Guest guest Posted November 18, 2002 Report Share Posted November 18, 2002 > Dear Everyone, > Can I ask your help and advice again? In the " Frequently Asked > Questions The question that came to mind as I read the answer is what is the different procedure used for people in chronic afib. Also, do centers really give precedence to people in paroxysmal afib? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2002 Report Share Posted November 18, 2002 Hi, I share the Chronic Afib. I have no hard data on hand but remember coming across info from different sources as to curing Chronic Afib. To date it is the more difficult to cure and the success rate is much lower than that of intermittent Afib. Currently different approaches are being pursued in an effort to tackle permanent Afib and progress is being made?? I discussed this at one point with my cardio who is aware of the efforts. His recommendation for me was to wait for the outcome until it is more perfected. He also said that permanent Afib has a somewhat lower rate of clot formation. / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2002 Report Share Posted November 18, 2002 Hi, I share the Chronic Afib. I have no hard data on hand but remember coming across info from different sources as to curing Chronic Afib. To date it is the more difficult to cure and the success rate is much lower than that of intermittent Afib. Currently different approaches are being pursued in an effort to tackle permanent Afib and progress is being made?? I discussed this at one point with my cardio who is aware of the efforts. His recommendation for me was to wait for the outcome until it is more perfected. He also said that permanent Afib has a somewhat lower rate of clot formation. / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2002 Report Share Posted November 19, 2002 In a message dated 11/18/2002 7:32:06 PM Pacific Standard Time, madisonn99@... writes: << His recommendation for me was to wait for the outcome until it is more perfected. He also said that permanent Afib has a somewhat lower rate of clot formation. >> , My brother's cardiologist also said that being in permanent afib is less conducive to clot formation than being paroxysmal as I am. This was the doctor's main rationale for not giving my brother Coumadin. He said that he was sure that he had been in permanent afib for a very long time and was quite stable. Since my brother had no history of clotting, his doctor felt it was unlikely that problems would arise. So far this has proven true. My brother doesn't worry about clots, therefore, and doesn't want to take Coumadin. His hysterical sister (me), on the other hand, will probably want to continue Coumadin for the rest of my life even if I stay in sinus for a year or more because to me the ultimate horror would be a stroke. I know I can live with afib because I've done it for nineteen years, but a stroke would be unknown and unthinkable territory. Since you are in chronic afib, you are safer in that respect than I am. When I was going in and out of afib so frequently, part of me almost wanted to just stay in permanent afib because at least the clot possibility wouldn't be so great. Also, my brother in permanent afib, taking Digoxin and Atenolol, was having far fewer problems than I was for the duration of my afib career. Now that I've been in sinus for six months, my thinking is different, however. If afib again becomes frequent, I would, like you, wait for the breakthrough or perfection of current procedures. in sinus in Seattle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2002 Report Share Posted November 20, 2002 Dear Trudy, The article doesn't describe the procedure used for chronic A-Fib, though it gives an illustration which I can't put in the E-mail. I'll E-mail Dr. Jais to see if he can't give me a description and possibly why it works. I'm also negotiating to put this whole article on http://www.a-fib.com. Good point about preference. I'll change it to, " ...most heart centers have a long waiting list and have better success rates with Paroxysmal A-Fib. " A-FibFriendSteve trudyjhagain wrote: > > > Dear Everyone, > > Can I ask your help and advice again? In the " Frequently Asked > > Questions > > The question that came to mind as I read the answer is what is the > different procedure used for people in chronic afib. > > Also, do centers really give precedence to people in paroxysmal afib? > > > > Web Page - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AFIBsupport > FAQ - > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AFIBsupport/files/Administrative/faq.htm > For more information: http://www.dialsolutions.com/af > Unsubscribe: AFIBsupport-unsubscribe > List owner: AFIBsupport-owner > For help on how to use the group, including how to drive it via email, > send a blank email to AFIBsupport-help > > Nothing in this message should be considered as medical advice, or > should be acted upon without consultation with one's physician. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2002 Report Share Posted November 20, 2002 > > Dear Everyone, > > Can I ask your help and advice again? In the " Frequently Asked > > Questions > > The question that came to mind as I read the answer is what is the > different procedure used for people in chronic afib. > Dear Trudy, I made a mistake. The article describes it but doesn't give an illustration. Here is what it says, " The procedure in this situation, involves a combination of long linear lesions placed in the posterior LA drawing an inferiorly incomplete (to avoid isolation) rectangle bounded by the PV ostia. To prevent perimitral reentry the rectangle is extended to the lateral mitral annulus at the level of the LIPV. High power (50-60 W) is usually required to create a complete connecting line anchored to the mitral annulus because of the thickness of the atrial wall at this level. " Without an illustration I don't know if I can translate this medical language to something the average person can understand. A-FibFriendSteve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2002 Report Share Posted November 20, 2002 > > Dear Everyone, > > Can I ask your help and advice again? In the " Frequently Asked > > Questions > > The question that came to mind as I read the answer is what is the > different procedure used for people in chronic afib. > Dear Trudy, I made a mistake. The article describes it but doesn't give an illustration. Here is what it says, " The procedure in this situation, involves a combination of long linear lesions placed in the posterior LA drawing an inferiorly incomplete (to avoid isolation) rectangle bounded by the PV ostia. To prevent perimitral reentry the rectangle is extended to the lateral mitral annulus at the level of the LIPV. High power (50-60 W) is usually required to create a complete connecting line anchored to the mitral annulus because of the thickness of the atrial wall at this level. " Without an illustration I don't know if I can translate this medical language to something the average person can understand. A-FibFriendSteve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 > > The question that came to mind as I read the answer is what is the > > different procedure used for people in chronic afib. > > > Dear Trudy, > I made a mistake. The article describes it but doesn't give an > illustration. Here is what it says, " The procedure in this situation, > involves a combination of long linear lesions placed in the posterior > LA drawing Hi, Steve, This sounds like a semi-maze done by ablation instead of by open heart surgery... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 21, 2002 Report Share Posted November 21, 2002 Yes it seems very similar. The maze operation was the precursor and stimulus for much of today's catheter based ablation procedures. A-FibFriendSteve trudyjhagain wrote: > > > > The question that came to mind as I read the answer is what is > the > > > different procedure used for people in chronic afib. > > > > > Dear Trudy, > > I made a mistake. The article describes it but doesn't give an > > illustration. Here is what it says, " The procedure in this > situation, > > involves a combination of long linear lesions placed in the > posterior > > LA drawing > > Hi, Steve, > > This sounds like a semi-maze done by ablation instead of by open > heart surgery... > > > > Web Page - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AFIBsupport > FAQ - > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AFIBsupport/files/Administrative/faq.htm > For more information: http://www.dialsolutions.com/af > Unsubscribe: AFIBsupport-unsubscribe > List owner: AFIBsupport-owner > For help on how to use the group, including how to drive it via email, > send a blank email to AFIBsupport-help > > Nothing in this message should be considered as medical advice, or > should be acted upon without consultation with one's physician. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.