Guest guest Posted August 26, 2001 Report Share Posted August 26, 2001 In a message dated 8/26/01 4:43:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time, tmcbarr@... writes: > Today I experienced a first in my 12 years of public safety. A first which > has apalled me and I am curious if this has happened to anybody else. > > Our unit was rehabbing from a fundraiser in full uniform when we witnessed a > non-injury motor vehicle accident which was blocking a major freeway in East > County. We verified there were no injuries, contacted County > Sheriffs Office (HCSO) via their non-emergency phone number (we didn't even > bother our dispatch with it), and had the witness and one of the involved > vehicles pull over into a side street to keep traffic moving and prevent > secondary collisions. We then proceeded to obtain patient refusals when the > investigating (and only) HCSO officer R. Zepeda badge #1312 arrived on > scene. He was very pertubed we were there and requested that we leave his > scene stating we were " hindering his investrigation. " I tried to explain to > him that all we were doing was obtaining the standard patient refusal forms > and he replied that " there is no law in Texas which mandates that you obtain > a refusal. " I tried to further explain this is a departmental policy and is > a standard policy for all EMS agencies nationwide. He didn't care. He had > explained to another member that if we didn't stop obtaining the refusals > and vacate the scene that we would be arrested and further made > unprofessional and discourteous remarks about us to those involved who > replied they were glad we there to help. > > We left the scene as the officer requested without any conflict as it is his > scene and nobody was injured. Shortly after our departure, he requested a > HCSO supervisor respond and one of the uninjured occupants developed severe > back pain and requested an ambulance. > > Did we do anything wrong? Should I bridge the organizational gap and file an > official complaint against him as I am inclined to do? What is the best way > to educate this officer and others to prevent this from occurring in the > future? Is there a report I need to file with TDH? I just want to prevent > this from occuring again and protect my agency legally. > > C. McBarron > Chief > South Texas Advanced Tactical Team Search & Rescue > http://www.stattsar.org > I think you have been given some good advice on the server. Having been a police officer for 23 years myself, I will not try to take sides or such on the matter. I would recommend that you contact the County Sheriff's Dept. and talk to someone within that agency. Police agencies urge citizen input and I am sure that they would like to speak with you regarding your complaint/observations. I am sure that they will be able to explain to you their policy on matters such as this and, if a policy was broken by their deputy, they will be more than willing to accept your complaint. This is the proper way to handle a matter like this. I think that you will get better peace of mind if you will talk to the department about your event. Have a Great Day! , BS, LP Instructor Tyler Junior College Emergency Medical Services Professions Department Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2001 Report Share Posted August 26, 2001 This sounds like a problem that needs to have a formal complaint brought up to your supervisor and/or EMS Director. This is one of " those scenes " in which the law enforcement once again tries to tell you how to do your job. Your EMS Director or Medical Director needs to speak to the Sheriff himself and let him know exactly what your job is on scene and the significant need to obtain patient refusals. The Sheriff then needs to educate that particular officer about treating other public servants with respect as we work together all of the time. You are in no way hindering his investigation, but just doing your specified job and obtaining the proper information needed for your AMA. It definately is not a " power struggle " because we all just want to do our particular job (I am not saying that the job of an EMS professional is any more important than that of a peace officer) and leave the scene. Good luck with this and follow through with the complaint as this is not something that you can just let go on by without anyone being notified or it will happen again, and again.... Donnie Stone __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2001 Report Share Posted August 26, 2001 My personal advice , would be to file a formal written complaint against the deputy involved in the incident to CYA. HCSO can not accept a complaint verbally only. It would probably have to be on their written form and notarized as a sworn affidavit for them to investigate it and take any action against their deputy. It at least lets them know what you did. With the officer not being EMS certified, there is nothing TDH can do to HCSO, as they only regulate you. I would write up an internal report about the incident, and attach a copy of the formal complaint against the officer to the report- just in case someone decided to sue. Just my thoughts and advice on that one.... J. Hoskins Texas Peace Officer EMT/EMS Instructor jhoskins@... Police refuse to allow medics gain patient refusals Today I experienced a first in my 12 years of public safety. A first which has apalled me and I am curious if this has happened to anybody else. Our unit was rehabbing from a fundraiser in full uniform when we witnessed a non-injury motor vehicle accident which was blocking a major freeway in East County. We verified