Guest guest Posted August 31, 1999 Report Share Posted August 31, 1999 giggle Judith > ********************** > AA MEMBER BORED TO DEATH! > ********************** > Thankfully SADS is not viral and does not pose a threat to the general public. However prolonged exposure to 12 Step meetings and literature is strongly discouraged by the Medical Community until a cure can be found. Alcoholics Anonymous has suspended the reading of Chapter 5 in meetings until further notice, but would not offer any further comment.> ________________________________________________________________ Get FREE voicemail, fax and email at http://voicemail.excite.com Talk online at http://voicechat.excite.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 1999 Report Share Posted August 31, 1999 giggle Judith > ********************** > AA MEMBER BORED TO DEATH! > ********************** > Thankfully SADS is not viral and does not pose a threat to the general public. However prolonged exposure to 12 Step meetings and literature is strongly discouraged by the Medical Community until a cure can be found. Alcoholics Anonymous has suspended the reading of Chapter 5 in meetings until further notice, but would not offer any further comment.> ________________________________________________________________ Get FREE voicemail, fax and email at http://voicemail.excite.com Talk online at http://voicechat.excite.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 1999 Report Share Posted August 31, 1999 giggle Judith > ********************** > AA MEMBER BORED TO DEATH! > ********************** > Thankfully SADS is not viral and does not pose a threat to the general public. However prolonged exposure to 12 Step meetings and literature is strongly discouraged by the Medical Community until a cure can be found. Alcoholics Anonymous has suspended the reading of Chapter 5 in meetings until further notice, but would not offer any further comment.> ________________________________________________________________ Get FREE voicemail, fax and email at http://voicemail.excite.com Talk online at http://voicechat.excite.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 1999 Report Share Posted August 31, 1999 At 03:39 PM 31/08/99 -0700, you wrote: >********************** >AA MEMBER BORED TO DEATH! >********************** > >Alcoholics Anonymous long known for saving the lives of hopeless >alcoholics has claimed yet another life in a trend that has stunned the >twelve step community. In the past most of the fatalities that occurred >in the meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous were due to the effects of >alcohol and drug use. Now it seems that the meetings themsevles are >contributing to the loss of life. Now you've gone and done it- I'm gettimg flashbacks of meetings. If I die of boredom mysteriously in the next few hours- sorry- yawn- oh never mind... Joe Berenbaum mailto:joe-b@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 1999 Report Share Posted August 31, 1999 At 03:39 PM 31/08/99 -0700, you wrote: >********************** >AA MEMBER BORED TO DEATH! >********************** > >Alcoholics Anonymous long known for saving the lives of hopeless >alcoholics has claimed yet another life in a trend that has stunned the >twelve step community. In the past most of the fatalities that occurred >in the meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous were due to the effects of >alcohol and drug use. Now it seems that the meetings themsevles are >contributing to the loss of life. Now you've gone and done it- I'm gettimg flashbacks of meetings. If I die of boredom mysteriously in the next few hours- sorry- yawn- oh never mind... Joe Berenbaum mailto:joe-b@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 1999 Report Share Posted August 31, 1999 At 03:39 PM 31/08/99 -0700, you wrote: >********************** >AA MEMBER BORED TO DEATH! >********************** > >Alcoholics Anonymous long known for saving the lives of hopeless >alcoholics has claimed yet another life in a trend that has stunned the >twelve step community. In the past most of the fatalities that occurred >in the meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous were due to the effects of >alcohol and drug use. Now it seems that the meetings themsevles are >contributing to the loss of life. Now you've gone and done it- I'm gettimg flashbacks of meetings. If I die of boredom mysteriously in the next few hours- sorry- yawn- oh never mind... Joe Berenbaum mailto:joe-b@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 1999 Report Share Posted August 31, 1999 At 03:39 PM 8/31/99 -0700, Hollister wrote: >********************** >AA MEMBER BORED TO DEATH! >********************** >Yet another case of SADS(sudden alcoholic death syndrome) has been >reported in Los Angeles area. It is the third such occurence in as many >Thankfully SADS is not viral and does not pose a threat to the general >public. I must strongly disagree here - with so many 12-step programs, most aimed at the 'general public', there is a great danger to everyone. CoDA, just by itself, qualifies almost everyone - someone declared years ago (perhaps recuvery luminary