but I haven't been back to see my doctor > yet, so I don't know > exactly how big it is or what we are going to do > about it. It's very > nice to know there are others out there to talk to > about it. > > - > Dawn & Last year in May my ultrasound found 2 large fibroids, they didn't start heavy bleeding till Dec of same year. What really made my abdomin get huge was this shot called depo-provera. I later learned at the website fibroids.net that depo-provera and provera actually cause the fibroid to grow. It only slowed down the bleeding, which was helpful to my blood hemoglobin. I was getting up 3 and 4 X at night to pee, making the following day so hard. I ended up staying home from work taking naps. I found info at different websites and had an UAE on Feb 13,2001. and I'm OK. Doc said my bladder will be back to normal few more weeks. the Doctor was so nice. If you need to know more I'd be happy to give you more info. In the meantime you just got to read this book titled " What your doctor may not tell you about premenopause " by Dr. JOHN LEE. Even if you are younger than 30 you should read it, due to the fact you have fibroids. __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 --- Poppet wrote: > > Dawn, I just had transvaginal ultrasound this week > and they made me empty my > bladder before they started. The procedure wasn't > bad, except when she > tried to move my fibroid out of the way to see if > she could find my left > ovary. I had expected that they would run something > over my stomach > like you see in all the tv shows when they do > ultrasounds for > pregnancies, so I was startled that it was a vaginal > and even more so > when I saw the probe until the technician told me > they don't use the > whole length. > > On another note, I'm very glad I found this mailing > list. The > technician at my ultrasound Wednesday diagnosed me > with " a big honkin > fibroid " , but I haven't been back to see my doctor > yet, so I don't know > exactly how big it is or what we are going to do > about it. It's very > nice to know there are others out there to talk to > about it. > > - > Dawn & Last year in May my ultrasound found 2 large fibroids, they didn't start heavy bleeding till Dec of same year. What really made my abdomin get huge was this shot called depo-provera. I later learned at the website fibroids.net that depo-provera and provera actually cause the fibroid to grow. It only slowed down the bleeding, which was helpful to my blood hemoglobin. I was getting up 3 and 4 X at night to pee, making the following day so hard. I ended up staying home from work taking naps. I found info at different websites and had an UAE on Feb 13,2001. and I'm OK. Doc said my bladder will be back to normal few more weeks. the Doctor was so nice. If you need to know more I'd be happy to give you more info. In the meantime you just got to read this book titled " What your doctor may not tell you about premenopause " by Dr. JOHN LEE. Even if you are younger than 30 you should read it, due to the fact you have fibroids. __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 Thanks for the news. I'll have to ask my radiologist to get this new equipment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 -- OK I had to laugh out loud " Big honkin' fibroid " cracked me up, though I was NOT laughing on wed. after my second vaginal probe. Seems I have something(s) too and after a bout with cervical cancer 17 years ago and my gradnmother dying of uterine cancer (when they used to place cobalt in her!) I am totally freakin' -- sort of. This group and some knowledge about mostly benign turmors/fibroids and other internet- middle of the night excursions to the computer- have me a bit more rational. A friend just had a polyp removed after losing 1/3 of her blood! So, I don't feel too awful. My story is that my FSHlevels are within normal (I'll be 50 in May) and my period just stopped for 4 months until 3 days after my first ultrasound and vaginal probe (for the men in my life I described THAT as a pool cue to the gonads-- hunting for the elusive ovaries!) I was lucky my sonographer (same one both times) told me the next dye injected test coming up was " not too bad " as she had had one herself-- and I wonder if anyone else could be a bit more descriptive. Friends have said the sonographer should nothave said anything-- unprofessional I said, " Yea, right. I should wait for two male doctors who have never had the procedures done to just tell me where and when to show up! I would much rather hear it from a woman. That's it for now. Reassurance would be great. Honesty better, both appreciated. Lucy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 Dawn, There is also the option of having an MRI instead, though the cost is more, maybe you can ask your doctor about that option. I've had a pelvic and transvaginal U/S, and also MRI's. For the U/S they may start out with a pelvic outside your uterus and then do a transvaginal with the tranducer inside your uterus, with an empty bladder, as I think Cori mentioned. You may ask your doctor specifically what they were ordering. They can order one way or the other or both. A pelvic U/S was ordered for me but they ended up doing both because of what they saw, per the Radiologist, but I know sometimes they can just do the transvaginal and not the pelvic. Carol Looking for answers re: ultrasound > Hi, > I'm Dawn and have been lurking on this list for awhile to find out more > about fibriods and different treatments. I have researched Endometrial > Ablation and that sounds like a viable alternative for me and after years of > very heavy periods (I'm 47), it seems like a dream come true that there > would be procedure that could leave my uterus intact yet still decrease the > heavy bleeding. I have not actually been diagnosed with fibroids because my > biggest fear at this point, believe it or not, is the ultrasound... I know > that sounds crazy, but I had an ultrasound 20 years ago and had to have my > bladder so full that it was painful and I was petrified that I was going to > wet the table while the technician was doing the procedure. She allowed me > to go to the bathroom a few times but only to relieve " some " of the > discomfort not to completely empty it. So I'm wondering if they have > improved the ultrasound procedure enough that you don't need to have your > bladder that full... . > > Dawn > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 Dawn, There is also the option of having an MRI instead, though the cost is more, maybe you can ask your doctor about that option. I've had a pelvic and transvaginal U/S, and also MRI's. For the U/S they may start out with a pelvic outside your uterus and then do a transvaginal with the tranducer inside your uterus, with an empty bladder, as I think Cori mentioned. You may ask your doctor specifically what they were ordering. They can order one way or the other or both. A pelvic U/S was ordered for me but they ended up