there were no injuries, contacted County Sheriffs Office (HCSO) via their non-emergency phone number (we didn't even bother our dispatch with it), and had the witness and one of the involved vehicles pull over into a side street to keep traffic moving and prevent secondary collisions. We then proceeded to obtain patient refusals when the investigating (and only) HCSO officer R. Zepeda badge #1312 arrived on scene. He was very pertubed we were there and requested that we leave his scene stating we were " hindering his investrigation. " I tried to explain to him that all we were doing was obtaining the standard patient refusal forms and he replied that " there is no law in Texas which mandates that you obtain a refusal. " I tried to further explain this is a departmental policy and is a standard policy for all EMS agencies nationwide. He didn't care. He had explained to another member that if we didn't stop obtaining the refusals and vacate the scene that we would be arrested and further made unprofessional and discourteous remarks about us to those involved who replied they were glad we there to help. We left the scene as the officer requested without any conflict as it is his scene and nobody was injured. Shortly after our departure, he requested a HCSO supervisor respond and one of the uninjured occupants developed severe back pain and requested an ambulance. Did we do anything wrong? Should I bridge the organizational gap and file an official complaint against him as I am inclined to do? What is the best way to educate this officer and others to prevent this from occurring in the future? Is there a report I need to file with TDH? I just want to prevent this from occuring again and protect my agency legally. C. McBarron Chief South Texas Advanced Tactical Team Search & Rescue http://www.stattsar.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2001 Report Share Posted August 26, 2001 Police/EMS relations depend upon mutual understanding and respect. I have no idea what was in the deputy's head, but I get the feeling that he's had some experiences with EMS people that were less than great, or, on the other hand, he's got a mindset against EMS that needs to be fixed, or there are circumstances that came into play that have not been fully delineated here. If I had had this experience I would have done the following: First, WRITE a letter to the Sheriff complaining about this deputy, with a copy to the deputy. I would ask for a meeting with the deputy in the presence of his superior officer (Sergeant?) to discuss the incident and seek to gain an understanding. Now, that said, I would not at all be surprised if you received no response from these communications, since many Sheriffs, County Attorneys, Judges, Commissioners, and others, view themselves as immune to criticism and responsibility for the actions of those who work for them until whapped up-side the head with a frozen dead squirrel and an order from a Federal Judge, a symptom of arrogance in Low Places. And so then I would implement Plan B. Send a copy of the letters and another letter explaining in full your position to the County Judge, the County Attorney, each of the County Commissioners, the Sheriff, the Deputy, the Chief Deputy, and everybody else you can identify in the hierarchy, and to each and every TV station consumer affairs person, and each and every radio station, the State Attorney General, CLEAT, and everybody else you can think of, plus your state representative, senator, the lieutenant governor, the governor, your congressman and both Texas senators, the President of the US, the Attorney General, the FBI, and the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, The CIA, and the National Security Council. Be factual, and not inflammatory. Be matter of fact and ask for attention to a problem that seems to be happening between EMS and LE. Emphasize that EMS and LE must work together and ASK WHY this particular officer seems to have a problem with EMS. Now, also, please, search your soul and make sure you are not at risk for having been out of line. If there's even a hint of that, then please go to your room! Also, whose territory were you in? Yours? Theirs? If Theirs, did THEY arrive on scene? What was your status at this scene? Bystander? That's important. What's the role of TDH in this? Well, they can't do anything to the deputy, but they can do something to you, so make sure you've acted reasonably. Remember, the test is that of the Reasonable Man. What Would a Reasonable and Ordinary (Paramedic or EMT) with the same education, training, and experience, have done in the same or similar circumstances. Recourse against a rogue deputy must come through HIS chain of command. And remember that what you bite can bite back! Well, I'm sure you're THRILLED with this advice. Your friend, Gene E. Gandy, JD, LP EMS Professions Program Tyler Junior College Tyler, TX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2001 Report Share Posted August 26, 2001 Too bad that situation had to happen, You asked if anyone else ever had a that happen, well not exactly but I had another " less than professional " incident a few years back...... On the scene of an MVA, I had a police officer cancel my backup because he " didnt want to many people there. " I had requested backup EMS and Fire/Rescue for vehicle extrication when he decided that the wrecker which had been called was qualified to " open up the car " for me, and that the fire department was " over-kill " He had the guts to look me in the eye while he canceled them over the radio. Sooo, I looked at him in the eye and re-requested them. He