Guest guest Posted December 31, 2001 Report Share Posted December 31, 2001 Hi all, I just got back my results of the fractionated urine porphyrin test and need your input, as I'm not clear how to calculate the proper ratio. Basically, I need to know whether my levels are high in relation to the creatinine level. I am 26 years old. These are the results: CREATININE 578 mg Ref. level: 500 to 1,500 mg UROPORPHYRINS 54.07 µg Ref. level: < 33.5 µg COPROPORPHYRINS 398.78 µg Ref. level: < 183 µg I would really appreciate your help, as I've been battling a persistent candida infection for years. I had my amalgams out three weeks ago and would want to start chelation as soon as possible (provided it's necessary, of course). Thank you very much in advance, Ruth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2001 Report Share Posted December 31, 2001 Ruth, Porphyria can be a sign of severe suphur deficiency. Just in case it is confusing that the study below reported that these sulfur-deficient rats were not dumping sulfate into the urine...this is the place where many of those with autism and those with AIDS seem to be working with an injured bit of regulation. Your body should be able to detect the need to retain sulfate when sulfur deficiency has occurred, but that seems to be broken in many cases of autism. These rats were also excreting some yucky stuff about the eyes, and that yucky stuff contained porphyrins as well. (They didn't say yucky, but I did!) Unique Identifier 99101090 Authors Tor-Agbidye J. Palmer VS. Sabri MI. Craig AM. Blythe LL. Spencer PS. Institution Center for Research on Occupational and Environmental Toxicology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201, USA. Title Dietary deficiency of cystine and methionine in rats alters thiol homeostasis required for cyanide detoxification. Source Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health. 55(8):583-95, 1998 Dec 25. Abstract Nutritional status is an important factor in modulating the metabolic fate of xenobiotics. Sulfur amino acid (SAA) deficiency has been proposed as a risk factor for human neurological diseases among protein-poor populations subsisting on the cyanophoric plant cassava. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were used to develop and define a model of SAA deficiency for use in future studies examining cassava-related neurotoxicity. Rats were kept in metabolic cages for 7-21 d and fed a balanced diet (BD) of known composition or a comparable diet selectively deficient in methionine and cystine (SAA-free diet). Animals fed the SAA-free diet failed to thrive, lost body weight, excreted porphyrinic materials, and showed a steep and persistent reduction of urinary inorganic sulfate. In contrast, animals on the BD gained body weight and maintained baseline output of urinary inorganic sulfate. Urinary thiocyanate excretion did not differ between groups, but plasma thiocyanate concentrations reached double that in SAA-deficient rats. Increased plasma thiocyanate suggests mobilization of sulfur amino acids from endogenous sources. Liver glutathione and blood cyanide concentrations were similar in animals on the BD and the SAA-deficient diet. In summary, a diet free of methionine and cystine results in increased retention of inorganic sulfur as thiocyanate and a near absence of inorganic sulfur excretion in urine. At 11:38 AM 12/31/2001 +0000, you wrote: >Hi all, > >I just got back my results of the fractionated urine porphyrin test >and need your input, as I'm not clear how to calculate the proper >ratio. Basically, I need to know whether my levels are high in >relation to the creatinine level. I am 26 years old. > >These are the results: > >CREATININE > >578 mg Ref. level: 500 to 1,500 mg > > >UROPORPHYRINS > > >54.07 µg Ref. level: < 33.5 µg > > >COPROPORPHYRINS > > >398.78 µg Ref. level: < 183 µg > > > >I would really appreciate your help, as I've been battling a >persistent candida infection for years. I had my amalgams out three >weeks ago and would want to start chelation as soon as possible >(provided it's necessary, of course). > >Thank you very much in advance, > > >Ruth > > > > >======================================================= > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2002 Report Share Posted January 1, 2002 Thank you for the study . I don't think I suffer from porphyria, I have checked for symptoms and it's not me at all. I'm confused about the sulfur issue. I don't tolerate any sulfur- containing foods, they stop my digestion and I feel terrible for days. Hence, I have excluded them all from my diet for the time being. I'm hoping my elevated porphyring levels are due to mercury, but I need somebody with the right knowledge to interpret my results in relation to the creatinine level. Doctors in my country are no use. I'm self-treating/self-diagnosing because all the doctors do is sending me to the shrink because they haven't got a clue and prefer to attribute my candidiasis and other symptoms to my mental state (and I can tell you I'm perfectly normal in that respect :-) If you or anybody knows what the results mean in relation to mercury poisoning, I would appreciate your help very much. Best wishes, Ruth > >Hi all, > > > >I just got back my results of the fractionated urine porphyrin test > >and need your input, as I'm not clear how to calculate the proper > >ratio. Basically, I need to know whether my levels are high in > >relation to the creatinine level. I am 26 years old. > > > >These are the results: > > > >CREATININE > > > >578 mg Ref. level: 500 to 1,500 mg > > > > > >UROPORPHYRINS > > > > > >54.07 µg Ref. level: < 33.5 µg > > > > > >COPROPORPHYRINS > > > > > >398.78 