Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

pap slow growing?!

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I had my yearly appt. with my gyn a couple of weeks ago. I told him

about my Thyca. He was surprised to hear that my GP felt the 1.5 cm

nodule last August because he had checked my thyroid himself in May

and didn't feel anything. He does this routinely - good doctor.

The nodule was very easy to feel. I thought pap was slow growing.

Just curious about it growing from unpalpable to 1.5 cm in less than

4 months. Maybe I don't understand the meaning of " slow growing " in

terms of cancer.

Sandy

TT/RAI Oct 2000

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Sandy,

> The nodule was very easy to feel. I thought pap was

> slow growing. Just curious about it growing from

> unpalpable to 1.5 cm in less than 4 months.

My nodule was 2.5 cm but was unpalpable by one doctor

and barely palpable by my endo. Although one standard

is probably taught in medical school, I'd guess each

practitioner palpates the gland differently and

therefore can have different results.

=====

Christy, 42, Las Vegas

2.5 cm Follicular and .9 cm Papillary

2/26/01 LL (Frozen Section was read as benign)

3/10/01 TT after a positive final pathology

Hypoparathyroidism (.5 Rocaltrol/1500 mg calcium daily)

3/28/01 148 mCi RAI (w/o LID), .225 Synthroid, 0 Tg

__________________________________________________

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> > The nodule was very easy to feel. I thought pap was

> > slow growing. Just curious about it growing from

> > unpalpable to 1.5 cm in less than 4 months.

>

> My nodule was 2.5 cm but was unpalpable by one doctor

> and barely palpable by my endo. Although one standard

> is probably taught in medical school, I'd guess each

> practitioner palpates the gland differently and

> therefore can have different results.

Additionally, I think some doctors palpate and are looking for trouble (a good

thing, in this case), while others palpate with the assumption that they won't

find anything, and are often right.

My nodule was 1.5cm also, and was missed by an endo and also by the ENT surgeon.

It showed up serendipitously in a CT scan taken for an unrelated neck pain.

All the other doctors I saw between that discovery and my surgery couldn't feel

the nodule until I told them where it was situated (far enough back, apparently,

to be easy to miss).

I think your understanding of the phrase " slow growing " is probably correct.

-

NYC (TT 2/99 dx pap/foll; RAI 100 mCi 3/99 & 4/00; current TSH ~.06 on .225

levothyroxine)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> > The nodule was very easy to feel. I thought pap was

> > slow growing. Just curious about it growing from

> > unpalpable to 1.5 cm in less than 4 months.

>

> My nodule was 2.5 cm but was unpalpable by one doctor

> and barely palpable by my endo. Although one standard

> is probably taught in medical school, I'd guess each

> practitioner palpates the gland differently and

> therefore can have different results.

Additionally, I think some doctors palpate and are looking for trouble (a good

thing, in this case), while others palpate with the assumption that they won't

find anything, and are often right.

My nodule was 1.5cm also, and was missed by an endo and also by the ENT surgeon.

It showed up serendipitously in a CT scan taken for an unrelated neck pain.

All the other doctors I saw between that discovery and my surgery couldn't feel

the nodule until I told them where it was situated (far enough back, apparently,

to be easy to miss).

I think your understanding of the phrase " slow growing " is probably correct.

-

NYC (TT 2/99 dx pap/foll; RAI 100 mCi 3/99 & 4/00; current TSH ~.06 on .225

levothyroxine)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> > The nodule was very easy to feel. I thought pap was

> > slow growing. Just curious about it growing from

> > unpalpable to 1.5 cm in less than 4 months.

>

> My nodule was 2.5 cm but was unpalpable by one doctor

> and barely palpable by my endo. Although one standard

> is probably taught in medical school, I'd guess each

> practitioner palpates the gland differently and

> therefore can have different results.

Additionally, I think some doctors palpate and are looking for trouble (a good

thing, in this case), while others palpate with the assumption that they won't

find anything, and are often right.

My nodule was 1.5cm also, and was missed by an endo and also by the ENT surgeon.

It showed up serendipitously in a CT scan taken for an unrelated neck pain.

All the other doctors I saw between that discovery and my surgery couldn't feel

the nodule until I told them where it was situated (far enough back, apparently,

to be easy to miss).

I think your understanding of the phrase " slow growing " is probably correct.

-

NYC (TT 2/99 dx pap/foll; RAI 100 mCi 3/99 & 4/00; current TSH ~.06 on .225

levothyroxine)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dentist and my OB-GYN both missed the lump in my neck. A friend of mine,

who is a doctor, saw it while just talking to me over a cup of coffee one

morning and suggested I have it looked at by an endo.

Debbi (Washington, DC)

Age 41

dx pap thyca 5/01

TT 7/01

2 cm tumor/no spread

RAI any day now

In a message dated 8/19/01 2:19:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time,

katiekabob@... writes:

> Subj: Re: pap slow growing?!

