Guest guest Posted January 16, 2006 Report Share Posted January 16, 2006 Dear FORUM, This refer to Mr. Raja 's posting Re: Protest against arrests under Section 377 of the indian penal code Mr. don't have to apologise about expressing his views. But please think - if you don't remove stigma against homosexuality, will you be able to stop HIV? I think 20 years into the epidemic, we really have to realise fast that condoms in themselves cannot stop HIV. Enabling people to put them on does stop HIV. And that won't happen till you criminalize homosexuality and therefore prevent information dissemination on the fact that male to male sex can spread HIV. In all the debate around sex work and homosexuality, we often tend to mix up legalizing and decriminalising. There may be a thin line of difference, but it is an important difference. The Indian LGBT movement is not asking for something like murder or robbery to be legalized. It is only asking for something that is as good or as bad as heterosexuality to be decriminalized. Also, there is no question of fighting for homosexuality. If somebody doesn't have same sex attraction or desires, he or she can't be forced to have such an attraction. But that does not give others the right to hold a prejudice against people who have a homosexual orientation or practise male to male sex with mutual consent. Regards Pawan Dhall SAATHII E-mail: <pawan30@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2006 Report Share Posted January 17, 2006 Dear FORUM, I agree with Pawan’s comment that condoms alone cannot reduce the progress of the HIV pandemic. But even this focuses on individual behaviour alone and leaves out macro economic factors that are known to play a big role in the proliferation of various diseases. Individual behaviour alone cannot possibly account for the enormous variation in HIV prevalence between population groups, countries and regions and this unexplained remaining variation has been neglected by the international AIDS community. Poor nutrition, hygiene and related factors lead to biological vulnerability to various infections including HIV due to seriously deficient immune systems and this has been ignored as a determinant of the high levels of infection in certain populations. This invariably happens to marginalized groups, in particular the economically marginalized. Also this exclusive focus on individual behaviour adds to stigma and discrimination of PLWHA since anyone who is positive is seen to have got the infection as a result of one’s individual behaviour. A sustainable and meaningful response to AIDS is simultaneously a sustainable and meaningful response to all the diseases of poverty. And this response has to take into account macroeconomic factors that affect the health of all people. Unless this happens we will continue to build our strategies in a vacuum Sunil Peoples Health Movement E-mail: sunilcssr@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.