Guest guest Posted December 28, 2001 Report Share Posted December 28, 2001 Thanks for a fine answer . : The only problem with that is that there seems to be a signal that is generated by oral sulfate which tells the kidneys to downregulate the reabsorption of sulfate by actually changing the number of sulfate transporters that are in the kidneys . Studies have shown that this downregulation seems to lead to no net gain in sulfate systemically because of how much more sulfate is spilled into the urine under this condition. The levels used in these studies may have been higher than what you state, and it has not been determined WHAT hormone r other regulator signals this change, so we don't know what the concentration has to be in the lumen or inside of the gut to trigger this " dump sulfate " signal. : This study may have been done on people ( or rats ) that had normal sulphate levels to begin with. Thus the body was just adjusting correctly. If the study had been done on people with low sulphate levels then things might be different. : The intestines do need more sulfate than other organs, but they need to get it from the basolateral side of cells. That means the side of cells that faces the blood supply. This means that the sulfate the cells needs is in the blood, and it may be driven by some sort of concentration gradient, making sulfate in the lumen of the gut interfere with sulfate absorption from the blood. : This argument seems false to me because the reason the gradient would be reduced would be because there was sulphate in there. If the sulphate needed to be escorted through into the blood then this would be a significant factor, in that this transported sulphate might have to go to the liver before it got into usable form.?? : A study by Dr. Stipanuk at Cornell showed that in rats, to accomodate the gut's need for sulfate, the liver exports sulfate in large quantity into the blood, but all that sulfate seems to be taken up out of the blood by the intestinal system. So when blood levels of sulfate are low, it will apparently be the gut that goes suffering. : Maybe the liver's regulation of sulphate is out ? How can such a simple thing get so difficult ? I will still take the epsom salts at 400 mg/litre and if I decide to stop then I will cut down to 300, then 200, then 100, to give my body time to readjust. The sulphur article fuels the fire here in this group. There seems to be some dispute as to what percentage of autistic people have high cysteine levels. I don't know how, or if, this can be determined. Moses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.