Guest guest Posted June 15, 2001 Report Share Posted June 15, 2001 Hello Tom, You SNIPped an important major fact from the question-part of the post which Dr. Ain addresses with his 1997 reply. " one of the reasons for having a tt is that otherwise it is impossible to use the TG test to detect recurrence " Tom; the reason to know this is that regardless of the quantity of RAI or the number of times that it has been prescribed (used); if a tt followed by RAI were not performed..then.. tg readings are of little or no value as to assessing the recurrence of thyroid cancer. (only as a relative indicator; specific to the individual being tested) Also; it must be know if antibodies exist. (read Dr. Rolla) Dr. Ain _did_ address the question but it seems that you want to hear more about it :-) Nick @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ > >--Thyroglobulin is a specific product of thyroid follicular cells, both >normal and malignant. There is no other type of cell in the human body which >has been found to produce this protein. My laboratory, and many others, have >studied the molecular biology and gene regulation of thyroglobulin and none >of us have ever found (and published or made known) any exceptions to >this.--Dr. Ain @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ ********************************************************************************\ ************************** Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 13:04:45 -0400 Subject: REPOST: Dr. Ain Re: tg marker --> Ndal In-reply-to: Sender: thyca-approval@... X-Sender: nmr1231@imap To: thyca@... Reply-to: thyca@... Message-id: <4.2.0.58.20000424124545.01ce5c40@imap> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Precedence: bulk " In theory, patients with complete >absence of thyroid cancer cells >should have undetectable thyroglobulin levels (less than or equal to 1.0), >both while hypothyroid and while on thyroid hormone. " Dr. Ain Complete REPOST from Dr. Ain, follows, below. tg straight answers X-Sender: nmr1231@imap To: nmr1231@... Message-id: <4.2.0.58.20000911121315.01a40f00@imap> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Content-type: text/plain; charset= " us-ascii " >*******************************************************************************\ ******************************** (A repost from Dr. Carol Spencer ; a tg researcher in Calif) >Thyroid 1999 May;9(5):435-41 > >Detection of residual and recurrent differentiated thyroid >carcinoma by serum thyroglobulin measurement. > >Spencer CA, LoPresti JS, Fatemi S, Nicoloff JT Department of Medicine, >University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033, >USA. cspencer@... > >Thyroglobulin (Tg) measurement is primarily used to monitor patients with >differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) for tumor recurrence. Serum Tg >levels principally integrate 3 variables: the mass of thyroid tissue >present (benign or neoplastic); the degree of thyrotropin (TSH) receptor >stimulation and tumor's intrinsic ability to synthesize and secrete Tg >--a factor that needs to be assessed by a preoperative serum Tg >determination. > >Serum Tg measurements should be interpreted relative to the TSH status >of the patient. When TSH is low (on levothyroxine [LT4] therapy) basal >serum Tg may be undetectable and recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH) >administration may be needed to increase serum Tg into the measureable >range. The Tg fold response to rhTSH (rhTSH-stimulated Tg/basal Tg) is >an index of the tumor's sensitivity to TSH. > >Normal thyroid remnant and well-differentiated thyroid tumors display a >greater (>10-fold) serum Tg response to TSH stimulation compared with >less well-differentiated tumors (<3-fold). The factors influencing the >response include the magnitude and chronicity of the serum TSH elevation, >the mass of thyroid tissue and the TSH receptor status of the tumor. > >Technical problems still compromise the clinical utility of serum Tg >measurement. Thyroglobulin autoantibodies are present in approximately >20% of all DTC patients and cause either underestimation or overestimation >of serum Tg measurements made by immunometric assay (IMA) and >radioimmunoassay (RIA) methods, respectively. > >Other technical problems include poor interassay precision, " hook " effects >(IMA methods), intermethod standardization differences, and suboptimal >sensitivity for detecting small amounts of tumor during TSH >suppression. When TSH is suppressed, the basal serum Tg provides an >integrated index of thyroid tissue mass and its capability to secrete Tg. >Serial measurements of basal Tg concentrations can be used to monitor >tumor progression or regression. The development of a low (<1 ng/mL) >serum Tg (on LT4 therapy) by the second postoperative year signifies a >low 5-year recurrence risk whereas a rising serum Tg in the face of TSH >suppression is an abnormal response consistent with recurrence. The >optimal degree of TSH suppression for a patient should be based on >clinical judgment, relative to tumor staging and the risks from >iatrogenic hyperthyroidism. > >Despite current technical limitations, serum Tg measurement is the >cornerstone of long-term monitoring for most DTC patients. For optimal >use of serum Tg, it is necessary to understand the pathophysiology of Tg >secretion, the limitations of Tg methods and the use of rhTSH to overcome >the insensitivity of current Tg methods. > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ At 6/14/01 03:42 PM, you wrote: >Nick, > >Your reposting of Dr. Ain's info from 1997 does not seem to me, to >address the question posted above it, from 2001, specifically: > >SNIP " Isn't it true that after receiving doses of RAI of 100 or more >mCi, then a TG is valuable in testing for thyca recurrence? I have >received RAI 100 mCi,150 mCi and 60 EBR. My endocrinologist, >radiation oncologist and now thyca specialist are using my last two >TG results of 13 and 39 as indication of recurrence with possible >mets. I have previously gone down to zero or near zero only to go up >again. This is what has made my doctors believe I do in fact have >cancer for a forth time. The test results I stated are while >suppressed with Synthroid. " SNIP > >I would be interested in seeing an answer to that specific question, >in lieu of a general statement, which although informative, does not >address the actual question. > >Thanks! >Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.