Guest guest Posted October 9, 1999 Report Share Posted October 9, 1999 The people I know (knew?) from AA who seem to have a grip on things, know that 90% of it is BS, and have managed to talk with each other " behind the scenes " to dismiss the bullshit. The last woman who sponsored me has an ability to stay down to earth and still go to AA. She goes to speak, and not to " learn " . I would describe her as an academic. A university professor in fact. She has had an analyst for 12 years, and I think this helps. A psychoanalyst can be helpful in grounding people. Long term psychoanalysis is rare these days though.... Sort of a luxury really. In fact, I've often thought that maybe if she stopped going to AA, she could do without a therapist. She's an atheist too, but she still manages to win the respect of people in one of the " Christianity run riot " type meetings. Except of course the occasional member who won't speak to her because she doesn't have a higher power. One thing she said to me near the end of my attendance was that I needed to debrief after meetings. Something I wasn't able to do previously. This means talking over the contents of the meeting with someone who has a grip on reality in order to separate the wheat from the chaff if you will. I find that young people, and those with a weak sense of self are the ones who can really get screwed by the program. The arrogant male archetype for which the program was founded had an overdeveloped sense of self, and was not as suggestible as the young... AA is not going to die. It just isn't. What is the best thing that we as a group (or as individuals) can do to improve the situation? The gears are still spinning in my head... Apple dmarcoo-@... wrote: original article:/group/12-step-free/?start=8535 > having not read the book i cant say what her rational may have been. > but i do belive aa enjoys a privlidged status as a " self help " group > from many people, msot of whom have no knowledge of what goes on > there. AA is not a self help group. if anyone were to say they can grow > and be responsiable for themselves in a aa meeting they would be > laughed at, if not in the meeting than certainly in coffee talk > afterwards.. > > i think people WANT to belive in aa, even thsoe outside of it. they > want to belive there is something out there for people in trouble, or > if a loved one is in trouble they can feel confident they know where > they should go. Unfortunaly they only knowledge they have is based on > societys unthinking acceptance of aa into the collective unconcious > mainly becasue its been around so long and has portrayed itself as THE > anwser to alcoholism. not to mention the protection and promotion it > enjoys from teh government and treatment industry and the media > ( " nightline " ... shudder...). > > > its for this reason i think people withhold alot of critism of aa, they > think " it can be what i think it may be, its helped so many people " or > becaue they are overwhelmed with a the aa newcomer treatment (welcomes, > phone numbers etc) they are heistant to bash thr program of all those > welcoming people. (nevermind they belive if they dont welcome you in > they will drink) > > even i when i first went in to aa, i left after 18 days sober (thats > another story) and when a friend asked my why dont i go any longer, i > said i thought it was " a depressing place, very masochistic " . which > was apparent to me, yet > there was no way i could have understood how much so then, after just > 17 days. i still thought at that time that some people need aa and that > it probaly more to it than what i saw. well, more of the same i guess. > > the vast majority of information comes on aa from the aa > member/treatment industry (who are one in the same), a court system > looking for the easy way out, and from people who are not exposed to aa > enough to see " how it works " and yet remain unconverted. > > also i think there is alck of understanding by average amerciana, > professionals in in psychotherapy and in media on what a cult is and > how it works (cult probably get 1 page in a psych 101 text book. its > not mainstream threapy and thus pays nothing to understand it) > > when we think of what a cult is and does, images are what we mainly > rely on in. the first images we have were created by entertainment > industry (guys in black robes performing sacrifices etc) or the famous > " scenes " we have witness on news, stown Masacre, Waco, Heavens Gate > etc) but none of those " images " says anything on how the cult actualy > worked to manipulate its members. thsoe are all the aftermaths of the > cults presence. their is no awareness or perceived need to have > awarness in our country on how a cult works to retain members. > > i remember when heavens gate happened, i was in aa. i asked my sponsor > how is it so many inteligent people couldnt see they were in a cult? > (at that time i was becoming more and more aware of what was going on > around me. i was waking up) > > he said absolutly nothing in response. and hes silence spoke volumes. > he would be first person in room to tell you aa wasnt a cult, but he > probably couldnt tell you what a cult was or how it worked eitehr. i > belive he couldnt think about how a cult works very long without seeing > the similarites. easier to not think about it i suppsoe. > > whew! that was a long rant. > > Dave > > > > > > railroadrit-@... wrote: > original article:/group/12-step-free/?start=8533 > > > Anyone interested on a refreshing look at these recovery cults > should > > > check out > > > Kaminer's book, " I'm Dysfunctional, You're Dysfunctional " > which > > > came out > > > in 1992. It's a look at how ill prepared these cults are at > providing > > > actual support to their followers. