Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 i would get a new doctor, i would want to know even just for peace of mind.............. healing hugs and prayers carol from michigan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 Dear Dianne, Yeah I used to ache, for 3 years after chemo--but also had a prophylactic oophorectomy at the same time (I'm BRCA2 positive), but when I developed really severe and debilitating fatigue, and all my lab tests were normal and the fatigue clinic at MD Cancer Center could find no reason for my fatigue I finally decided that I needed to try low dose estrogen. I'm on a really really tiny dose (and please I would NEVER advocate this for anyone else) and since I've been on it (since January) my joint pain and fatigue both resolved. Go figure. Please know I agonized over this decision, and although it is what I decided for me, my doctors make sure I understand that there could be risk involved even on the dose that I'm on. Ok, hope I didn't open a can of worms here. Hugs, Sue I need advice on Bone Scans My wife had a 1.1cm with 2 nodes positive and she had a mastectomy. I was talking to a lady who had a similar incident and is about 10-20 yrs older then my wife but she lives in Arizona. She told me that her doctor makes her get a yearly bone scan. I approached my wife's oncologist about the bone scan the other day and he said that it is not worth doing a bone scan after the chemo. He doesn't feel it is beneficial knowing whether you have cancer in the bone two months earlier then when you catch it. He quoted all the studies on bone scans and cancer. He said it is up to the doctor whether to do it or not. Some do it and some don't. I'd like to know what everyone else has been doing. We have been done with chemo for 1 yr now. Thanks Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 Dear Sue, Oh really! 3 years after Chemo. What stage Breast Cancer were you Sue? Oh so many questions, thankyou for answering me, and don't answer the questions you feel uncomfortable about. I had a hysterectomy 15 years back, and was under Breast Specilaist for 16 years before this cancer came to being. I was diagnosed with Invasive Lobular Cancer, and of course it didn't show up in the mammograms. Sneaky cancer is Lobular. Thats what scares me now, is that it didn't show up before, and unfortunately I ended up with stage 3, and had to have a Bilateral Masectomy. They should of been doing a biopsy a lot earlier. If I hadn't had cystic problems I would not of known I had Cancer. No lump. I would of been on the short list Sue. MMmm yeah I know what you mean about Estrogen. My Tumours were Estrogen positive. I don't think I would be given Estrogen somehow. Goes to show though Sue, that the estrogen being low could well be causing my tiredness and aches. Oh dear what do you do. Thank Sue. Hugs again Dianne I need advice on Bone Scans My wife had a 1.1cm with 2 nodes positive and she had a mastectomy. I was talking to a lady who had a similar incident and is about 10-20 yrs older then my wife but she lives in Arizona. She told me that her doctor makes her get a yearly bone scan. I approached my wife's oncologist about the bone scan the other day and he said that it is not worth doing a bone scan after the chemo. He doesn't feel it is beneficial knowing whether you have cancer in the bone two months earlier then when you catch it. He quoted all the studies on bone scans and cancer. He said it is up to the doctor whether to do it or not. Some do it and some don't. I'd like to know what everyone else has been doing. We have been done with chemo for 1 yr now. Thanks Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 Dear Dianne, Sigh, mine was a complex situation. My cancer also was never a lump. I was diagnosed at age 33 on a mammogram, and similar to you, if it hadn't been for a benign problem (in my case a fibroadenoma) I wouldnt have ever had mammograms. My initial (mis)staging was stage 0 (DCIS) but they were wrong. I had a mastectomy but the pathologist missed that there was invasive cancer in the breast, and the second part was that they never checked my lymph nodes. Both together led me not to have any further treatment (because they thought it was all DCIS--precancerous). Nine months after my mastectomy I found an enlarged lymph node in my axilla which turned out to be regional recurrence. That was when another pathologist went over the slides from my mastectomy 9 months prior and found the invasive cancer that the first pathologist had overlooked!!!!!! She wrote it in her report too, so that's how I learned that it had been missed, when I asked for a copy of my path report. I was initially thought to be er positive and that was part of my decision to have an oophorectomy after chemo (I was 35 at the time). Later they thought I was er negative, but now they have reassessed it and have concluded (by 2 separate facilities) that I am er positive. As far as the hormones go, well I had no choice. Aparently I'm tremendously sensitive to estrogen deprivation. I had no quality of life. I could barely get out of bed. Exercise didn't help, diet changes didn't help, they even tried a stimulant called provigil which didn't help either. Antidepressents helped my hot-flashes and my libido (Wellbutrin) but not my fatigue. My thyroid was checked 3 times--normal every time. I became so frustrated and upset by the fatigue that I was suicidal. Believe me for 2 years I was relatively happy about being postmenopausal but the 3rd year I just felt terrible all the time. I searched for any other answer and saw a ton of experts and no one really had answers. I was at my wit's end when I begged my doctors for hormones. My understanding is that most people aren't