Bradshaw) that 95% of all Americans are codependent. For the other 5%, surely they can fit into one of the hundreds of other 12-step programs. Even just the alcohol-related groups can easily cover a large segment of the poppulation. I saw where things were out of hand nine or ten years ago when I saw a book titled " Grandchildren of Alcoholics " which described a 12-step group of the same name. >However prolonged exposure to 12 Step meetings and literature is >strongly discouraged by the Medical Community until a cure can be found. But currently there is no cure, only daily remission contingient on abstinence from all 12-step programs. This can ONLY be achieved through self-direction and self-determination. ----- http://listen.to/benbradley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 1999 Report Share Posted August 31, 1999 At 03:39 PM 8/31/99 -0700, Hollister wrote: >********************** >AA MEMBER BORED TO DEATH! >********************** >Yet another case of SADS(sudden alcoholic death syndrome) has been >reported in Los Angeles area. It is the third such occurence in as many >Thankfully SADS is not viral and does not pose a threat to the general >public. I must strongly disagree here - with so many 12-step programs, most aimed at the 'general public', there is a great danger to everyone. CoDA, just by itself, qualifies almost everyone - someone declared years ago (perhaps recuvery luminary Bradshaw) that 95% of all Americans are codependent. For the other 5%, surely they can fit into one of the hundreds of other 12-step programs. Even just the alcohol-related groups can easily cover a large segment of the poppulation. I saw where things were out of hand nine or ten years ago when I saw a book titled " Grandchildren of Alcoholics " which described a 12-step group of the same name. >However prolonged exposure to 12 Step meetings and literature is >strongly discouraged by the Medical Community until a cure can be found. But currently there is no cure, only daily remission contingient on abstinence from all 12-step programs. This can ONLY be achieved through self-direction and self-determination. ----- http://listen.to/benbradley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 1999 Report Share Posted August 31, 1999 > I must strongly disagree here - with so many 12-step programs, most aimed at the 'general public', there is a great danger to everyone. CoDA, just by itself, qualifies almost everyone - someone declared years ago (perhaps recuvery luminary Bradshaw) that 95% of all Americans are codependent. For the other 5%, surely they can fit into one of the hundreds of other 12-step programs.> If a condition exists in 95% of a population, then isn't it really codependent for a person or group of people to obsess about defining that condition as an " illness " and " helping " that large majority of a population change? Judith ________________________________________________________________ Get FREE voicemail, fax and email at http://voicemail.excite.com Talk online at http://voicechat.excite.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 1999 Report Share Posted September 1, 1999 j_stillwater@... writes: > If a condition exists in 95% of a population, then isn't it really > codependent for a person or group of people to obsess about defining that > condition as an " illness " and " helping " that large majority of a population > change? The figure is completely arbitrary and as far as I've ever been able to discover, just made up out of whole cloth. Amazing how these fantasy figures continue to stick in people's minds, isn't it? This is one con that really does deserve Mark Twain's sarcastic remark about " lies, damned lies, and statistics. " When anyone quotes this to me (and have done in the past) I ask: who did the research? What population was being studied? What was the size of the sample, and how can we be assured that this is indeed representative of the population? What was the methodology? (and so forth) Since none of these questions can be answered because the figure is nothing but an number pulled out of thin air, depending on how insistent you are, the person making this claim can be made to look quite the fool for believing it. Regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 1999 Report Share Posted September 1, 1999 j_stillwater@... writes: > If a condition exists in 95% of a population, then isn't it really > codependent for a person or group of people to obsess about defining that > condition as an " illness " and " helping " that large majority of a population > change? The figure is completely arbitrary and as far as I've ever been able to discover, just made up out of whole cloth. Amazing how these fantasy figures continue to stick in people's minds, isn't it? This is one con that really does deserve Mark Twain's sarcastic remark about " lies, damned lies, and statistics. " When anyone quotes this to me (and have done in the past) I ask: who did the research? What population was being studied? What was the size of the sample, and how can we be assured that this is indeed representative of the population? What was the methodology? (and