Guest guest Posted December 17, 2002 Report Share Posted December 17, 2002 Short Chemo Intervals Cut Breast Cancer Recurrence By a Moyer NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Shortening the interval between chemotherapy treatments may help reduce the risk of breast cancer recurrence, according to a New York researcher who is to report the findings Thursday at the annual San Breast Cancer Symposium. What's more, when chemotherapy agents are given sequentially, patients experience less toxicity than when the drugs are given in combination. Adding a white blood cell stimulator to the mix helps prevent hospitalizations due to neutropenia, a condition characterized by a drop in infection-fighting white blood cells that can occur with frequent chemotherapy, said Dr. Marc Citron, a clinical professor of medicine at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City. " For patients with breast cancer, frequency of dosing is an important area of research now, " Citron told Reuters Health. A new generation of breast cancer studies is looking at a more closely spaced regimen, known as the " dose-dense " approach, he said. If the results are confirmed, they may become more available to patients. " More frequent dosing will be a treatment option for some patients. It is not yet the standard of care for patients with node-positive breast cancer, but it is an option that will be discussed with patients after these study results are released, " Citron said. In the study, Citron and colleagues followed 2,005 breast cancer patients who had undergone surgery, either lumpectomy or mastectomy, along with lymph node removal. All the women had cancer that had spread to the lymph nodes, a situation that often calls for chemotherapy. The study had two aims: to see if shortening the interval between chemotherapy treatments helped reduce breast cancer recurrence, and to see if sequential chemotherapy was associated with less toxicity than combination chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment arms. Some patients were on a two-week cycle (the dose-dense group) while others received treatment on a three-week cycle. In addition, some patients took one drug during a cycle and then switched for the next cycle (the sequential group), while others took combinations of drugs. In the dose-dense arms, patients also received treatment with a genetically engineered version of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, called filgrastim, which stimulates white blood cell regeneration. The researchers found that dose-dense treatment was associated with a 26% reduction in the risk of recurrence and a 31% improvement in survival. " Disease-free survival was 82% in the dose-dense arms, and 75% in the conventional arms, " Citron told Reuters Health. " There was no difference in the efficacy of concurrent treatment versus sequential treatment, but sequential treatment was less toxic. " Dose-dense treatment was also associated with fewer hospitalizations for neutropenia, an outcome Citron attributed to treatment with the white blood cell-boosting drug. In the combination dose-dense arm, 13% of patients received transfusions of red blood cells, compared to less than 4% in the other arms. " This outcome surprised me, because there are medications to stimulate red blood cells, " he said. " However, in my own practice we haven't had any transfusions. " The transfusion rate may be related to insurance issues, he said, noting that some insurance companies do not cover red blood cell-boosting treatment unless hemoglobin-- the oxygen-carrying component of blood--falls to a certain level. The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Amgen, a company that makes the white blood cell-boosting drug. Some of the researchers were from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, which discovered and licenses the drug to Amgen. ===================================================================== ====================== Breast Cancer News is brought to you by BREAST CANCER OPTIONS, part of the Mid Hudson Options Project, a grassroots Breast Cancer Health Advocacy, Support and Activist Group. The information is intended for educational purposes only, in order to help you make informed health choices and may not have been touched upon by your doctors. We are not doctors and we do not recommend any particular treatments. We are sending this information to advise you of the complete scientific overview that is currently available, although we may not necessarily endorse it. http://www.breastcanceroptions.org/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.