Guest guest Posted August 29, 2001 Report Share Posted August 29, 2001 You are correct. This " doctor " has very lame reasoning. If you cut off your arm you wouldn't have to worry about it being broken. Does this idiot think you should amputate limbs? Fibroids should be left alone if they are asymptomatic and not interfering with the function of any other organs. It may be good to get more information from this ultra sound, but by no means should you listen to this guy. What nerve! He doesn't want " women running around with masses in their bellies. " Does the ignorance and misogyny ever end? Not with this one apparently. There is an old song, " Do Nothing 'Till You've Heard From Me. " Don't follow his instructions without talking to the group. Good luck. > Hello everyone - I was diagnosed with fibroids a year ago after an > exam and an ultrasound. I have absolutely no symptoms. Just > returned from a regular visit to my gyn, and he is still pushing for > a complete hysterectomy. My uterous is the size of a 16 week > pregnancy and he said that he doesn't like to see a woman " running > around with a mass in her belly " . I'm going for another ultrasound > on Friday. I really can't justify major surgery if I'm not > experiencing a lesser quality of life and if they are not causing me > any real harm. I would certainly appreciate your thoughts on whether > I should be worried about carrying these three fibroids around inside > me. He also said that if I have a hysterectomy, I won't have to > worry about anything going wrong with these organs in the future. > That sounds like a lame reason to me. Thanks so much - Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2001 Report Share Posted August 30, 2001 Sharon -- What the other women have said is true: your doctor has lame reasoning, you should get a second opinion, and you shouldn't have anything done if the fibroids aren't causing any symptoms or life style problems. I would encourage you to keep up with the growth of the fibroid for a couple of reasons. One reason is that a larger uterus might (and it might not) cut down on your options at a future time. Anecedotal evidence suggests that the women who are having extended problems after uterine artery embolization are women who had a couple of large fibroids (and a uterus 20-week size or larger). Also, my impression is that is that it's harder to find a doctor willing to do a myomectomy on the larger uteruses -- but this impression is based on living in a place where there are not reknown doctors and on not having the means to travel to where these reknown doctors live. Second, depending on where your fibroids are located and on where they grow, there is the potential of developing hydronephrosis, partial or complete blockage of the ureter. It's rare. And, according to some of the women on this list, it may be something that doctors use to scare you into have surgery. But I know that one of my kidneys had become considerably larger than the other and drained a lot slower, which would suggest that damage would have eventually occurred. > Hello everyone - I was diagnosed with fibroids a year ago after an > exam and an ultrasound. I have absolutely no symptoms. Just > returned from a regular visit to my gyn, and he is still pushing for > a complete hysterectomy. My uterous is the size of a 16 week > pregnancy and he said that he doesn't like to see a woman " running > around with a mass in her belly " . I'm going for another ultrasound > on Friday. I really can't justify major surgery if I'm not > experiencing a lesser quality of life and if they are not causing me > any real harm. I would certainly appreciate your thoughts on whether > I should be worried about carrying these three fibroids around inside > me. He also said that if I have a hysterectomy, I won't have to > worry about anything going wrong with these organs in the future. > That sounds like a lame reason to me. Thanks so much - Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2001 Report Share Posted September 6, 2001 Dear Sharon: I think your first instinct was right on. A hysterectomy is a big deal. . ..mostly because of all the functions of the uterus we don't quite know about yet. I'd find another doctor. . .one less pushy and aggressive. on 8/29/01 6:34 PM, ebb312@... at ebb312@... wrote: > Hello everyone - I was diagnosed with fibroids a year ago after an > exam and an ultrasound. I have absolutely no symptoms. Just > returned from a regular visit to my gyn, and he is still pushing for > a complete hysterectomy. My uterous is the size of a 16 week > pregnancy and he said that he doesn't like to see a woman " running > around with a mass in her belly " . I'm going for another ultrasound > on Friday. I really can't justify major surgery if I'm not > experiencing a lesser quality of life and if they are not causing me > any real harm. I would certainly appreciate your thoughts on whether > I should be worried about carrying these three fibroids around inside > me. He also said that if I have a hysterectomy, I won't have to > worry about anything going wrong with these organs in the future. > That sounds like a lame reason to me. Thanks so much - Sharon > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.