so forth) Since none of these questions can be answered because the figure is nothing but an number pulled out of thin air, depending on how insistent you are, the person making this claim can be made to look quite the fool for believing it. Regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 1999 Report Share Posted September 1, 1999 Yeah Apple, Isn't it a shame that humankind couldn't find some positive milieu in which to congregate en masse instead of this hideous 12 step quagmire that plagues our culture. I think the many people mystified by the magic of AA would be readily surprised at the fact that there really is no magic, other than the resumption of connectedness and socialization that comes with group participation. AppleDTP@... wrote: > > 95% of the population in CoDA eh? Grrrreeaat! I've just ordered a > book on 12 step use and CoDA. The title is " The Twelve Steps of > Destruction " . Don't know anything about it, just found it accidentally > on the web, but with a title like that I had to have it. > > I really think that these meetings which are taking over the world, are > a response to the utter loneliness so many of us feel in our high-tech > world, where human interaction has been minimized thanks to the great > inventions of man. And the price for the human interaction is > self-labelling with the disease duJour. The history books will have > fun with this someday I am sure. I'm just surprised that more people > don't see the phenomenon for what it is. > Apple > > > >Yet another case of SADS(sudden alcoholic death syndrome) has been > > >reported in Los Angeles area. It is the third such occurence in as > many > > > > >Thankfully SADS is not viral and does not pose a threat to the > general > > >public. > > > > I must strongly disagree here - with so many 12-step programs, most > > aimed at the 'general public', there is a great danger to everyone. > CoDA, > > just by itself, qualifies almost everyone - someone declared years ago > > (perhaps recuvery luminary Bradshaw) that 95% of all Americans > are > > codependent. For the other 5%, surely they can fit into one of the > hundreds > > of other 12-step programs. > > Even just the alcohol-related groups can easily cover a large > segment of > > the poppulation. I saw where things were out of hand nine or ten > years ago > > when I saw a book titled " Grandchildren of Alcoholics " which described > > a 12-step group of the same name. > > > > >However prolonged exposure to 12 Step meetings and literature is > > >strongly discouraged by the Medical Community until a cure can be > found. > > > > But currently there is no cure, only daily remission contingient on > > abstinence from all 12-step programs. This can ONLY be achieved > through > > self-direction and self-determination. > > > > ----- > > http://listen.to/benbradley > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > MyPoints-Free Rewards When You're Online. > Start with up to 150 Points for joining! > http://clickhere./click/805 > > eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 1999 Report Share Posted September 1, 1999 Yeah Apple, Isn't it a shame that humankind couldn't find some positive milieu in which to congregate en masse instead of this hideous 12 step quagmire that plagues our culture. I think the many people mystified by the magic of AA would be readily surprised at the fact that there really is no magic, other than the resumption of connectedness and socialization that comes with group participation. AppleDTP@... wrote: > > 95% of the population in CoDA eh? Grrrreeaat! I've just ordered a > book on 12 step use and CoDA. The title is " The Twelve Steps of > Destruction " . Don't know anything about it, just found it accidentally > on the web, but with a title like that I had to have it. > > I really think that these meetings which are taking over the world, are > a response to the utter loneliness so many of us feel in our high-tech > world, where human interaction has been minimized thanks to the great > inventions of man. And the price for the human interaction is > self-labelling with the disease duJour. The history books will have > fun with this someday I am sure. I'm just surprised that more people > don't see the phenomenon for what it is. > Apple > > > >Yet another case of SADS(sudden alcoholic death syndrome) has been > > >reported in Los Angeles area. It is the third such occurence in as > many > > > > >Thankfully SADS is not viral and does not pose a threat to the > general > > >public. > > > > I must strongly disagree here - with so many 12-step programs, most > > aimed at the 'general public', there is a great danger to everyone. > CoDA, > > just by itself, qualifies almost everyone - someone declared years ago > > (perhaps recuvery luminary Bradshaw) that 95% of all Americans > are > > codependent. For the other 5%, surely they can fit into one of the > hundreds > > of other 12-step programs. > > Even just the alcohol-related groups can easily cover a large > segment of > > the poppulation. I saw where things were out of hand nine or ten > years ago > > when I saw a book titled " Grandchildren of Alcoholics " which