Guest guest Posted February 16, 2007 Report Share Posted February 16, 2007 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kim-stagliano/the-expanding-vocabulary-_b_41397.ht\ ml " But can better diagnosis really account for a change from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 150 in 20 or 30 years? " What do all these people have against peer reviewed science....? Why cling to this purely fictitious number of 1 in 10,000??? -jypsy ________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.