Guest guest Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 Thanks Laurel, I have attended several brachytherapy conferences. I have attended and videotaped the procedure a couple of times. The procedure may take no more than 45 minutes to accomplish. Of course, there is a considerable amount of time required to stage and plan the procedure. When I had my radical prostatectomy, the doctor used 6 units of blood, and the operation took five hours. More experienced doctors can now do the operation in less than three hours. I was in the hospital for 7 days. Today, many are out in less than three days, or even less if done by robotic. Many are able to do the procedure with less than one unit of blood. No blood transfusion is required for brachytherapy. After 15 years, I still have an incontinent problem. There is little or no incontinence with brachytherapy. The brachytherapy may require an overnight stay at the hospital, but some are able to leave the same day. For several years women who were diagnosed with breast cancer had a radical mastectomy or removal of the whole breast. Now most of them have a lumpectomy. I believe that brachytherapy is similar to the lumpectomy in many respects. I wish you all the bestAubrey Pilgrim, DC (Ret.) Author ofA Revolutionary Approach to Prostate Cancer-Read the original book for FREE at: http://www.prostatepointers.org/prostate/lay/apilgrim/Read new edition for FREE at http://www.cancer.prostate-help.org/capilgr.htmDr. E. Crawford is co-author of the revision This is one paragraph of an article I found on Medscape Today. Don't know how accurate it is?LaurelMerrick and colleagues[7] found that results of prostate brachytherapy for low-risk patients were comparable to the most positive outcomes for RP and external-beam radiotherapy. In intermediate- and high-risk patients, more durable biochemical outcomes were achieved when treatment was done with brachytherapy alone, or in combination with external-beam radiotherapy. In addition, their findings showed that serious complications were relatively rare, and that total cost of prostate brachytherapy was approximately 20% less than costs for prostatectomy and external beam RT See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 Hi All, One other very important cost of prostate cancer therapy, is the cost of the hospital operating room and the stay in they hospital. Brachytherapy may avoid most of these costs. Aubrey This is one paragraph of an article I found on Medscape Today. Don't know how accurate it is?LaurelMerrick and colleagues[7] found that results of prostate brachytherapy for low-risk patients were comparable to the most positive outcomes for RP and external-beam radiotherapy. In intermediate- and high-risk patients, more durable biochemical outcomes were achieved when treatment was done with brachytherapy alone, or in combination with external-beam radiotherapy. In addition, their findings showed that serious complications were relatively rare, and that total cost of prostate brachytherapy was approximately 20% less than costs for prostatectomy and external beam RT See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 Do you have a link to this article? Kathy From: ProstateCancerSupport [mailto:ProstateCancerSupport ] On Behalf Of yellow_laurel Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 11:27 PM To: ProstateCancerSupport Subject: cost of brachy vs surgery This is one paragraph of an article I found on Medscape Today. Don't know how accurate it is? Laurel Merrick and colleagues[7] found that results of prostate brachytherapy for low-risk patients were comparable to the most positive outcomes for RP and external-beam radiotherapy. In intermediate- and high-risk patients, more durable biochemical outcomes were achieved when treatment was done with brachytherapy alone, or in combination with external-beam radiotherapy. In addition, their findings showed that serious complications were relatively rare, and that total cost of prostate brachytherapy was approximately 20% less than costs for prostatectomy and external beam RT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 Thanks Bob, I just wish I had been able to have seeds in 1992. But what's done is done. There are some on this list and others, who are thoroughly convinced that surgery is the only way to go. I have been castigated for posting about other alternatives. All I have ever wanted to do was to inform others that there is more than one way to treat prostate cancer. (I was going to say, more than one way to skin a cat, but that might not sound very professional.) I was thinking along the same lines. My brachytherapy was done in a hospital operating room, but it was an outpatient procedure.. two hours pre-op, then the procedure itself took less than an hour, then I spent another hour recovering. Then I went home. No overnight stay, no hospital room. Assuming pre and post procedure appointments are similar for brachytherapy and surgery, then the biggest difference would be for in-hospital charges.Of course medical charges are sometimes so bizarre that nothing would surprise me..Bobinnv I wish you all the bestAubrey Pilgrim, DC (Ret.) Author ofA Revolutionary Approach to Prostate Cancer-Read the original book for FREE at: http://www.prostatepointers.org/prostate/lay/apilgrim/Read new edition for FREE at http://www.cancer.prostate-help.org/capilgr.htmDr. E. Crawford is co-author of the revision See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 Hi Louis, Again, only a small percentage of men who have brachytherapy need to have their prostates reduced by Lupron or Zoladex. However, even with the $3000 you claim, brachytherapy would probably still be less expensive without the hospital stay and other hospital charges. Aubrey If Lupron shots are needed before brachytherapy can be performed, that adds some $3000 to the cost. Louis. . . See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 I was thinking along the same lines. My brachytherapy was done in a hospital operating room, but it was an