described > > a 12-step group of the same name. > > > > >However prolonged exposure to 12 Step meetings and literature is > > >strongly discouraged by the Medical Community until a cure can be > found. > > > > But currently there is no cure, only daily remission contingient on > > abstinence from all 12-step programs. This can ONLY be achieved > through > > self-direction and self-determination. > > > > ----- > > http://listen.to/benbradley > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > MyPoints-Free Rewards When You're Online. > Start with up to 150 Points for joining! > http://clickhere./click/805 > > eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 1999 Report Share Posted September 1, 1999 Yeah Apple, Isn't it a shame that humankind couldn't find some positive milieu in which to congregate en masse instead of this hideous 12 step quagmire that plagues our culture. I think the many people mystified by the magic of AA would be readily surprised at the fact that there really is no magic, other than the resumption of connectedness and socialization that comes with group participation. AppleDTP@... wrote: > > 95% of the population in CoDA eh? Grrrreeaat! I've just ordered a > book on 12 step use and CoDA. The title is " The Twelve Steps of > Destruction " . Don't know anything about it, just found it accidentally > on the web, but with a title like that I had to have it. > > I really think that these meetings which are taking over the world, are > a response to the utter loneliness so many of us feel in our high-tech > world, where human interaction has been minimized thanks to the great > inventions of man. And the price for the human interaction is > self-labelling with the disease duJour. The history books will have > fun with this someday I am sure. I'm just surprised that more people > don't see the phenomenon for what it is. > Apple > > > >Yet another case of SADS(sudden alcoholic death syndrome) has been > > >reported in Los Angeles area. It is the third such occurence in as > many > > > > >Thankfully SADS is not viral and does not pose a threat to the > general > > >public. > > > > I must strongly disagree here - with so many 12-step programs, most > > aimed at the 'general public', there is a great danger to everyone. > CoDA, > > just by itself, qualifies almost everyone - someone declared years ago > > (perhaps recuvery luminary Bradshaw) that 95% of all Americans > are > > codependent. For the other 5%, surely they can fit into one of the > hundreds > > of other 12-step programs. > > Even just the alcohol-related groups can easily cover a large > segment of > > the poppulation. I saw where things were out of hand nine or ten > years ago > > when I saw a book titled " Grandchildren of Alcoholics " which described > > a 12-step group of the same name. > > > > >However prolonged exposure to 12 Step meetings and literature is > > >strongly discouraged by the Medical Community until a cure can be > found. > > > > But currently there is no cure, only daily remission contingient on > > abstinence from all 12-step programs. This can ONLY be achieved > through > > self-direction and self-determination. > > > > ----- > > http://listen.to/benbradley > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > MyPoints-Free Rewards When You're Online. > Start with up to 150 Points for joining! > http://clickhere./click/805 > > eGroups.com home: /group/12-step-free > - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 1999 Report Share Posted September 1, 1999 > If a condition exists in 95% of a population, then isn't it really > codependent for a person or group of people to obsess about defining that > condition as an " illness " and " helping " that large majority of a population > change? > > Judith BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That 12th. Step sucks, doesn't it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 1999 Report Share Posted September 1, 1999 > If a condition exists in 95% of a population, then isn't it really > codependent for a person or group of people to obsess about defining that > condition as an " illness " and " helping " that large majority of a population > change? > > Judith BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That 12th. Step sucks, doesn't it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 1999 Report Share Posted September 1, 1999 > If a condition exists in 95% of a population, then isn't it really > codependent for a person or group of people to obsess about defining that > condition as an " illness " and " helping " that large majority of a population > change? > > Judith BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That 12th. Step sucks, doesn't it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 1999 Report Share Posted September 1, 1999 At 06:08 PM 01/09/99 EDT, you wrote: >j_stillwater@... writes: > >> If a condition exists in 95% of a population, then isn't it really >> codependent for a person or group of people to obsess about defining that >> condition as an " illness " and " helping " that large majority of a population >> change? > >The figure is completely arbitrary