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 1999 Report Share Posted October 9, 1999 true aa isnt goin to die, but i see no way it can be improved either. its built on a foundation of bs that is going to go away. hell its bs from top to bottom. it will never evolve to a level i consider legitmate becasue it rejects and refuses to acknowldge outside influences and methods. rather than spending time trying to " improve aa " ( you can spend a 1000 liftimes and not acomplish much to that end), i would encourage people to try differnt programs, to at very least be aware of breadth of beliefs concerning sobriety. that alone would do more to help the majority of alcholics than trying to fix aa. i would rather support the ones who see the bs and give them and ear that will listen and which wont tell them they are on verge of being a dry drunk. i see no attibute to aa which can be seen as a postive which any other sobreity program doesnt also have, sans the cult mind control BS. appledt-@... wrote: original article:/group/12-step-free/?start=8537 > The people I know (knew?) from AA who seem to have a grip on things, > know that 90% of it is BS, and have managed to talk with each other > " behind the scenes " to dismiss the bullshit. The last woman who > sponsored me has an ability to stay down to earth and still go to AA. > She goes to speak, and not to " learn " . I would describe her as an > academic. A university professor in fact. She has had an analyst for 12 > years, and I think this helps. A psychoanalyst can be helpful in > grounding people. Long term psychoanalysis is rare these days > though.... Sort of a luxury really. In fact, I've often thought that > maybe if she stopped going to AA, she could do without a therapist. > She's an atheist too, but she still manages to win the respect of > people in one of the " Christianity run riot " type meetings. Except of > course the occasional member who won't speak to her because she doesn't > have a higher power. > > One thing she said to me near the end of my attendance was that I > needed to debrief after meetings. Something I wasn't able to do > previously. This means talking over the contents of the meeting with > someone who has a grip on reality in order to separate the wheat from > the chaff if you will. > > I find that young people, and those with a weak sense of self are the > ones who can really get screwed by the program. The arrogant male > archetype for which the program was founded had an overdeveloped sense > of self, and was not as suggestible as the young... > > AA is not going to die. It just isn't. What is the best thing that we > as a group (or as individuals) can do to improve the situation? The > gears are still spinning in my head... > > Apple > > > dmarcoo-@... wrote: > original article:/group/12-step-free/?start=8535 > > having not read the book i cant say what her rational may have been. > > but i do belive aa enjoys a privlidged status as a " self help " group > > from many people, msot of whom have no knowledge of what goes on > > there. AA is not a self help group. if anyone were to say they can > grow > > and be responsiable for themselves in a aa meeting they would be > > laughed at, if not in the meeting than certainly in coffee talk > > afterwards.. > > > > i think people WANT to belive in aa, even thsoe outside of it. they > > want to belive there is something out there for people in trouble, or > > if a loved one is in trouble they can feel confident they know where > > they should go. Unfortunaly they only knowledge they have is based on > > societys unthinking acceptance of aa into the collective unconcious > > mainly becasue its been around so long and has portrayed itself as THE > > anwser to alcoholism. not to mention the protection and promotion it > > enjoys from teh government and treatment industry and the media > > ( " nightline " ... shudder...). > > > > > > its for this reason i think people withhold alot of critism of aa, > they > > think " it can be what i think it may be, its helped so many people " or > > becaue they are overwhelmed with a the aa newcomer treatment > (welcomes, > > phone numbers etc) they are heistant to bash thr program of all those > > welcoming people. (nevermind they belive if they dont welcome you in > > they will drink) > > > > even i