Guest guest Posted March 31, 2000 Report Share Posted March 31, 2000 I've just had a member bring something to my attention concerning recent discussion on medication. I too share her concern with this. She's given me permission to share her correspondence with you and then I'd like to add my proverbial two cents worth. >>I don't consider my child to be ADHD. Yes, he's busy but >>I'm not >>going to drug him up. > As a parent who has had to go the Ritalin route, I guess I feel I'm not " drugging my child up " but am putting into effect some much needed >medication to help him have success. > I applaud those who haven't had the need to use meds. I do, however, feel that terms such as " drug him up " have very negative connotations. > I simply worry about those parents who are struggling with decisions about medication - statements such as this may make them feel medication is a " bad " choice. As with everything else, each child is unique as are their needs. I mentioned earlier about our putting our son on the Feingold diet to help him be able to have more control. I perhaps was a bit remis in not giving the whole story, which I will now. Our son has always been a very active child. Even as a newborn, he rarely slept more than 10 hours out of 24, 8 was the average and that included naps. He's always been active and we didn't want to medicate him either. I had seen 2 children who had been on ADHD medication, one had good results, and I felt, in the case of the second child, the medication was being abused and the parents were medicating the child to the point where she was in a zombie like condition most of the time. As our son's problem became more and more evident in school and home, we looked for alternatives and tried the Feingold diet which worked for our son. As our son's hearing loss progressed and being able to function auditorily became more and more of a problem, his symptoms increased to the point where the diet wasn't doing enough for him any more. Obviously we were working on improving his amplification in some way, but the side effect of worse and worse behavior was one that we had to deal with. During the evaluation his teachers filled out forms and each one of his teachers agreed that it was interfering with his education. We realized that medication was something that we now had to look to in order to help our son - now 12 years old. My husband felt that to go this route would be in effect " drugging him " in an effort to " control " him and he was against it, however, I am the one who has always delt with his educational needs and that's not how I felt. I felt that this was a tool that was available to us in order to help our son gain some control over his behavior and to function better socially. We ended up not putting our son on medication, but it wasn't because I gave in to my husband's feelings (one of the few areas we've ever truly disagreed on). I got the prescription in hand and was ready to start giving it to him at the start of the school year this year. Those who know our background know that one year ago our son got a cochlear implant and during last summer he made amazing progress with it and had noticed some improvement in his behavior. So, why didn't I give him the medication? The first week or so of school JD was so excited about school he had a difficult time getting to sleep. I was warned when I got the medication that if JD didn't have a full nights sleep I shouldn't give him the medication because it would make him drowsey at school. When he finally settled down enough to start getting to sleep before midnight, I decided to talk to his teachers because at home I had noticed the improved behavior and I wanted to know if this was carrying over into the classroom or not. One of his teachers also happened to have him in her class last year so she was the first one I talked to. This year, not one of his teachers felt like he needed the medication, compared with last year where every teacher did. Even the one who had him last year said that this year there was a very noticable improvement. It continues to improve also. 2 months ago we took him off of the diet except for the few things we knew he really had a problem with (tomatoes and strawberries) but the last couple of weeks I've been letting him have catsup and he's had no problems. I say all this to point out that sometimes medication is appropriate, sometimes not. I feel that the decision to medicate or not should be looked at very carefully, but not ruled out if it's something that could benefit the child. Had our son's behavior not improved, I would have given him the medication because his ability to function in the classroom, and in life, was being affected. Kay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2000 Report Share Posted March 31, 2000 Kay, There was a study posted on another list to which I belong. The study found that some children had deficient bloodflow to a particular part of the brain. Ritalin increased blood flow to that part of the brain. If the child did not begin with a deficient bloodflow, the Ritalin actually decreased bloodflow to that area. The final conclusion of the study was that there was a scientific basis for the diagnosis of ADHD and that Ritilan, although it did not cure ADHD, was a positive treatment for it. It also determined that for children who were misdiagnosed with ADHD, it was a detriment. I wish I had paid closer attention to the posting but I can try to track it down if you need it for any reason. Eleanor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2000 Report Share Posted April 1, 2000 > There was a study posted on another list to which I belong. The study > found that some children had deficient bloodflow to a particular part of the > brain. How interesting! I wonder if someday they'll use this information as a diagnostic tool. Thanks! Kay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2000 Report Share Posted April 2, 2000 In a message dated 4/1/2000 10:38:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time, listenup@... writes: << The study > found that some children had deficient bloodflow to a particular part of the brain. >> My son has ADHD/ODD characteristic and a lecture was given that most all the kids they had in a study had temporal lobe disruption that they thought caused the behavior. I have a tape, if I find it I will tell you what it said exactly Kay. Elaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.