and as far as I've ever been able to >discover, just made up out of whole cloth. Amazing how these fantasy figures >continue to stick in people's minds, isn't it? This is one con that really >does deserve Mark Twain's sarcastic remark about " lies, damned lies, and >statistics. " > >When anyone quotes this to me (and have done in the past) I ask: who did the >research? What population was being studied? What was the size of the >sample, and how can we be assured that this is indeed representative of the >population? What was the methodology? (and so forth) Since none of these >questions can be answered because the figure is nothing but an number pulled >out of thin air, depending on how insistent you are, the person making this >claim can be made to look quite the fool for believing it. > >Regards, > Not only that, but this 95% figure supposedly refers to the percentage of the population (er, what population?) suffering from " codependency " . And there are a number of definitions of codependency. Not only that, there is some basis for thinking it is a non-existant condition anyway. If codependency means people who are involved in a self-defeating way with someone who has an addiction problem (original meaning of the term I believe), why would that be a condition and not just a poor choice? If codependency means a set of characteristics including poor boundaries, innappropriately low levels of self-esteem, etc, why is that a condition and not just a set of characteristics? It is all nonsense, isn't it... Joe Berenbaum mailto:joe-b@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 1999 Report Share Posted September 1, 1999 At 06:08 PM 01/09/99 EDT, you wrote: >j_stillwater@... writes: > >> If a condition exists in 95% of a population, then isn't it really >> codependent for a person or group of people to obsess about defining that >> condition as an " illness " and " helping " that large majority of a population >> change? > >The figure is completely arbitrary and as far as I've ever been able to >discover, just made up out of whole cloth. Amazing how these fantasy figures >continue to stick in people's minds, isn't it? This is one con that really >does deserve Mark Twain's sarcastic remark about " lies, damned lies, and >statistics. " > >When anyone quotes this to me (and have done in the past) I ask: who did the >research? What population was being studied? What was the size of the >sample, and how can we be assured that this is indeed representative of the >population? What was the methodology? (and so forth) Since none of these >questions can be answered because the figure is nothing but an number pulled >out of thin air, depending on how insistent you are, the person making this >claim can be made to look quite the fool for believing it. > >Regards, > Not only that, but this 95% figure supposedly refers to the percentage of the population (er, what population?) suffering from " codependency " . And there are a number of definitions of codependency. Not only that, there is some basis for thinking it is a non-existant condition anyway. If codependency means people who are involved in a self-defeating way with someone who has an addiction problem (original meaning of the term I believe), why would that be a condition and not just a poor choice? If codependency means a set of characteristics including poor boundaries, innappropriately low levels of self-esteem, etc, why is that a condition and not just a set of characteristics? It is all nonsense, isn't it... Joe Berenbaum mailto:joe-b@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 1999 Report Share Posted September 7, 1999 On Wed, 01 Sep 1999 05:45:39 PDT Judith Stillwater wrote: > > If a condition exists in 95% of a population, then isn't it really > codependent for a person or group of people to obsess about defining that > condition as an " illness " and " helping " that large majority of a population > change? Hello Judith, list Actually, no. Dental Caries affects some 98% of Westerners; nevertheless, tooth decay is undoubtedly a disorder meriting treatment. I made this point in my Psychology Degree Project which offered tentative support to the legitimacy of Codependence as a theoretical concept. However, acknowledging its legitimacy as a concept does not in itself endorse the use of 12-step programs or other interventions to deal with it. I also pointed out that in all probability " Codependence " is merely what personality theorists hve been referring to as " Neuroticism " for years. Neuroticism is Normally ( in the statistical sense, of a bell curve) distributed in the population. The " average " person shows an average level of neuroticism, and only a small proportion - 5% perhaps - could be considered to show no neurotic symptoms. Another statistic claimed is that " 96% of families are dysfunctional " which can be subjected to the same analogical argument. I have seen it suggested that 95% of ppl are codependent through having grown up in a dysfunctional family, the other 5% possibly having " secondary codependence " through being in a codependent society. I really must see the dentist soon! Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 1999 Report Share Posted September 7, 1999 On Wed, 01 Sep 1999 05:45:39 PDT Judith Stillwater wrote: > > If a condition exists in 95% of a population, then isn't it really > codependent for a person or group of people to obsess about defining that > condition as an " illness " and " helping " that large majority of a population > change? Hello Judith, list Actually, no. Dental Caries affects some 98% of Westerners; nevertheless, tooth decay is undoubtedly a disorder meriting treatment. I made this point in my Psychology Degree Project which offered tentative support to the legitimacy of Codependence as a theoretical concept. However, acknowledging its legitimacy as a concept does not in itself endorse the use of 12-step programs or other interventions to deal with it. I also pointed out that in all probability " Codependence " is merely what personality theorists hve been referring to as " Neuroticism " for years. Neuroticism is Normally ( in the statistical sense, of a bell curve) distributed in the population. The " average " person shows an average level of neuroticism, and only a small proportion - 5% perhaps - could be considered to show no neurotic symptoms. Another statistic claimed is that " 96% of families are dysfunctional " which can be subjected to the same analogical argument. I have seen it suggested that 95% of ppl are codependent through having grown up in a dysfunctional family, the other 5% possibly having " secondary codependence " through being in a codependent society. I really must see the dentist soon! Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 1999 Report Share Posted September 8, 1999 On Tue, 7 Sep 1999 21:38:45 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Pete Watts wrote: > On Wed, 01 Sep 1999 05:45:39 PDT Judith Stillwater > wrote: > > > If a condition exists in 95% of a population, then isn't it really codependent for a person or group of people to obsess about defining that condition as an " illness " and " helping " that large majority of a population change? > > > > Hello Judith, list > > Actually, no. Dental Caries affects some 98% of Westerners; nevertheless, tooth decay is undoubtedly a disorder meriting treatment. I made this point in my Psychology Degree Project which offered tentative support to the legitimacy of Codependence as a theoretical concept. However, acknowledging its legitimacy as a concept does not in itself endorse the use of 12-step programs or other interventions to deal with it. > Good point. However, Dental Caries (I am assuming this is synonymous with what I would call cavities) are diagnosable with a consistent set of physically visible symptoms. Are we comparing apples and oranges by using a physical condition to prove a point about an alleged mental health condition? >I also pointed out that in all probability " Codependence " is merely what personality theorists hve been referring to as " Neuroticism " for years. Neuroticism is Normally ( in the statistical sense, of a bell curve) distributed in the population. The " average " person shows an average level of neuroticism, and only a small proportion - 5% perhaps - could be considered to show no neurotic symptoms.> I'm not familiar with neuroticism--I will have to look it up. > Another statistic claimed is that " 96% of families are dysfunctional " which can be subjected to the same analogical argument. I have seen it suggested that 95% of ppl are codependent through having grown up in a dysfunctional family, the other 5% possibly having " secondary codependence " through being in a codependent society. I really must see the dentist soon!> Well Pete, I wasn't going to say anything but now that you mention it.... Judith ________________________________________________________________ Get FREE voicemail, fax and email at http://voicemail.excite.com Talk online at http://voicechat.excite.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 1999 Report Share Posted September 9, 1999 At 05:45 AM 9/1/99 PDT, Judith Stillwater wrote: > > >> I must strongly disagree here - with so many 12-step programs, most >aimed at the 'general public', there is a great danger to everyone. CoDA, >just by itself, qualifies almost everyone - someone declared years ago >(perhaps recuvery luminary Bradshaw) that 95% of all Americans are >codependent. For the other 5%, surely they can fit into one of the hundreds >of other 12-step programs.> > >If a condition exists in 95% of a population, then isn't it really >codependent for a person or group of people to obsess about defining that >condition as an " illness " and " helping " that large majority of a population >change? > >Judith I think the context of the quote, which I totally forgot to include in my earlier message, was that codependency is so broadly defined (as in " if you have ANY of the following um-teen zillion symptoms, you're codependent " ), that it no longer means anything. Whoever it was who originally said that was actually being critical of the 'codependent movement', or at least the ways that many people were defining codependency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.