outpatient procedure.. two hours pre-op, then the procedure itself took less than an hour, then I spent another hour recovering. Then I went home. No overnight stay, no hospital room. Assuming pre and post procedure appointments are similar for brachytherapy and surgery, then the biggest difference would be for in-hospital charges. Of course medical charges are sometimes so bizarre that nothing would surprise me.. Bobinnv > Hi All, > > One other very important cost of prostate cancer therapy, > is the cost of the hospital operating room and the stay in > they hospital. Brachytherapy may avoid most of these > costs. > > Aubrey > > In a message dated 11/17/2007 8:27:13 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, LaurelFace@... > writes: > This is one paragraph of an article I found on Medscape Today. Don't > know how accurate it is? > > Laurel > > Merrick and colleagues[7] found that results of prostate brachytherapy > for low-risk patients were comparable to the most positive outcomes > for > RP and external-beam radiotherapy. In intermediate- and high-risk > patients, more durable biochemical outcomes were achieved when > treatment was done with brachytherapy alone, or in combination with > external-beam radiotherapy. In addition, their findings showed that > serious complications were relatively rare, and that total cost of > prostate brachytherapy was approximately 20% less than costs for > prostatectomy and external beam RT > > > > See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 If Lupron shots are needed before brachytherapy can be performed, that adds some $3000 to the cost. Louis. . . Re: cost of brachy vs surgery I was thinking along the same lines. My brachytherapy was done in a hospital operating room, but it was an outpatient procedure.. two hours pre-op, then the procedure itself took less than an hour, then I spent another hour recovering. Then I went home. No overnight stay, no hospital room. Assuming pre and post procedure appointments are similar for brachytherapy and surgery, then the biggest difference would be for in-hospital charges.Of course medical charges are sometimes so bizarre that nothing would surprise me..BobinnvOn Nov 18, 2007, at 10:01 AM, APilgrmaol (DOT) com wrote:> Hi All,>> One other very important cost of prostate cancer therapy,> is the cost of the hospital operating room and the stay in> they hospital. Brachytherapy may avoid most of these> costs.>> Aubrey>> In a message dated 11/17/2007 8:27:13 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, LaurelFaceaol (DOT) com > writes:> This is one paragraph of an article I found on Medscape Today. Don't> know how accurate it is?>> Laurel>> Merrick and colleagues[7] found that results of prostate brachytherapy> for low-risk patients were comparable to the most positive outcomes > for> RP and external-beam radiotherapy. In intermediate- and high-risk> patients, more durable biochemical outcomes were achieved when> treatment was done with brachytherapy alone, or in combination with> external-beam radiotherapy. In addition, their findings showed that> serious complications were relatively rare, and that total cost of> prostate brachytherapy was approximately 20% less than costs for> prostatectomy and external beam RT>>>> See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 I was in the hospital for just one night. No blood replacement was needed. My surgery was done the old-fashioned perineal access method. I am 98 to 99 percent continent, and sexual function is slowly returning. Mine was one Don on Spet. 13, 2007. My past history of ulcerative colitis, plus the dread of the pre-seeding Lupron shot side effects quickly caused me to go with surgery. Louis. . . Re: cost of brachy vs surgery Thanks Laurel, I have attended several brachytherapy conferences. I have attended and videotaped the procedure a couple of times. The procedure may take no more than 45 minutes to accomplish. Of course, there is a considerable amount of time required to stage and plan the procedure. When I had my radical prostatectomy, the doctor used 6 units of blood, and the operation took five hours. More experienced doctors can now do the operation in less than three hours. I was in the hospital for 7 days. Today, many are out in less than three days, or even less if done by robotic. Many are able to do the procedure with less than one unit of blood. No blood transfusion is required for brachytherapy. After 15 years, I still have an incontinent problem. There is little or no incontinence with brachytherapy. The brachytherapy may require an overnight stay at the hospital, but some are able to leave the same day. For several years women who were diagnosed with breast cancer had a radical mastectomy or removal of the whole breast. Now most of them have a lumpectomy. I believe that brachytherapy is similar to the lumpectomy in many respects. I wish you all the bestAubrey Pilgrim, DC (Ret.) Author ofA Revolutionary Approach to Prostate Cancer-Read the original book for FREE at: http://www.prostate pointers. org/prostate/ lay/apilgrim/Read new edition for FREE at http://www.cancer. prostate- help.org/ capilgr.htmDr. E. Crawford is co-author of the revision In a message dated 11/17/2007 8:27:13 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, LaurelFaceaol (DOT) com writes: This is one paragraph of an article I found on Medscape Today. Don't know how accurate it is?LaurelMerrick and colleagues[7] found that results of prostate brachytherapy for low-risk patients were comparable to the most positive outcomes for RP and external-beam radiotherapy. In intermediate- and high-risk patients, more durable biochemical outcomes were achieved when treatment was done with brachytherapy alone, or in combination with external-beam radiotherapy. In addition, their findings showed that serious complications were relatively rare, and that total cost of prostate brachytherapy was approximately 20% less than costs for prostatectomy and external beam RT See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.