doing both because of what they saw, per the Radiologist, but I know sometimes they can just do the transvaginal and not the pelvic. Carol Looking for answers re: ultrasound > Hi, > I'm Dawn and have been lurking on this list for awhile to find out more > about fibriods and different treatments. I have researched Endometrial > Ablation and that sounds like a viable alternative for me and after years of > very heavy periods (I'm 47), it seems like a dream come true that there > would be procedure that could leave my uterus intact yet still decrease the > heavy bleeding. I have not actually been diagnosed with fibroids because my > biggest fear at this point, believe it or not, is the ultrasound... I know > that sounds crazy, but I had an ultrasound 20 years ago and had to have my > bladder so full that it was painful and I was petrified that I was going to > wet the table while the technician was doing the procedure. She allowed me > to go to the bathroom a few times but only to relieve " some " of the > discomfort not to completely empty it. So I'm wondering if they have > improved the ultrasound procedure enough that you don't need to have your > bladder that full... . > > Dawn > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 It really has nothing to do with how old the machine is it's the type of exam they do pelvic vs. transabdominal. I'm currently an MRI Technologist and know this for sure. I've assisted with ultrasounds. Carol Re: Looking for answers re: ultrasound > > > > Sorry. Ultrasound still requires a full bladder. You should not avoid this > > necessary diagnostic test. When I get to the radiologist's office I remind > > the receptionist that I have a full bladder because I am having ultra > sound > > and I insist on going first. I even say, " I am about to burst. " Also > discuss > > your concerns with the technician. Perhaps if you are that concerned about > > peeing on yourself you should bring Depends and place them underneath you > on > > the table. > > > > I know it is uncomfortable but don't avoid it. Ultrasound is necessary. > Good > > luck to you. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 Just to let you know, my last Ultrasound I drank the required 3-5 glasses of water the hour before and the tech. told me next time only drink 2--your bladder's too full! I don't think it's supposed to be so full you that you feel that uncomfortable. At 04:13 AM 3/3/2001 -0800, you wrote: >Hi, >I'm Dawn and have been lurking on this list for awhile to find out more >about fibriods and different treatments. I have researched Endometrial >Ablation and that sounds like a viable alternative for me and after years of >very heavy periods (I'm 47), it seems like a dream come true that there >would be procedure that could leave my uterus intact yet still decrease the >heavy bleeding. I have not actually been diagnosed with fibroids because my >biggest fear at this point, believe it or not, is the ultrasound... I know >that sounds crazy, but I had an ultrasound 20 years ago and had to have my >bladder so full that it was painful and I was petrified that I was going to >wet the table while the technician was doing the procedure. She allowed me >to go to the bathroom a few times but only to relieve " some " of the >discomfort not to completely empty it. So I'm wondering if they have >improved the ultrasound procedure enough that you don't need to have your >bladder that full... . > >Dawn > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 I think depo has different effects on different people. The years I was on the pill my fibroids grew. The year I was on Depo Provera my fibroid stayed the same size. At 09:59 AM 3/3/2001 -0800, you wrote: >What really made my abdomin get huge was >this shot called depo-provera. I later learned at the >website fibroids.net that depo-provera and provera >actually cause the fibroid to grow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 There are 3 different gynecological ultrasounds all for different purposes. When I went last week I had all three: 1) with the bladder full (in my case she said too full!), they did the kind like when you're having a baby, on the outside of the tummy. She could see a fibroid and size it pretty accurately. Then, she had me get up and go to the bathroom. 2) the second one was vaginal with the probe inserted in the vagina (the let me put it in), that enabled them to see the ovaries and get a confirmation of the size of the fibroid. After this she said your bladder still has a lot in it go AGAIN. 3) Then I had the kind where a doctor came in and put a catheter through the cervix to put liquid in the uterus. This enabled them to determine whether the fibroid was inside, outside or in the wall of the uterus. Again, they verified the size and now the exact location. This one I found a bit uncomfortable while they put the catheter in. This was also done with the vaginal ultrasound wand which I really found was no big deal. I have had this 3rd one 3 times in the last 3 years and always dread it but it always turns out easier than I have built it up in my mind. At 12:48 PM 3/3/2001 -0600, you wrote: >It really has nothing to do with how old the machine is it's the type of >exam they do pelvic vs. transabdominal. I'm currently an MRI Technologist >and know this for sure. I've assisted with ultrasounds. Carol > Re: Looking for answers re: ultrasound > > > > > > > Sorry. Ultrasound still requires a full bladder. You should not avoid >this > > > necessary diagnostic test. When I get to the radiologist's office I >remind > > > the receptionist that I have a full bladder because I am having ultra > > sound > > > and I insist on going first. I even say, " I am about to burst. " Also > > discuss > > > your concerns with the technician. Perhaps if you are that concerned >about > > > peeing on yourself you should bring Depends and place them underneath >you > > on > > > the table. > > > > > > I know it is uncomfortable but don't avoid it. Ultrasound is necessary. > > Good > > > luck to you. > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 3, 2001 Report Share Posted March 3, 2001 Margaret, That is absolutely not true. I have had several ultrasounds and I was required to empty my bladder before the procedure. The modern machines don't require a full bladder. Hazel Re: Looking for answers re: ultrasound > Sorry. Ultrasound still requires a full bladder. You should not avoid this > necessary diagnostic test. When I get to the radiologist's office I remind > the receptionist that I have a full bladder because I am having ultra sound > and I insist on going first. I even say, " I am about to burst. " Also discuss > your concerns with the technician. Perhaps if you are that concerned about > peeing on yourself you should bring Depends and place them underneath you on > the table. > > I know it is uncomfortable but don't avoid it. Ultrasound is necessary. Good > luck to you. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.