when i first went in to aa, i left after 18 days sober (thats > > another story) and when a friend asked my why dont i go any longer, i > > said i thought it was " a depressing place, very masochistic " . which > > was apparent to me, yet > > there was no way i could have understood how much so then, after just > > 17 days. i still thought at that time that some people need aa and > that > > it probaly more to it than what i saw. well, more of the same i > guess. > > > > the vast majority of information comes on aa from the aa > > member/treatment industry (who are one in the same), a court system > > looking for the easy way out, and from people who are not exposed to > aa > > enough to see " how it works " and yet remain unconverted. > > > > also i think there is alck of understanding by average amerciana, > > professionals in in psychotherapy and in media on what a cult is and > > how it works (cult probably get 1 page in a psych 101 text book. its > > not mainstream threapy and thus pays nothing to understand it) > > > > when we think of what a cult is and does, images are what we mainly > > rely on in. the first images we have were created by entertainment > > industry (guys in black robes performing sacrifices etc) or the famous > > " scenes " we have witness on news, stown Masacre, Waco, Heavens > Gate > > etc) but none of those " images " says anything on how the cult actualy > > worked to manipulate its members. thsoe are all the aftermaths of the > > cults presence. their is no awareness or perceived need to have > > awarness in our country on how a cult works to retain members. > > > > i remember when heavens gate happened, i was in aa. i asked my sponsor > > how is it so many inteligent people couldnt see they were in a cult? > > (at that time i was becoming more and more aware of what was going on > > around me. i was waking up) > > > > he said absolutly nothing in response. and hes silence spoke volumes. > > he would be first person in room to tell you aa wasnt a cult, but he > > probably couldnt tell you what a cult was or how it worked eitehr. i > > belive he couldnt think about how a cult works very long without > seeing > > the similarites. easier to not think about it i suppsoe. > > > > whew! that was a long rant. > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > railroadrit-@... wrote: > > original article:/group/12-step-free/?start=8 533 > > > > Anyone interested on a refreshing look at these recovery cults > > should > > > > check out > > > > Kaminer's book, " I'm Dysfunctional, You're Dysfunctional " > > which > > > > came out > > > > in 1992. It's a look at how ill prepared these cults are at > > providing > > > > actual support to their followers. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 1999 Report Share Posted October 9, 1999 true aa isnt goin to die, but i see no way it can be improved either. its built on a foundation of bs that is going to go away. hell its bs from top to bottom. it will never evolve to a level i consider legitmate becasue it rejects and refuses to acknowldge outside influences and methods. rather than spending time trying to " improve aa " ( you can spend a 1000 liftimes and not acomplish much to that end), i would encourage people to try differnt programs, to at very least be aware of breadth of beliefs concerning sobriety. that alone would do more to help the majority of alcholics than trying to fix aa. i would rather support the ones who see the bs and give them and ear that will listen and which wont tell them they are on verge of being a dry drunk. i see no attibute to aa which can be seen as a postive which any other sobreity program doesnt also have, sans the cult mind control BS. appledt-@... wrote: original article:/group/12-step-free/?start=8537 > The people I know (knew?) from AA who seem to have a grip on things, > know that 90% of it is BS, and have managed to talk with each other > " behind the scenes " to dismiss the bullshit. The last woman who > sponsored me has an ability to stay down to earth and still go to AA. > She goes to speak, and not to " learn " . I would describe her as an > academic. A university professor in fact. She has had an analyst for 12 > years, and I think this helps. A psychoanalyst can be helpful in > grounding people. Long term psychoanalysis is rare these days > though.... Sort of a luxury really. In fact, I've often thought that > maybe if she stopped going to AA, she could do without a therapist. > She's an atheist too, but she still manages to win the respect of > people in one of the " Christianity run riot " type meetings. Except of > course the occasional member who won't speak to her because she doesn't > have a higher power. > > One thing she said to me near the end of my attendance was that I > needed to debrief after meetings. Something I wasn't able to do > previously. This means talking over the contents of the meeting with > someone who has a grip on reality in order to separate the wheat from > the chaff if you will. > > I find that young people, and those