effected this way by menopause, even in their 30s even surgical menopause. So I'm not sure what it is about me, and sometimes I feel that it's a HUGE shortcoming on my part that I couldn't cut it. But I did a ton of research and at the time that I chose estrogen I was out of treatment for 4 years and I was suffering so badly that I really had no other option. Further, although I am on a LOW LOW LOW dose of estrogen, my bloodwork is still toward the menopausal range. So I figure that since I removed my ovaries so young I " m probably better off where I'm at now than I would have been had I kept my ovaries, who knows, only time will tell. I was and continue to be amazed by the fact that even on this small dose I feel so much better. My libido is back, my energy is mostly back (not 100%) and my achiness is improved. I hate that we have to make these decisions, though, and wish there were better options. Again I will stress that the decisions I made were tough ones and certainly wouldn't recommend anyone think I'm advocating hormones. I have to admit that my oncologists are for the most part supportive, not because they think it's incredibly safe for me to be on estrogen but because I made them understand the huge quality of life issue it came down to for me. Sorry to ramble on and on. This is an issue that I have grappled with over the last 9 months and have gone back and forth and every which way with. I post on 3 other breast cancer boards (not including FORCE) and most have sort of followed my story. I'm happy to answer any other questions. You will find that I'm not a private person. On the other hand I don't post alot to this list but not because I don't care but between my work with FORCE and my family and the other boards I post on, I just don't always have the time! Hugs, Sue I need advice on Bone Scans My wife had a 1.1cm with 2 nodes positive and she had a mastectomy. I was talking to a lady who had a similar incident and is about 10-20 yrs older then my wife but she lives in Arizona. She told me that her doctor makes her get a yearly bone scan. I approached my wife's oncologist about the bone scan the other day and he said that it is not worth doing a bone scan after the chemo. He doesn't feel it is beneficial knowing whether you have cancer in the bone two months earlier then when you catch it. He quoted all the studies on bone scans and cancer. He said it is up to the doctor whether to do it or not. Some do it and some don't. I'd like to know what everyone else has been doing. We have been done with chemo for 1 yr now. Thanks Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2002 Report Share Posted October 26, 2002 Once in awhile my onc gets angry at what he calls my " ad hoc approach to follow up care " I threaten to go to another cancer center and he capitulates. I guess I'm what they call a " difficult patient " . Sue, I'd say you have a " difficult doctor " and not the other way around! If your oncologist really doesn't respect you and your choices, you might want to consider a new oncologist. I feel so dependent on my own oncologist that I tend to forget that I am still the consumer here. It's my body and I'm hiring an expert for their services, just like I hire a plumber when the toilet breaks. Jill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2002 Report Share Posted October 27, 2002 Dear Jill, Actually this oncologist is one of my favorite. He always capitulates. I had one of the country's top oncologists at MD before my current one and he was IMPOSSIBLE! He wouldn't order ultrasounds of my lymph nodes (long story) and so I fired him. I actually have 2 breast oncologists, one in Houston and one locally who is also very good and made the very insightful call about retesting my hormone status since I was thinking of going up on estrogen. After 3 years of believing I was er negative, the repeat tests showed I'm er positive. So as much as I hate being on estrogen, at least I know that going up in dose would be a very bad decision . Thanks again. Hugs, Sue Re: I need advice on Bone Scans Once in awhile my onc gets angry at what he calls my " ad hoc approach to follow up care " I threaten to go to another cancer center and he capitulates. I guess I'm what they call a " difficult patient " . Sue, I'd say you have a " difficult doctor " and not the other way around! If your oncologist really doesn't respect you and your choices, you might want to consider a new oncologist. I feel so dependent on my own oncologist that I tend to forget that I am still the consumer here. It's my body and I'm hiring an expert for their services, just like I hire a plumber when the toilet breaks. Jill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2002 Report Share Posted October 27, 2002 Hi Sue, What a horrible choice to have to make; an unbearable quality of life, or an increased risk of recurrence. Although it sounds like the estrogen dose you're on is so low, it's unlikely to be related to your breast cancer. I'm just glad you got your quality of life back. Jill At 02:06 PM 10/27/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Dear Jill, >Actually this oncologist is one of my favorite. He always capitulates. I >had one of the country's top oncologists at MD before my current >one and he was IMPOSSIBLE! He wouldn't order ultrasounds of my lymph >nodes (long story) and so I fired him. > >I actually have 2 breast oncologists, one in Houston and one locally who >is also very good and made the very insightful call about retesting my >hormone status since I was thinking of going up on estrogen. After 3 >years of believing I was er negative, the repeat tests showed I'm er >positive. So as much as I hate being on estrogen, at least I know that >going up in dose