backed down. Last I heard he was doing construction or something. Let us know what kind of response you get from his supervisor, _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2001 Report Share Posted August 26, 2001 I work in Northeast County, and Have had run ins with the deputy mentioned personally. He is usually not EMS friendly and will try to interfere in pt care if he feels the need to get a driver's license or other information he deems neccessary. We usually ignore him and do whatever is neccessary to treat our pts. My best advice is to file a formal written complaint and give it to a HCSO supervisor, and then follow up on the complaint in writing in a few weeks time. Deena > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2001 Report Share Posted August 26, 2001 I agree, I too have had run-ins with this deputy. Hopefully something will get done soon about this problem. Kim ----Original Message Follows---- Reply-To: To: Subject: Re: Police refuse to allow medics gain patient refusals Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 01:18:58 +0000 I work in Northeast County, and Have had run ins with the deputy mentioned personally. He is usually not EMS friendly and will try to interfere in pt care if he feels the need to get a driver's license or other information he deems neccessary. We usually ignore him and do whatever is neccessary to treat our pts. My best advice is to file a formal written complaint and give it to a HCSO supervisor, and then follow up on the complaint in writing in a few weeks time. Deena > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2001 Report Share Posted August 26, 2001 Back in the day when I worked in the Greater Houston area, I also had (what I considered...) more than my fair share of encounter with this same officer. He is DEFINITELY not EMS/patient health and safety friendly. And it is not just to privates, not just to emergency units, not just to the ambulance crews, nor not just to first responders. He didn't like me when I was wearing blue, grey, red (uniform shirts), or civvies! (Hard to believe, isn't it? <wink>) I'd go with the internal incident report, and file a written complaint with HCSO, if I were you. If someone on that scene decides they want to receive " money for their pain and suffering " , you need your rump protected. Maybe if someone had filed a formal written complaint for a prior incident (myself included), then maybe his attitude would be different. Barry E. McClung, Paramedic/Crew Chief North Blanco County EMS City, Texas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2001 Report Share Posted August 26, 2001 Christy, et al: As Chief of STATTSAR, I must state you are absolutely WRONG that STATTSAR has been asked to leave a scene of an accident, or any other incident for that matter, before. I am not personally EMS certified, although certified / licensed medical professionals representing STATTSAR were on location. Our Medical Director is Dr. Matt Minson, also a Director with Texas Task Force 1 (Blue Team?) and other federal, state and local agencies and colleges. STATTSAR personnel were huddled under an overpass bridge deciding on a location for lunch when the accident occurred in front of us. Being in our blaze orange uniform it is kind of hard to hide our identity, and it appeared that one of the drivers was initially slumped over the steering wheel (later to learn she was placing an object under her seat). Not only did we have a moral duty to act, but a legal one as well. Christy, I will state that your immflammatory and incorrect response on a state-wide mail list is yet another unprofessional action taken by yourself because you have a history between STATTSAR and your agency, North Channel EMS, in which I and others personally filed egregious complaints against yourself to your superior, with the end result being STATTSAR cancelling the dispatch contract by and between North Channel EMS and migrating to County Emergency Communications. Additionally, I am aware that you and/or a significant other contacted other agencies which contract with County Emergency Communications stating false facts about STATTSAR in another attempt to discredit STATTSAR during the migration process -- allegations and concerns to be proven false per the administration of County Emergency Communications. It seems you have a history and pattern of deceptive communications. I am sorry to bring this up again, but I will not let you slander the reputation of a fellow agency dedicated to saving lives. Additionally, in your post, I do not believe that you are representing North Channel EMS, which I regard as a dedicated EMS which has continued to be very supportive of STATTSAR. I hope this is all I have to say about this matter between Christy Petty and STATTSAR, but I am willing to respond to pertinent reasonable inquiries on a private basis. And no, Deputy Zepeda had no cause to act like he did. Perhaps he was upset his lunch was interrupted, I do not know... I graciously appreciate the advice I have received from other professionals, saddened to learn about other alleged unprofessional instances with the same deputy and deeply saddened by an attempt to subvert the credibility of STATTSAR by a fellow EMS " professional " . I look forward to communicating with the rest of the professional EMS community. To Bring Them Home, McBarron C. McBarron Chief South Texas Advanced Tactical Team Search & Rescue tmcbarr@... Re: Police refuse to allow medics gain patient refusals I would be curious to know which EMS agency you were representing. Per the most current lists on the TDH website, your organization