µg Ref. level: < 183 µg > > > > > > > >I would really appreciate your help, as I've been battling a > >persistent candida infection for years. I had my amalgams out three > >weeks ago and would want to start chelation as soon as possible > >(provided it's necessary, of course). > > > >Thank you very much in advance, > > > > > >Ruth > > > > > > > > > >======================================================= > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2002 Report Share Posted January 1, 2002 Hi Ruth, Since Andy hasn't answered (I think that you asked a few days ago about this)-- anyway, there is a FILE (from Andy) about porphyrins. It is here: /files/porphryins.text I don't know if this would help you or not. there is also a section in the file /files/ANDY_INDEX which has a heading that looks like this: DETERMINING MERCURY TOXICITY (fractionated urine porphyrins test) There are several items there (from Andy). I don't know if this is any help either. FWIW. Moria At 07:31 PM 1/1/2002 -0000, you wrote: >Thank you for the study . I don't think I suffer from porphyria, >I have checked for symptoms and it's not me at all. > >I'm confused about the sulfur issue. I don't tolerate any sulfur- >containing foods, they stop my digestion and I feel terrible for >days. Hence, I have excluded them all from my diet for the time being. > >I'm hoping my elevated porphyring levels are due to mercury, but I >need somebody with the right knowledge to interpret my results in >relation to the creatinine level. > >Doctors in my country are no use. I'm self-treating/self-diagnosing >because all the doctors do is sending me to the shrink because they >haven't got a clue and prefer to attribute my candidiasis and other >symptoms to my mental state (and I can tell you I'm perfectly normal >in that respect :-) > >If you or anybody knows what the results mean in relation to mercury >poisoning, I would appreciate your help very much. > >Best wishes, > > >Ruth > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2002 Report Share Posted January 1, 2002 Hi Moria, Thank you for that. I had seen Andy's files but I'm not sure how to do the porphyrin/creatinine ratio because of the different units. I need to be sure I'm doing it correctly and that's why I would appreciate somebody interpreting my results. In any case, thanks a lot Moria, you're always extremely helpful to everybody here, it's wonderful of you :-) Ruth > >Thank you for the study . I don't think I suffer from porphyria, > >I have checked for symptoms and it's not me at all. > > > >I'm confused about the sulfur issue. I don't tolerate any sulfur- > >containing foods, they stop my digestion and I feel terrible for > >days. Hence, I have excluded them all from my diet for the time being. > > > >I'm hoping my elevated porphyring levels are due to mercury, but I > >need somebody with the right knowledge to interpret my results in > >relation to the creatinine level. > > > >Doctors in my country are no use. I'm self-treating/self- diagnosing > >because all the doctors do is sending me to the shrink because they > >haven't got a clue and prefer to attribute my candidiasis and other > >symptoms to my mental state (and I can tell you I'm perfectly normal > >in that respect :-) > > > >If you or anybody knows what the results mean in relation to mercury > >poisoning, I would appreciate your help very much. > > > >Best wishes, > > > > > >Ruth > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2002 Report Share Posted January 1, 2002 Ruth and Moria, I took a look at the page Moria referred to us in the archives where Andy had calculated this chart: Upper normal limit versus age for children: Age uroporphyrin coproporphyrin mcg/g cr mcg/g cr birth 92 203 3 mo 111 165 6 mo 50 137 9 mo 43 71 1 yr 39 78 1.5 yr 64 83 2.25 yr 38 85 3 yr 43 78 4 yr 38 61 6 yr 33 60 9 yr 29 47 15 yr 32 48 adult 29 49 What wonderful data. What really is interesting to me is how the level changes during the first four years. You may have heard that people reported that Andy Wakefield at the last San Diego Conference presented data showing that children who became autistic after the MMR failed to grow normally both after the first and second MMR, and the second MMR was much later. Deficient growth can be very much a sign of sulfur deficiency, just like elevated porphyrins. I thought of his finding since the biggest change in this chart appears at 18 months...which happens to be MMR time. Were the children in this study immunized and can immunization affect porphyrin levels? Or if these control children were not immunized, if the chemistry is going through such a huge shift at this time developmentally, do we have any idea what the effect of immunization would be on this chemistry, and how that might affect development? It may be interesting to listmates to learn that the enzymes of sulfation are very upregulated in the brain during infancy and early toddlerhood to accomplish the job of myelinating the brain and building the regulatory extracellular matrix around neurons. These structures can't form until glial cells form, and that is because some of the molecules are made and exported by the glial cells. This process happens almost entirely after birth and within the same period that these figures on porphyrins are changing so much. According to Andy's figures, things porphyrinic seem to ease off at about age four and that is also when most of myelination is complete. At that point the porphyrins start more of a gentle change from about four to nine, and then stay about the same from then on. I imported Andy's data into Excel, and graphed the change over time, and it is just stunning what is happening