Re: Re: Swank's diet/

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

Many people come into this site strictly to sell their products. When we

the moderators see that they are not having normal conversations but

merely jumping on every post with a sales pitch, we do censor them. If

someone asks, " does anyone here use product XYZ??? then the associate

for that company is more then welcome to share their experience. We

don't have a problem with that, and welcome that type of help to others.

WHen said you don't know what goes on behind the scenes, she is

referring to what moderators do. We contact people and let them know

they need to change their post. SOmetimes people get angry, call us

names and all kinds of things. It becomes quite obvious to us that these

people are just here for one reason and its not to support people.

As far as your comments about consistancy and being fair, everyone is

allowed to share their experiences. When they share them excessively

with every person then it becomes obvious they have an agenda. Over the

years there have been many discussions on Glyconutrients because lots of

people in this group use them. Its pretty hard to not share our

experiences and have it not seem like lots of talk about one subject

since there are so many of us.

I am on other forums and many other products are favorites in those

forums because everyone receives benefit from using them. It only makes

sense that people will share what worked for them and others will try

it. I had no idea what went on behind the scenes until I became

moderator of this group and several others, its our job to keep the

forums friendly and supportive. I don't think anyone would like it if we

quit doing our job.

So until you see the original posts before they get " censored " you

really have no idea the way some people think. ALl you see is the edited

version and the angry person who has been edited.

So lets get back to the business of supporting each other and enjoying

the Christmas Season!!!

cherry_bomb99x wrote:

>a :

>That was my point--someone was being censored and repremanded for

>mentioning Reliv, she was merely *sharing her experience* and was

>shut down for it.

>

>Me lighten up?

>

>

>