Guest guest Posted December 16, 2001 Report Share Posted December 16, 2001 Hi We have done both the 8 hour and the 4 hour dosing schedule and my son has gotten the mercury rash with both ...... so there goes that theory!! LOL... I think it's just specific to the individual. maranie unlockingautism state rep for MS Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 03:48:25 -0000 > From: " jondank " <jondank@...> > Subject: 4 hrs vs 8 hrs avoids " mercury rash " > > Listmates, > > After my 5th, 6th and 7th cycles of DMSA I experienced a progressively > more severe " mercury rash " (hives). I had been taking 500 mg DMSA > every 8 hrs for 3 days on with 11 days off (per the DAN protocol). My > doctor advised me to rest and then cut the dose in half and to dose > more frequently as per Andy's recommendations. The DAN protocol > (Dr. Laidler) now also recommends such a course if reactions are > experienced. I rested for 6 weeks and then started again at 100 mg > every 4 hours for 3 days. I took 50 mg as the last dose in the > sequence. Having gone through two such complete cycles, I am pleased > to report that there has been no sign of the mercury rash/hives. > > Regards, > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 04:18:04 -0000 > From: " lb1704 " <lb1704@...> > Subject: Progress Report > > Group- > Thought it might be time for a progress report. We've been chelating > my 5-year old since labor day weekend of this year. He started out > at 25 mg. of DMSA every 4 hours. We bumped it up to 50 mg. every 4 > hours a few cycles ago. Here's what we've noticed so far: > > 1. By far the most dramatic change is he's no longer tired. > Although he's kinda a hyper guy - not the bouncing off the > wall type, but fidgety, can't sit still, impulsive, - he > always was tired. He'd lay on the couch to watch tv or videos, > after every meal he'd go lay down on the couch, he'd go up in > his room to lay down. This was every day. And it wasn't as if > he wasn't getting enough sleep at night. He goes to bed around > 8:30 and sleeps all the way through to 7:30 or 8:00 in the > morning. > > Since we started chelating, this chronic fatigue thing has > totally disappeared. I have not seen him lay down on the couch > once since we began chelation (although I must admit I kinda > miss it sometimes!) > > 2. His motor planning is better. For example, he could dress himself > prior to chelation, but after he got started, he couldn' quite > finish the job without alot of reminders and prodding from me. > Suddenly, once we began chelation, I'll tell him to go get > dressed and a minute later he's done. Picked out his clothes > and got them all on in the right order. No fuss, no muss. > > 3. He's dropped a couple of annoying habits. One was he was always > digging his chin into something. Some sorta sensory thing I > guess and grinding his teeth when he did it. Totally stopped > since chelation. He also did this stim thing with pushing > books around. Stopped doing that too. > > 4. He's more social. He has a younger brother who, although he > liked him being around, he didn't really say anything to him. > He would kinda let me know what he wanted to get across to his > brother, but now I've noticed he'll say things directly to him > now and also to his teenage sister. He also used to move if > his brother came and sat next to him on the couch or someplace > else and now he has no problem being close to him. > > 5. He hand flaps a lot less. I'm a little reluctant to add this > one because I've seen the flapping vary before, but this is > a pretty long time where it's been way down. > > > A couple of things I've noticed regarding DMSA. At 25 mgs he had no > side effects. At 50 mgs. he gets more hyper on the 2nd day and that > lasts a couple of days and fades. We just got back the results of > our first urine test and he had high tin. Consequently, our Dr. > advised not to start ALA until we reduce the tin, so we upped his > DMSA to 75 mgs. this weekend to move it out faster. At 75 mgs. he > seems a bit worse than at 50mgs. I actually saw him toewalking > today which he never ever did in his life. > > Another interesting thing is his bloodwork. He's had bloodwork done > every so often for the past 2 years or so and his MCV, MCH and MCHC > values were always off. Too high. In addition his BU/CR Ratio was > always way off - once double the high end of the range. > Everytime I asked a Dr. about what that ratio was & why it was always > off I always got a blow-off - Oh, it's nothing. Anyway, on his last > blood test since chelating, that goofy ratio is finally normal as are > the MCV, MCH and MCHC values. Don't know what any of them mean or if > they are significant or not, but I just thought I'd mention it. It > would be great if someone could enlighten me on what those mean. > > Finally, what I haven't seen any improvement in is the > hpyer/impulsivity/distractibility component. He is verbal and I > haven't noticed too much in the way in language improvement, but I > wouldn't expect that until we added the ALA. > > Lori > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 23:02:51 -0600 > From: " Tana Cothran " <tana@...