in the second year particularly. This is when signs of autism typically show up. Very interesting. Ruth, you said: >I'm confused about the sulfur issue. I don't tolerate any sulfur- >containing foods, they stop my digestion and I feel terrible for >days. Hence, I have excluded them all from my diet for the time being. Ruth, please help me learn about these symptoms, and maybe we can get to the bottom of this. When you say it stops digestion, what do you think is happening exactly. Is the food staying in your stomach? Are you getting heartburn or gas? Do you get constipated or diarrhea? Can you better describe how you feel? Headachy? Body aches? Any protein is going to have some sulfur in it, by the way. Some just has more than others. What are you eating, and what are you excluding? Which items make you feel the worst? Have you ever tried the sort of enzymes that are being used in the autism community, like Serenaid or enzyme-aid, or some other brands? Some of these are made to help digest foods with a lot cysteine in them like casein and gluten. A lot of enzymes are dependent on their activity needing to bind to a sulfated GAG in the environment which protects the enzyme from degradationf, and also affects the enzyme's shape and function. If lack of sulfation of intestinal cells is impairing enzyme activity in the gut, then the more deficient of sulfur you become, the worse the situation with GAG dependent proteases and peptidases would become. If digestion in the upper intestines is poor, then more sulfur-containing foods would make it undigested to the colon where sulfur-loving bacteria can make bad-for-you things out of them and give you gas. A good measure of the possibility that this is happening is to measure the level of p-cresol in either urine or blood, for it is made of leftover tyrosine that comes from underdigested protein that makes it to the colon. Do you have exactly the same reaction to " sulfur-foods " as you do to either MSM or SAMe or NAC? If not, would you mind explaining the differences? Any other listmate can answer this too, if you'd like. One thing I wonder about is if the intestinal cells are sulfur deficient, if that means the levels of some factors inside and out make it where the transporters don't work the right direction. Scientists talk about cis-inhibition and trans-inhibition. Some substances inhibit something crossing a membrane by being on the same side of the membrane as what you are trying to move across (cis-inhibition). Other substances inhibit it by being on the opposite side (trans-inhibition). Every transporter which has been investigated thoroughly has a list of substances that inhibit or enhance transport from either side. It may be that higher sulfate is needed on the inside of intestinal cells to allow transport of some other substances across the apical side. It looks like most of the sulfate may come from the blood, not from the inside or from the food side of the intestines. That means that the intestines are very likely dependent on the liver to provide proper sulfate levels through the blood after it has used cysteine to make sulfate. Mercury in the gut may impair sulfate transport there, but I'm not sure how long that would be a problem after exposure. Intestinal cells turn over very quickly, so I would expect the problem would move fairly rapidly from the gut to the kidneys. Mercury does impair the kidney sulfate transporters. 1: J Biol Chem 2001 Aug 24;276(34):32322-9 Role of individual disulfide bonds in the structural maturation of a low molecular weight glutenin subunit. Orsi A, Sparvoli F, Ceriotti A. Istituto Biosintesi Vegetali, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, via Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy. Gliadins and glutenins are the major storage proteins that accumulate in wheat endosperm cells during seed development. Although gliadins are mainly monomeric, glutenins consist of very large disulfide-linked polymers made up of high molecular weight and low molecular weight subunits. These polymers are among the largest protein molecules known in nature and are the most important determinants of the viscoelastic properties of gluten. As a first step toward the elucidation of the folding and assembly pathways that lead to glutenin polymer formation, we have exploited an in vitro system composed of wheat germ extract and bean microsomes to examine the role of disulfide bonds in the structural maturation of a low molecular weight glutenin subunit. When conditions allowing the formation of disulfide bonds were established, the in vitro synthesized low molecular weight glutenin subunit was recovered in monomeric form containing intrachain disulfide bonds. Conversely, synthesis under conditions that did not favor the formation of disulfide bonds led to the production of large aggregates from which the polypeptides could not be rescued by the post-translational generation of a more oxidizing environment. These results indicate that disulfide bond formation is essential for the conformational maturation of the low molecular weight glutenin subunit and suggest that early folding steps may play an important role in this process, allowing the timely pairing of critical cysteine residues. To determine which cysteines were important to maintain the protein in monomeric form, we prepared a set of mutants containing selected cysteine to serine substitutions. Our results show that two conserved cysteine residues form a critical disulfide bond that is essential in preventing the exposure of adhesive domains and the consequent formation of aberrant aggregates. PMID: 11418605 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.