with a weak sense of self are the > ones who can really get screwed by the program. The arrogant male > archetype for which the program was founded had an overdeveloped sense > of self, and was not as suggestible as the young... > > AA is not going to die. It just isn't. What is the best thing that we > as a group (or as individuals) can do to improve the situation? The > gears are still spinning in my head... > > Apple > > > dmarcoo-@... wrote: > original article:/group/12-step-free/?start=8535 > > having not read the book i cant say what her rational may have been. > > but i do belive aa enjoys a privlidged status as a " self help " group > > from many people, msot of whom have no knowledge of what goes on > > there. AA is not a self help group. if anyone were to say they can > grow > > and be responsiable for themselves in a aa meeting they would be > > laughed at, if not in the meeting than certainly in coffee talk > > afterwards.. > > > > i think people WANT to belive in aa, even thsoe outside of it. they > > want to belive there is something out there for people in trouble, or > > if a loved one is in trouble they can feel confident they know where > > they should go. Unfortunaly they only knowledge they have is based on > > societys unthinking acceptance of aa into the collective unconcious > > mainly becasue its been around so long and has portrayed itself as THE > > anwser to alcoholism. not to mention the protection and promotion it > > enjoys from teh government and treatment industry and the media > > ( " nightline " ... shudder...). > > > > > > its for this reason i think people withhold alot of critism of aa, > they > > think " it can be what i think it may be, its helped so many people " or > > becaue they are overwhelmed with a the aa newcomer treatment > (welcomes, > > phone numbers etc) they are heistant to bash thr program of all those > > welcoming people. (nevermind they belive if they dont welcome you in > > they will drink) > > > > even i when i first went in to aa, i left after 18 days sober (thats > > another story) and when a friend asked my why dont i go any longer, i > > said i thought it was " a depressing place, very masochistic " . which > > was apparent to me, yet > > there was no way i could have understood how much so then, after just > > 17 days. i still thought at that time that some people need aa and > that > > it probaly more to it than what i saw. well, more of the same i > guess. > > > > the vast majority of information comes on aa from the aa > > member/treatment industry (who are one in the same), a court system > > looking for the easy way out, and from people who are not exposed to > aa > > enough to see " how it works " and yet remain unconverted. > > > > also i think there is alck of understanding by average amerciana, > > professionals in in psychotherapy and in media on what a cult is and > > how it works (cult probably get 1 page in a psych 101 text book. its > > not mainstream threapy and thus pays nothing to understand it) > > > > when we think of what a cult is and does, images are what we mainly > > rely on in. the first images we have were created by entertainment > > industry (guys in black robes performing sacrifices etc) or the famous > > " scenes " we have witness on news, stown Masacre, Waco, Heavens > Gate > > etc) but none of those " images " says anything on how the cult actualy > > worked to manipulate its members. thsoe are all the aftermaths of the > > cults presence. their is no awareness or perceived need to have > > awarness in our country on how a cult works to retain members. > > > > i remember when heavens gate happened, i was in aa. i asked my sponsor > > how is it so many inteligent people couldnt see they were in a cult? > > (at that time i was becoming more and more aware of what was going on > > around me. i was waking up) > > > > he said absolutly nothing in response. and hes silence spoke volumes. > > he would be first person in room to tell you aa wasnt a cult, but he > > probably couldnt tell you what a cult was or how it worked eitehr. i > > belive he couldnt think about how a cult works very long without > seeing > > the similarites. easier to not think about it i suppsoe. > > > > whew! that was a long rant. > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > railroadrit-@... wrote: > > original article:/group/12-step-free/?start=8 533 > > > > Anyone interested on a refreshing look at these recovery cults > > should > > > > check out > > > > Kaminer's book, " I'm Dysfunctional, You're Dysfunctional " > > which > > > > came out > > > > in 1992. It's a look at how ill prepared these cults are at > > providing > > > > actual support to their followers. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 1999 Report Share Posted October 9, 1999 At 06:28 PM 09/10/99 -0700, you wrote: <snipped> >AA is not going to die. It just isn't. >Apple Don't be so sure. They must have said the same thing about the Roman empire, and the Third Reich. Nothing is invulnerable to the forces of change and decay, and to its own weaknesses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 Please cancel my subscription. