Guest guest Posted November 5, 2001 Report Share Posted November 5, 2001 My response to question about " wait and see " approach over age 50. As for being over 50 & diagnosed with fibroids – that's me too – I'm 54. I've decided I can't deal with the " wait and see " approach. For me, this situation is bothersome. It needs to be fixed. Waiting around while feeling lousy is the pits. At our age, mostly they figure if we wait long enough, maybe we'll reach menopause and the fibroids will then shrink & not be so problematic. For at least 6, if not 8, years now – every year at my annual pelvic exam I'm told that " maybe by the time we see you next year, you'll have reached menopause " (in fact when I had a bleeding incident in 1985, they told me that maybe I was going to start into menopause early – well here I am 16 years later and still having regular periods). – So far their batting average on this " prediction " is exactly ZERO. Even if they are right this year, their batting average will still be in the sewer. It would be nice – I'd love for it to happen. Obviously, sooner or later they'll be right – if I don't get hit by a truck or something first. But, I could wait for a year – and be even worse off & still not be menopausal – what do I do then – wait for another year – and another - ???? I know a lady who is 60 and still not menopausal – I don't have 6 years of waiting in me. I know that by the odds I should get there – but I don't like the idea of handling my health like it was something to be put on a roulette wheel. I have to base my decisions on what I have now – unless someone can PROMISE me something else, I can't depend on it. Besides, it's expectations that lead to disappointment. If I go around for a year expecting to reach menopause and it doesn't happen, I'll be really depressed & I don't need that. Maybe I'll win the lotto in the next year too. That would also be nice & I'd love for that to happen (probably even more than becoming menopausal), but I'm not quitting my job this week based on that " possibility. " I can't quit my job because I " might " win the lotto, and I can't just let my fibroids go because I " might " become menopausal soon. Maybe if I wasn't bleeding, or at least spotting most of the time; maybe if I could eat a whole meal at one sitting; maybe if I didn't wake up in the middle of the night because it feels like I've got rocks in my gut – I'd feel better about waiting. I don't doubt that menopause might be the " ideal " solution – it just isn't very dependable about happening & I don't have the patience to just live my life around these things, possibly for years. One of the things that I think very few medical professionals consider with proposing that we " wait and see " – at any age – is how much dealing with symptomatic fibroids impacts our lives. For instance (just one example), I don't go hiking anymore – because it often starts or increases my bleeding – which means I have to carry a backpack full of kotex and at least one change of clothes and then keep trying to find bushes to change behind – which isn't easy or fun – so the whole thing has become unfun – and I don't go. Pat B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2001 Report Share Posted November 5, 2001 Well, I'm not quite 50 yet (just 49), but my ex-gyn had me on wait & see for many years, and for some reason I finally got fed up with it. " At my age " I don't need these problems is true, but " at my age " is certainly no reason to take it all out! My bleeding is stopped right now by birth control pills (with no week of dummy pills), and I'm scheduled for a UAE next week. But the wait & see approach does change your life in so many ways. I've long gotten used to avoiding seminars & property showings as best I can around my period. But something little happened last week that just struck me. I had to go to court, and I wore a tan suit. A light colored suit! With all the heavy bleeding & spotting before, I would never have dared wear something that light. I really hadn't noticed the change, but almost all the bottom half of my wardrobe is dark - navies, blacks, browns - with one lone pair of khakis. Trivial compared to everything else we go through I know, but there was something about it.... I am so looking forward to getting rid of these things and taking back my life (and my wardrobe)! Christy > My response to question about " wait and see " approach over age 50. > > As for being over 50 & diagnosed with fibroids – that's me too – I'm > 54. I've decided I can't deal with the " wait and see " approach. For > me, this situation is bothersome. It needs to be fixed. Waiting > around while feeling lousy is the pits. At our age, mostly they > figure if we wait long enough, maybe we'll reach menopause and the > fibroids will then shrink & not be so problematic. > > For at least 6, if not 8, years now – every year at my annual pelvic > exam I'm told that " maybe by the time we see you next year, you'll > have reached menopause " (in fact when I had a bleeding incident in > 1985, they told me that maybe I was going to start into menopause > early – well here I am 16 years later and still having regular > periods). – So far their batting average on this " prediction " is > exactly ZERO. Even if they are right this year, their batting > average will still be in the sewer. > > It would be nice – I'd love for it to happen. Obviously, sooner or > later they'll be right – if I don't get hit by a truck or something > first. But, I could wait for a year – and be even worse off & still > not be menopausal – what do I do then – wait for another year – and > another - ???? I know a lady who is 60 and still not menopausal – I > don't have 6 years of waiting in me. I know that by the odds I > should get there – but I don't like the idea of handling my health > like it was something to be put on a roulette wheel. I have to base > my decisions on what I have now – unless someone can PROMISE me > something else, I can't depend on it. Besides, it's expectations > that lead to disappointment. If I go around for a year expecting to > reach menopause and it doesn't happen, I'll be really depressed & I > don't need that. > > Maybe I'll win the lotto in the next year too. That would also be > nice & I'd love for that to happen (probably even more than becoming > menopausal), but I'm not quitting my job this week based on > that " possibility. " I can't quit my job because I " might " win the > lotto, and I can't just let my fibroids go because I " might " become > menopausal soon. > > Maybe if I wasn't bleeding, or at least spotting most of the time; > maybe if I could eat a whole meal at one sitting; maybe if I didn't > wake up in the middle of the night because it feels like I've got > rocks in my gut – I'd feel better about waiting. I don't doubt that > menopause might be the " ideal " solution – it just isn't very > dependable about happening & I don't have the patience to just live > my life around these things, possibly for years. > > One of the things that I think very few medical professionals > consider with proposing that we " wait and see " – at any age – is how > much dealing with symptomatic fibroids impacts our lives. For > instance (just one example), I don't go hiking anymore – because it > often starts or increases my bleeding – which means I have to carry a > backpack full of kotex and at least one change of clothes and then > keep trying to find bushes to change behind – which isn't easy or > fun – so the whole thing has become unfun – and I don't go. > > Pat B. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.