Guest guest Posted January 10, 2006 Report Share Posted January 10, 2006 Dear FORUM, I read this article with a bit of irritation. Really, folks, if Big Brother and God and Parents cannot observe youth for 24 hours 7 days a week to monitor their sexual habits then please please please install those lifesaving condom machines. Honestly, this doesn't take an Einstein to figure out. Signed, Irritated in Alaska Christian Heppinstall Volunteer Coordinator Alaskan AIDS Assistance Association tel/907.263.2047/fax/907.263.2051 cheppinstall@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2006 Report Share Posted January 10, 2006 Dear Forum, For how many more decades we would be pretending that the youngsters are not having sex (out of wedlock)? We need to accept that sex between a young couple is a natural thing to happen. Even in rural bihar (where the youngsters are living among typically conservative socity) un-wanted preganancies are regular leading to unsafe abortions. In cities the youngsters are even more exposed and have greater freedom. Educating them about safe sex and provisioning of CVM is the right way to avoid unwanted pregnancies and related complications besides allowing them to protect themselves from getting infected. Manish CARE India, Bihar E-mail: <mmathur_in@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2006 Report Share Posted January 11, 2006 Dear Forum members, Let me take this opprotunity to wish you all, your loving family members and friends a very happy new year. I totally agree with Manish and several others on the issue of whether we have to talk on condoms or not and if so do we provide the necessary provisions for the same such as the CVM. The following are to be noted: 1. People who decide have sexual relationships will never ask permission to do so. It is definitely believing us to close our eyes to the same fact, while the truth is that the youngsters are continuing the behavior and we should be attempting to keep them safe. Attempts failing to do the same will end up us having to loose them to complications such as HIV etc. 2. As for CVM, the Chennai Corporation under the mighty leadership of Mr. Manivasakam IAS and his team have taken on trial a complete installation of CVMs through NGOs at all the NGO intervention sites. At least our experience gathers that out of the 24 CVM set up at the area where the cine industry is prominently settled, within a months time of instalation, there had been 1-3 times of refill, which shows that the condom use is increasing. Therefore on one hand we have given the environment for condom access, which actually was made possible after several years of interventions, i think we shouldnt be having the horse run back giving rise to sentiments based on our youngsters and thier behaviors. Let us smartly digest the recent happenings with wide openness and make them safe which certainly does not sum up to say that we support them. With warm regards shyamala ashok E-mail: aabinand@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2006 Report Share Posted January 23, 2006 Hello Forum, I've been lurking on this list for some time now -- and thank you for the interesting and informative posts! To follow up on Shyamala Ashok's and 's posts: I read a recent meta-analysis of 44 controlled studies on the effectiveness of HIV sexual risk reduction interventions for adolescents. The authors concluded on statistical grounds that " ...providing condoms did not accelerate the onset of sexual debut nor increase the number of sexual partners, corroborating others' findings ... and allaying concerns about the iatrogenic effects of behavioral interventions to reduce risk. " Citation: , B. T., Carey, M. P., Marsh, K. L., Levin, K. D., & -Sheldon, L. A. J. (2003). Interventions to reduce sexual risk for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus in adolescents, 1985 - 2000: A research synthesis. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 157, 381 - 388. What is the world view of someone who honestly believes that by giving a teenager a condom, we motivate him or her to engage in promiscuous sexual activity? All the best, warren Warren A. Reich, Ph.D. Research and Evaluation Manager The Family Center 66 Reade St., New York, NY 10007 (212) 766-4522 x136 www.thefamilycenter.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2006 Report Share Posted January 24, 2006 Dear Forum, I’ve been following with interest the comments on this forum, especially the recent ones on condom vending machines. I’m a student of anthropology, and my specific focus is on AIDS and stigma. The idea that accessible condoms will promote sexual activity among youth has, time and again, been proved incorrect by various studies as well as by people’s personal experiences growing up and interacting with young people. I have a couple of comments of my own to make. First, people – and not just young people – will likely have sex if they can. The only thing giving people access to condoms does is increase the likelihood that they will have protected sex. Second, the use of condom vending machines, if they are in relatively “private” public areas, such as bathrooms, takes away much of the fear and embarrassment associated with trying to buy protection in your neighbourhood chemist shop. This is a powerful reason that many young people do not use protection. Sexual activity needs to be destigmatized. While I'm not suggesting that children be enouraged to have sex, we need to respect the decision-making ability of young adults and also to acknowledge that people are going to pretty much do what they want, whatever social authority thinks. Third, talking in terms of “our traditions” or “our culture” is not very productive, and also rather inaccurate. Indians follow many different traditions and have many different cultures. These are not restricted to those delimited by religion, region, or ethnicity. Social rules, rituals, and behaviour patterns are also differentiated based upon age, gender, sexual orientation, economics, and so on. It is critical to remember, also, that just as appropriate behaviour changes with context, so, too, does it change with time. Now is not the time to worry about what “our culture” permits and what it doesn’t. It is the time to engage in practical solutions to immediate problems, while continuing to look to the long run. In solidarity, Lavanya E-mail: <lavi_m@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 Dear FORUM, The condom was introduced in the Family Planning progm of India in 1952, that time also the relegious ,social,political groups and individuals made a noice that by this act of making condoms available free in the progm will promote the promisquity. Adolescent will try the sex because it cant cause pregnacy.In reality today the promiscuty did increased in the society but not due to condoms. May be due to changes in lifestyle ? Some First timers who has seen the condom first may get tempted to have sex and start searching the venue and the sex partener,but majority will be temted to have sex when they find sex partener and if condoms are not available then also they will have sex. We can be usefull to the second group and first group may join later. However in my openion condom cannot increase the promisquity as the experience shows. Dr A S Rathore Joint Director Centre for AIDS & Related DIs NICD,Delhi E-mail: <asr_naco@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.