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 I think AA will evolve into something else. In a thousand years from now someone who develops " living problems " will have better options than we have as far as getting help. Just like 100 years ago, people with drinking problems were locked up in an asylum. Things have improved some what but unfortunately as we approach the year 2000, the way society chooses to help its less fortunate is far from ideal. The way I see it, those individuals who screw up or fall on their face are given few options: go to AA or be institutionalized. Hopefully, as mankind evolves and are thinking progresses we will find more options for those of us who need a help with self destructive habits and low self esteem. I'm not real sure about this religious dependence in America though. That may last forever, no matter what the consequences. People in the US may forever think spirituality and God is a necessary part of society. I'd like to think that maybe one day spirituality could be replaced by a strong belief in humanity. That are hope or positivity could stem from a faith in humanism rather than some invisible man in the sky who sees everything we do. Of course that may sound crazy to Christians and other religious people. I think as long as people are ashamed of their humanity and they're dark desires they will turn to god or anytype of higher power to cling to. As long as we Americans can't acknowledge are so called " dark sides " and unhealthy thoughts we are going to have a lot of confusion about how to peacefully co-exist. A lot of times I wish every person on this planet could have an electronic billboard on their forehead that shows what they are thinking. Then we wouldn't have any secrets or lies or reasons to hide our true selves. Maybe then all this misunderstanding and miscommunication could be eliminated in this country. We could finally realize that everyone whose human has worries and difficulties and concerns. And that we are very similar. The only thing that's different is how we react to these daily difficulties. Anyway, that's just my opinion. > >Reply-To: 12-step-freeegroups >To: 12-step-freeegroups >Subject: Re: Kaminer's book my ranting >Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 03:46:37 +0100 > >At 06:28 PM 09/10/99 -0700, you wrote: > ><snipped> > > >AA is not going to die. It just isn't. > > >Apple > >Don't be so sure. They must have said the same thing about the Roman >empire, and the Third Reich. Nothing is invulnerable to the forces of >change and decay, and to its own weaknesses. > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications > > > > > ______________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 I think AA will evolve into something else. In a thousand years from now someone who develops " living problems " will have better options than we have as far as getting help. Just like 100 years ago, people with drinking problems were locked up in an asylum. Things have improved some what but unfortunately as we approach the year 2000, the way society chooses to help its less fortunate is far from ideal. The way I see it, those individuals who screw up or fall on their face are given few options: go to AA or be institutionalized. Hopefully, as mankind evolves and are thinking progresses we will find more options for those of us who need a help with self destructive habits and low self esteem. I'm not real sure about this religious dependence in America though. That may last forever, no matter what the consequences. People in the US may forever think spirituality and God is a necessary part of society. I'd like to think that maybe one day spirituality could be replaced by a strong belief in humanity. That are hope or positivity could stem from a faith in humanism rather than some invisible man in the sky who sees everything we do. Of course that may sound crazy to Christians and other religious people. I think as long as people are ashamed of their humanity and they're dark desires they will turn to god or anytype of higher power to cling to. As long as we Americans can't acknowledge are so called " dark sides " and unhealthy thoughts we are going to have a lot of confusion about how to peacefully co-exist. A lot of times I wish every person on this planet could have an electronic billboard on their forehead that shows what they are thinking. Then we wouldn't have any secrets or lies or reasons to hide our true selves. Maybe then all this misunderstanding and miscommunication could be eliminated in this country. We could finally realize that everyone whose human has worries and difficulties and concerns. And that we are very similar. The only thing that's different is how we react to these daily difficulties. Anyway, that's just my opinion. > >Reply-To: 12-step-freeegroups >To: 12-step-freeegroups >Subject: Re: Kaminer's book my ranting >Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 