is neither a Provider nor a First Responder organization. Who IS your medical director? And who was obtaining the refusals? You indicate " we, " but you do not have a TDH certification per the TDH CertQuery. This is not the first time STATTSAR members have been " asked " to leave a scene of an MVA. Perhaps Deputy Zepeda had good cause... Christy Petty, EMT-P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2001 Report Share Posted August 26, 2001 This information is does NOT constitute legal advice and is the opinion of the sender ONLY. As always, consult your department’s legal advisor. You might want to advise the officer’s Sgt., Lt., Capt., Sheriff along with the departmental and county legal advisors, that when such an incident occurs that per Texas' CCP, §6.06. Duty to Prevent Injury, he is mandated by law to prevent injury to any person. This may be interpreted to in such a manner since he (if he does not) is not medically competent to make such decisions. He also, like anyone else, has a duty to stop and render aid (Texas’ Transportation Code). Furthermore, his obstruction of your pt. access (If done WITHOUT good reason) may constitute a violation of his departmental policy for " Non-conformance to laws " . This may jeopardize his TCLEOSE license. As we know, a refusal must bear the scrutiny of investigation to affirm said refusal was given voluntarily based upon adequate information. If this is not the case then pt. abandonment (a violation of law) may be claimed. If he were a party to such a violation of law, while on duty and in uniform, it might constitute a civil rights violation under color of law. Lastly, in v. City of Canton, OH, police officers and their dept. were found civilly liable for a civil rights violation for demonstrating what the court termed deliberate indifference, in that they denied medical care in a non-life threatening medical event. I don’t think his dept. would appreciate the negative publicity any such claim could generate nor is that type of behavior (based upon the information provided) ethical or caring. LP Arlington PD Police refuse to allow medics gain patient refusals Today I experienced a first in my 12 years of public safety. A first which has apalled me and I am curious if this has happened to anybody else. Our unit was rehabbing from a fundraiser in full uniform when we witnessed a non-injury motor vehicle accident which was blocking a major freeway in East County. We verified there were no injuries, contacted County Sheriffs Office (HCSO) via their non-emergency phone number (we didn't even bother our dispatch with it), and had the witness and one of the involved vehicles pull over into a side street to keep traffic moving and prevent secondary collisions. We then proceeded to obtain patient refusals when the investigating (and only) HCSO officer R. Zepeda badge #1312 arrived on scene. He was very pertubed we were there and requested that we leave his scene stating we were " hindering his investrigation. " I tried to explain to him that all we were doing was obtaining the standard patient refusal forms and he replied that " there is no law in Texas which mandates that you obtain a refusal. " I tried to further explain this is a departmental policy and is a standard policy for all EMS agencies nationwide. He didn't care. He had explained to another member that if we didn't stop obtaining the refusals and vacate the scene that we would be arrested and further made unprofessional and discourteous remarks about us to those involved who replied they were glad we there to help. We left the scene as the officer requested without any conflict as it is his scene and nobody was injured. Shortly after our departure, he requested a HCSO supervisor respond and one of the uninjured occupants developed severe back pain and requested an ambulance. Did we do anything wrong? Should I bridge the organizational gap and file an official complaint against him as I am inclined to do? What is the best way to educate this officer and others to prevent this from occurring in the future? Is there a report I need to file with TDH? I just want to prevent this from occuring again and protect my agency legally. C. McBarron Chief South Texas Advanced Tactical Team Search & Rescue http://www.stattsar.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2001 Report Share Posted August 27, 2001 , Thank you for that information. I have been looking for other information other than the Transportation code and you have saved me some research. I graciously appreciate your response. C. McBarron Chief South Texas Advanced Tactical Team Search & Rescue http://www.stattsar.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2001 Report Share Posted August 27, 2001 Glad to help and I apologize for the behavior. Stay safe. RE: Police refuse to allow medics gain patient refusals , Thank you for that information. I have been looking for other information other than the Transportation code and you have saved me some research. I graciously appreciate your response. C. McBarron Chief South Texas Advanced Tactical Team Search & Rescue http://www.stattsar.