Guest guest Posted September 6, 2001 Report Share Posted September 6, 2001 On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 at 22:57:34 " Danny s Jr " wrote, in part: > >... If EMD has saved only one life in the past 20 years, then >EMD is worth it. ...<remainder & quote of previos post gone> I've heard this statement thousands of times from EMS gadget salesmen and EMS providers who want rigs to carry something new and usually expensive. Lots of things that save lives just aren't affordable. Those in power in every jurisdiction constantly make hard choices about what they can and cannot do, usually based on funding levels. All of us have to work within budgets over which we have little control. Tax payers demand services, then complain about the tax rate. City councils and county boards fight to provide the most with the least, then pass that battle on to the rest of us. Out of the money pool called 'the general fund,' portions are allocated to schools, roads, public safety, overhead (buildings, personnel department, etc) and a host of other things. Politicians set the priorities. The City of Falls Church has, count 'em, TWO arborists. The tiny city of Falls Church brags about being 'A Tree City.' I know that other jurisdictions in this area with 100 times the population don't have even one arborist. I also know that if the city got rid of their arborists, they could afford some life-saving programs and services that can't be funded. But the politicians and citizens are proud to be 'A Tree City' and choose to pay for arborists rather than upgrading very old radio systems that badly need replacement. So no money went into the 'capital improvements' pool for new radios. After the schools and arborists are paid, the remainder is divided up for 'essential services' like the water department and public safety. Out of the public safety dollars, they have to pay for police, fire, EMS. Will the police get new cars this year of have to drive the old clunkers for another year? Will the fire station get the new ambulance? Will anyone get a raise? Oh, and out of the same pot, they pay dispatchers... and buy chairs for the dispatch center, a CAD system or big supply of printed cards, ribbons for printers, pens, paper, and everything else that's needed in dispatch. " If ____ saved only one life in the last 20 years, ____ is worth it. " Fill in the blanks with your choice. One more police officer, 10 mg vials of atropine for antidotal dosing of organophosphate poisioning, a heavy squad truck in each station, ... or EMD ... or any of a host of other things that the citizens, politicians, and managers of cities, counties, boroughs, and other political divisions must choose to fund or not to fund. I was an EMT for 24 years, a rural medic for 11. One time in that time, I encountered a patient, a child, who probably would have been saved if only we had enough atropine to counteract ingested bug spray. We didn't. To my knowledge, not one ambulance in Virginia carries enough atropine. Out in the sticks, with very long transport times, lives are saved on the scene or in the ambulance. If breathing and circulation weren't restored before arrival at the hospital, almost none lived. Actually, I don't recall even one who left the hospital alive if I didn't get 'em there alive. The decision is based on money. Thousands of dollars worth of atropine, or other lifesaving drugs, would expire and be thrown away for the chance of saving one person every ten or twenty or thirty years. Worth it? The community of citizens, politicians, and managers said, " No. " EMD is valuable. So are ambulances, police cars, computer aided dispatch systems, dispatchers, and defibrillators. Each jurisdiction has to decide how they choose to use their limited rosources. More of any of the above may save a life; even many lives. Can you document that EMD will save more or fewer lives than an automated external defibrillator (AEDs)? Initial costs are similar. Before I get down off my soap box, I'll stick my neck out once more. EMD is NOT, at least in Virginia, an 'all-or- nothing' program. Emergency Medical Dispatching includes prioritizing resources. Collecting information needed by responders that is often very different from information needed for police or fire dispatching; that's part of EMD courses. Lots of big city folk have paramedics on every piece of fire or rescue equipment. Great... if they can afford it. In rural areas, ALS resources are limited. EMD allows sending limited ALS resources only to calls likely to need advanced life support. EMD is NOT just giving prearrival instructions. NOT 'all-or-nothing' even applies to prearrival instructions in the places where I've worked either EMS or dispatch. A jurisdiction, at least in Virginia, can decide on their own protocols, specifying exactly what prearrival procedures are appropriate for their center and which are not. Attempting to instruct an untrained person on full CPR may be justifi- able in a city with average EMS response times of 4 minutes. In a rural area, where the average time from dispatch to on- scene is typically 20 minutes or more, such CPR won't save anyone. Buy more AEDs and spread 'em around the county. A city may decide that emergency child birth instruction isn't necessary because of short response time; an ambulance will be at the door before getting far enough along to make a difference. Out in the sticks, emergency child birth instruction can potentially save lots of little lives or at least prevent a well-meaning but ignorant father or other relative from doing something that would harm the new baby. I think that we all agree that emergency medical dispatch programs are valuable. But EMD programs are NOT all the same and not all jurisdictions are the same. Each must decide how they will allocate their limited resources, often based on what they can afford in personnel and training. It may be a shame that decisions have to be based on what we can afford, but that is reality. So is buying from the lowest bidder. I'll get down off my soap box now. Always take good care of yourself and yours, R J 'Tree' Greenwood Falls Church & Catlett VA QUESTION: What percentage of patients over the age of 65 who suffer sudden cardiac arrest outside a hospital survive to leave the hospital after receiving effective CPR? ANSWER: Zero percent (1994 AHA ECC/CPR Conference) QUESTION: Why, then, do we continue to do CPR on patients who are over 65 and suffer sudden cardiac arrest outside of hospitals. ANSWER: The cost is minimal and there's always that one-in- a-million chance that the patient can be saved (among some other reasons, many having to do with psychological effects on surviving family and EMS providers who need to know that they did everything possible). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2001 Report Share Posted September 7, 2001 Well said Tree, >>... If EMD has saved only one life in the past 20 years, then >EMD is worth it. ...<remainder & quote of previos post gone> I've heard this from many.. And it's simply ridiculous.... Some say it out of passion for their work, and I respect them for that however, it's simply not based in reality..... >EMD is valuable. So are ambulances, police cars, computer aided dispatch systems, dispatchers, and defibrillators. Each jurisdiction has to decide how they choose to use their limited rosources. In my initial post, my argument simply was that in most cases EMD can not be done properly with one dispatcher on duty. And that many small " one dispatcher " centers can not afford the training, the money to keep up certification, the money to pay overtime while others train... and certainly not the money to have two dispatcher per shift.... which, in my opinion, is really necessary. It's all about resource allotment. >Thousands of dollars worth of atropine, or other lifesaving drugs, would expire and be thrown away for the chance of saving one person every ten or twenty or thirty years. Worth it? The community of citizens, politicians, and managers said, " No. " People all over the world, die every day, because of some decision someone made over " resource allotment " .... It's been that way forever. It will continue to be that way. Weintraut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.