would be a very bad decision . > >Thanks again. >Hugs, >Sue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2002 Report Share Posted October 28, 2002 Thanks Sue, For me mine didn't even show on the mammogram at all. It was when they were doing a Mammorgram, and the Breast, just burst muck, that they thought perhaps they should do a biopsy. I should of been biopsied much much earlier (years). Misadventure and of course the fact that Loublar Cancer dosen't present itself with a lump, ended me up in a Stage 111 situation. Thats why these days with the aching in different areas, makes me think how can they tell with out doing a Bone Scan, MRI. Yeah my surgeon made a statement, like we don't know how long it has been there. When I hear them going on back early detection, it really annoys me. I was under a specialist surgeon for 16 years. So it is not all plain sailing is it. Big Hugs Sue, I hope everything works out well for you. Dianne I need advice on Bone Scans My wife had a 1.1cm with 2 nodes positive and she had a mastectomy. I was talking to a lady who had a similar incident and is about 10-20 yrs older then my wife but she lives in Arizona. She told me that her doctor makes her get a yearly bone scan. I approached my wife's oncologist about the bone scan the other day and he said that it is not worth doing a bone scan after the chemo. He doesn't feel it is beneficial knowing whether you have cancer in the bone two months earlier then when you catch it. He quoted all the studies on bone scans and cancer. He said it is up to the doctor whether to do it or not. Some do it and some don't. I'd like to know what everyone else has been doing. We have been done with chemo for 1 yr now. Thanks Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2002 Report Share Posted October 28, 2002 I can sympathize, Dianne. I was seeing a really excellent primary care doctor and the first words out of my mouth at every doctor's appointment I ever went to were always " My mom died of breast cancer and I'm at risk. " I'm part of an HMO. I blame myself first, for forgetting two years of mammograms, but I also blame my HMO for not staying on top of things and waiting to send me a reminder until I'm in the middle of chemo for stage three bc! No, it is definitely not all plain sailing, is it. Jill >Yeah my surgeon made a statement, like we don't know how long it has been >there. When I hear them going on back early detection, it really annoys >me. I was under a specialist surgeon for 16 years. So it is not all plain >sailing is it. > >Big Hugs Sue, >I hope everything works out well for you. >Dianne > I need advice on Bone Scans > > > My wife had a 1.1cm with 2 nodes positive and she had a > mastectomy. > I was talking to a lady who had a similar incident and is > about 10-20 > yrs older then my wife but she lives in Arizona. She > told me that > her doctor makes her get a yearly bone scan. > > I approached my wife's oncologist about the bone scan the > other day > and he said that it is not worth doing a bone scan after > the chemo. > He doesn't feel it is beneficial knowing whether you have > cancer in > the bone two months earlier then when you catch it. He > quoted all > the studies on bone scans and cancer. He said it is up > to the doctor > whether to do it or not. Some do it and some don't. I'd > like to > know what everyone else has been doing. We have been > done with chemo > for 1 yr now. > > Thanks > Tony > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2002 Report Share Posted October 29, 2002 Georgia, I guess that cancer doesn't pay much attention to whether or how often we visit our doctors. I'm glad yours was confined to your breast. Mine was, too, and it's given me great peace of mind, at least for now. How is your husband doing? Jill p.s. I agree about being glad that I had no choice about aggressive treatment. If I had to ponder " do I really need chemo? " or " could I really be just as safe with a lumpectomy? " I'd probably be really worried about it all the time. It's a weird kind of relief not to have a choice. For me, it's chemo then mammogram or else... At 07:18 PM 10/28/2002 -0800, you wrote: >I never had a mammogram until this year. I'm 51. The reasons are >numerous but I can't tell you that it would have made any >difference. Inflammatory carcinoma does not always show up on a mammogram >or ultra sound anyway. I went because all of a sudden my left breast was >red swollen with the " skin of the orange " itty bitty pits. There was no >history in my family. All of my pregnancies were a breeze. (I loved being >pregnant ) Had all natural vaginal deliveries for which I only took >Tylenol when my uterus began to contract and the pain of the milk coming >in for nursing. My mother is 80 and still drives herself from New Orleans >to Savannah. She is not on any medication and has all of her body parts, >like her mother before her who died one month short of 92. We don't even >have a primary care physician because we are never sick. Last year when >my husband went through his multiple myeloma treatments I decided that >when our lives settled down from that I would go get a head to toe >physical......Well.......I've been checked head to toe alright.....I'm >really kind of glad that my bc was not caught earlier....It seems that >when the symptoms became something for me to notice the cancer in my >breast had maxed out before going anywhere else. So aggressive treatment >was started immediately as opposed to maybe not so aggressive and having a >recurrence....Even cancer caught early is still cancer. I am most >thankful it was contained only in the breast....something I can live >without if necessary. .....georgia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.