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2001 Report Share Posted August 27, 2001 Ummm...not wanting to get involved in this particular issue or anything (just gonna sit back and watch) but concerning someone not being on the TDH website...I know of a person who has been certified for over 10 years, and they aren't listed anywhere on the site. Yes, I am 150% sure they are current, active status. (They've contacted TDH about it...TDH says they'll look into it.) Just saying that sometimes, the website does have errors. Connie --- Christy Petty wrote: > I would be curious to know which EMS agency you were > representing. Per the > most current lists on the TDH website, your > organization is neither a > Provider nor a First Responder organization. Who IS > your medical director? > And who was obtaining the refusals? You indicate > " we, " but you do not have > a TDH certification per the TDH CertQuery. > > This is not the first time STATTSAR members have > been " asked " to leave a > scene of an MVA. Perhaps Deputy Zepeda had good > cause... > > Christy Petty, EMT-P > Police refuse to allow medics > gain patient refusals > > > > Today I experienced a first in my 12 years of > public safety. A first which > > has apalled me and I am curious if this has > happened to anybody else. > > > > Our unit was rehabbing from a fundraiser in full > uniform when we witnessed > a > > non-injury motor vehicle accident which was > blocking a major freeway in > East > > County. We verified there were no injuries, > contacted County > > Sheriffs Office (HCSO) via their non-emergency > phone number (we didn't > even > > bother our dispatch with it), and had the witness > and one of the involved > > vehicles pull over into a side street to keep > traffic moving and prevent > > secondary collisions. We then proceeded to obtain > patient refusals when > the > > investigating (and only) HCSO officer R. Zepeda > badge #1312 arrived on > > scene. He was very pertubed we were there and > requested that we leave his > > scene stating we were " hindering his > investrigation. " I tried to explain > to > > him that all we were doing was obtaining the > standard patient refusal > forms > > and he replied that " there is no law in Texas > which mandates that you > obtain > > a refusal. " I tried to further explain this is a > departmental policy and > is > > a standard policy for all EMS agencies nationwide. > He didn't care. He had > > explained to another member that if we didn't stop > obtaining the refusals > > and vacate the scene that we would be arrested and > further made > > unprofessional and discourteous remarks about us > to those involved who > > replied they were glad we there to help. > > > > We left the scene as the officer requested without > any conflict as it is > his > > scene and nobody was injured. Shortly after our > departure, he requested a > > HCSO supervisor respond and one of the uninjured > occupants developed > severe > > back pain and requested an ambulance. > > > > Did we do anything wrong? Should I bridge the > organizational gap and file > an > > official complaint against him as I am inclined to > do? What is the best > way > > to educate this officer and others to prevent this > from occurring in the > > future? Is there a report I need to file with TDH? > I just want to prevent > > this from occuring again and protect my agency > legally. > > > > C. McBarron > > Chief > > South Texas Advanced Tactical Team Search & Rescue > > http://www.stattsar.org > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2001 Report Share Posted August 27, 2001 Mr. McBarron, It is obvious that there are personal differences between your organization and some others on this list, however the email from early this morning certainly raises some issues that I believe are relevant to this discussion. Let's take a hypothetical look at this from a different angle: It is late November and 6 members of ABC EMS are standing outside of a hotel in Austin Texas trying to decide where to eat lunch before returning to the State EMS Conference. Then, out of nowhere, there is a 3 vehicle collision right in front of the hotel. It appears serious (as do most MVA's when you witness them that is why I enjoy showing up 3-5 minutes later) so the ABC kids run over and begin to render aid. Fortunately it turns out that there are no injuries but the vehicles are tying up traffic. So they instruct them to pull into the hotel parking lot and notify PD. Austin PD shows up and finds ABC EMS all huddled around the vehicles. The PD officer has just come from his 4th domestic dispute of the shift and is a little testy. He asks the EMS kids to step back so he can do his investigation. They tell him they are getting refusals and will be done in a minute or two. He doesn't see Austin EMS patches on their uniforms and again tells them to remove themselves p! rior to him doing it for them. Looking at this scenario, was the officer out of line? Was ABC EMS? Where was Austin EMS? Did ABC have a duty to act??? (ABC does EMS around Austin and interacts regularly with Austin, but is not a primary responder in Austin) It has been over 9 years since I did EMS in the Houston area (Pasadeener where the skys are greener)and I never met Deputy Zepeda. I do question your agencies Duty to Act if you are not a FRO or EMS Provider in the area where the accident occurred. Don't get me wrong, I see every reason to first respond...but when you called PD, why didn't you call the local EMS provider as well? Even telling them that providers were on scene, but you needed them to come out for refusals non-emergency??? I have never been prevented from accessing patients in my response area in over 15 years of EMS. I have, acting as a good samaritan, been prevented from accessing scenes on a number of occasions. In my primary response district I would not hesitate to contact the local law enforcement chief and have him explore the situation (again every story has 2 sides). If it was not my area, I would chock it up to trying to do the right thing and move on. Just my 2 cents. Dudley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2001 Report Share Posted August 27, 2001 I have replied to this individual privately. I would like to refocus the discussion on law enforcement refusing to allow medical providers access to obtain patient refusals as this is what I was originally seeking advice on. C. McBarron Chief South Texas Advanced Tactical Team Search & Rescue http://www.stattsar.