> > Subject: RE: Fish-Natural sources and Mercury poioning.......... > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: findcure4autism [mailto:a_margaretcummings@...] > > i -and my family-have recently started fishing-purely as a way of > introducing natural e.f,a's (essential fatty acids)to my childrens- > diet (which i do believe are an important part of the human bodys > detoxification process)- however, i have noted that the Flat-Fish we > have caught, are /often/commonly deformed-ie:- two sides the same, > > Do you mean that they are built almost like " normal " fish? > > > tumours ,deformed, in the river Tyne, N. E. England, these flat Fish > (and /or Flounders)are bottom feeding fish-and i have noted that in > their guts, there exists " sludge " -due, perhaps, to the fact that they > are " bottom feeders " i do wonder if factory waste/ toxins such as > Mercury/heavy metals from factory wastes etc; play a great part in > this and would be interested to hear any other comments/ideas as > to " safe fishing in the N.E. of England. > > Industrial waste and general pollution have everything to do with this. > > > >From research i understand it only takes the small amount of Mercury > ie:from a thermometor, to heavily contaminate a small lake! > > When I lived in Colorado, and I have heard of it in other locations, there > were places that one was allowed to fish, but advised against eating the > catch, or were advised not to eat more than X amount a week and that > pregnant women and children shouldn't eat the fish from that area, etc. At > the same time one hears advisories against eating tuna because of heavy > metals, the low income WIC program puts it on the checks for breast feeding > women. Fish is a needed part of the human diet, unfortunately, we have made > them toxic. I would say that if you have seen more than 1 deformed fish in > less than 5 years the river is too polluted to eat fish from. > > Anyway, those are my thoughts. > Tana > > > Why on earth, i wonder, is Mercury (Thiomersal) Aluminium in vaccines- > when it is known to " knock out " Enzyme functions? > Best wishes, > Margaret. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Enzyme > > > > > ======================================================= > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2001 Report Share Posted December 17, 2001 Maranie, I have not proposed a theory, just stated the facts, in my case. However, I would agree with your theory that one element influencing the presence or absence of the reaction is determined by an individual's genetically predetermined immune response (e.g. HLA/MHC type). My point is that it may be worth trying lower and more frequent dosing if you are experiencing the " mercury rash " , despite the fact that there is no guarantee that the rash would be eliminated in all cases. For comparison, I would be interested to learn whether or not you also reduced the dosing and by what amount or factor. In my case I reduced the total daily dosing by 60%, i.e., 600 mg vs 1500 mg. Regards, > > Hi > > We have done both the 8 hour and the 4 hour dosing schedule and my son has > gotten the mercury rash with both ...... so there goes that theory!! > LOL... I think it's just specific to the individual. > > > maranie > unlockingautism state rep for MS > > > Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 03:48:25 -0000 > > From: " jondank " <jondank@s...> > > Subject: 4 hrs vs 8 hrs avoids " mercury rash " > > > > Listmates, > > > > After my 5th, 6th and 7th cycles of DMSA I experienced a progressively > > more severe " mercury rash " (hives). I had been taking 500 mg DMSA > > every 8 hrs for 3 days on with 11 days off (per the DAN protocol). My > > doctor advised me to rest and then cut the dose in half and to dose > > more frequently as per Andy's recommendations. The DAN protocol > > (Dr. Laidler) now also recommends such a course if reactions are > > experienced. I rested for 6 weeks and then started again at 100 mg > > every 4 hours for 3 days. I took 50 mg as the last dose in the > > sequence. Having gone through two such complete cycles, I am pleased > > to report that there has been no sign of the mercury rash/hives. > > > > Regards, > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.