> Date: 8/19/01 2:19:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time

> From: katiekabob@...

> Reply-to: <A HREF= " mailto:Thyca " >Thyca </A>

> To: Thyca

>

>

>

>

> > > The nodule was very easy to feel. I thought pap was

> > > slow growing. Just curious about it growing from

> > > unpalpable to 1.5 cm in less than 4 months.

> >

> > My nodule was 2.5 cm but was unpalpable by one doctor

> > and barely palpable by my endo. Although one standard

> > is probably taught in medical school, I'd guess each

> > practitioner palpates the gland differently and

> > therefore can have different results.

>

> Additionally, I think some doctors palpate and are looking for trouble (a

> good thing, in this case), while others palpate with the assumption that

> they won't find anything, and are often right.

> My nodule was 1.5cm also, and was missed by an endo and also by the ENT

> surgeon. It showed up serendipitously in a CT scan taken for an unrelated

> neck pain.

>

> All the other doctors I saw between that discovery and my surgery couldn't

> feel the nodule until I told them where it was situated (far enough back,

> apparently, to be easy to miss).

>

> I think your understanding of the phrase " slow growing " is probably correct.

>

>

> -

> NYC (TT 2/99 dx pap/foll; RAI 100 mCi 3/99 & 4/00; current TSH ~.06 on .225

> levothyroxine)

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dentist and my OB-GYN both missed the lump in my neck. A friend of mine,

who is a doctor, saw it while just talking to me over a cup of coffee one

morning and suggested I have it looked at by an endo.

Debbi (Washington, DC)

Age 41

dx pap thyca 5/01

TT 7/01

2 cm tumor/no spread

RAI any day now

In a message dated 8/19/01 2:19:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time,

katiekabob@... writes:

> Subj: Re: pap slow growing?!

> Date: 8/19/01 2:19:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time

> From: katiekabob@...

> Reply-to: <A HREF= " mailto:Thyca " >Thyca </A>

> To: Thyca

>

>

>

>

> > > The nodule was very easy to feel. I thought pap was

> > > slow growing. Just curious about it growing from

> > > unpalpable to 1.5 cm in less than 4 months.

> >

> > My nodule was 2.5 cm but was unpalpable by one doctor

> > and barely palpable by my endo. Although one standard

> > is probably taught in medical school, I'd guess each

> > practitioner palpates the gland differently and

> > therefore can have different results.

>

> Additionally, I think some doctors palpate and are looking for trouble (a

> good thing, in this case), while others palpate with the assumption that

> they won't find anything, and are often right.

> My nodule was 1.5cm also, and was missed by an endo and also by the ENT

> surgeon. It showed up serendipitously in a CT scan taken for an unrelated

> neck pain.

>

> All the other doctors I saw between that discovery and my surgery couldn't

> feel the nodule until I told them where it was situated (far enough back,

> apparently, to be easy to miss).

>

> I think your understanding of the phrase " slow growing " is probably correct.

>

>

> -

> NYC (TT 2/99 dx pap/foll; RAI 100 mCi 3/99 & 4/00; current TSH ~.06 on .225

> levothyroxine)

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dentist and my OB-GYN both missed the lump in my neck. A friend of mine,

who is a doctor, saw it while just talking to me over a cup of coffee one

morning and suggested I have it looked at by an endo.

Debbi (Washington, DC)

Age 41

dx pap thyca 5/01

TT 7/01

2 cm tumor/no spread

RAI any day now

In a message dated 8/19/01 2:19:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time,

katiekabob@... writes:

> Subj: Re: pap slow growing?!

> Date: 8/19/01 2:19:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time

> From: katiekabob@...

> Reply-to: <A HREF= " mailto:Thyca " >Thyca </A>

> To: Thyca

>

>

>

>

> > > The nodule was very easy to feel. I thought pap was

> > > slow growing. Just curious about it growing from

> > > unpalpable to 1.5 cm in less than 4 months.

> >

> > My nodule was 2.5 cm but was unpalpable by one doctor

> > and barely palpable by my endo. Although one standard

> > is probably taught in medical school, I'd guess each

> > practitioner palpates the gland differently and

> > therefore can have different results.

>

> Additionally, I think some doctors palpate and are looking for trouble (a

> good thing, in this case), while others palpate with the assumption that

> they won't find anything, and are often right.

> My nodule was 1.5cm also, and was missed by an endo and also by the ENT

> surgeon. It showed up serendipitously in a CT scan taken for an unrelated

> neck pain.

>

> All the other doctors I saw between that discovery and my surgery couldn't

> feel the nodule until I told them where it was situated (far enough back,

> apparently, to be easy to miss).

>

> I think your understanding of the phrase " slow growing " is probably correct.

>

>

> -

> NYC (TT 2/99 dx pap/foll; RAI 100 mCi 3/99 & 4/00; current TSH ~.06 on .225

> levothyroxine)

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...