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2001 Report Share Posted August 27, 2001 Which EMS agency are you with ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2001 Report Share Posted August 27, 2001 Dudley: Here is our situation. We have applied to become a state-wide FRO. For all we know the letter could be in the mail today with our license. Being the chief administrator I have to look at the liability of each operation. What if we didn't do anything at the wreck and the patient dies of a subdural hematoma or other hidden injury and our license arrives today. It will be very difficult to explain to a jury that our medical professionals did not act because we had not received our letter in the mail even though the license is dated say last Thursday. That is a " check is in the mail " scenario which I believe is easy to torpedo in court. What we have been doing is IF a situation develops where a medical emergency presents itself creating a duty to act for STATTSAR, we have been proving care as a good samaritan, following all procedures (refusal, patient documentation) as if we were a FRO in the event we receive our license dated before or on the date of the event. I believe the issue of whether or not we are an FRO is moot because we simply don't know. We could be; we may not be right now, but will be shortly. One reason I posted this is so I can get the feedback from the Brad England and Gene Weatherall types out there. Am I being to cautious? What can we do to prevent future occurances of this type of confrontation? Is there a different policy we need to review? ps. we only had 2 personnel around the vehicles, everybody else was away from the scene so as not to prevent a " cluster " . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2001 Report Share Posted August 27, 2001 I would report this in writting to the HCSO at once and to the TDH EMS office as well. Just to cover all the bases,> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2001 Report Share Posted August 27, 2001 , I understand your situation, and could see how you are seeing it. Sure the deputy should not have been rude or anything, but until your agency is a FRO or EMS Provider, there is no duty to act, and your agency is not liable- because you are not an EMS agency as of yet. Until you get the paper from TDH in your hand, there is no need for " refusal forms " . I know you were just trying to help and all, but I would have simply asked the patient if they were OK (note- you are not acting as an agency or FRO, just as an individual. Patient says, " I'm fine " or whatever, then you say " OK " and leave. I am not saying the deputy was right, or wrong in this case- but if you feel he was wrong, you need to file a formal written complaint for HCSO to investigate, and take any action- if warranted against the deputy. That is state law when it comes to complaints, they must be in writing. There is no duty to act, just at times a moral obligation to do so- Since you are not a provider as of yet, then you have no affiliation with TDH as an FRO or EMS provider, but some of your members are trained in EMS. They could go there as individuals, but I would not go as far as to say that you as an agency need to be engaging in this type of conduct, because it could be misconstrued that you are an " official " provider of EMS services, and cause liability that way. Again, I am not trying to slam you, but after learning that you have not recieved FRO or EMS Provider status officially from TDH- there is no reason to get refusal sheets. I am not second guessing, but since you are not yet a provider- steer clear of situations like this if possible. It gets your agency that is not certifed or designated as an FRO or EMS provider in a liability situation, because you are not. I am not 100% certain on this, but I think TDH could have something to say about unlicensed providers doing stuff like this- if it appears you are acting as a provider or FRO, even if the application is in the mail. Until the certificate comes from TDH with your agency on it, then I would avoid stuff like this. Jay RE: Police refuse to allow medics gain patient refusals Dudley: Here is our situation. We have applied to become a state-wide FRO. For all we know the letter could be in the mail today with our license. Being the chief administrator I have to look at the liability of each operation. What if we didn't do anything at the wreck and the patient dies of a subdural hematoma or other hidden injury and our license arrives today. It will be very difficult to explain to a jury that our medical professionals did not act because we had not received our letter in the mail even though the license is dated say last Thursday. That is a " check is in the mail " scenario which I believe is easy to torpedo in court. What we have been doing is IF a situation develops where a medical emergency presents itself creating a duty to act for STATTSAR, we have been proving care as a good samaritan, following all procedures (refusal, patient documentation) as if we were a FRO in the event we receive our license dated before or on the date of the event. I believe the issue of whether or not we are an FRO is moot because we simply don't know. We could be; we may not be right now, but will be shortly. One reason I posted this is so I can get the feedback from the Brad England and Gene Weatherall types out there. Am I being to cautious? What can we do to prevent future occurances of this type of confrontation? Is there a different policy we need to review? ps. we only had 2 personnel around the vehicles, everybody else was away from the scene so as not to prevent a " cluster " . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2001 Report Share Posted August 27, 2001 I would be curious to know which EMS agency you were representing. Per the most current lists on the TDH website, your organization is neither a Provider nor a First Responder organization. Who IS your medical director? And who was obtaining the refusals? You indicate " we, " but you do not have a TDH certification per the TDH CertQuery. This is not the first time STATTSAR members have been " asked " to leave a scene of an MVA. Perhaps Deputy Zepeda had good cause... Christy Petty, EMT-P Police refuse to allow medics gain patient refusals > Today I experienced a first in my 12 years of public safety. A first which > has apalled me and I am curious if this has happened to anybody else. > > Our unit was rehabbing from a fundraiser in full uniform when we witnessed a > non-injury motor vehicle accident which was blocking a major freeway in East > County. We verified there were no injuries, contacted County > Sheriffs Office (HCSO) via their non-emergency phone number (we didn't even > bother our dispatch with it), and had the witness and one of the involved > vehicles pull over into a side street to keep traffic moving and prevent > secondary collisions. We then proceeded to obtain patient refusals when the > investigating (and only) HCSO officer R. Zepeda badge #1312 arrived on > scene. He was very pertubed we were there and requested that we leave his > scene stating we were " hindering his investrigation. " I tried to explain to > him that all we were doing was obtaining the standard patient refusal forms > and he replied that " there is no law in Texas which mandates that you obtain > a refusal. " I tried to further explain this is a departmental policy and is > a standard policy for all EMS agencies nationwide. He didn't care. He had > explained to another member that if we didn't stop obtaining the refusals > and vacate the scene that we would be arrested and further made > unprofessional and discourteous remarks about us to those involved who > replied they were glad we there to help. > > We left the scene as the officer requested without any conflict as it is his > scene and nobody was injured. Shortly after our departure, he requested a > HCSO supervisor respond and one of the uninjured occupants developed severe > back pain and requested an ambulance. > > Did we do anything wrong? Should I bridge the organizational gap and file an > official complaint against him as I am inclined to do? What is the best way > to educate this officer and others to prevent this from occurring in the > future? Is there a report I need to file with TDH? I just want to prevent > this from occuring again and protect my agency legally. > > C. McBarron > Chief > South Texas Advanced Tactical Team Search & Rescue > http://www.stattsar.org > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2001 Report Share Posted August 27, 2001 To help you out, until you recieve your certificate in your hands, you are not a FRO. Since you had not seen a certificate, you are not certified. Therefore you had no " duty to act. " Also as a FRO, you must have an agreement with the EMS service in who's district you choose to first respond in. You cannot just first respond anywhere. Was there a copy of your protocols on the scene? Did your agency have the minimum equipment, as per your protocol, at the scene? Do you have a copy of the agreement with the in-distrct EMS agency with you? I do have questions concerning the professionalism of your service. If your service wants to be of a profesional image, then it needs to begin with the leadership. It was very unprofessional to bring actual names into this listserv. You say you were just asking for advice, it should have been done anonamously. How you presented the information tends to bring out any personal opinions about that one individual and not factual information. One suggestion to you and your organization is to try and contact the individual off the streets and discuss everything that happend. Perhaps someone, the officer or yourself, WAS having a " bad day. " Everyone does from time to time. If a focused discussion does not solve the problem, then, at that time, further actions may be necessary. When there is not good cooperation between emergency services, it is the public that ultimately loses. My seventy cents worth, Tim Payne LIC-P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2001 Report Share Posted August 28, 2001 Well, I wasn't intending to be brought into this mess, but since you see fit... First, I have not initiated any conversations regarding your organization to anyone. When asked, I have given my opinion. I will continue to do so. I will say that I am somewhat amazed at the quickness and willingness of members on this listserver to vilify Deputy Zepeda (sp?) based on a one-sided account. If your facts are correct, I urge you to file a formal, written complaint with the Traffic Division of the Sheriff's Office as soon as possible. If your facts are NOT correct, then perhaps you'd best not... Your initial posting leads one to think that your agency is the recognized EMS provider for the area, or at least a recognized