Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Meds.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Sam the Lion wrote:

<< I see a lot of talk and publication about how we should provide old folks

with medication free. as an example they showed a couple that was obese, she

had heart trouble, he diabetes and their yearly drug bill was

$6,800, To me this was a case of needing diet and exercise far more than

expensive medication. I wonder if we can ever face facts. >>

Sam, your posts are wise. Our medical system disseminates unquestioning

belief in the Almighty Pill. We can do so much to improve our health and

sense of wellbeing by eating naturally, exercising as much as we are able to,

and being hopeful about our own future prospects.

Susie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teri wrote:

<< I exercise at least 30 minutes at least five days a week and eat properly

yet I still need to lose quite a bit of weight that appears NOT to be

inclined to go anywhere. >>

I still have old weight & measurement records from 20-30 years ago, and I see

that my waist is actually 4 " larger, proportionally, than it was when I was

younger. It's that dang " insulin-resistance fat. " I have wondered whether

there is a surgical approach to the problem. Could liposuction or a tummy

tuck help us? I have to wear leggings because my hips are one size and my

waist is two sizes larger. If I buy jeans to fit my waist, they balloon

around my hips. They make jeans for women with big butts, but none for women

with thick, diabetic waists ... :o[

I sometimes would like to grab a big knife and just saw off those two

handfuls of " diabetes fat " from around my navel. What's the deal with that?

How come we can't lose it, no matter what? I'm seriously thinking of either

going ketogenic, or consulting a cosmetic surgeon. But I'm a-scared (as my

kid sister used to say) that if I tell him/her I'm diabetic, they won't touch

me.

Susie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sam wrote:

<< Sam, your problem is? That's a perfectly balanced meal. My caloric intake

for the day was within my allotment of 1,500. I use exchanges and had

planned them accordingly to have that evening me.

You know what? I'm going to be very blunt here. This post makes you an ass.

>>

Hmmmm ... I must have missed something ... gues my bwain is on vacation,

along with the body. I saw Sam's list of foods and thought, " salad's okay ...

berries okay ... big prob with the spaghetti and garlic bread. " But then

again, my pancreas is headed for the junk heap. Each of us is in a different

spot, diabetes-wise. If I ate spaghetti and garlic bread, I'd be up for hours

with a pounding heart and high bg's. When our only diabetes treatment is diet

and we mess up, there's no alternative.

As an aside, Rob got turned on to berries this trip. I like to keep them

frozen and whack off a bunch and top off with Half & Half. It turns into a

sort of " berry slush " ... yummy! Rob likes to nuke the berries in the

microwave a short time, then add the " arf and arf. " Lemmesee ... the berries

are blueberries, n blackberries, and dingleberries! Nonononono ... last

one is raspberries.

Susie :ox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh oh.. Headache alert.. hit the trenches..

Teri wrote:

>

> Sam, your problem is? That's a perfectly balanced meal. My caloric intake for

the day was within my allotment of 1,500. I use exchanges and had planned them

accordingly to have that evening me.

>

> You know what? I'm going to be very blunt here. This post makes you an ass.

>

> Re: Meds.

>

> Yesterday evening, we had:

> -- salad with lettuce, spinach, shredded cheese, green peppers,

> croutons, fat-free ranch dressing

> -- spaghetti with meat and mushroom sauce

> -- one slice each of toasted garlic bread

> -- sliced fresh strawberries

>

> eGroups Sponsor

>

>

> Public website for Diabetes International:

> http://www.msteri.com/diabetes-info/diabetes_int

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> I have also heard the term type 1 1/2

> used loosely to describe diabetics that

> are nearly type 1, IDDM, but still have

> some self generated insulin.

Well, Sam, " nearly diabetic " might do instead of " half diabetic " , I

suppose but whichever way you look at it, there has to be some term

to describe the situation. Just because the diagnosis is still based

on hyperglycemia and because plasma glucose concentrations are

distributed over a continuum there have to be arbitrary limits set

and agreed upon. So if a patient fulfils the criteria, he or she is

diabetic, while a patient that does not fulfil the criteria is simply

not diabetic.

So since the criteria are:

1. Symptoms of diabetes plus casual plasma glucose concentration of

200 mg/dl or more, OR

2. FPG of 126 mg/dl or more (fasting = zero caloric intake for at

least 8 hours), OR

3. 2 hr PG of 200 mg/dl during an OGTT.

if no unequivocal hyperglycemia is present then the test has to be

confirmed by a repeat test on a different day. The symptoms of

diabetes in criterion 1 being: polyuria, polydipsia and unexplained

weight loss.

So if somebody is tested casually in the middle of the morning and

shows 195 mg/dl and claims to have none of the symptoms and then

comes in the next day after 14 hours fasting and shows an FPG of 125

mg/dl then that person is not diabetic, right? (the OGTT is now no

longer recommended for routine clinical use).

There must be some medical term for someone in that condition but I

cannot find it anywhere. It seems to me that " half a diabetic " is a

possible lay description, I don't understand what people have against

it.

There are also the people who have symptoms of diabetes, including

hyperglycemia, after exposure to certain medicaments or chemicals who

revert to normoglycemia when that exposure is discontinued for some

time. They are no longer diabetic but are presumably predisposed to

diabetes so they could probably be usefully called half diabetic,

too, I would imagine, why not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is a mainstream diabetic? D.J.

Re: Meds.

> Yes, but you said it was dangerous to warn people off breakfast cereals,

> is it really dangerous? Or do you just disagree? To say something is

> dangerous it must be, not just something you disagree with. I still hold

> that you are not a mainstream diabetic, and your advice to them is most

> likely wrong and dangerous. Sam

>

>

>

> Public website for Diabetes International:

> http://www.msteri.com/diabetes-info/diabetes_int

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh. When I was informed, I was in the emergency room at 12am in the

morning, and the nurse walked in--not a doctor--and said, " Congratulations,

you have a disease. "

*sings softly " Break it to me gently....gimme time oh gimme a little

time.... "

Mimi

Mimi Dionne

[Diabetes] may have robbed me of that blissful ignorance that once led me to

believe that tomorrow stretched forever. In exchange I've been granted the

wisdom to see each today as something special, a gift to be used wisely and

fully. Nothing can take that away.

_________________________________________________________________________

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at

http://profiles.msn.com.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...