03:46:37 +0100 > >At 06:28 PM 09/10/99 -0700, you wrote: > ><snipped> > > >AA is not going to die. It just isn't. > > >Apple > >Don't be so sure. They must have said the same thing about the Roman >empire, and the Third Reich. Nothing is invulnerable to the forces of >change and decay, and to its own weaknesses. > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications > > > > > ______________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 Although I am not an Athiest (you may or may not be) I agree with a lot of what you talk about here. AA has that slogan that they are not bad people trying to get better, but sick people trying to get well. That's what is said, but it seems more the other way around judging by behavior and the puritanical overtones in the steps. Fundementalism takes many forms. I have seen it in most types of religious beliefs, not just Christian.I was terrified in treatment that I would find out something truly terrible about myself. A few nervous breakthroughs later, I am finding I have lightened up on my attempts to " be a good person " through strict adherence to certain religious beliefs. I'm getting realy bored with the idea I have to suffer. That " dark side " isn't as bad as I once thought. The better I feel about myself, the better I treat myself....or the other way around. I liked the things you talked about, Matt. Rebekah former cult member and " High Priestess of the Church of the Divine Rebekah " ---------- > >To: 12-step-freeegroups >Subject: Re: Kaminer's book my ranting >Date: Sun, Oct 10, 1999, 2:00 AM > >I think AA will evolve into something else. In a thousand years from now >someone who develops " living problems " will have better options than we have >as far as getting help. Just like 100 years ago, people with drinking >problems were locked up in an asylum. Things have improved some what but >unfortunately as we approach the year 2000, the way society chooses to help >its less fortunate is far from ideal. > The way I see it, those individuals who screw up or fall on their face >are given few options: go to AA or be institutionalized. Hopefully, as >mankind evolves and are thinking progresses we will find more options for >those of us who need a help with self destructive habits and low self >esteem. > I'm not real sure about this religious dependence in America though. >That may last forever, no matter what the consequences. People in the US >may forever think spirituality and God is a necessary part of society. I'd >like to think that maybe one day spirituality could be replaced by a strong >belief in humanity. That are hope or positivity could stem from a faith in >humanism rather than some invisible man in the sky who sees everything we >do. > Of course that may sound crazy to Christians and other religious >people. I think as long as people are ashamed of their humanity and they're >dark desires they will turn to god or anytype of higher power to cling to. >As long as we Americans can't acknowledge are so called " dark sides " and >unhealthy thoughts we are going to have a lot of confusion about how to >peacefully co-exist. > A lot of times I wish every person on this planet could have an >electronic billboard on their forehead that shows what they are thinking. >Then we wouldn't have any secrets or lies or reasons to hide our true >selves. Maybe then all this misunderstanding and miscommunication could be >eliminated in this country. We could finally realize that everyone whose >human has worries and difficulties and concerns. And that we are very >similar. The only thing that's different is how we react to these daily >difficulties. > Anyway, that's just my opinion. > > >> >>Reply-To: 12-step-freeegroups >>To: 12-step-freeegroups >>Subject: Re: Kaminer's book my ranting >>Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 03:46:37 +0100 >> >>At 06:28 PM 09/10/99 -0700, you wrote: >> >><snipped> >> >> >AA is not going to die. It just isn't. >> >> >Apple >> >>Don't be so sure. They must have said the same thing about the Roman >>empire, and the Third Reich. Nothing is invulnerable to the forces of >>change and decay, and to its own weaknesses. >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free >> - Simplifying group communications >> >> >> >> >> > >______________________________________________________ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 Cancel your own subscription Thank you Re: Kaminer's book my ranting >Please cancel my subscription. > >Thank you. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 Cancel your own subscription Thank you Re: Kaminer's book my ranting >Please cancel my subscription. > >Thank you. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 Cancel your own subscription Thank you Re: Kaminer's book my ranting >Please cancel my subscription. > >Thank you. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 At 06:14 AM 10/10/99 EDT, you wrote: >Please cancel my subscription. > >Thank you. Please walk my dog, trim my Wisteria and wash my car. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 At 06:14 AM 10/10/99 EDT, you wrote: >Please cancel my subscription. > >Thank you. Please walk my dog, trim my Wisteria and wash my car. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 At 06:14 AM 10/10/99 EDT, you wrote: >Please cancel my subscription. > >Thank you. Please walk my dog, trim my Wisteria and wash my car. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 --- Rebekah wrote: AA has that slogan that they are not bad people trying to get better, but sick people trying to get > well. That's what is > said, but it seems more the other way around judging > by behavior and the > puritanical overtones in the steps. That's really offensive either way. If you are 'sick', then you have an excuse for not having control over your life, and then that opens to door to 'pass the buck' to an 'unseen entity' to take responsibility for your behavior. That's just as demeaning as saying it is a 'bad' person Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 Good point Joe... it is going to die sometime... but when, and how... did the Roman empire fizzle out? The Third Riech died out when the war ended, but AA won't die because of a war. I think that the movement will improve in some places, because with more & more anti-AA books/internet presence, it looks dumb to keep it as it is, but I don't see it dying out in my lifetime. What do you think? Apple > > <snipped> > > >AA is not going to die. It just isn't. > > >Apple > > Don't be so sure. They must have said the same thing about the Roman > empire, and the Third Reich. Nothing is invulnerable to the forces of > change and decay, and to its own weaknesses. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 Good point Joe... it is going to die sometime... but when, and how... did the Roman empire fizzle out? The Third Riech died out when the war ended, but AA won't die because of a war. I think that the movement will improve in some places, because with more & more anti-AA books/internet presence, it looks dumb to keep it as it is, but I don't see it dying out in my lifetime. What do you think? Apple > > <snipped> > > >AA is not going to die. It just isn't. > > >Apple > > Don't be so sure. They must have said the same thing about the Roman > empire, and the Third Reich. Nothing is invulnerable to the forces of > change and decay, and to its own weaknesses. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 Good point Joe... it is going to die sometime... but when, and how... did the Roman empire fizzle out? The Third Riech died out when the war ended, but AA won't die because of a war. I think that the movement will improve in some places, because with more & more anti-AA books/internet presence, it looks dumb to keep it as it is, but I don't see it dying out in my lifetime. What do you think? Apple > > <snipped> > > >AA is not going to die. It just isn't. > > >Apple > > Don't be so sure. They must have said the same thing about the Roman > empire, and the Third Reich. Nothing is invulnerable to the forces of > change and decay, and to its own weaknesses. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 Matt, you sound like a secular humanist. Pretty reasonable. Governments want the church in place, because when humans bow to a superior force, they metaphorically bow to the government as well. I would be frightened as hell to see what people are thinking. I think we'd see a lot of " I hurt " , " I'm lonely " , " I'm horny " , " Will someone please love me " and the like. We are not a particularly happy species. Apple > A lot of times I wish every person on this planet could have an > electronic billboard on their forehead that shows what they are thinking. > Then we wouldn't have any secrets or lies or reasons to hide our true > selves. Maybe then all this misunderstanding and miscommunication could be > eliminated in this country. We could finally realize that everyone whose > human has worries and difficulties and concerns. And that we are very > similar. The only thing that's different is how we react to these daily > difficulties. > Anyway, that's just my opinion. > > > > > >Reply-To: 12-step-freeegroups > >To: 12-step-freeegroups > >Subject: Re: Kaminer's book my ranting > >Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 03:46:37 +0100 > > > >At 06:28 PM 09/10/99 -0700, you wrote: > > > ><snipped> > > > > >AA is not going to die. It just isn't. > > > > >Apple > > > >Don't be so sure. They must have said the same thing about the Roman > >empire, and the Third Reich. Nothing is invulnerable to the forces of > >change and decay, and to its own weaknesses. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 Matt, you sound like a secular humanist. Pretty reasonable. Governments want the church in place, because when humans bow to a superior force, they metaphorically bow to the government as well. I would be frightened as hell to see what people are thinking. I think we'd see a lot of " I hurt " , " I'm lonely " , " I'm horny " , " Will someone please love me " and the like. We are not a particularly happy species. Apple > A lot of times I wish every person on this planet could have an > electronic billboard on their forehead that shows what they are thinking. > Then we wouldn't have any secrets or lies or reasons to hide our true > selves. Maybe then all this misunderstanding and miscommunication could be > eliminated in this country. We could finally realize that everyone whose > human has worries and difficulties and concerns. And that we are very > similar. The only thing that's different is how we react to these daily > difficulties. > Anyway, that's just my opinion. > > > > > >Reply-To: 12-step-freeegroups > >To: 12-step-freeegroups > >Subject: Re: Kaminer's book my ranting > >Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 03:46:37 +0100 > > > >At 06:28 PM 09/10/99 -0700, you wrote: > > > ><snipped> > > > > >AA is not going to die. It just isn't. > > > > >Apple > > > >Don't be so sure. They must have said the same thing about the Roman > >empire, and the Third Reich. Nothing is invulnerable to the forces of > >change and decay, and to its own weaknesses. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 Matt, you sound like a secular humanist. Pretty reasonable. Governments want the church in place, because when humans bow to a superior force, they metaphorically bow to the government as well. I would be frightened as hell to see what people are thinking. I think we'd see a lot of " I hurt " , " I'm lonely " , " I'm horny " , " Will someone please love me " and the like. We are not a particularly happy species. Apple > A lot of times I wish every person on this planet could have an > electronic billboard on their forehead that shows what they are thinking. > Then we wouldn't have any secrets or lies or reasons to hide our true > selves. Maybe then all this misunderstanding and miscommunication could be > eliminated in this country. We could finally realize that everyone whose > human has worries and difficulties and concerns. And that we are very > similar. The only thing that's different is how we react to these daily > difficulties. > Anyway, that's just my opinion. > > > > > >Reply-To: 12-step-freeegroups > >To: 12-step-freeegroups > >Subject: Re: Kaminer's book my ranting > >Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 03:46:37 +0100 > > > >At 06:28 PM 09/10/99 -0700, you wrote: > > > ><snipped> > > > > >AA is not going to die. It just isn't. > > > > >Apple > > > >Don't be so sure. They must have said the same thing about the Roman > >empire, and the Third Reich. Nothing is invulnerable to the forces of > >change and decay, and to its own weaknesses. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 maybe we're maladaptive people trying to become adaptive. Or perhaps dysfunctional trying to become functional? -jerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 At 09:58 AM 10/10/99 -0700, you wrote: >Good point Joe... it is going to die sometime... but when, and how... >did the Roman empire fizzle out? The Third Riech died out when the war >ended, but AA won't die because of a war. I think that the movement >will improve in some places, because with more & more anti-AA >books/internet presence, it looks dumb to keep it as it is, but I don't >see it dying out in my lifetime. What do you think? >Apple I think that its current unearned hold over the addictions field will diminish markedly in my lifetime. As other programs catch on and can be seen to offer various plus points that AA doesn't, the idea that seems so hard to shift- that AA is the best or only program, will just slowly wither away. You can't claim to be the best and offer no evidence to support that claim indefinitely. I think AA will become an option, rather than THE option, and it will be known as a religiously oriented program, and and be regarded as fine for those who would naturally gravitate to that sort of thing and who can make it work for them, but by no means the only choice and not necessarily the best choice. It sounds strange in a way to say this now, but the current saturation with 12 step recovery books and programs is only happening because of a historical accident- AA, relatively ineffective as it is, has been around a long time and has aquired a place in the mythology of our time, and a lot of people have got involved with it. The current 12 step proliferation is answering, very crudely, a need for people to help themselves and one another with their addictions. But it in no way represents a fixed entity that cannot be mostly swept away by better things. I think it will eventually acquire a similar status to what faith healing has now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 I have canceled my subscription twice and keep receiving stuff!!!!!!! Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 1999 Report Share Posted October 10, 1999 I know you all think you are a bunch of smart asses.........All I ask is that you quit sending me crap. Do you think you can manage that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.