First Responder Organization for the area. Is that the case? My concern is this: the activities you have described fall specifically within the bounds of a First Responder organization. Are you, or are you not, a recognized First Responder organization? You managed to not answer that question, so far. If you are an FRO, with the appropriate agreements required by TDH Rule 157.14, then you may have a grievance. If you are not an FRO, then by " obtaining patient refusals " you just may have a problem of your own. Your agency is not listed as an FRO on the TDH website. I personally applaud your members for the willingness to volunteer during search and rescue operations. We don't see enough of that anymore. Checking on the welfare of people involved in an accident that you have witnessed is also a noble thing. However, continuing your interaction with these people to the point of " obtaining a refusal? " How does that sit with the recognized EMS provider in that area? Were they even notified? For the other EMS participants in this discussion, let's say you were responding with a legitimate EMS service to this very MVA. On your arrival, you are met by a bunch of people you dont know, from an agency you dont recognize, that have signed patient refusals. Now what? For the LEO's that have chimed in, you have arrived on a traffic accident where people may or may not need EMS assistance. You have a group of bystanders who are not any EMS providers from the area interacting with the participants of the MVA, having them sign documents, etc. No ambulance in sight. Your reaction? Anyway, that particular Deputy has always been helpful and cooperative on any scene I've been on. I am disappointed that so many are so willing to condemn, so quickly. Petty, EMT-P EMSI Re: Police refuse to allow medics gain patient > refusals > > > I would be curious to know which EMS agency you were representing. Per > the > most current lists on the TDH website, your organization is neither a > Provider nor a First Responder organization. Who IS your medical > director? > And who was obtaining the refusals? You indicate " we, " but you do not > have > a TDH certification per the TDH CertQuery. > > This is not the first time STATTSAR members have been " asked " to leave a > scene of an MVA. Perhaps Deputy Zepeda had good cause... > > Christy Petty, EMT-P > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2001 Report Share Posted August 28, 2001 I have been reading this discussion with limited interest, and think that some legitimate points have been made by several writers. However, the statement below is the one that got my attention more than any others. I am curious as to how an agency becomes a " state-wide FRO. " In reading the FRO rule, I see nothing about a state-wide FRO. How does this work? Will this group have agreements in place with every licensed provider, and their associated medical directors, in the state. Just wondering. Maxine ----- Original Message ----- > We have applied to become a state-wide FRO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2001 Report Share Posted August 28, 2001 I want to jump in and ask this in response to your question Christy.... Why would one need to know that kind of in-depth information to that extent just to answer a question for advise. Would you need to know that information from any and everyone that posts to the list before you give any kind of advise to them. All I would want to know is what they were wanting advise on and I would help anyway I could..... Jeff Fox EMT-I > =Christy, I will state that your immflammatory and incorrect response on a > state-wide mail list is yet another unprofessional action taken by yourself > because you have a history between STATTSAR= > > Asking which EMS agency you were representing or > Who IS your medical director? or who was obtaining the refusals? is > immflamatory and incorrect. How is that unprofessional ? > I simply asked a question. > Christy > > > > Re: Police refuse to allow medics gain patient > > refusals > > > > > > I would be curious to know which EMS agency you were representing. Per > > the > > most current lists on the TDH website, your organization is neither a > > Provider nor a First Responder organization. Who IS your medical > > director? > > And who was obtaining the refusals? You indicate " we, " but you do not > > have > > a TDH certification per the TDH CertQuery. > > > > This is not the first time STATTSAR members have been " asked " to leave a > > scene of an MVA. Perhaps Deputy Zepeda had good cause... > > > > Christy Petty, EMT-P > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2001 Report Share Posted August 28, 2001 Just to say, I was speaking of the fact that it was requested what agency someone was representing, who their Medical Director was, and whether or not the person posting has or had a current cert with TDH or if there was a FRO in place. That was my question was for the second post to the original, not whether there was a request for in- depth coversation in the first post. Sorry if I confused you any . Jeff Fox EMT-I > > I want to jump in and ask this in response to your > > question > > Christy.... Why would one need to know that kind of > > in-depth > > information to that extent just to answer a question > > for advise. > > Would you need to know that information from any and > > everyone that > > posts to the list before you give any kind of advise > > to them. All I > > would want to know is what they were wanting advise > > on and I would > > help anyway I could..... > > > > Jeff Fox EMT-I > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.